Next Article in Journal
Toxoplasma gondii and Neospora caninum Antibodies in Dogs and Cats from Egypt and Risk Factor Analysis
Previous Article in Journal
Genomic Variability of SARS-CoV-2 Omicron Variant Circulating in the Russian Federation during Early December 2021 and Late January 2022
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Colletotrichum truncatum—A New Etiological Anthracnose Agent of Sword Bean (Canavalia gladiata) in Southwestern China

1
State Key Laboratory of Herbage Improvement and Grassland Agro-Ecosystems, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Engineering Research Center of Grassland Industry, Ministry of Education, College of Pastoral Agriculture Science and Technology, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou 730000, China
2
Academe of Grassland and Animal Science, Kunming 650212, China
3
Forage and Fodder Station of Qujing, Qujing 655000, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Pathogens 2022, 11(12), 1463; https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens11121463
Submission received: 26 October 2022 / Revised: 27 November 2022 / Accepted: 28 November 2022 / Published: 2 December 2022

Abstract

:
Anthracnose is a disease caused by Colletotrichum species. They are well known as major plant pathogens, and a black stem disease, specifically caused by Colletotrichum truncatum and primarily infecting sword bean (Canavalia gladiata), was observed in the Yunnan province, China. To aid disease management and to determine pathogenic characteristics, the species causing the leaf spot disease of hairy vetch was verified as C. truncatum. A sequence analysis of the ITS, ACT, GAPDH, and HIS3 genes was conducted, as well as morphological and cultural characteristics, to identify this Colletotrichum species, which has curved conidia. C. truncatum isolates from sword bean formed a distinctive group among Colletotrichum species, including those that infect other forage and field crops. Artificially inoculated sword bean seedlings showed typical symptoms of anthracnose, which were similar to field observations. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report of C. truncatum causing black stem disease on sword beans in China.

1. Introduction

Sword bean (Canavalia gladiata) is an important annual legume consumed as a vegetable and as a medicine, and is endemic to tropical Asia, Africa, and India [1,2]. It is currently cultivated across 0.065 million hectares in southwestern China [3,4]. All parts of the sword bean are edible, such as the beans, leaves, pods, or roots [5]. Immature sword bean pods are extensively utilized in Asia as a vegetable [6]. It is widely cultivated across the world, but especially so in central and southern China, where it is an important food supply [4]. It can increase soil nutrient levels, improve soil structure, and reduce soil erosion [7]. Sword bean is the third most important medicinal and food crop in southwestern China.
The fungal pathogen Colletotrichum causes anthracnose on legume crops globally [8,9,10]. The genus Colletotrichum includes about 600 species that can destroy many crops [11], and cause typical symptoms such as sunken necrotic lesions, generally known as anthracnose [12]. Anthracnose is an important disease of sword bean, and Colletotrichum capsica and Colletotrichum lindemuthianum have specifically been detected in sword beans in India and China [13,14].
Colletotrichum truncatum is a species commonly reported to cause disease in papaya, lentils, and soybeans [15,16,17,18]. No previous studies have reported any fungi associated with anthracnose disease on sword beans. Therefore, this study aimed to identify the causal agent of anthracnose disease in sword beans by investigating its morphological and molecular properties, as well as to test its pathogenicity.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Plant Collection and Fungal Isolation

A total of fifteen diseased stems from five plants (three stems per plant) were excised from the margins of lesions. Stem pieces were sterilized with 75% ethanol for 30 s and 1% NaClO for 75 s, rinsed three times with sterile distilled water, dried three times between sterile filter paper, and plated onto potato dextrose agar (PDA) supplemented with 25 mg/L of penicillin and streptomycin, and incubated at 24 °C for 3 to 21 days [19]. The isolation frequency for each tissue type was determined by examining colony characteristics on the fourth day. Pure colonies were obtained by transferring 1–2 mm emerging hyphal tips onto fresh PDA plates with no supplements. A diseased specimen, as well as three isolates, was deposited at the Mycological Herbarium of the Lanzhou University (MHLZU) with the numbers MHLZU19328, and YN1932501, YN1932502, YN1932503, and YN1932504, respectively.

2.2. Morphological Characterization

Mycelial plugs (5 mm in diameter) were removed from subcultured hyphae colony edges and dark-incubated at 25 °C on PDA. The PDA colony characteristics were recorded after 10 days, and acervuli, setae, and conidia were observed using a stereomicroscope (Nikon ECLIPSE Ti, Tokyo, Japan) and regular microscope and photographed with a Canon DS126391 camera (Canon, Lanzhou, China). Colony diameters and colors were recorded from PDA-grown cultures.

2.3. DNA Extraction, Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) Amplification, and Sequencing

Pure culture mycelia were scraped into centrifuge tubes using a sterilized spoon. Total genomic DNA was extracted from representative isolates using a Fungal DNA Kit (D3195; OMEGA Biotech Co. Ltd., Norcross, GA, USA) following the manufacturer’s instructions. DNA samples were stored at −20 °C for further study. The rDNA internal transcribed spacer (ITS), a partial actin sequence (ACT), glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH), and histone3 (HIS3) genes were amplified (PCR amplification and sequencing primers are given in Table 1). PCR reactions were performed in a 2720 Thermal Cycler (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA) in a total volume of 25μLthat contained 1 μL of genomic DNA, 1 μL of forward and reverse primers, 12.5 μL of 2 x High-Fidelity Master Mix, and 9.5 μL of ddH2O. The PCR conditions were as follows: an initial denaturation step was performed at 94 °C for 3 min, followed by 30 cycles at 94 °C for 10 s, then 30 s of annealing (54 °C, 56 °C, 46 °C, 56 °C, and 52 °C for ITS, ACT, GAPDH, and HIS3, respectively), and 72 °C for 10 s. A final extension step was performed at 72 °C for 10 min [20].

2.4. Phylogenetic Analysis

The sequences obtained from the four isolates, as well as other Colletotrichum spp. reference sequences as described by Damm [26], were downloaded from GenBank (Table 2).
Single sequences were aligned using ClustalW in MEGA 5.1. The four loci were combined with Sequence Matrix 1.8. The best-fit nucleotide substitution models of each gene were assessed by MrModeltest 2.3 for Bayesian reference (BI) analysis. The best-fit model of each gene was imported into MrBayes v. 3.2.6, and the full dataset was run for 2,000,000 generations, and sampled every 100 generations and four chains. The resulting tree was created in Figtree v1.4.3, Adobe Acrobat DC (Adobe, San Jose, CA, USA), and Microsoft Office PowerPoint 2007 (Microsoft, Redmond, CA, USA).

2.5. Pathogenicity Assay

The pathogenicity of C. truncatum was determined by a spray treatment. A total of 100 sword bean seeds were obtained from sword bean plants during the 2020 harvest season, surface-sterilized with 75% ethanol for 30 s and 1% NaClO for 75 s, rinsed three times with sterile distilled water, and transferred into sterilized Petri dishes that contained a double filter paper layer. A total of 5 mL sterile distilled water was added to the seeds, whereafter they were incubated in the dark at 25 °C for 7 days. The fungal strains were cultivated in the dark at 25 °C for 14 days, and the colony surfaces were gently scraped with a glass spreader. The conidial suspension was adjusted to a concentration of 1.0 × 106 conidia/mL sterile water using a hemocytometer. Fifty sword bean plants were transferred into 10 pots (with five plants per pot) that contained 500 g of sterilized soil. The stems of 50 healthy plants were sprayed with a conidial suspension that contained 1.0 × 106 conidia/mL and 0.01% Tween 80. A total of 50 healthy plants were used as controls and received a sterile water spray. All plants were kept in a greenhouse (days: 22 °C, 18 h light; nights: 18 °C, 6 h dark) and were covered with clear polyethylene bags for three days to maintain a high humidity level.

3. Results

3.1. Symptoms and Fungal Isolation

Severe anthracnose disease symptoms were observed on sword bean plants from 2020 to 2021 between November and December in Yuanmou County (N 25°84′92″, E 101°83′37″), Yunnan Province. Approximately 60% of the stems were infected. Leaf lesions initially appeared on older leaf blade edges, and presented as the round, or nearly round, black spots marked with a red arrow (Figure 1b). Lesions eventually covered entire blades, and brown necrotic spots with a darker border developed on petioles, which had slightly sunken centers. The initial symptoms were characterized by small, chlorotic spots that appeared on the lower stems; stem lesions were spindle-to-fusiform shaped, and brown to dark brown in the middle of the lesions marked with a red arrow (Figure 1a). Finally, the affected stems eventually turned brown, and sunken, brown necrotic spots covered entire stems. Setae were produced from stem pieces on PDA when the humidity reached 100% (Figure 1c). Three isolates were obtained from symptomatic samples, and the average separation rate was 36.27%.

3.2. Morphological Characterization

The PDA plate adaxial fungal colony surfaces were whitish-brown at 7 days and 55–63 mm in diameter, whereafter they became gray to pale gray with sparse white aerial surfaces, whereas the reverse sides were an ash-black color. The PDA colonies subsequently turned black with a flocculous mycelium (Figure 2a,b). Acervuli were produced on the PDA at 13 days and were 124–165 mm in diameter (Figure 2c). Setae were linear and growing on spherical acervuli, were dark brown to black, rigid and straight at their bases, and with rounded tips being 52~54 μm long × 1.8~2.1 μm wide (n = 50). Conidia were crescent-shaped, hyaline, smooth-walled, aseptate, and slightly curved with parallel walls, and were 1.9~2.7 × 10.8~15.9 μm in size (Figure 2d).

3.3. Phylogenetic Analysis

The ITS, ACT, GAPDH, and HIS3 gene sequences were obtained from GenBank. Four representative strains were aligned in MEGA 5.1 for phylogenetic analysis. C. lindemuthianum (CBS 315.28) was used as an outgroup. The sequence contained 1449 characters after sequence alignment (429 for ITS, 358 for ACT, 270 for GAPDH, 392 for HIS3). The following models were selected by MrModeltest 2.3 for the MrBayes analysis: GTR+G for ITS, GTR+G for ACT, GTR+I+G for GAPDH, and GTR+G for HIS3. The combined multigene tree (Figure 3), including ITS, ACT, GAPDH, and HIS3, showed that the YN1932501, YN1932502, YN1932503, and YN1932504 isolates from this study formed a clade with the representative strains of C. truncatum (CBS119189, CBS151.35, and CBS710.70). The corresponding Bayesian posterior probability was 1.0, and the clade was clearly distinct from the other Colletotrichum species (Figure 3).

3.4. Pathogenicity

To confirm Koch’s postulates, four representative isolates were tested on sword bean stems. Inoculations with YN1932501, YN1932502, YN1932503, and YN1932504 (identified as C. truncatum) exhibited spindle to fusiform lesions marked with a red arrow (Figure 4), whereas no symptoms appeared on the control plants. C. truncatum was re-isolated from the inoculated plants and identified by morphology as described above.

4. Discussion

In this study, sword bean was described as a new host for C. truncatum in the Yunnan Province, China. Sunken necrotic lesions were typical symptoms observed on sword bean stems in the field. Koch’s postulates were satisfied since this fungus was (1) isolated from diseased sword bean plants, (2) the successfully inoculated sword bean plants produced the same symptoms, and (3) the fungus was subsequently re-isolated. A combined analysis of the morphological characteristics and multiple gene sequence data further confirmed that all four Colletotrichum isolates were C. truncatum.
Sword bean anthracnose symptoms caused by C. truncatum, as observed in the field, were similar to those caused by C. lentis. The stem lesions were initially dark and linear, but later enlarged and often coalesced with adjacent lesions until large stem areas were involved [20]. However, C. truncatum anthracnose seemed to cause more and more severe lesions on stems than on leaf laminas, whereas C. lentis caused severe lesions on both stems and leaves. Four other plant species grew in the vicinity, namely Canavalia gladiata, Brachiaria eruciformis, Indigofera amblyantha, and Stylosanthes guianensis, and previous studies have reported that C. truncatum can infect Indigofera plants. It is possible that the infection source for C. truncatum on sword bean might be closely related to the presence of Indigofera amblyantha plants, but this must be verified. Furthermore, the climatic conditions of the area, as well as field planting patterns, may also play a role.
Identification based on morphology is a primary step towards classifying fungal pathogens at the genus level [30]. Corda described the genus Colletotrichum in 1831, which was historically based on morphological characteristics such as fusiformed, curved, hyaline conidia with acute ends, and brown, opaque, subulate setae with acute tips [31]. The morphology of C. truncatum found in this study was similar to that of previous reports [26]. However, Colletotrichum species identification based only on morphology is not highly accurate since few morphological characters can distinguish between the species, and the teleomorphic stages are rarely formed [32]. Moreover, morphological species characteristics can change when environmental conditions change, particularly the small morphological differences among C. destructivum, C. linicola, and C. truncatum [33]. The combination of molecular diagnostic tools, along with morphological techniques, is therefore the best approach for studying Colletotrichum species complexes [34].
Doyle and Gaut [35] described that single genes are usually insufficient to resolve interspecific relationships in Colletotrichum, which is why phylogram trees derived from single genes always yield limited information at lower taxonomic ranks. Using single-gene ITS cannot clearly distinguish between C. lentis and C. truncatum [29]. Previous studies have indicated that using a combined dataset analysis of datasets to generate multigene phylogenetic trees could provide a higher overall support than any of the single-locus phylogenies [36,37]. In this study, phylogenetic analyses based on the combination of ITS, ACT, HIS3, and GAPDH sequences clearly distinguished C. truncatum (YN1932501, YN1932502, YN1932503, and YN1932504) from the other closely related Colletotrichum species.
C. truncatum has a broad host range and can reportedly infect numerous plant species, such as Chinese flowering cabbage, soybean, lentil, common vetch, alfalfa, chili, solanaceous crops, and hemp plants [17,29,38,39,40]. To the best of our knowledge, no previous record exists of C. truncatum causing disease in sword bean. This is, therefore, the first report of sword bean anthracnose caused by C. truncatum.

5. Conclusions

Anthracnose disease in sword bean plants, caused by C. truncatum, was first described in China. The fungi was isolated from infected plants and identified based on the morphological characteristics and molecular properties of multiple DNA sequences. A pathogenicity test revealed similar symptoms in a greenhouse. This is the first report of C. truncatum causing anthracnose in sword bean in China. The accurate identification of C. truncatum is important for developing efficient control strategies to better understand the epidemiology of this disease. In fact, breeding for resistance against anthracnose depends on it. Further disease management studies are needed to select efficient fungicides for controlling sword bean anthracnose.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, M.S. and Y.-Z.L.; methodology, M.S.; software, M.S.; validation, M.S. and Y.-Z.L.; formal analysis, M.S.; investigation, M.S., S.-M.X., M.-Y.Z., S.-P.L., B.-Z.H., Q.H., Q.-B.L., X.-L.L. and Y.-Z.L.; writing—original draft preparation, M.S.and Y.-Z.L.; writing—review and editing, M.S.; visualization, M.S.; supervision, Y.-Z.L.; project administration, Y.-Z.L.; funding acquisition, Y.-Z.L. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was supported by Gansu Provincial Science, Technology Major Projects (No. 19ZD2NA002), National Natural Science Foundation of China (32061123004), China Agriculture Research System of MOF and MARA (CARS-34), Academician workstation of Zhibiao Nan (No. 2018IC074), High-tech talents introduction program of Yunnan Province (No. 2012HA012), and National Key R & D Program of China (2022YFD1401103).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Morris, J. Sword bean (Canavalia ensiformis (L.) DC.) genetic resources regenerated for potential medical, nutraceutical and agricultural traits. Genet. Resour. Crop Evol. 2007, 54, 586–592. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Joo, S.; Choi, K.; Kim, K.; Lee, J.; Park, S. Characteristics of yougurt prepared with Jinpum bean and sword bean (Canavalia gladiata). Korean J. Postharv. Sci. Technol. 2001, 8, 308–312. [Google Scholar]
  3. Han, V.X. Optimal extraction and fattay acid analysis of oil from Canavalia gladiata. Food. Mach. 2022, 2, 186–209. [Google Scholar]
  4. Li, J.; Peng, K.; Li, Y.; Zhi, S.; Huang, M. The cultivation technology and application value of jack bean in South China. J. Chang. Veg. 2019, 16, 41–43. [Google Scholar]
  5. Hwang, K.A.; Heo, W.; Hwang, H.J.; Han, B.K.; Song, M.C.; Kim, Y.J. Anti-Inflammatory effect of immature sword bean pod (Canavalia gladiata) in Lipopoly saccharide-Induced RAW264.7 Cells. J. Med. Food 2020, 23, 1183–1191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Purseglove, J.W. Tropical Crops—Dicotyledons; Longmans: Harlow, UK, 1984; 225p. [Google Scholar]
  7. Lin, Z. The composition and nutrition of legume oil seeds. China Oil Fats 1986, 3, 24–28. [Google Scholar]
  8. Barbetti, M. Survey of fungi associated with subterrane an clover leaves and petioles in Western Australia. Plant Pathol. 1985, 34, 49–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Hartman, G.; Manandhar, J.; Sinclair, J. Incidence of Colletotrichum spp. on soybean and weeds in Illinois and pathogenicity of Colletotrichum Truncatum. Plant Dis. 1986, 70, 780–782. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Kaiser, W.J.; Mihov, M.; Muehlbauer, F.J.; Hannan, R.M. First report of anthracnose of lentil incited by Colletotrichum truncatum in Bulgaria. Plant Dis. 1998, 82, 128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. O’Connell, R.J.; Thon, M.R.; Hacquard, S.; Amyotte, S.G.; Kleemann, J.; Torres, M.F. Lifestyle transitions in plant pathogenic Colletotrichum fungi deciphered by genome and transcriptome analyses. Nat. Genet. 2012, 44, 1056–1060. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Freeman, S.; Katan, T.; Shabi, E. Characterization of Colletotrichum species responsible for anthracnose diseases of various fruits. Plant Dis. 1998, 82, 596–605. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  13. Pande, A.; Rao, V.G. A Compendium Fungi on Legumes from India; Scientific Publishers: New Delhi, India, 1998; 188p. [Google Scholar]
  14. Tai, F.L. Sylloge Fungorum Sinicorum; Science Press: Beijing, China, 1979; 1527p. [Google Scholar]
  15. David, A.S.; Mark, A.J. Germination of soil-incorporated microsclerotia of Colletotrichum truncatum and colonization of seedlings of the weed Sesbania exaltata. Can. J. Microbiol. 1996, 1, 1032–1038. [Google Scholar]
  16. Md, A.; Tania, A.; Young, G.L.; Byung, S.K. Post-harvest anthracnose of papaya caused by Colletotrichum truncatum in Korea. Eur. J. Plant Pathol. 2017, 6, 259–265. [Google Scholar]
  17. Ford, R.; Banniza, D.S.; Photita, B.W.; Taylor, P.W.J. Morphological and molecular discrimination of Colletotrichum truncatumcausing anthracnose on lentil in Canada. Australas. Plant Pathol. 2004, 33, 559–569. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Yang, H.C.; Hartman, G.L. Methods and evaluation of soybean genotypes for resistance to Colletotrichum truncatum. Plant Dis. 2015, 99, 143–148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Li, Y.Z. Studies of yellow stunt and root rot of standing milk-vetch (Astragalus adsuegens Pall.). Ph.D. Thesis, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China, 2007. [Google Scholar]
  20. Xu, S.; Christensen, M.J.; Li, Y.Z. Pathogenicity and characterization of Colletotrichum lentis: A causal agent of anthracnose in common vetch (Vicia sativa). Eur. J. Plant Pathol. 2017, 149, 718–731. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Hoog, G.S.D.; vanden, G.; Ende, A.H.G. Molecular diagnostics of clinical strains of filamentous Basidiomycetes. Mycoses 1998, 41, 183–189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. White, T.J. A Guide to Methods and Applications; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 1990; Volume 1, 315p. [Google Scholar]
  23. Carbone, I.; Kohn, L.M. A method for designing primer sets for speciation studies infilamentous ascomycetes. Mycologia 1999, 91, 553–556. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Guerber, J.C.; Liu, B.; Correll, J.C.; Johnston, P.R. Characterization of diversity in Colletotrichum acutatum sensulato by sequence analysis of two gene introns, mtDNA and intron RFLPs and mating compatibility. Mycologia 2003, 95, 872–895. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Crous, P.W.; Groenewald, J.Z.; Risede, J.M.; Hywel-Jones, N.L. Calonectria species and their Cylindrocladium anamorphs: Species with sphaerop edunculate vesicles. Stud. Mycol. 2004, 50, 415–430. [Google Scholar]
  26. Damm, U.; Woudenberg, J.H.C.; Cannon, P.F.; Crous, P.W. Colletotrichum species with curved conidia from herbaceous hosts. Fungal Divers. 2009, 39, 45–87. [Google Scholar]
  27. Vu, D.; Groenewald, M.; Vries, M.D.; Gehrmann, T.; Stielow, B.; Eberhardt, U.; Al-Hatmi, A.; Groenewald, J.Z.; Cardinali, G.; Houbraken, J. Large-Scale Generation and Analysis of Filamentous Fungal DNA Barcodes Boosts Coverage for Kingdom Fungi and Reveals Thresholds for Fungal Species and Higher Taxon Delimitation; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  28. Kennedy, A.H.; Schoch, C.L.; Marrero, G.; Brover, V.; Robbertse, B. Publicly available and validated DNA reference sequences are critical to fungal identification and global plant protection efforts: Ause-casein Colletotrichum. Plant Dis. 2022, 106, 1573–1596. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Hacquard, S.; Kracher, B.; Hiruma, K.; Munch, P.C.; Garrido-Oter, R.; Thon, M.R.; Weimann, A.; Damm, U.; Dallery, J.F.; Hainaut, M. Survival trade-offs in plant roots during colonization by closely related beneficial and pathogenic fungi. Nat. Commun. 2016, 7, 11362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  30. Paul, N.C.; Deng, J.X.; Lee, H.B.; Yu, S.H. Characterization and pathogenicity of Alternaria burnsii from seeds of Cucurbita maxima. Mycobio. 2015, 43, 384–391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  31. Corda, A.C.I. DiePilzeDeutschlands. In Deutschlands Flora in Abbildungennach der Nturmit Beschreibungen 3; Sturm, J., Ed.; Abt., ab.21-Nürnberg; Sturm12: Nurnberg, Germany, 1831; pp. 33–64. [Google Scholar]
  32. Hyde, K.D.; Cai, L.; Cannon, P.F.; Crouch, J.A.; Crous, P.W.; Damm, U.; Goodwin, P.H.; Chen, H.; Johnston, P.R.; Jones, E.B.G. Colletotrichum—Names in current use. Fungal Divers. 2009, 39, 147–183. [Google Scholar]
  33. Latunde-Dada, A.O.; Lucas, J.A. Localized hemibiotrophy in Colletotrichum: Cytological and molecular taxonomic similarities among C. destructivum, C. linicola and C. truncatum. Plant Pathol. 2007, 56, 437–447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  34. Cannon, P.F.; Damm, U.; Johnston, P.R.; Weir, B.S. Colletotrichum—Current status and future directions. Stud. Mycol. 2012, 73, 181–213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  35. Doyle, J.J.; Gaut, B.S. Evolution of genes and taxa:Aprimer. Plant Mol. Bio. 2000, 42, 1–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Inderbitzin, P.; Bostock, R.M.; Davis, R.M.; Usami, T.; Platt, H.W.; Subbarao, K.V. Phylogenetics and taxonomy of the fungal vascular wilt pathogen Verticillium, with the descriptions of five new species. PLoS ONE 2011, 6, 28341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Miyamoto, M.M.; Fitch, W.M. Testing species phylogenies and phylogenetic methods with congruence. Syst. Biol. 1995, 44, 64–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. He, Y.Y.; Chen, Q.G.; Shu, C.W.; Yang, M.; Zhou, E. Colletotrichum truncatum, a new cause of anthracnose on Chinese flowering cabbage (Brassica parachinensis) in China. Trop. Plant Pathol. 2016, 6, 183–192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Auyong, A.S.; Ford, R.; Taylor, P.W.J. Genetic transformation of Colletotrichum truncatum associated with anthracnose disease of chili by random insertional mutagenesis. J. Basic Microbiol. 2012, 52, 327–382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Buchwaldt, L.; Anderson, K.L.; MorrallRA, A.; Gossen, B.D.; Bernier, C.C. Identification of lentil germ plasm resistant to Colletotrichum truncatum and characterization of two pathogen races. Phytopathology 2004, 94, 236–243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Symptoms of anthracnose caused by curved conidial species of Colletotrichum on stem and leaves (a) field symptoms of stem spot; (b) leaf symptoms of blackening; (c) states on stems pieces.
Figure 1. Symptoms of anthracnose caused by curved conidial species of Colletotrichum on stem and leaves (a) field symptoms of stem spot; (b) leaf symptoms of blackening; (c) states on stems pieces.
Pathogens 11 01463 g001
Figure 2. Morphological features of Colletotrichum truncatum (YN19325). Colony morphology on PDA ((a,b); upper and reverse colony). (c); acervuli, (d) conidia with seta; Scale bar of d = 20 μm.
Figure 2. Morphological features of Colletotrichum truncatum (YN19325). Colony morphology on PDA ((a,b); upper and reverse colony). (c); acervuli, (d) conidia with seta; Scale bar of d = 20 μm.
Pathogens 11 01463 g002
Figure 3. A Bayesian analysis tree of the concatenated partial sequences of ITS, ACT, GAPDH, and HIS3, gene regions of the isolates used in this study. The numbers on the nodes are posterior probability values. Bootstrap support values (100 replicates) above 50% are shown at the nodes. C. lindemuthianum CBS 151.28 is used as outgroup.
Figure 3. A Bayesian analysis tree of the concatenated partial sequences of ITS, ACT, GAPDH, and HIS3, gene regions of the isolates used in this study. The numbers on the nodes are posterior probability values. Bootstrap support values (100 replicates) above 50% are shown at the nodes. C. lindemuthianum CBS 151.28 is used as outgroup.
Pathogens 11 01463 g003
Figure 4. Sword bean stems inoculated with C. truncatum after 14 days. (a,b); sword bean stems inoculated with conidia of C. truncatum, (c); Control plant.
Figure 4. Sword bean stems inoculated with C. truncatum after 14 days. (a,b); sword bean stems inoculated with conidia of C. truncatum, (c); Control plant.
Pathogens 11 01463 g004
Table 1. Primers used in this study for PCR and sequencing.
Table 1. Primers used in this study for PCR and sequencing.
GeneProductPrimerDirectionSequence (5′–3′) Reference
ITSInternal transcribed spacerITS1ForwardTCCGTAGGTGAACCTGCGG[21,22]
ITS4ReverseTCCTCCGCTTATTGATATGC
ACTActinACT-512FForwardATGTGCAAGGCCGGTTTCGC[23]
ACT-783RReverseTACGAGTCCTTCTGGCCCAT
GAPDHGlyceraldehyde- 3-phosphate
dehydrogenase
GDF1ForwardGCCGTCAACGACCCCTTCATTG[24]
GDR1ReverseGGGTGGAGTCGTACTTGAGCAT
HIS3Chitin synthase ICYLH3FForwardAGGTCCACTGGTGGCAAG[25]
CYLH3RReverseAGCTGGATGTCCTTGGACTG
Table 2. Collection details and GenBank accession numbers of isolates.
Table 2. Collection details and GenBank accession numbers of isolates.
SpeciesCultural NumberHostCountryGenBank Accessions
ITSACTgapdhHis3Reference
C. anthrisciCBS 125334Anthriscus sylvestrisThe NetherlandsGU227845GU227943GU228237GU228041[27]
CBS 125335Anthriscus sylvestrisThe NetherlandsGU227846 GU227944GU228238GU228042[27]
C. chlorophytiIMI 103806ChlorophytumIndiaGU227894 GU227992GU228286 GU228090[28]
CBS 142.79Stylosanthes hamataAustraliaGU227895 GU227993GU228287 GU228091[27]
C. circinansCBS 111.21Allium cepaUSAGU227854GU227952GU228246GU228050[26]
CBS 221.81Allium cepaSerbiaGU227855GU227953GU228247GU228051[27]
C. dematiumCBS 125.25Eryngium campestreFranceGU227819GU227917GU228211GU228015[26]
CBS 125340ApiaceaeCzechGU227820GU227918GU228212 GU228016[27]
C. fructiCBS 346.37Malus sylvestrisUSAGU227844 GU227942GU228236 GU228040[26]
C. liliiCBS 109214 LiliumJapanGU227810 GU227908GU228202 GU228006[26]
C. lineolaCBS 125337ApiaceaeCzechGU227829GU227927 GU228221 GU228025[27]
CBS 125339 ApiaceaeCzechGU227830 GU227928GU228222 GU228026[27]
C. liriopesCBS 119444Lirope muscariMexicoGU227804 GU227902GU228196 GU228000[28]
CBS 122747 Liriope muscariMexicoGU227805 GU227903GU228197 GU228001[26]
C. phaseolorumCBS 157.36 Phaseolus radiatusJapanGU227896 GU227994GU228288 GU228092[26]
CBS 158.36Vigna sinensisJapanGU227897 GU227995GU228289 GU228093[26]
C. rusciCBS 119206RuscusItalyGU227818 GU227916GU228210 GU228014[28]
C. spaethianumCBS 167.49Hosta sieboldianaGermanyGU227807 GU227905GU228199 GU228003[27]
CBS 100063 LiliumSouth KoreaGU227808 GU227906GU228200 GU228004[27]
C. spinaciaeCBS 128.57Spinacia oleraceaThe NetherlandsGU227847GU227945GU228239 GU228043[26]
CBS 108.40 Spinacia oleraceaThe NetherlandsGU227848GU227946GU228240 GU228044[26]
C. tofieldiaeCBS 495.85Tofieldia calyculataSwitzerlandGU227801GU227899GU228193 GU227997[29]
CBS 168.49Lupinus polyphyllusGermanyGU227802GU227900GU228194 GU227998[27]
C. trichellumCBS 118198HederaGuatemalaGU227813GU227911GU228205 GU228009[26]
CBS 448.90 Hedera helixGermanyGU227814GU227912GU228206 GU228010[26]
C. truncatumCBS 151.35Phaseolus lunatusUSAGU227862GU227960GU228254 GU228058[26]
CBS 119189 Phaseolus lunatusUSAGU227863GU227961GU228255 GU228059[26]
CBS 710.70 Phaseolus vulgarisBrazilGU227864GU227962GU228256 GU228060[26]
YN1932501Camavalia brasiliensisChinaOP616009OP649740OP649744OP649748This study
YN1932502Camavalia brasiliensisChinaOP616010OP649741OP649745OP649749This study
YN1932503Camavalia brasiliensisChinaOP616011OP649742OP649746OP649750This study
YN1932504Camavalia brasiliensisChinaOP616012OP649743OP649747OP649751This study
C. lindemuthianum
(outgroup)
CBS 151.28Phaseolus vulgarisUKGU227800GU227898GU228192 GU227996[26]
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Shi, M.; Xue, S.-M.; Zhang, M.-Y.; Li, S.-P.; Huang, B.-Z.; Huang, Q.; Liu, Q.-B.; Liao, X.-L.; Li, Y.-Z. Colletotrichum truncatum—A New Etiological Anthracnose Agent of Sword Bean (Canavalia gladiata) in Southwestern China. Pathogens 2022, 11, 1463. https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens11121463

AMA Style

Shi M, Xue S-M, Zhang M-Y, Li S-P, Huang B-Z, Huang Q, Liu Q-B, Liao X-L, Li Y-Z. Colletotrichum truncatum—A New Etiological Anthracnose Agent of Sword Bean (Canavalia gladiata) in Southwestern China. Pathogens. 2022; 11(12):1463. https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens11121463

Chicago/Turabian Style

Shi, Min, Shi-Ming Xue, Mei-Yan Zhang, Shi-Ping Li, Bi-Zhi Huang, Qi Huang, Qiong-Bo Liu, Xiang-Long Liao, and Yan-Zhong Li. 2022. "Colletotrichum truncatum—A New Etiological Anthracnose Agent of Sword Bean (Canavalia gladiata) in Southwestern China" Pathogens 11, no. 12: 1463. https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens11121463

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop