Next Article in Journal
New Reference Genes for qRT-PCR Analysis as a Potential Target for Identification of Trichophyton verrucosum in Different Culture Conditions
Next Article in Special Issue
Electrostatic Dust Cloth: A Useful Passive Sampling Method When Assessing Exposure to Fungi Demonstrated in Studies Developed in Portugal (2018–2021)
Previous Article in Journal
Virucidal Activity of Plant Extracts against African Swine Fever Virus
Previous Article in Special Issue
Chaetomium and Chaetomium-like Species from European Indoor Environments Include Dichotomopilus finlandicus sp. nov.
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Pathogens
Volume 10
Issue 11
10.3390/pathogens10111360
pathogens-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

The Toxicity of Wiped Dust and Airborne Microbes in Individual Classrooms Increase the Risk of Teachers’ Work-Related Symptoms: A Cross-Sectional Study

by
Janne Salin
1,*,
Pasi Ohtonen
2,3,
Maria A. Andersson
4,5 and
Hannu Syrjälä
1
1
The Department of Infection Control, Oulu University Hospital, FI-90029 Oulu, Finland
2
Division of Operative Care, Oulu University Hospital, FI-90220 Oulu, Finland
3
Research Unit of Surgery, Anesthesia and Intensive Care, University of Oulu, FI-90014 Oulu, Finland
4
Department of Microbiology, Faculty of Agriculture and Forestry, University of Helsinki, FI-00014 Helsinki, Finland
5
Department of Civil Engineering, Aalto University, FI-00076 Aalto, Finland
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Pathogens 2021, 10(11), 1360; https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens10111360
Submission received: 20 August 2021 / Revised: 6 October 2021 / Accepted: 12 October 2021 / Published: 21 October 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Detection of Indoor Fungi)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Background: The causes and pathophysiological mechanisms of building-related symptoms (BRS) remain open. Objective: We aimed to investigate the association between teachers’ individual work-related symptoms and intrinsic in vitro toxicity in classrooms. This is a further analysis of a previously published dataset. Methods: Teachers from 15 Finnish schools in Helsinki responded to the symptom survey. The boar sperm motility inhibition assay, a sensitive indicator of mitochondrial dysfunction, was used to measure the toxicity of wiped dust and cultured microbial fallout samples collected from the teachers’ classrooms. Results: 231 teachers whose classroom toxicity data had been collected responded to the questionnaire. Logistic regression analysis adjusted for age, gender, smoking, and atopy showed that classroom dust intrinsic toxicity was statistically significantly associated with the following 12 symptoms reported by teachers (adjusted ORs in parentheses): nose stuffiness (4.1), runny nose (6.9), hoarseness (6.4), globus sensation (9.0), throat mucus (7.6), throat itching (4.4), shortness of breath (12.2), dry cough (4.7), wet eyes (12.7), hypersensitivity to sound (7.9), difficulty falling asleep (7.6), and increased need for sleep (7.7). Toxicity of cultured microbes was found to be associated with nine symptoms (adjusted ORs in parentheses): headache (2.3), nose stuffiness (2.2), nose dryness (2.2), mouth dryness (2.8), hoarseness (2.2), sore throat (2.8), throat mucus (2.3), eye discharge (10.2), and increased need for sleep (3.5). Conclusions: The toxicity of classroom dust and airborne microbes in boar sperm motility inhibition assay significantly increased teachers’ risk of work-related respiratory and ocular symptoms. Potential pathophysiological mechanisms of BRS are discussed.

1. Introduction

Building-related symptoms (BRS) have been reported worldwide for decades [1]. Classic BRS include eye, nose, respiratory, and skin symptoms, as well as headache, fatigue, dizziness, inability to concentrate, nausea, fever, and chills [2,3]. In addition, exposure to moisture damage in buildings and emissions from indoor mold growth have been shown to be associated with the development and exacerbation of asthma, allergic rhinitis, and bronchitis [4,5,6]. However, the pathophysiological mechanisms and causal relationships of symptoms remain unclear.
In moisture-damaged buildings, a variety of toxic fungi and bacteria are known to grow in the structures, ventilation systems and on indoor surfaces [7,8,9,10,11,12]. Airborne dust, spores, and hyphae fragments can act as carriers of microbial toxins in indoor air [13,14,15]. Recent studies show that toxins can also be very easily aerosolized [16,17], particularly even without airflow, due to highly toxic guttation droplets secreted by microbes actively growing on building materials [10,11,18,19,20]. Settled dust collected from moisture-damaged buildings has been found to contain microbial toxins [21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28].
In toxicity measurements, various dust sampling and processing methods and different in vitro models have demonstrated contradictory results [16,29,30,31,32]. The inflammatory potential of the deposited dust in human lung epithelial cell A549 assay was statistically significantly associated with employees’ symptoms in schools [33] and offices [29]. Although the immunotoxicity of indoor samples in the mouse RAW264.7 macrophage assay has been described to reduce after the renovation of moisture-damaged schools [31,34], it was not possible to distinguish moisture-damaged schools from control schools with this method [32,35]. The same holds true for hemolytic activity tested on human erythrocytes or oxidative capacity by plasmid scission assay [36].
The classic boar sperm motility inhibition (BSMI) assay has been found to be a sensitive method for detecting bacterial and mycotoxins in moisture-damaged buildings [9,11,16,37,38,39,40,41,42,43,44,45,46]. The method has also shown to be sensitive to man-made xenobiotic mitochondriotoxic chemicals known to occur in indoor dusts [47,48]. In a recent study, a clear temporal association was found between heavy occupational exposure to sperm-toxic dust during renovation of a water-damaged building and a cluster of 21 new occupational asthma cases [49].
We previously showed that both the total number of literature-known BRS [50] and the most common other work-related symptoms [51] were associated with intrinsic in vitro toxicity of settled dust and cultivated airborne microbes from teachers’ classrooms. The aim of this sub-analysis of the same dataset was to investigate whether there is an association between teachers’ individual symptoms and the toxicity of dust and airborne microbes

2. Results

Two hundred and thirty-one teachers met the admission criteria, and had completed a questionnaire, and had at least one classroom toxicity result (200 respondents had microbial toxicity results and 169 respondents had dust toxicity results) [50,51]. The median age of the respondents was 43 years, 81.8% were women, 9.5% were current smokers, and 10.4% were atopic. Their median working time at their primary workplace was 22 h per week.
Table 1 shows the prevalence and association with the workplace of the literature-known BRS and the most common other symptoms (prevalence over 10%), of which at least 50% were perceived to be work-related. There was a total of 41 such symptoms, including 7 general, 17 respiratory, 3 dermal, 6 ocular, 2 hearing, 3 sleeping, and 3 mental symptoms. The highest work-relatedness (at least 70% of the symptom worsening in the workplace) was reported for eight symptoms: three general symptoms (fatigue, generalized feeling of sickness, indefinite feeling of thermoregulation failure), four respiratory symptoms (hoarseness, dry cough, throat mucus, throat itching), and one mental symptom (mental irritability).
Dust toxicity was divided into three categories and microbial toxicity into two categories [50,51]. The number of teachers with primary workspace dust toxicity results was 169; 111 (65.7%) were non-toxic (EC50 ≥ 25 µg/mL), 43 (25.4%) were low toxic (EC50 = 12 µg/mL) and 15 (8.9%) were highly toxic (EC50 ≤ 6 µg/mL). The number of teachers with primary workspace microbial toxicity results was 200; 118 (59%) were non-toxic (EC50 > 12 µg/mL), and 82 (41%) were toxic (EC50 ≤ 12 µg/mL). The fallout plates representative for sampling are pictured in Figure 1. The mold genera recognized based on colony morphology on MEA plates were Penicillium, Aspergillus, and Trichoderma. The dominant genera, representing Trichoderma isolates, were detected on 19% of the plates. The isolates were covering and feeding on co-growing fungal colonies, and apparently represent mycoparasitic species. The mycoparasitic and mycotrophic Trichoderma isolates covered between 5% and >50% of all plates collected in the different schools. Trichoderma isolates grew in 13 (15.9%) toxic fallout plates and two (1.7%) non-toxic plates (p < 0.001, Fisher’s exact test).
According to the logistic regression model based on dust samples and adjusted for age, gender, smoking, and atopy (Table 2), 12 work-related symptoms were statistically significantly more common among teachers whose primary classroom was highly toxic compared to non-toxic classrooms (adjusted ORs in parentheses): nose stuffiness (4.1), runny nose (6.9), hoarseness (6.4), globus sensation (9.0), throat mucus (7.6), throat itching (4.4), shortness of breath (12.2), dry cough (4.7), wet eyes (12.7), hypersensitivity to sound (7.9), difficulty falling asleep (7.6), and increased need for sleep (7.7). Based on analyses of cultured microbial fallout samples (Table 3) among teachers whose classrooms were toxic, nine work-related symptoms were statistically significantly more common compared to non-toxic classes (adjusted ORs in parentheses): headache (2.3), nose stuffiness (2.2), nose dryness (2.2), mouth dryness (2.8), hoarseness (2.2), sore throat (2.8), throat mucus (2.3), eye discharge (10.2), and increased need for sleep (3.5). ORs could not be calculated for three symptoms (nose stinging, wheezing, and exanthema) because these symptoms were not reported by teachers in the group of non-toxic microbes. Work-related nose stinging occurred in 4/82 and 0/118 teachers with and without toxic airborne microbes in their classrooms, respectively. The crude OR results are presented in the Supplementary Tables S1 and S2.
Allergic rhinitis was significantly more common among teachers in toxic classrooms with regard to dust sample results (Table 2).

3. Discussion

Our results show variations in intrinsic toxicities in settled dusts and fungal biomass from fallout plates collected from 231 classrooms in 15 schools in the city of Helsinki, Finland. 41% of the cultured microbial fallout samples and 34% of the wiped dust samples in classrooms were toxic in vitro. Our results suggest that exposure to toxic dust and microbes increases the risk of teachers’ work-related symptoms.
In our series, significant toxicity-related symptoms were typically linked with the respiratory tract (nose stuffiness, nose dryness, nose stinging, runny nose, allergic rhinitis, mouth dryness, hoarseness, sore throat, globus sensation, throat mucus, throat itching, shortness of breath, and dry cough) and eyes (wet eyes and eye discharge). Our results show that some of the work-related symptoms were significantly associated with both dust and microbial toxicities, whereas some toxicity-associated symptoms were identified only by dust or microbial analyses, suggesting differences in exposure or activation of body responses.
Toxic indoor exposure is a complex phenomenon [16,27,52,53,54,55]. Microbial toxins are known to be present in non-industrial buildings, but concentrations of individual toxins are typically low [21,22,23]. However, in addition to hundreds of known microbial toxins, new ones are still identified. Furthermore, a huge number of different toxic chemicals have been found in indoor dust, such as plasticizers, flame retardants, polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, pesticides, and other biocides [56]. The toxic properties of many chemicals are not yet known [57]. Chemical assays cannot determine the harmfulness of total exposure to microbial and anthropogenic toxins or their interactions. Thus, bioassays providing an integrated picture of overall toxicity are essential tools for understanding toxic mechanisms, detecting known and unknown toxins, and studying the potential health relevance of complex toxic exposure [37,57,58,59,60]. However, sensitivity and specificity varies in different bioassays, and there is no single comprehensive method for detecting all potentially adverse effects of indoor air on human health.
BSMI assay has been identified as a sensitive biosensor of microbial toxins in buildings associated with health complaints and food poisonings [12,16,43,46,53]. Toxicity detected in fallout plates may indicate dominance of bacteria producing sperm-toxic substances—such as the mitochondriotoxins produced by Streptomycetes, Bacillus, and Paenibacillus, [9,16,38,43,45,53,58]—and also toxins affecting ion homeostasis and energy metabolism produced by the fungal genera Chaetomium, Stachybotrys, mycoparasitic Trichoderma species and toxigenic Paecilomyces, Aspergillus and Penicillium species [10,11,12,46]. Many of these species and genera are recognized as indicators of water damage to buildings [61,62]. The mycoparasitic genus Trichoderma feed on fungi colonizing indoor spaces, and may indicate mold growth in building structures [10,41,63]. It was interesting to note that in toxic fallout plates there were significantly more mycoparasitic and mycotrophic Trichoderma isolates than in non-toxic plates.
Mitochondrial toxins affecting cellular energy metabolism and ion homeostasis cause sublethal injury, which can be demonstrated by a decreased motility in boar sperm [53,64,65,66]. In addition to a wide variety of different microbial toxins, also environmental pollutants, biocides, consumer chemicals, tobacco smoke, and particulate matter can damage mitochondria [47,67,68,69,70,71,72]. We have earlier seen that there was no correlation between dust and microbial toxicities [51], and we suggested that dust toxicity was at least partially derived from the environmental chemicals, whereas microbial culture toxicity directly expresses microbial toxicity.
Mitochondria play an important role in human physiological regulatory mechanisms [73,74]. In addition to energy production and cellular calcium regulation, mitochondria have a central role in the regulation of the inflammatory response through production of reactive oxygen species (mtROS) and activation of the NLRP3 inflammasome [75,76]. Mitochondrial dysfunction and ROS-mediated oxidative stress are associated with the pathophysiology of many chronic inflammatory diseases, such as asthma, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, as well as Alzheimer’s and Parkinson’s diseases [77,78,79]. Moreover, environmental mitochondriotoxic exposure has been suggested to be a significant causal factor for these diseases [68,69,71,76,80,81,82,83,84].
Microbial toxins cause immunological inflammation, especially in combination with other exposures, such as to lipopolysaccharides (LPS) [9,33,40,85]. Pro-inflammatory cytokines have been found to interfere with mitochondrial function [86]. Transient receptor potential (TRP) channels in the chemosensory trigeminal C-fibers innervating the nasal cavity, throat, and conjunctiva and in the vagal C-fibers innervating the lower respiratory tract can sense irritating and toxic chemicals [87,88]. The sperm-toxic microbial toxin antimycin A has been shown to cause mitochondrial dysfunction, mtROS production, and C-fiber activation via TRP channels in experimental mice models [89,90,91]. When exposed to mtROS—even non-toxic concentrations of chemicals, LPS, or inflammatory mediators—this chemosensory system can induce neurogenic inflammation via neuropeptide secretion and mast cell degranulation [90,92,93,94,95,96,97,98].
The majority of the 18 boar sperm toxicity-related symptoms may be due to one or more of these three mechanisms (1) mitochondrial dysfunction / oxidative stress, (2) immunological inflammation, and (3) chemosensory C-fibers. Five symptoms (headache, throat mucus and itching, shortness of breath, and cough) may be activated via all three mechanisms [99,100,101,102,103,104,105,106,107,108,109,110,111], six symptoms (stuffy and runny nose, hoarseness, sore throat, globus sensation, watery eyes) via immunological inflammation and C-fibers [99,106,112,113,114,115,116,117,118,119], and one symptom (difficulty falling asleep) via mitochondrial dysfunction and immunological inflammation [120,121,122]. Eye discharge and increased need for sleep can be triggered due to immunological inflammation [119,120,121], and nasal stinging via C-fibers [88]. Only three symptoms associated with boar sperm toxicity (dry nose and mouth, sound hypersensitivity) did not appear to be related to these three mechanisms according to thus far published literature. This strong overlap supports the hypothesis that mitochondrial dysfunction, immunological inflammation, and chemosensory C-fibers are involved in the pathophysiology of boar sperm toxicity-related symptoms.
Respiratory protection from toxic particles is significantly based on airway mucociliary clearance [123]. However, microbial toxins can inhibit the motility of cilia, just as occurs with exposure to tobacco smoke [59,124,125]. The airway particle load is directed mostly to the upper respiratory tract [126]. Upper respiratory symptoms were also most common among teachers’ toxicity-related symptoms in our series.
Axonal transport of the olfactory and trigeminal nerves and bulk flow through the perivascular space provide direct access to toxic exposures from the nasal cavity to the brain, which bypasses the blood–brain barrier [127]. The importance of mitochondrial toxicity and the nose-to-brain route has been demonstrated in an experimental model by nasal administration of mitochondriotoxic MPTP to induce Parkinson’s disease in mice [128]. Toxic exposures may also be transferred from the respiratory tract into systemic circulation, thus bypassing hepatic first-pass metabolism [126,129]. Thus, adverse inhalation exposure to lipophilic mitochondriotoxins may potentially cause consequences in any part of the body.
Although the pathogenesis of BRS thus far remains open, our results show that teachers have dust and microbial toxicity-associated symptoms in toxic classrooms demonstrated by BSMI assay. This assay also detects mitochondrial dysfunction, which could explain how BRS may be initiated. Several mechanisms are likely involved in the inhibition of these mechanisms, such as the anti-inflammatory effect of CGRP secreted by C-fibers [130]. Further studies are needed to explore the possible presence of mitochondrial dysfunction and oxidative stress, activation, and peripheral sensitization of chemosensory C-fibers, and neuro-immune crosstalk in those exposed to mitochondriotoxic microbes and chemicals in indoor environments. A possible link between these physiological systems and work-related symptoms is described in Figure 2.
Our study had some limitations. In this series, toxicity analyses were performed only for teachers’ current principal classrooms, while data related to exposures in other areas of school, home, and previous work places were not available. The low proportion of men (18%) weakens the assessment of the association between toxicity and symptoms in men. Furthermore, our sampling methods did not allow us to analyze the exact amount of teachers’ exposure, and BSMI assay is insensitive to many types of toxins—e.g., toxins affecting macromolecular syntheses and several mycotoxins such as sterigmatocystine and ochratoxin [46]. Quantities of toxic microbes in indoor air were not determined and systematic identification of toxic microbes was not performed. Other exposures potentially provoking symptoms—such as volatile organic compounds, room temperature, insufficient ventilation rate, or high carbon dioxide concentration—were not measured concurrently. However, although we only tested the teachers’ current principal classrooms, we found a significant association between symptoms and measured toxicity in settled dust and cultured airborne microbial biomass.
A main strength of our study was an in vitro model that has been successfully used to identify toxin producers in buildings with health complaints, and that measures a significant mechanism of environmental toxicity. Two independent sampling methods were used in the study. Due to the strong tendency of microbial toxins to aerosolize, especially in airflow [11,16,17,20], we ruled out high airflows (e.g., vacuum cleaner) for dust sampling or sample processing to ensure that toxins were not lost from samples. We also used ethanol to extract dust and microbial samples, because a large proportion of microbial toxins and indoor chemicals are lipophilic and potentially bioaccumulative [56,131]. In addition, we made a comparison based on teachers’ individual workspace toxicity instead of a building-level comparison. Examining the association between individual symptoms and toxicity allowed a preliminary assessment of a hypothetical model of the pathophysiological mechanisms involved in sperm-toxic exposure.
Teachers did not know the toxicities of their classrooms, which reduced the risk of information bias. The study population was also comparable. Teachers belonged to the same profession and the same socio-economic class, worked in the same city, and clear inclusion criteria were defined in the study. The Real Estate Department of the City of Helsinki selected the schools to represent the actual age and condition distribution of the city’s schools.
In conclusion, our results show a clear variation in in vitro toxicity in classroom environments as measured by the BSMI assay, a sensitive indicator of mitochondrial toxicity. The risk of various work-related symptoms, especially respiratory and ocular symptoms, was strongly increased among exposed teachers in classrooms with toxic dust and airborne microbes. These findings provide a new perspective for the research field of indoor adverse exposure and pathophysiological processes in exposed, symptomatic individuals. This approach can also be used in real life for detection of adverse occupational exposures at individual or organizational levels.

4. Materials and Methods

Materials and methods have been presented in more detail previously [50,51]. Here we present a short summary of a sub-analysis of the same dataset.

4.1. Schools

Fifteen schools representing construction, building services, and ventilation systems from different decades, some of which had been renovated, were selected by the Real Estate Department of the City of Helsinki. A more detailed description of schools has been presented previously [50]. The schools were built in 1924–2004 and one building was renovated in 2009. Fourteen schools had an area of 2400–8300 m2 and one school 474 m2. Concrete was the main structural material for all the schools. Thirteen schools had a mechanical exhaust air system, eight schools also had a mechanical supply air system, and one had completely natural ventilation. Several moisture damage and indoor air studies had been required in eight of the schools, one study in one school, and no concern for indoor air quality or moisture damage had been identified in six schools. This building-level information was not available to the research team during the research project.

4.2. Teachers

Teachers were eligible for the study if they worked at least seven hours a week in the school under study and for at least one year in the same classroom; they were not pregnant at the time of the study; and information was available about their workspace. The symptoms of students in these schools were not studied.
We sent a questionnaire to all the teachers in the 15 schools. Demographics included age, gender, smoking status, and atopy. The survey asked whether symptoms had occurred in the last 12 months. If the teacher had answered that the symptom was related to time spent in the workplace, his/her symptom was classified as work-related. In addition to all known BRS, all other symptoms with a prevalence of at least 10% and concomitant work-relatedness of at least 50% were also selected for analysis.
The privacy of the subjects was protected by conducting the survey anonymously, thus no personal identity information was collected. According to the Ethics Committee of Helsinki University Hospital, no formal approval was required for this type of anonymous study.

4.3. Indoor Samples

Two types of indoor samples (wiped dust and airborne microbes) were collected from each teacher’s principal school classroom [50,51]. Cotton balls were used to wipe dust samples from surfaces above the floor (e.g., above lamps and cabinets) that had last been cleaned 8–12 months earlier. Airborne microbial propagules were collected by allowing them to fall onto malt extract agar (MEA) plates for a sampling time of 1 h. Malt extract agars (malt extract 70167, Sigma-Aldrich, Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany; agar 05039, Sigma-Aldrich, Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany) were incubated at 22–24 °C. After 4–6 weeks of incubation, all plates were photographed and microbial biomasses were collected. Colony-forming units were not counted, but recognizable species were identified from the photographs of microbial cultures (Figure 1). To treat these two different types of samples, the wiped dust and microbial biomasses were extracted into ethanol and evaporated to dryness at 62 °C. The residues were then re-dissolved in ethanol to a concentration of 10 mg dry weight/mL [16]. Next, boar sperm were exposed to extracts of wiped dust and microbial mass for three days [50,51].

4.4. Toxicity Assay

Toxicity of the extracts was tested with the classical ex vivo BSMI assay measuring sublethal toxicity as sperm motility inhibition. The BSMI assay measures inability to respond to induction of motility in resting immotile toxin-exposed sperm cells and has been described in detail earlier [12,52,53]. In brief, after exposure for three days at 22–24 °C, motility was induced in the exposed sperm cells by shaking to provide the sperm cells with oxygen and warming to 37 °C for 5 min. The induced sperm motility, i.e., progressive and rapid motility, was assessed using a phase contrast microscope with a warmed stage (37 °C) as described earlier [50]. Progressive and rapid motility was subjectively estimated as the proportion of spermatozoa exhibiting high amplitude tail beating (Figure 3A), which is required for progressive and rapid sperm motility. This is easily visualized as rapid swirling motility comparable to mass activity in a microscopic frame [53]. Static, shivering, or slowly motile sperm cells express no amplitude or low amplitude of tail beating (Figure 3B,C).
The half maximal effective concentration (EC50) indicated the level of toxicity (i.e., the lower the EC50, the higher the toxicity). The EC50 concentration of the ethanol-extracted dry substances in the dust- and microbial extracts is defined as the lowest concentration at which ≥50% of sperm had lost rapid and progressive motility relative to the solvent vehicle, ethanol. The motility of the ethanol-exposed sperm cells was estimated as the reference value of 100%, representing the negative control in each test. Sperm cells immobilized by exposure to triclosan exhibiting motility close to 0% were used as positive controls [37,50].
The EC50 (<50% motility) was estimated as the concentration between EC< 20 (motility > 80% compared to the control, meaning similar to the negative control) and EC80 (motility < 20%, similar to the immobilized control). When testing > 200 extracts, this protocol gave 99% similarity to measurements of the proportion of rapidly motile spermatozoa done with a Hamilton Thorne sperm analyzer (HTM-S, ver. 7.2; Hamilton-Thorn Research, Danvers, MA, USA). When calibrated with triclosan (Sigma Chemical Co., St. Louis, MO, USA) in 10 parallel tests, the EC50 was 1 μg/mL (SD ± 0.2) [37,52].

4.5. Statistical Analysis

The effect of toxicity on the presence of different symptoms was analyzed using a logistic regression model. The results of the logistic regression analyses are presented with odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Age, sex, current smoking status, and atopy as potential confounding factors were used as adjusting variables when judging the effects of the toxicity outcomes of the classroom samples on the presence of different symptoms. In the adjustment, age was divided into four categories (≤34, 35–44, 45–54, and ≥55 years), while sex, smoking status, and atopy were dichotomous. The presence of symptoms was divided into two categories (yes or no). Dust toxicity was divided into three categories (EC50 ≥ 25, 12, and ≤6 µg/mL) and microbial toxicity into two categories (EC50 > 12 and ≤12 µg/mL). Categorical data was analyzed using Fisher’s exact test. Two-tailed p values are reported. All analyses were performed with SPSS for Windows (IBM Corp. Released 2019. IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 26.0. Armonk, NY: IBM Corp.).

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/pathogens10111360/s1, Table S1: title, The results of the crude logistic regression models for the impact of increased toxicity levels of wiped dust in the classroom on work-related symptoms.; Table S2: The results of the crude logistic regression models for the impact of toxicity of airborne microbes in the classroom on work-related symptoms.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, J.S., P.O., M.A.A. and H.S.; methodology, J.S., P.O., M.A.A. and H.S.; software, J.S. and P.O.; validation, J.S., P.O., M.A.A. and H.S.; formal analysis, J.S. and P.O.; investigation, J.S., P.O., M.A.A. and H.S.; resources, J.S., P.O., M.A.A. and H.S.; data curation, J.S. and P.O.; writing—original draft preparation, J.S., P.O., M.A.A. and H.S.; writing—review and editing, J.S., P.O., M.A.A. and H.S.; visualization, J.S. and M.A.A.; supervision, H.S.; project administration, H.S.; funding acquisition, J.S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the Finnish Work Environment Fund (grant 200262). The funders had no role in the study design, data collection, data analysis, data interpretation, in the writing of the report or in the decision to submit the article for publication.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Approval was waived by the Ethics Committee of Helsinki University Hospital. The Ethics Committee stated that no formal approval was required for this type of anonymous study.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data supporting reported results are available upon reasonable request from the correspondence author.

Acknowledgments

We acknowledge grant from the Finnish Work Environment Fund (TSR 200262).

Conflicts of Interest

J.S. owns 3% of company shares in Inspector Sec Ltd. P.O., M.A., and H.S. declare no conflict of interest.

Abbreviations

BRS building-related symptoms
BSMIboar sperm motility inhibition assay
CGRP calcitonin gene-related peptide
CIconfidence interval
EC50half maximal effective concentration
ILinterleukin
IL-1β interleukin 1beta
LPSlipopolysaccharide
LTleukotriene
MEAmalt extract agar
MPTP1-methyl-4-phenyl-1,2,3,6-tetrahydropyridine
mtDAMPmitochondrial damage-associated molecular pattern
mtROSmitochondrial-derived reactive oxygen species
NFA nitrated fatty acid
NKA neurokinin A
NLRP3NLR family pyrin domain containing 3
ORodds ratio
PGprostaglandin
P2X purinergic 2X receptor
SP substance P
SDstandard deviation
TNFα tumor necrosis factor alpha
TRPtransient receptor potential
VIP vasoactive intestinal peptide

References

  1. World Health Organisation. WHO Guidelines for Indoor Air Quality: Dampness and Mould; World Health Organization: Geneva, Swithzerland, 2009; pp. 93–95.
  2. Burge, S.; Hedge, A.; Wilson, S.; Bass, J.H.; Robertson, A. Sick building syndrome: A study of 4373 office workers. Ann. Occup. Hyg. 1987, 31, 493–504. [Google Scholar]
  3. World Health Organisation. Indoor Air Pollutants: Exposure and Health Effects; EURO Reports and Studies 78; World Health Organization: Copenhagen, Denmark, 1983; pp. 23, 25.
  4. Mendell, M.J.; Mirer, A.G.; Cheung, K.; Tong, M.; Douwes, J. Respiratory and allergic health effects of dampness, mold, and dampness-related agents: A review of the epidemiologic evidence. Environ. Health Perspect. 2011, 119, 748–756. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Quansah, R.; Jaakkola, M.S.; Hugg, T.T.; Heikkinen, S.A.; Jaakkola, J.J. Residential dampness and molds and the risk of developing asthma: A systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e47526. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Jaakkola, M.S.; Quansah, R.; Hugg, T.T.; Heikkinen, S.A.; Jaakkola, J.J. Association of indoor dampness and molds with rhinitis risk: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2013, 132, 1099–1110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Engelhart, S.; Loock, A.; Skutlarek, D.; Sagunski, H.; Lommel, A.; Färber, H.; Exner, M. Occurrence of toxigenic Aspergillus versicolor isolates and sterigmatocystin in carpet dust from damp indoor environments. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2002, 68, 3886–3890. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  8. Hirvonen, M.R.; Huttunen, K.; Roponen, M. Bacterial strains from moldy buildings are highly potent inducers of inflammatory and cytotoxic effects. Indoor Air 2005, 15, 65–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Rasimus-Sahari, S.; Teplova, V.V.; Andersson, M.A.; Mikkola, R.; Kankkunen, P.; Matikainen, S.; Gahmberg, C.G.; Andersson, L.C.; Salkinoja-Salonen, M. The peptide toxin amylosin of Bacillus amyloliquefaciens from moisture-damaged buildings is immunotoxic, induces potassium efflux from mammalian cells, and has antimicrobial activity. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2015, 81, 2939–2949. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  10. Castagnoli, E.; Marik, T.; Mikkola, R.; Kredics, L.; Andersson, M.A.; Salonen, H.; Kurnitski, J. Indoor Trichoderma strains emitting peptaibols in guttation droplets. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2018, 125, 1408–1422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  11. Salo, J.; Marik, T.; Mikkola, R.; Andersson, M.A.; Kredics, L.; Salonen, H.; Kurnitski, J. Penicillium expansum strain isolated from indoor building material was able to grow on gypsum board and emitted guttation droplets containing chaetoglobosins and communesins A, B and D. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2019, 127, 1135–1147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  12. Salo, J.; Kedves, O.; Mikkola, R.; Kredics, L.; Andersson, M.A.; Kurnitski, J.; Salonen, H. Detection of Chaetomium globosum, Ch. cochliodes and Ch. rectangulare during the Diversity Tracking of Mycotoxin-Producing Chaetomium-Like Isolates Obtained in Buildings in Finland. Toxins 2020, 12, 443. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Brasel, T.L.; Martin, J.M.; Carriker, C.G.; Wilson, S.C.; Straus, D.C. Detection of airborne Stachybotrys chartarum macrocyclic trichothecene mycotoxins in the indoor environment. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2005, 71, 7376–7388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  14. Lemons, A.R.; Croston, T.L.; Goldsmith, W.T.; Barnes, M.A.; Jaderson, M.A.; Park, J.H.; McKinney, W.; Beezhold, D.H.; Green, B.J. Cultivation and aerosolization of Stachybotrys chartarum for modeling pulmonary inhalation exposure. Inhal. Toxicol. 2019, 31, 446–456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Brasel, T.L.; Douglas, D.R.; Wilson, S.C.; Straus, D.C. Detection of airborne Stachybotrys chartarum macrocyclic trichothecene mycotoxins on particulates smaller than conidia. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2005, 71, 114–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Andersson, M.A.; Mikkola, R.; Rasimus, S.; Hoornstra, D.; Salin, P.; Rahkila, R.; Heikkinen, M.; Mattila, S.; Peltola, J.; Kalso, S.; et al. Boar spermatozoa as a biosensor for detecting toxic substances in indoor dust and aerosols. Toxicol. Vitr. 2010, 24, 2041–2052. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Aleksic, B.; Draghi, M.; Ritoux, S.; Bailly, S.; Lacroix, M.; Oswald, I.P.; Bailly, J.D.; Robine, E. Aerosolization of Mycotoxins after Growth of Toxinogenic Fungi on Wallpaper. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2017, 83, e01001-17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  18. Gareis, M.; Gareis, E.M. Guttation droplets of Penicillium nordicum and Penicillium verrucosum contain high concentrations of the mycotoxins ochratoxin A and B. Mycopathologia 2007, 163, 207–214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Gareis, M.; Gottschalk, C. Stachybotrys spp. and the guttation phenomenon. Mycotoxin Res. 2014, 30, 151–159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Andersson, M.A.; Salo, J.; Kedves, O.; Kredics, L.; Druzhinina, I.; Kurnitski, J.; Salonen, H. Bioreactivity, Guttation and Agents Influencing Surface Tension of Water Emitted by Actively Growing Indoor Mould Isolates. Microorganisms 2020, 8, E1940. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Bloom, E.; Nyman, E.; Must, A.; Pehrson, C.; Larsson, L. Molds and mycotoxins in indoor environments--a survey in water-damaged buildings. J. Occup. Environ. Hyg. 2009, 6, 671–678. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Täubel, M.; Sulyok, M.; Vishwanath, V.; Bloom, E.; Turunen, M.; Järvi, K.; Kauhanen, E.; Krska, R.; Hyvärinen, A.; Larsson, L.; et al. Co-occurrence of toxic bacterial and fungal secondary metabolites in moisture-damaged indoor environments. Indoor Air 2011, 21, 368–375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Peitzsch, M.; Sulyok, M.; Täubel, M.; Vishwanath, V.; Krop, E.; Borràs-Santos, A.; Hyvärinen, A.; Nevalainen, A.; Krska, R.; Larsson, L. Microbial secondary metabolites in school buildings inspected for moisture damage in Finland, The Netherlands and Spain. J. Environ. Monit. 2012, 14, 2044–2053. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  24. Došen, I.; Andersen, B.; Phippen, C.B.; Clausen, G.; Nielsen, K.F. Stachybotrys mycotoxins: From culture extracts to dust samples. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 2016, 408, 5513–5526. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  25. Park, J.H.; Sulyok, M.; Lemons, A.R.; Green, B.J.; Cox-Ganser, J.M. Characterization of fungi in office dust: Comparing results of microbial secondary metabolites, fungal internal transcribed spacer region sequencing, viable culture and other microbial indices. Indoor Air 2018. online ahead of print. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Viegas, C.; Almeida, B.; Monteiro, A.; Paciência, I.; Rufo, J.C.; Carolino, E.; Quintal-Gomes, A.; Twarużek, M.; Kosicki, R.; Marchand, G.; et al. Settled dust assessment in clinical environment: Useful for the evaluation of a wider bioburden spectrum. Int. J. Environ. Health Res. 2019, 1–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Viegas, S.; Viegas, C.; Martins, C.; Assunção, R. Occupational Exposure to Mycotoxins-Different Sampling Strategies Telling a Common Story Regarding Occupational Studies Performed in Portugal (2012–2020). Toxins 2020, 12, 513. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Polizzi, V.; Delmulle, B.; Adams, A.; Moretti, A.; Susca, A.; Picco, A.M.; Rosseel, Y.; Kindt, R.; Van Bocxlaer, J.; De Kimpe, N.; et al. JEM Spotlight: Fungi, mycotoxins and microbial volatile organic compounds in mouldy interiors from water-damaged buildings. J. Environ. Monit. 2009, 11, 1849–1858. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Allermann, L.; Pejtersen, J.; Gunnarsen, L.; Poulsen, O.M. Building-related symptoms and inflammatory potency of dust from office buildings. Indoor Air 2007, 17, 458–467. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Tirkkonen, J.; Täubel, M.; Hirvonen, M.R.; Leppänen, H.; Lindsley, W.G.; Chen, B.T.; Hyvärinen, A.; Huttunen, K. Evaluation of sampling methods for toxicological testing of indoor air particulate matter. Inhal. Toxicol. 2016, 28, 500–507. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  31. Roponen, M.; Meklin, T.; Rintala, H.; Hyvärinen, A.; Hirvonen, M.R. Effect of moisture-damage intervention on the immunotoxic potential and microbial content of airborne particles and on occupants’ upper airway inflammatory responses. Indoor Air 2013, 23, 295–302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Huttunen, K.; Tirkkonen, J.; Täubel, M.; Krop, E.; Mikkonen, S.; Pekkanen, J.; Heederik, D.; Zock, J.P.; Hyvärinen, A.; Hirvonen, M.R. Inflammatory potential in relation to the microbial content of settled dust samples collected from moisture-damaged and reference schools: Results of HITEA study. Indoor Air 2016, 26, 380–390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Allermann, L.; Meyer, H.W.; Poulsen, O.M.; Nielsen, J.B.; Gyntelberg, F. Inflammatory potential of dust from schools and building related symptoms. Occup. Environ. Med. 2003, 60, E5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  34. Huttunen, K.; Rintala, H.; Hirvonen, M.R.; Vepsalainen, A.; Hyvarinen, A.; Meklin, T.; Toivola, M.; Nevalainen, A. Indoor air particles and bioaerosols before and after renovation of moisture-damaged buildings: The effect on biological activity and microbial flora. Environ. Res. 2008, 107, 291–298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Tirkkonen, J.; Täubel, M.; Leppänen, H.; Peltonen, M.; Lindsley, W.; Chen, B.T.; Hyvärinen, A.; Hirvonen, M.R.; Huttunen, K. Toxicity of airborne dust as an indicator of moisture problems in school buildings. Inhal. Toxicol. 2017, 29, 75–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Huttunen, K.; Wlodarczyk, A.J.; Tirkkonen, J.; Mikkonen, S.; Täubel, M.; Krop, E.; Jacobs, J.; Pekkanen, J.; Heederik, D.; Zock, J.P.; et al. Oxidative capacity and hemolytic activity of settled dust from moisture-damaged schools. Indoor Air 2019, 29, 299–307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Andersson, M.A.; Nikulin, M.; Koljalg, U.; Andersson, M.C.; Rainey, F.; Reijula, K.; Hintikka, E.L.; Salkinoja-Salonen, M. Bacteria, molds, and toxins in water-damaged building materials. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1997, 63, 387–393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Andersson, M.A.; Mikkola, R.; Kroppenstedt, R.M.; Rainey, F.A.; Peltola, J.; Helin, J.; Sivonen, K.; Salkinoja-Salonen, M.S. The mitochondrial toxin produced by Streptomyces griseus strains isolated from an indoor environment is valinomycin. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1998, 64, 4767–4773. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Andersson, M.A.; Mikkola, R.; Raulio, M.; Kredics, L.; Maijala, P.; Salkinoja-Salonen, M.S. Acrebol, a novel toxic peptaibol produced by an Acremonium exuviarum indoor isolate. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2009, 106, 909–923. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Kankkunen, P.; Rintahaka, J.; Aalto, A.; Leino, M.; Majuri, M.L.; Alenius, H.; Wolff, H.; Matikainen, S. Trichothecene mycotoxins activate inflammatory response in human macrophages. J. Immunol. 2009, 182, 6418–6425. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  41. Mikkola, R.; Andersson, M.A.; Kredics, L.; Grigoriev, P.A.; Sundell, N.; Salkinoja-Salonen, M.S. 20-Residue and 11-residue peptaibols from the fungus Trichoderma longibrachiatum are synergistic in forming Na+/K+ -permeable channels and adverse action towards mammalian cells. FEBS J. 2012, 279, 4172–4190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Mikkola, R.; Andersson, M.A.; Hautaniemi, M.; Salkinoja-Salonen, M.S. Toxic indole alkaloids avrainvillamide and stephacidin B produced by a biocide tolerant indoor mold Aspergillus westerdijkiae. Toxicon 2015, 99, 58–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Peltola, J.; Andersson, M.A.; Haahtela, T.; Mussalo-Rauhamaa, H.; Rainey, F.A.; Kroppenstedt, R.M.; Samson, R.A.; Salkinoja-Salonen, M.S. Toxic-metabolite-producing bacteria and fungus in an indoor environment. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2001, 67, 3269–3274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  44. Peltola, J.; Niessen, L.; Nielsen, K.F.; Jarvis, B.B.; Andersen, B.; Salkinoja-Salonen, M.; Möller, E.M. Toxigenic diversity of two different RAPD groups of Stachybotrys chartarum isolates analyzed by potential for trichothecene production and for boar sperm cell motility inhibition. Can. J. Microbiol. 2002, 48, 1017–1029. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Mikkola, R.; Andersson, M.A.; Grigoriev, P.; Heinonen, M.; Salkinoja-Salonen, M.S. The toxic mode of action of cyclic lipodepsipeptide fusaricidins, produced by Paenibacillus polymyxa, toward mammalian cells. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2017, 123, 436–449. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Salo, J.; Marik, T.; Bencsik, O.; Mikkola, R.; Kredics, L.; Szekeres, A.; Andersson, M.A.; Salonen, H.; Kurnitski, J. Screening Mold Colonies by Using Two Toxicity Assays Revealed Indoor Strains of Aspergillus calidoustus Producing Ophiobolins G and K. Toxins 2019, 11, 683. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  47. Ajao, C.; Andersson, M.A.; Teplova, V.V.; Nagy, S.; Gahmberg, C.G.; Andersson, L.C.; Hautaniemi, M.; Kakasi, B.; Roivainen, M.; Salkinoja-Salonen, M. Mitochondrial toxicity of triclosan on mammalian cells. Toxicol. Rep. 2015, 2, 624–637. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  48. Toxicities of Detergents Used in Cleaning Chemicals and Hygiene Products in a Test Battery of Ex Vivo and In Vitro Assays. Updated 2019. Available online: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/332180207_FSdetergentpaper (accessed on 12 April 2021).
  49. Hyvönen, S.; Syrjala, H. Asthma Case Cluster during Renovation of a Water-Damaged and Toxic Building. Microorganisms 2019, 7, 642. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  50. Salin, J.T.; Salkinoja-Salonen, M.; Salin, P.J.; Nelo, K.; Holma, T.; Ohtonen, P.; Syrjälä, H. Building-related symptoms are linked to the in vitro toxicity of indoor dust and airborne microbial propagules in schools: A cross-sectional study. Environ. Res. 2017, 154, 234–239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Salin, J.T.; Ohtonen, P.; Syrjälä, H. Teachers’ work-related non-literature-known building-related symptoms are also connected to indoor toxicity: A cross-sectional study. Indoor Air 2021, 31, 1533–1539. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Bencsik, O.; Papp, T.; Berta, M.; Zana, A.; Forgó, P.; Dombi, G.; Andersson, M.A.; Salkinoja-Salonen, M.; Vágvölgyi, C.; Szekeres, A. Ophiobolin A from Bipolaris oryzae perturbs motility and membrane integrities of porcine sperm and induces cell death on mammalian somatic cell lines. Toxins 2014, 6, 2857–2871. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  53. Castagnoli, E.; Salo, J.; Toivonen, M.S.; Marik, T.; Mikkola, R.; Kredics, L.; Vicente-Carrillo, A.; Nagy, S.; Andersson, M.T.; Andersson, M.A.; et al. An Evaluation of Boar Spermatozoa as a Biosensor for the Detection of Sublethal and Lethal Toxicity. Toxins 2018, 10, 463. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  54. Miller, J.D.; McMullin, D.R. Fungal secondary metabolites as harmful indoor air contaminants: 10 years on. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2014, 98, 9953–9966. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Straus, D.C. Molds, mycotoxins, and sick building syndrome. Toxicol. Ind. Health 2009, 25, 617–635. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Dong, T.; Zhang, Y.; Jia, S.; Shang, H.; Fang, W.; Chen, D.; Fang, M. Human Indoor Exposome of Chemicals in Dust and Risk Prioritization Using EPA’s ToxCast Database. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2019, 53, 7045–7054. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Zhang, J.; Hsieh, J.H.; Zhu, H. Profiling animal toxicants by automatically mining public bioassay data: A big data approach for computational toxicology. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e99863. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Mikkola, R.; Andersson, M.A.; Grigoriev, P.; Teplova, V.V.; Saris, N.E.; Rainey, F.A.; Salkinoja-Salonen, M.S. Bacillus amyloliquefaciens strains isolated from moisture-damaged buildings produced surfactin and a substance toxic to mammalian cells. Arch. Microbiol. 2004, 181, 314–323. [Google Scholar]
  59. Pieckova, E.; Wilkins, K. Airway toxicity of house dust and its fungal composition. Ann. Agric. Environ. Med. 2004, 11, 67–73. [Google Scholar]
  60. Holme, J.A.; Øya, E.; Afanou, A.K.J.; Øvrevik, J.; Eduard, W. Characterization and pro-inflammatory potential of indoor mold particles. Indoor Air 2020, 30, 662–681. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  61. Täubel, M.; Karvonen, A.M.; Reponen, T.; Hyvärinen, A.; Vesper, S.; Pekkanen, J. Application of the Environmental Relative Moldiness Index in Finland. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2015, 82, 578–584. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  62. Andersen, B.; Frisvad, J.C.; Dunn, R.R.; Thrane, U. A Pilot Study on Baseline Fungi and Moisture Indicator Fungi in Danish Homes. J. Fungi 2021, 7, 71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Vornanen-Winqvist, C.; Järvi, K.; Andersson, M.A.; Duchaine, C.; Létourneau, V.; Kedves, O.; Kredics, L.; Mikkola, R.; Kurnitski, J.; Salonen, H. Exposure to indoor air contaminants in school buildings with and without reported indoor air quality problems. Environ. Int. 2020, 141, 105781. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Andersson, M.A.; Mikkola, R.; Helin, J.; Andersson, M.C.; Salkinoja-Salonen, M. A novel sensitive bioassay for detection of Bacillus cereus emetic toxin and related depsipeptide ionophores. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1998, 64, 1338–1343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  65. Hoornstra, D.; Andersson, M.A.; Mikkola, R.; Salkinoja-Salonen, M.S. A new method for in vitro detection of microbially produced mitochondrial toxins. Toxicol. Vitr. 2003, 17, 745–751. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Vicente-Carrillo, A.; Edebert, I.; Garside, H.; Cotgreave, I.; Rigler, R.; Loitto, V.; Magnusson, K.E.; Rodríguez-Martínez, H. Boar spermatozoa successfully predict mitochondrial modes of toxicity: Implications for drug toxicity testing and the 3R principles. Toxicol. Vitr. 2015, 29, 582–591. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Teplova, V.V.; Belosludtsev, K.N.; Kruglov, A.G. Mechanism of triclosan toxicity: Mitochondrial dysfunction including complex II inhibition, superoxide release and uncoupling of oxidative phosphorylation. Toxicol. Lett 2017, 275, 108–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Dreier, D.A.; Mello, D.F.; Meyer, J.N.; Martyniuk, C.J. Linking Mitochondrial Dysfunction to Organismal and Population Health in the Context of Environmental Pollutants: Progress and Considerations for Mitochondrial Adverse Outcome Pathways. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 2019, 38, 1625–1634. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  69. Daiber, A.; Kuntic, M.; Hahad, O.; Delogu, L.G.; Rohrbach, S.; Di Lisa, F.; Schulz, R.; Münzel, T. Effects of air pollution particles (ultrafine and fine particulate matter) on mitochondrial function and oxidative stress-Implications for cardiovascular and neurodegenerative diseases. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 2020, 696, 108662. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Li, N.; Sioutas, C.; Cho, A.; Schmitz, D.; Misra, C.; Sempf, J.; Wang, M.; Oberley, T.; Froines, J.; Nel, A. Ultrafine particulate pollutants induce oxidative stress and mitochondrial damage. Environ. Health Perspect. 2003, 111, 455–460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Meyer, J.N.; Leung, M.C.; Rooney, J.P.; Sendoel, A.; Hengartner, M.O.; Kisby, G.E.; Bess, A.S. Mitochondria as a target of environmental toxicants. Toxicol. Sci. 2013, 134, 1–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  72. Zolkipli-Cunningham, Z.; Falk, M.J. Clinical effects of chemical exposures on mitochondrial function. Toxicology 2017, 391, 90–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Nunnari, J.; Suomalainen, A. Mitochondria: In sickness and in health. Cell 2012, 148, 1145–1159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  74. Mottis, A.; Herzig, S.; Auwerx, J. Mitocellular communication: Shaping health and disease. Science 2019, 366, 827–832. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Moro, L. Mitochondria at the Crossroads of Physiology and Pathology. J. Clin. Med. 2020, 9, 1971. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. West, A.P. Mitochondrial dysfunction as a trigger of innate immune responses and inflammation. Toxicology 2017, 391, 54–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  77. Cloonan, S.M.; Kim, K.; Esteves, P.; Trian, T.; Barnes, P.J. Mitochondrial dysfunction in lung ageing and disease. Eur. Respir. Rev. 2020, 29, 200165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Wiegman, C.H.; Michaeloudes, C.; Haji, G.; Narang, P.; Clarke, C.J.; Russell, K.E.; Bao, W.; Pavlidis, S.; Barnes, P.J.; Kanerva, J.; et al. COPDMAP Oxidative stress-induced mitochondrial dysfunction drives inflammation and airway smooth muscle remodeling in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2015, 136, 769–780. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  79. Gao, J.; Wang, L.; Liu, J.; Xie, F.; Su, B.; Wang, X. Abnormalities of Mitochondrial Dynamics in Neurodegenerative Diseases. Antioxidants 2017, 6, 25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  80. Caito, S.W.; Aschner, M. Mitochondrial Redox Dysfunction and Environmental Exposures. Antioxid. Redox. Signal. 2015, 23, 578–595. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Fetterman, J.L.; Sammy, M.J.; Ballinger, S.W. Mitochondrial toxicity of tobacco smoke and air pollution. Toxicology 2017, 391, 18–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Manevski, M.; Muthumalage, T.; Devadoss, D.; Sundar, I.K.; Wang, Q.; Singh, K.P.; Unwalla, H.J.; Chand, H.S.; Rahman, I. Cellular stress responses and dysfunctional Mitochondrial-cellular senescence, and therapeutics in chronic respiratory diseases. Redox. Biol. 2020, 33, 101443. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Sundar, I.K.; Maremanda, K.P.; Rahman, I. Mitochondrial dysfunction is associated with Miro1 reduction in lung epithelial cells by cigarette smoke. Toxicol. Lett. 2019, 317, 92–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Sachdeva, K.; Do, D.C.; Zhang, Y.; Hu, X.; Chen, J.; Gao, P. Environmental Exposures and Asthma Development: Autophagy, Mitophagy, and Cellular Senescence. Front. Immunol. 2019, 10, 2787. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  85. Korkalainen, M.; Täubel, M.; Naarala, J.; Kirjavainen, P.; Koistinen, A.; Hyvärinen, A.; Komulainen, H.; Viluksela, M. Synergistic proinflammatory interactions of microbial toxins and structural components characteristic to moisture-damaged buildings. Indoor Air 2017, 27, 13–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  86. van Horssen, J.; van Schaik, P.; Witte, M. Inflammation and mitochondrial dysfunction: A vicious circle in neurodegenerative disorders? Neurosci. Lett. 2019, 710, 132931. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Mazzone, S.B.; Undem, B.J. Vagal Afferent Innervation of the Airways in Health and Disease. Physiol. Rev. 2016, 96, 975–1024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  88. Viana, F. Chemosensory properties of the trigeminal system. ACS Chem. Neurosci. 2011, 2, 38–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  89. Rasimus-Sahari, S.; Mikkola, R.; Andersson, M.A.; Jestoi, M.; Salkinoja-Salonen, M. Streptomyces strains producing mitochondriotoxic antimycin A found in cereal grains. Int. J. Food. Microbiol. 2016, 218, 78–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  90. Stanford, K.R.; Hadley, S.H.; Barannikov, I.; Ajmo, J.M.; Bahia, P.K.; Taylor-Clark, T.E. Antimycin A-induced mitochondrial dysfunction activates vagal sensory neurons via ROS-dependent activation of TRPA1 and ROS-independent activation of TRPV1. Brain Res. 2019, 1715, 94–105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  91. Bahia, P.K.; Hadley, S.H.; Barannikov, I.; Sowells, I.; Kim, S.H.; Taylor-Clark, T.E. Antimycin A increases bronchopulmonary C-fiber excitability via protein kinase C alpha. Respir. Physiol. Neurobiol. 2020, 278, 103446. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Ruan, T.; Lin, Y.J.; Hsu, T.H.; Lu, S.H.; Jow, G.M.; Kou, Y.R. Sensitization by pulmonary reactive oxygen species of rat vagal lung C-fibers: The roles of the TRPV1, TRPA1, and P2X receptors. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e91763. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Lehmann, R.; Schöbel, N.; Hatt, H.; van Thriel, C. The involvement of TRP channels in sensory irritation: A mechanistic approach toward a better understanding of the biological effects of local irritants. Arch. Toxicol. 2016, 90, 1399–1413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Silverman, H.A.; Chen, A.; Kravatz, N.L.; Chavan, S.S.; Chang, E.H. Involvement of Neural Transient Receptor Potential Channels in Peripheral Inflammation. Front. Immunol. 2020, 11, 590261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  95. Green, D.P.; Limjunyawong, N.; Gour, N.; Pundir, P.; Dong, X. A Mast-Cell-Specific Receptor Mediates Neurogenic Inflammation and Pain. Neuron 2019, 101, 412–420.e3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  96. Kabata, H.; Artis, D. Neuro-immune crosstalk and allergic inflammation. J. Clin. Investig. 2019, 129, 1475–1482. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  97. Thapaliya, M.; Chompunud Na Ayudhya, C.; Amponnawarat, A.; Roy, S.; Ali, H. Mast Cell-Specific MRGPRX2: A Key Modulator of Neuro-Immune Interaction in Allergic Diseases. Curr. Allergy Asthma Rep. 2021, 21, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Shouman, K.; Benarroch, E.E. Peripheral neuroimmune interactions: Selected review and some clinical implications. Clin. Auton. Res. 2021, 31, 477–489. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  99. Bessac, B.F.; Jordt, S.E. Breathtaking TRP channels: TRPA1 and TRPV1 in airway chemosensation and reflex control. Physiology 2008, 23, 360–370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Tillie-Leblond, I.; Montani, D.; Crestani, B.; de Blic, J.; Humbert, M.; Tunon-de-Lara, M.; Magnan, A.; Roche, N.; Ostinelli, J.; Chanez, P. Relation between inflammation and symptoms in asthma. Allergy 2009, 64, 354–367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  101. Jaramillo, A.M.; Azzegagh, Z.; Tuvim, M.J.; Dickey, B.F. Airway Mucin Secretion. Ann. Am. Thorac. Soc. 2018, 15, S164–S170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  102. Taylor-Clark, T.E. Role of reactive oxygen species and TRP channels in the cough reflex. Cell Calcium 2016, 60, 155–162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  103. Taylor-Clark, T.E.; Undem, B.J. Sensing pulmonary oxidative stress by lung vagal afferents. Respir. Physiol. Neurobiol. 2011, 178, 406–413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  104. Oetjen, L.K.; Mack, M.R.; Feng, J.; Whelan, T.M.; Niu, H.; Guo, C.J.; Chen, S.; Trier, A.M.; Xu, A.Z.; Tripathi, S.V.; et al. Sensory Neurons Co-opt Classical Immune Signaling Pathways to Mediate Chronic Itch. Cell 2017, 171, 217–228.e13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  105. Diver, S.; Russell, R.J.; Brightling, C.E. Cough and Eosinophilia. J. Allergy. Clin. Immunol. Pract. 2019, 7, 1740–1747. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  106. Chung, K.F. Approach to chronic cough: The neuropathic basis for cough hypersensitivity syndrome. J. Thorac. Dis. 2014, 6, S699–S707. [Google Scholar]
  107. Pecova, T.; Kocan, I.; Vysehradsky, R.; Pecova, R. Itch and Cough-Similar Role of Sensory Nerves in Their Pathogenesis. Physiol. Res. 2020, 69, S43–S54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Smeitink, J.; Koene, S.; Beyrath, J.; Saris, C.; Turnbull, D.; Janssen, M. Mitochondrial Migraine: Disentangling the angiopathy paradigm in m.3243A>G patients. JIMD Rep. 2019, 46, 52–62. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  109. Conti, P.; D’Ovidio, C.; Conti, C.; Gallenga, C.E.; Lauritano, D.; Caraffa, A.; Kritas, S.K.; Ronconi, G. Progression in migraine: Role of mast cells and pro-inflammatory and anti-inflammatory cytokines. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 2019, 844, 87–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  110. Gross, E.C.; Lisicki, M.; Fischer, D.; Sándor, P.S.; Schoenen, J. The metabolic face of migraine-from pathophysiology to treatment. Nat. Rev. Neurol. 2019, 15, 627–643. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  111. Dux, M.; Rosta, J.; Messlinger, K. TRP Channels in the Focus of Trigeminal Nociceptor Sensitization Contributing to Primary Headaches. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  112. Renner, B.; Mueller, C.A.; Shephard, A. Environmental and non-infectious factors in the aetiology of pharyngitis (sore throat). Inflamm. Res. 2012, 61, 1041–1052. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  113. Sundar, K.M.; Stark, A.C.; Hu, N.; Barkmeier-Kraemer, J. Is laryngeal hypersensitivity the basis of unexplained or refractory chronic cough? ERJ Open Res. 2021, 7, 00793–02020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Wang, W.; Xian, M.; Xie, Y.; Zheng, J.; Li, J. Aggravation of airway inflammation and hyper-responsiveness following nasal challenge with Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus in perennial allergic rhinitis without symptoms of asthma. Allergy 2016, 71, 378–386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  115. Eifan, A.O.; Durham, S.R. Pathogenesis of rhinitis. Clin. Exp. Allergy 2016, 46, 1139–1151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  116. Yang, Z.; Liang, C.; Wang, T.; Zou, Q.; Zhou, M.; Cheng, Y.; Peng, H.; Ji, Z.; Deng, Y.; Liao, J.; et al. NLRP3 inflammasome activation promotes the development of allergic rhinitis via epithelium pyroptosis. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2020, 522, 61–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  117. Järvenpää, P.; Arkkila, P.; Aaltonen, L.M. Globus pharyngeus: A review of etiology, diagnostics, and treatment. Eur. Arch. Otorhinolaryngol. 2018, 275, 1945–1953. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  118. Beuerman, R.W.; Stern, M.E. Neurogenic inflammation: A first line of defense for the ocular surface. Ocul. Surf. 2005, 3, S203–S206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Ryder, E.C.; Benson, S. Conjunctivitis; StatPearls Publishing LLC: Treasure Island, FL, USA, 2021; pp. 1–4. [Google Scholar]
  120. Ranjbaran, Z.; Keefer, L.; Stepanski, E.; Farhadi, A.; Keshavarzian, A. The relevance of sleep abnormalities to chronic inflammatory conditions. Inflamm. Res. 2007, 56, 51–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  121. Besedovsky, L.; Lange, T.; Haack, M. The Sleep-Immune Crosstalk in Health and Disease. Physiol. Rev. 2019, 99, 1325–1380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  122. Brunetti, V.; Della Marca, G.; Servidei, S.; Primiano, G. Sleep Disorders in Mitochondrial Diseases. Curr. Neurol. Neurosci. Rep. 2021, 21, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  123. Gohy, S.T.; Hupin, C.; Pilette, C.; Ladjemi, M.Z. Chronic inflammatory airway diseases: The central role of the epithelium revisited. Clin. Exp. Allergy 2016, 46, 529–542. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  124. Pieckova, E.; Jesenska, Z. Molds on house walls and the effect of their chloroform-extractable metabolites on the respiratory cilia movement of one-day-old chicks in vitro. Folia Microbiol. 1998, 43, 672–678. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  125. Pieckova, E.; Kunova, Z. Indoor fungi and their ciliostatic metabolites. Ann. Agric. Environ. Med. 2002, 9, 59–63. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  126. Mack, S.M.; Madl, A.K.; Pinkerton, K.E. Respiratory Health Effects of Exposure to Ambient Particulate Matter and Bioaerosols. Compr. Physiol. 2019, 10, 1–20. [Google Scholar]
  127. Lochhead, J.J.; Thorne, R.G. Intranasal delivery of biologics to the central nervous system. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 2012, 64, 614–628. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  128. Rojo, A.I.; Montero, C.; Salazar, M.; Close, R.M.; Fernández-Ruiz, J.; Sánchez-González, M.A.; de Sagarra, M.R.; Jackson-Lewis, V.; Cavada, C.; Cuadrado, A. Persistent penetration of MPTP through the nasal route induces Parkinson’s disease in mice. Eur. J. Neurosci. 2006, 24, 1874–1884. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  129. Miller, M.R.; Raftis, J.B.; Langrish, J.P.; McLean, S.G.; Samutrtai, P.; Connell, S.P.; Wilson, S.; Vesey, A.T.; Fokkens, P.H.B.; Boere, A.J.F.; et al. Inhaled Nanoparticles Accumulate at Sites of Vascular Disease. ACS Nano 2017, 11, 4542–4552. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  130. Baral, P.; Udit, S.; Chiu, I.M. Pain and immunity: Implications for host defence. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2019, 19, 433–447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  131. Sotnichenko, A.; Pantsov, E.; Shinkarev, D.; Okhanov, V. Hydrophobized Reversed-Phase Adsorbent for Protection of Dairy Cattle against Lipophilic Toxins from Diet. Efficiensy in Vitro and in Vivo. Toxins 2019, 11, 256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Pathogens 10 01360 g001 550
Figure 1. Diversity of the major toxigenic fungal genera obtained on fallout plates from the 15 schools. Panels (A) (arrow), (B,C) in the upper row show the dominant colony types on malt extract agar incubated for 4–6 weeks at 21 °C. The middle row: Panels (D–F) show the conidia of the colonies pictured using a phase contrast microscope. The lower row shows the mycoparasitic growth characteristic for representatives of the genus Trichoderma. Panel (G) shows lately germinated young hyphae (arrow) after 1 week of incubation. Panel (H) shows hyphae covering cogrowing fungi producing new green conidia (arrow). Panel (I) shows a 5-week-old plate completely covered by green conidia of Trichoderma. Representatives of mycoparasitic members of the genus Trichoderma covered 19% of the plates collected, and represented the dominant characteristic fungal genus.
Figure 1. Diversity of the major toxigenic fungal genera obtained on fallout plates from the 15 schools. Panels (A) (arrow), (B,C) in the upper row show the dominant colony types on malt extract agar incubated for 4–6 weeks at 21 °C. The middle row: Panels (D–F) show the conidia of the colonies pictured using a phase contrast microscope. The lower row shows the mycoparasitic growth characteristic for representatives of the genus Trichoderma. Panel (G) shows lately germinated young hyphae (arrow) after 1 week of incubation. Panel (H) shows hyphae covering cogrowing fungi producing new green conidia (arrow). Panel (I) shows a 5-week-old plate completely covered by green conidia of Trichoderma. Representatives of mycoparasitic members of the genus Trichoderma covered 19% of the plates collected, and represented the dominant characteristic fungal genus.
Pathogens 10 01360 g001
Pathogens 10 01360 g002 550
Figure 2. Hypothetical model of pathophysiological processes triggered by sperm-toxic dusts and microbes. The work-related symptoms are probably due to activation of described mechanisms and their interactions. Abbreviations: TRP—transient receptor potential channels; LTs—leukotrienes; PGs—prostaglandins; NFAs—nitrated fatty acids; ILs—interleukins, IL-1β—interleukin 1beta; TNFα—tumor necrosis factor alpha; SP—substance P; NKA—neurokinin A; CGRP—calcitonin gene-related peptides; VIP—vasoactive intestinal peptide; mtROS—mitochondria-derived reactive oxygen species; P2X—purinergic 2X receptor; mtDAMPs—mitochondrial damage-associated molecular patterns.
Figure 2. Hypothetical model of pathophysiological processes triggered by sperm-toxic dusts and microbes. The work-related symptoms are probably due to activation of described mechanisms and their interactions. Abbreviations: TRP—transient receptor potential channels; LTs—leukotrienes; PGs—prostaglandins; NFAs—nitrated fatty acids; ILs—interleukins, IL-1β—interleukin 1beta; TNFα—tumor necrosis factor alpha; SP—substance P; NKA—neurokinin A; CGRP—calcitonin gene-related peptides; VIP—vasoactive intestinal peptide; mtROS—mitochondria-derived reactive oxygen species; P2X—purinergic 2X receptor; mtDAMPs—mitochondrial damage-associated molecular patterns.
Pathogens 10 01360 g002
Pathogens 10 01360 g003 550
Figure 3. Estimation of sperm motility. Phase contrast micrographs visualizing different amplitudes of tail beating in boar sperm. The vehicle-exposed sperm cells in Panel (A) express high amplitude tail beating visible to the human eye as an artefact consisting of two tails. The angle between the tails is >40° and the majority of the sperm cells exhibit rapid and progressive motility. Panel (B) shows sperm cells with low amplitude tail beating, the angle between two tails is less than 20° and the swimming speed/the number of rapidly swimming sperm cells is reduced by 50% compared to the cells in Panel (A). Panel (C) shows the immobilized sperm cells of the positive control. In this panel, only a few sperm cells moved at all and no sperm cells with two tails were visible.
Figure 3. Estimation of sperm motility. Phase contrast micrographs visualizing different amplitudes of tail beating in boar sperm. The vehicle-exposed sperm cells in Panel (A) express high amplitude tail beating visible to the human eye as an artefact consisting of two tails. The angle between the tails is >40° and the majority of the sperm cells exhibit rapid and progressive motility. Panel (B) shows sperm cells with low amplitude tail beating, the angle between two tails is less than 20° and the swimming speed/the number of rapidly swimming sperm cells is reduced by 50% compared to the cells in Panel (A). Panel (C) shows the immobilized sperm cells of the positive control. In this panel, only a few sperm cells moved at all and no sperm cells with two tails were visible.
Pathogens 10 01360 g003
Table
Table 1. Number of total and work-related symptoms in 231 teachers.
Table 1. Number of total and work-related symptoms in 231 teachers.
Total,
N (%)		Work-Related,
N (%)		Literature-Known BRS,
Yes or No
GENERAL SYMPTOMS
Fatigue88 (38.1)65 (28.1)yes
Headache92 (39.8)46 (20.0)yes
Fever13 (5.6)8 (3.5)yes
Chills31 (13.4)19 (8.2)yes
Generalized feeling of sickness60 (26.0)46 (20.0)no
Decreased physical condition54 (23.4)27 (11.7)no
Indefinite feeling of thermoregulation failure27 (11.7)19 (8.2)no
RESPIRATORY SYMPTOMS
Nose stuffiness106 (45.9)64 (27.7)yes
Nose dryness84 (36.4)52 (22.5)yes
Nose stinging22 (9.5)7 (3.0)yes
Bloody nasal discharge30 (13.0)16 (6.9)yes
Runny nose74 (32.0)37 (16.0)yes
Sneezing66 (28.6)39 (16.9)yes
Mouth dryness48 (20.8)30 (13.0)yes
Hoarseness88 (38.1)62 (26.8)yes
Sore throat42 (18.2)27 (11.7)yes
Wheezing15 (6.5)4 (1.7)yes
Shortness of breath21 (9.1)12 (5.2)yes
Asthma attacks12 (5.2)5 (2.2)yes
Dry cough53 (22.9)40 (17.3)yes
Pressure in the cheek42 (18.2)22 (9.5)no
Globus sensation31 (13.4)19 (8.2)no
Throat mucus70 (30.3)50 (21.6)no
Throat itching49 (21.2)35 (15.2)no
DERMAL SYMPTOMS
Skin dryness58 (25.1)20 (8.7)yes
Exanthema13 (5.6)3 (1.3)yes
Pruritus32 (13.9)12 (5.2)yes
EYE SYMPTOMS
Eye irritation61 (26.4)39 (16.9)yes
Wet eyes30 (13.0)15 (6.5)yes
Dry eyes67 (29.0)45 (19.5)yes
Swollen eyelids19 (8.2)9 (3.9)yes
Red eyes32 (13.9)18 (7.8)no
Eye discharge24 (10.4)14 (6.1)no
HEARING SYMPTOMS
Difficulty distinguishing speech in noise51 (22.1)27 (11.7)no
Hypersensitivity to sound28 (12.1)14 (6.1)no
SLEEPING SYMPTOMS
Insomnia41 (17.7)25 (10.8)yes
Difficulty falling asleep42 (18.2)21 (9.1)yes
Increased need for sleep34 (14.7)18 (7.8)no
MENTAL SYMPTOMS
Difficulty concentrating12 (5.2)4 (1.7)yes
Mental irritability29 (12.6)22 (9.5)no
Decreased stress resistance26 (11.3)18 (7.8)no
BUILDING-RELATED DISEASES
Asthma22 (9.5)ayes
Allergic rhinitis32 (13.9)ayes
Modified from [51]. a A disease diagnosed by a physician, association with work was not studied. BRS, building-related symptoms.
Table
Table 2. Results of the multivariable adjusted logistic regression models for the impact of increased toxicity levels of wiped dust in the classroom on work-related symptoms.
Table 2. Results of the multivariable adjusted logistic regression models for the impact of increased toxicity levels of wiped dust in the classroom on work-related symptoms.
EC50 12 µg mL−1 EC50 ≤ 6 µg mL−1
OR (95% CI)p ValueOR (95% CI)p Value
GENERAL SYMPTOMS
Fatigue1.08 (0.46,2.53)0.863.00 (0.96,9.36)0.058
Headache1.04 (0.41,2.65)>0.901.79 (0.49,6.57)0.38
Fever3.75 (0.63,22.2)0.152.59 (0.23,29.4)0.44
Chills1.50 (0.41,5.56)0.541.22 (0.13,11.2)0.86
Generalized feeling of sickness1.11 (0.42,2.94)0.843.28 (1.00,10.8)0.050
Decreased physical condition1.08 (0.31,3.72)0.903.85 (0.99,15.0)0.052
Indefinite feeling of thermoregulation failure0.66 (0.13,3.30)0.612.96 (0.65,13.4)0.16
RESPIRATORY SYMPTOMS
Nose stuffiness1.78 (0.76,4.15)0.184.08 (1.24,13.4)0.021
Nose dryness1.65 (0.69,3.91)0.260.97 (0.24,4.01)>0.90
Nose stinging0.67 (0.07,6.37)0.731.67 (0.17,16.8)0.66
Bloody nasal discharge3.33 (0.73,15.2)0.122.22 (0.21,23.0)0.51
Runny nose4.24 (1.49,12.1)0.00706.93 (1.76,27.2)0.0056
Sneezing1.17 (0.43,3.18)0.762.07 (0.55,7.75)0.28
Mouth dryness1.99 (0.63,6.33)0.242.29 (0.49,10.5)0.29
Hoarseness3.38 (1.47,7.75)0.00416.42 (1.95,21.1)0.0022
Sore throat0.92 (0.17,4.95)>0.903.80 (0.72,19.9)0.12
Wheezing4.43 (0.21,95.2)0.347.56 (0.27,209)0.23
Shortness of breath3.69 (0.76,17.9)0.1012.2 (1.95,76.8)0.0076
Asthma attacks7.07 (0.55,91.3)0.1314.8 (1.00,219)0.050
Dry cough2.14 (0.81,5.70)0.134.65 (1.29,16.8)0.019
Pressure in the cheek0.36 (0.04,3.17)0.362.76 (0.46,16.6)0.27
Globus sensation1.34 (0.23,7.72)0.749.02 (1.74,46.7)0.0088
Throat mucus2.46 (0.99,6.14)0.0537.64 (2.21,26.4)0.0013
Throat itching2.19 (0.71,6.75)0.174.35 (1.08,17.6)0.039
DERMAL SYMPTOMS
Skin dryness0.66 (0.17,2.50)0.540.65 (0.07,5.55)0.69
Exanthema3.45 (0.15,78.0)0.4414.78 (0.36,606)0.16
Pruritus0.63 (0.06,6.29)0.692.24 (0.19,26.2)0.52
EYE SYMPTOMS
Eye irritation0.93 (0.30,2.90)>0.903.58 (0.89,14.4)0.072
Wet eyes4.06 (0.65,25.3)0.1312.7 (1.44,112)0.022
Dry eyes0.86 (0.31,2.40)0.781.94 (0.52,7.28)0.32
Swollen eyelids0.65 (0.07,6.28)0.712.29 (0.21,25.5)0.50
Red eyes0.26 (0.03,2.46)0.242.34 (0.17,31.4)0.52
Eye discharge0.80 (0.08,8.25)0.857.69 (0.96,61.4)0.054
HEARING SYMPTOMS
Difficulty distinguishing speech in noise0.14 (0.02,1.16)0.0692.10 (0.45,9.69)0.34
Hypersensitivity to soundN.D. 7.91 (1.70,36.8)0.0084
SLEEPING SYMPTOMS
Insomnia1.00 (0.32,3.11)>0.902.57 (0.59,11.2)0.21
Difficulty falling asleep1.14 (0.32,4.02)0.847.58 (1.93,29.8)0.0038
Increased need for sleep0.22 (0.03,1.76)0.157.74 (2.09,28.6)0.0022
MENTAL SYMPTOMS
Difficulty concentratingN.D. 17.8 (0.64,496)0.090
Mental irritability0.91 (0.27,3.10)0.882.53 (0.58,11.0)0.22
Decreased stress resistance1.42 (0.39,5.18)0.603.33 (0.75,14.8)0.11
BUILDING-RELATED DISEASES
Asthma2.13 (0.59,7.76)0.251.44 (0.22,9.51)0.70
Allergic rhinitis1.07 (0.33,3.44)0.904.64 (1.08,20.0)0.039
The results are presented as odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). ORs are adjusted for age, gender, smoking, and atopy. P values are for comparisons between teachers with toxic and non-toxic classroom samples. The half maximal effective concentration (EC50) indicates the degree of toxicity (ie, the lower the EC50, the higher the toxicity). N.D., not definable.
Table
Table 3. Results of the multivariable adjusted logistic regression models for the impact of toxicity of airborne microbes in the classroom on work-related symptoms.
Table 3. Results of the multivariable adjusted logistic regression models for the impact of toxicity of airborne microbes in the classroom on work-related symptoms.
EC50 ≤ 12 µg mL−1
OR (95% CI)p Value
GENERAL SYMPTOMS
Fatigue1.63 (0.85,3.12)0.14
Headache2.26 (1.06,4.79)0.034
Fever2.80 (0.42,18.6)0.29
Chills0.94 (0.31,2.85)>0.90
Generalized feeling of sickness1.81 (0.85,3.85)0.12
Decreased physical condition1.47 (0.59,3.64)0.40
Indefinite feeling of thermoregulation failure2.02 (0.68,5.96)0.20
RESPIRATORY SYMPTOMS
Nose stuffiness2.19 (1.10,4.38)0.026
Nose dryness2.17 (1.05,4.52)0.038
Nose stinging aN.D.
Bloody nasal discharge2.34 (0.68,8.04)0.18
Runny nose2.07 (0.92,4.66)0.79
Sneezing1.50 (0.67,3.39)0.33
Mouth dryness2.76 (1.13,6.71)0.026
Hoarseness2.18 (1.12,4.26)0.022
Sore throat2.81 (1.08,7.31)0.034
Wheezing aN.D.
Shortness of breath4.79 (0.89,25.7)0.067
Asthma attacks1.67 (0.11,24.5)0.71
Dry cough1.10 (0.50,2.44)0.81
Pressure in the cheek2.60 (0.89,7.59)0.079
Globus sensation2.32 (0.76,7.05)0.14
Throat mucus2.28 (1.09,4.74)0.028
Throat itching2.22 (0.93,5.31)0.073
DERMAL SYMPTOMS
Skin dryness3.02 (0.97,9.44)0.057
Exanthema aN.D.
Pruritus0.90 (0.22,3.76)0.89
EYE SYMPTOMS
Eye irritation2.07 (0.94,4.56)0.073
Wet eyes2.97 (0.90,9.76)0.073
Dry eyes1.73 (0.84,3.57)0.14
Swollen eyelids2.23 (0.49,10.1)0.30
Red eyes2.70 (0.91,7.99)0.072
Eye discharge10.2 (2.03,50.9)0.0048
HEARING SYMPTOMS
Difficulty distinguishing speech in noise1.52 (0.64,3.65)0.34
Hypersensitivity to sound0.72 (0.20,2.56)0.61
SLEEPING SYMPTOMS
Insomnia1.85 (0.70,4.91)0.22
Difficulty falling asleep2.54 (0.87,7.46)0.089
Increased need for sleep3.54 (1.03,12.2)0.045
MENTAL SYMPTOMS
Difficulty concentrating1.68 (0.19,14.6)0.64
Mental irritability1.10 (0.37,3.26)0.87
Decreased stress resistance0.98 (0.31,3.06)>0.90
BUILDING-RELATED DISEASES
Asthma1.28 (0.43,3.77)0.66
Allergic rhinitis1.59 (0.63,4.03)0.33
The results are presented as odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). ORs are adjusted for age, gender, smoking, and atopy. P values are for comparisons between teachers with toxic and non-toxic classroom samples. The half maximal effective concentration (EC50) indicates the degree of toxicity (ie, the lower the EC50, the higher the toxicity). N.D., not definable. a These symptoms were not reported by teachers in the group of non-toxic microbes, so OR could not be calculated.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Salin, J.; Ohtonen, P.; Andersson, M.A.; Syrjälä, H. The Toxicity of Wiped Dust and Airborne Microbes in Individual Classrooms Increase the Risk of Teachers’ Work-Related Symptoms: A Cross-Sectional Study. Pathogens 2021, 10, 1360. https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens10111360

AMA Style

Salin J, Ohtonen P, Andersson MA, Syrjälä H. The Toxicity of Wiped Dust and Airborne Microbes in Individual Classrooms Increase the Risk of Teachers’ Work-Related Symptoms: A Cross-Sectional Study. Pathogens. 2021; 10(11):1360. https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens10111360

Chicago/Turabian Style

Salin, Janne, Pasi Ohtonen, Maria A. Andersson, and Hannu Syrjälä. 2021. "The Toxicity of Wiped Dust and Airborne Microbes in Individual Classrooms Increase the Risk of Teachers’ Work-Related Symptoms: A Cross-Sectional Study" Pathogens 10, no. 11: 1360. https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens10111360

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop