Cooling and Lubrication Performance Analysis in Ultrasonic Vibration-Assisted Grinding by Heat Pipe Grinding Wheel

Abstract

Due to low thermal conductivity and high specific strength, nickel-based superalloys are prone to service performance degradation caused by thermal damage during traditional high-efficiency grinding processes. Although the heat pipe grinding wheel with minimum quantity lubrication (HPGW-MQL) technology can reduce the probability of thermal damage to a certain extent, further breakthroughs are still needed. Therefore, this study proposes a new integrated process of ultrasonic vibration-assisted grinding by heat pipe grinding wheel with minimum quantity lubrication (UVAG-HPGW-MQL), aiming to balance the requirements of green grinding and the optimization of grinding performance for nickel-based superalloys. However, the mechanism of action of ultrasonic vibration on the cooling and lubrication performance of the proposed process remains unclear. Given that, comparative experiments between UVAG-HPGW-MQL and HPGW-MQL were conducted, focusing on exploring the influence of ultrasonic vibration on their cooling and lubrication performance. The experimental results, obtained when the grinding speed, workpiece feed rate, and grinding depth were set at 15–35 m/s, 40–120 mm/min, and 0.05–0.25 mm, respectively, indicate that, compared with HPGW-MQL, ultrasonic vibration causes periodic “contact-separation” between grains and workpiece. This dynamic process shortens the contact length between grains and workpiece, leading to maximum reductions of 43.85%, 22.15%, 34.16%, and 30.77% in grinding force, grinding force ratio, grinding temperature, and specific grinding energy, respectively. On the other hand, the ultrasonic cavitation effect causes atomization of the lubricating oil film adsorbed on the workpiece surface, leading to a decrease in lubrication performance and resulting in a maximum increase of 27.27% in the friction coefficient. This study provides new theoretical support and technical approaches for the green grinding of nickel-based superalloys.

1. Introduction

Owing to their excellent comprehensive properties such as high strength and toughness, oxidation resistance, and thermal fatigue resistance, nickel-based superalloys have become one of the indispensable core materials for key hot-end components of high-end equipment such as aero-engine turbine blades and combustion chambers [1,2,3]. As the final process for component forming, grinding quality directly affects the service life and reliability of components [4]. However, while nickel-based superalloys possess the aforementioned excellent properties, their material characteristics such as low thermal conductivity and high specific strength lead to the easy generation and accumulation of a large amount of heat in grinding zone during process, which tends to cause irreversible thermal damages such as grinding burn and thermal crack initiation, seriously reducing surface integrity and dimensional accuracy [5,6,7,8].

In order to reduce grinding temperature and conform to the development trend of modern green grinding, the rotating heat pipe cooling technology is applied to the grinding wheel metal matrix [9,10]. The cyclic phase change in working fluid can significantly improve grinding wheel heat transfer performance, thereby enhancing heat transfer in the grinding zone [11,12]. A developed heat pipe grinding wheel (HPGW) can effectively conduct grinding heat without using cooling fluid and has now become one of the effective solutions for cooling the grinding zone [13,14,15,16]. However, grinding heat is essentially generated from elastic deformation, plastic deformation, and frictional work between grains and the workpiece. HPGW does not change the interaction mode between grains and the workpiece; therefore, it can only efficiently conduct the generated grinding heat rather than interfering with the generation process of grinding heat from the source.

To reduce the generation of grinding heat, researchers have developed a new green minimum quantity lubrication (MQL) cooling technology [17,18,19,20]. This technology mixes and atomizes an extremely small amount of cooling fluid (10–100 mL/h) with high-pressure air to form micron-sized droplets (5–50 μm) that are sprayed onto the machining interface, enabling the formation of a stable lubricating oil film in the grain-workpiece contact zone [21,22]. Theoretical studies have shown that the core friction-reducing mechanism of MQL at the grinding interface lies in its excellent lubrication performance brought by the lubricating oil film, which can effectively reduce the friction coefficient [23,24]. Zhang et al. [25] conducted a comparative study on the machining of Ti-6Al-4V titanium alloy and found that, compared with the dry grinding process, the adoption of MQL technology can reduce the friction coefficient, thereby decreasing frictional heat generation. Zhao et al. [26] revealed in the machining of Fiber-reinforced resin matrix composites (FRP) that the excellent lubrication performance of MQL can significantly reduce the friction force and grinding force ratio during grinding, and reduce fiber wear. Li et al. [27] further confirmed that the lubricating oil film generated under MQL can not only effectively inhibit the temperature rise in the grinding zone but also greatly improve workpiece surface quality. The above studies indicate that MQL technology has significant advantages in reducing friction and lubrication, temperature control, and improving surface integrity.

Therefore, HPGW-MQL, which combines HPGW and MQL, has a dual advantage: on the one hand, it relies on the lubrication and cooling of MQL to reduce grinding heat generation from the source; on the other hand, it relies on the excellent heat transfer performance of HPGW to effectively conduct the generated grinding heat. However, although MQL has shown good lubrication and cooling effects in the field of precision grinding with small cutting depths, HPGW is generally applicable to large cutting depth application scenarios under creep feed deep grinding processes. In such scenarios, the contact length of the grinding zone is long and relatively closed, and the instantaneous heat generation density is high. Therefore, relying solely on the oil mist lubrication and cooling of MQL is prone to local heat accumulation in the grinding zone due to problems such as insufficient oil mist penetration depth.

As a special energy field-assisted machining technology, ultrasonic vibration promotes periodic “contact-separation” between grains and workpiece by exciting high-frequency micro-amplitude vibration between the tool and the workpiece, and it has now become one of the key technologies to solve the grinding bottlenecks of difficult-to-machine materials (superalloys, titanium alloys, ceramics, composites, etc.) [28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35]. Wu et al. [36] studied the influence of grinding parameters on grinding force and surface roughness of C_f/SiC composites in traditional grinding (CG) and ultrasonic vibration-assisted grinding (UVAG). The study found that, compared with CG, UVAG is a more effective and accurate material processing method, which reduces grinding force and improves workpiece surface machining quality. Huang et al. [37] compared the grinding temperatures of hardened steel under CG and UVAG. The experimental results showed that ultrasonic vibration improved the heat transfer capacity of cooling fluid in the grinding zone, reducing grinding temperature by 19.01%. Zhao et al. [38] established thermal models and finite element simulation models of γ-TiAl material under two working conditions, high-efficiency deep grinding and ultrasonic vibration-assisted high-efficiency deep grinding, and conducted comparative grinding experiments. The experimental results showed that the introduction of ultrasonic vibration effectively inhibited grinding burn, and the prediction error with the simulation model was within 15%. Tawakoli et al. [39] applied ultrasonic vibration to the dry grinding experiment of 100Cr6 steel and found that the intermittent grinding method reduced contact length between the grinding wheel and workpiece, thereby reducing the grinding force, friction effect, and plastic deformation zone and further reducing grinding temperature. The above studies indicate that UVAG can also reduce grinding heat generation from the source due to its unique machining method.

To further reduce grinding heat generation, researchers have attempted to combine UVAG and MQL [40,41]. Molaie et al. [42] observed that UVAG and MQL have complementary mechanisms of action, and their combined use can significantly reduce grinding force and improve surface roughness. Das et al. [43,44] introduced ultrasonic vibration into MQL and found that the periodic separation characteristic between grains and workpiece enables the lubricating medium to effectively penetrate into the grinding zone, thereby enhancing lubrication performance. Rabiei et al. [45] compared the friction coefficient and grinding temperature under three grinding conditions (MQL, UVAG, and UVAG-MQL) through experiments and found that the values were the lowest under the UVAG-MQL composite condition. Gao et al. [46,47] established a grinding force model for UVAG-MQL grinding of carbon fiber reinforced polymer (CFRP) and verified that the model has acceptable estimation errors. In addition, experiments showed that ultrasonic vibration helps to reduce the stable aspect ratio of MQL oil mist droplets and increase their spreading speed, improving the cooling and lubrication effects. Collectively, these studies confirm that the integration of UVAG and MQL achieves synergistic optimization of grinding performance—ultrasonic vibration enhances the accessibility and effectiveness of MQL, while MQL supplements UVAG’s heat reduction effect, jointly reducing key indicators such as grinding force, temperature, and friction coefficient, and improving surface quality.

In summary, to further improve the grinding performance of nickel-based superalloys by heat pipe grinding wheel with minimum quantity lubrication, this study proposes and deeply explores a new process of ultrasonic vibration-assisted grinding by heat pipe grinding wheel with minimum quantity lubrication (UVAG-HPGW-MQL). Through comparative grinding experiments, the variation laws of grinding force, grinding force ratio, grinding temperature, specific grinding energy, and lubrication performance under two grinding conditions (UVAG-HPGW-MQL and HPGW-MQL) will be systematically analyzed. This study innovatively integrates UVAG, HPGW, and MQL into a unified process for Inconel 718 grinding, revealing the dual effect of ultrasonic vibration on cooling and lubrication balance, as well as the advantages and prospects of this process in green grinding of nickel-based high-temperature alloys.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Experimental Equipment

Figure 1 shows the setup of grinding experimental platform. An ultrasonic vibration-assisted grinding device for workpieces was installed on the workbench of a Profimat MT-408 surface grinder (Blohm Jung Co., Ltd., Hamburg, Germany), with the following main technical parameters: maximum spindle power of 45 kW; maximum grinding wheel speed of 8000 r/min; maximum allowable grinding wheel diameter of 400 mm. The workpiece material was Inconel 718, a typical nickel-based superalloy used in aero-engines, with dimensions (length × width × height) of 30 mm × 12 mm × 10 mm.

Table 1. Chemical composition of Inconel 718 [49].

Chemical Element	Proportion/(wt. %)
Ni	53.4
Cr	18.8
Nb	5.27
Mo	2.99
Ti	1.02
Al	0.50
Co	0.17
Si	0.12
Mn	0.07
Cu	0.07
C	0.03
P	0.01
Fe	Remainder

lists the chemical composition of Inconel 718. The grinding tool used was a heat pipe grinding wheel modified from a single-layer electroplated CBN grinding wheel matrix, with dimensions (outer diameter × thickness × inner diameter) of Φ350 mm × 35 mm × Φ127 mm, the grains size of 80/100#, and 100 mL of anhydrous ethanol was injected into the annular tube cavity as the cyclic phase change working fluid. The MQL system adopted an external oil supply device (model: MIDORI FS, Bluebe Environmental Protection Technology Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China), using dual nozzles to spray lubricating oil, with a flow rate of 50 mL/h per nozzle and an input air pressure of 0.6 MPa. The sprayed lubricating oil was prepared by mixing soybean oil and castor oil at a ratio of 1:1, with 0.2% (by volume) of antioxidant vitamin E oil added to prevent the failure of the mixed lubricating oil [48]. According to the application position of ultrasonic vibration, ultrasonic vibration-assisted grinding can be divided into tool ultrasonic vibration and workpiece ultrasonic vibration. This study adopted workpiece ultrasonic vibration, whose working principle is as follows: the power supply outputs a high-frequency electrical signal to the transducer; the piezoelectric ceramics in the transducer convert the electrical signal into mechanical vibration using the piezoelectric effect; the amplitude is amplified by the amplitude transformer and transmitted to the workpiece fixedly installed on the porous platform. The experiment controlled the addition of ultrasonic vibration by turning the power switch on or off, with a resonant frequency of 19.4 kHz, a fixed amplitude of 3 μm, and the vibration direction along the feed direction (tangential). The creep feed deep grinding process and the up-grinding mode (opposite directions of grinding wheel rotation and workpiece feed) were adopted. Each set of grinding parameters was repeated 3 times to ensure the authenticity and reliability of the data. The specific parameters and conditions of grinding experiment are shown in

Table 2. Specific parameters and conditions of the grinding experiment.

Condition	Specific Parameter
Grinder	Profimat MT-408 surface grinder
Grinding Mode	Creep feed deep grinding, up-grinding
Heat Pipe Grinding Wheel (HPGW)	Electroplated CBN abrasive layer; Grain size: 80/100# (#: Granularity Number); Dimensions: Φ350 mm × 35 mm × Φ127 mm
Workpiece	Inconel 718, dimensions: 30 mm × 12 mm × 10 mm
Grinding Speed vs (m/s)	15, 20, 25, 30, 35
Workpiece Feed Speed vw (mm/min)	40, 60, 80, 100, 120
Grinding Depth ap (mm)	0.05, 0.1, 0.15, 0.2, 0.25
MQL Flow Rate Q (mL/h)	50
MQL Air Pressure P (MPa)	0.6
Ultrasonic Frequency f (kHz)	19.4
Ultrasonic Amplitude Ax (μm)	3

.

2.2. Testing Methods

To explore the grinding performance of Inconel 718 under two working conditions (UVAG-HPGW-MQL and HPGW-MQL), a Kistler 9253B dynamometer (Kistler Group, Winterthur, Switzerland) was used to collect the grinding force signals in the horizontal and vertical directions during processing. After amplification by a Kistler 5080A charge amplifier (Kistler Group, Winterthur, Switzerland), the collected grinding force signals were processed using DynoWare 3.3.2.0 software. Grinding temperature was measured using a K-type standard thermocouple combined with an NI USB-6225 data acquisition card, and temperature signals were processed using LabVIEW 2020 software. The measurement position of grinding temperature is shown in Figure 1. A Sensofar S Neox 3D confocal microscope (Sensofar Group, Terrassa, Spain) was used to observe workpiece surface morphology. In addition, an HRX-01 3D digital microscope (Hirox Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan) was used to observe and count the number of effective cutting points.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Grinding Force

Grinding force, including the normal force per unit width (F_n′) and tangential force per unit width (F_t′), is one of the important parameters for evaluating material grinding performance and the difficulty of material removal, and its magnitude significantly affects grinding temperature, specific grinding energy, and workpiece surface quality. The ratio of the normal force per unit width to the tangential force per unit width (F_n′/F_t′) is called the grinding force ratio, which can reflect the sharpness of the grinding wheel; a smaller value indicates higher sharpness of the grinding wheel. Therefore, to analyze the grinding performance of Inconel 718, grinding forces and grinding force ratios under two working conditions (UVAG-HPGW-MQL and HPGW-MQL) were compared.

The maximum undeformed chip thickness (a_gmax) is a key parameter reflecting the variation in grinding force, and its calculation formula is as follows:

$$a_{g\max }=2\sqrt{{\displaystyle \frac{v_w}{v_s{N}_{d}C}}\sqrt{{\displaystyle \frac{a_p}{d_s}}}}$$

(1)

where N_d refers to the dynamic average number of effective abrasive grains per unit area on the grinding wheel surface, which is 6 mm⁻² after observation using an HRX-01 3D digital microscope; C is a constant related to the sharpness of grains, taking a value of 6.89; and d_s represents the grinding wheel diameter.

Figure 2a shows that, as grinding speed (v_s) increases, the variation trends of grinding forces under the two working conditions are basically consistent, but the grinding force under UVAG-HPGW-MQL is always lower than that under HPGW-MQL. When v_s varies between 15 and 35 m/s, F_n′ and F_t′ under HPGW-MQL fluctuate between 3.36 and 3.66 N/mm and 0.83–0.91 N/mm, respectively, while those under UVAG-HPGW-MQL fluctuate between 2.31 and 2.75 N/mm and 0.62–0.8 N/mm, with maximum reductions of 31.86% and 27.91%, respectively. Figure 2b,c show that both F_n′ and F_t′ exhibit an increasing trend as the workpiece feed rate (v_w) and grinding depth (a_p) increase, primarily due to the relative increase in a_gmax. According to Equation (1), when v_w increases from 40 mm/min to 120 mm/min, a_gmax increases from 0.21 μm to 0.36 μm; when a_p increases from 0.05 mm to 0.25 mm, a_gmax increases from 0.25 μm to 0.37 μm. In addition, except when a_p reaches 0.25 mm, where the grinding forces under the two working conditions are relatively close, the grinding force under UVAG-HPGW-MQL is still lower than that under HPGW-MQL under other grinding parameters. Among them, when a_p is 0.05 mm, the force reduction effect of ultrasonic vibration is the best, with the reductions of F_n′ and F_t′ reaching 43.85% and 30.77%, respectively. It can be found that the force reduction effect of ultrasonic vibration is more obvious when a_p is small, and the effect gradually weakens with the increase in a_p. This is mainly because a larger a_p requires the grains to remove more materials during the “contact” phase of the ultrasonic vibration cycle, resulting in a significant extension of the effective contact time between grains and workpiece. When a_p exceeds a certain critical value, the “separation” effect of ultrasonic vibration basically fails, and the contact state between grains and workpiece approaches that of HPGW-MQL; therefore, the difference in grinding force between the two working conditions gradually decreases until it disappears.

It can also be seen from Figure 2 that, under all grinding parameters, compared with HPGW-MQL, UVAG-HPGW-MQL can obtain a lower and more stable grinding force ratio, which also indicates that the grinding wheel under this working condition has higher sharpness. Among them, the grinding force ratio under UVAG-HPGW-MQL fluctuates between 3.02 and 3.98, while that under HPGW-MQL fluctuates between 3.18 and 4.79, with a maximum reduction of 22.15%. This is mainly due to the periodic “contact-separation” dynamic process caused by ultrasonic vibration, which reduces the accumulation and adhesion of adhesive Inconel 718 chips at grain edges, avoiding the loss of grinding ability of grains.

3.2. Grinding Temperature

An increase in grinding temperature can have negative impacts on surface integrity, dimensional accuracy of processed workpiece, and the wear state of the grinding wheel; therefore, it is necessary to control grinding temperature in a timely and effective manner. In this study, the original grinding temperature signals (after low-pass filtering) measured by K-type standard thermocouple were taken as the research object, and the temperature rise characteristics of the grinding zone of Inconel 718 under two working conditions (UVAG-HPGW-MQL and HPGW-MQL) were compared.

Figure 3 shows the influence of grinding parameters on grinding temperature. Different from the smooth grinding temperature signal curve measured under HPGW-MQL, the grinding temperature signal under UVAG-HPGW-MQL shows oscillation due to the addition of ultrasonic vibration. In addition, with the increase of v_s, v_w, and a_p, the grinding temperatures under both working conditions show an increasing trend; however, compared with HPGW-MQL, the grinding temperature under UVAG-HPGW-MQL remains lower. This is mainly because the addition of ultrasonic vibration changes the generation and transfer mechanism of heat in the grinding zone, which acts jointly from two aspects: “reducing heat source generation” and “strengthening heat dissipation”. “Reducing heat source generation” is mainly reflected in the fact that the periodic “contact-separation” working mode can avoid local overheating of grains caused by continuous high-pressure friction, reducing the total amount of frictional heat generation in the grinding zone from the source and directly reducing grinding temperature accumulation. “Strengthening heat dissipation” is mainly reflected in the fact that the dynamic gap between grains and workpiece generated by ultrasonic vibration can break the “closed” environment of the traditional grinding zone; when the gap expands, more cooling medium can be sucked in, enhancing the convective heat transfer on the surfaces of grains and workpiece.

Figure 3a shows that, when v_s increases from 15 m/s to 35 m/s, the grinding temperature under HPGW-MQL increases from 150.71 °C to 332.01 °C, while that under UVAG-HPGW-MQL increases from 114.49 °C to 218.61 °C, with a reduction range of 24.03–34.16%. Figure 3b shows that the grinding temperature under UVAG-HPGW-MQL increases gently when v_w is in the range of 40–100 mm/min; when v_w increases from 100 mm/min to 120 mm/min, the grinding temperature increases rapidly, from 173.85 °C to 224.68 °C. At the same time, the grinding temperature under HPGW-MQL increases rapidly when v_w increases from 40 mm/min to 60 mm/min, from 156.91 °C to 189.79 °C. The reason for the increase in grinding temperature is that, when v_w increases from 40 mm/min to 120 mm/min, the material removal rate increases from 0.07 mm³/(mm·s) to 0.2 mm³/(mm·s). Figure 3c shows that, compared with v_s and v_w, the increase in a_p has a greater influence on grinding temperature. On the one hand, it is due to the 5-fold increase in the material removal rate (from 0.07 mm³/(mm·s) to 0.33 mm³/(mm·s)); on the other hand, it is because a larger a_p increases a_gmax, leading to an increase in grinding force and thus more grinding heat generation. The grinding temperature under HPGW-MQL increases from 148.88 °C to 400.78 °C, while that under UVAG-HPGW-MQL increases from 112.33 °C to 302.81 °C, with a maximum reduction of 29.2%. In addition, under both working conditions, when the grinding depth increases from 0.2 mm to 0.25 mm, grinding temperature rises most sharply: under HPGW-MQL, it increases from 307.84 °C to 400.78 °C; under UVAG-HPGW-MQL, it increases from 235.41 °C to 302.81 °C, with increases of 92.94 °C and 67.4 °C, respectively.

3.3. Specific Grinding Energy

Specific grinding energy (e_s) is defined as the energy consumed to remove a unit volume of workpiece material, which is an important reference index for measuring energy consumption and grinding efficiency during the grinding process. Equation (2) is used to calculate e_s:

$$e_s={\displaystyle \frac{{F_t}^{\prime }{v}_s}{Q_w}}={\displaystyle \frac{{F_t}^{\prime }{v}_s}{v_w{a}_p}}$$

(2)

where Q_w represents the material removal volume, which can be obtained by the product of v_w and a_p.

Figure 4 shows the influence of grinding parameters on specific grinding energy. It can be seen that the specific grinding energy under both working conditions increases with the increase in v_s and a_p (Figure 4a,c), and decreases with the increase in v_w; under UVAG-HPGW-MQL, it tends to be stable when v_w is 80–120 mm/min (Figure 4b). Compared with HPGW-MQL, the specific grinding energy under UVAG-HPGW-MQL is slightly higher only when the grinding parameters are v_s = 35 m/s, v_w = 40 mm/min, and a_p = 0.25 mm; under other grinding parameters, it is at a lower level. This variation law is consistent with the variation law of grinding force mentioned above. This indicates that, when using UVAG-HPGW-MQL, Inconel 718 has better grinding performance, less energy is consumed to remove a unit volume of workpiece material, and the material is easier to remove. In addition, it can be seen from Figure 4 that the maximum reductions in specific grinding energy occur when v_s = 35 m/s, v_w = 40 mm/min, and a_p = 0.05 mm, reaching 27.91%, 23.53%, and 30.77%, respectively.

4. Lubrication Performance Analysis

4.1. Friction Coefficient

The core function of lubrication performance is to reduce the interaction intensity of the friction interface, and the friction coefficient (μ) is a quantitative index for measuring the resistance of the friction interface, showing a significant negative correlation with lubrication performance. During the grinding process of metal materials, the grinding forces (F_n and F_t) are mainly composed of two components: the chip formation component (F_nc and F_tc) and the friction component (F_nf and F_tf), as shown in Figure 5. Therefore, the calculation Equation (3) of grinding force is as follows:

$$\left\{\begin{array}{l}{F}_n=F_{nc}+F_{nf}\\ F_t=F_{tc}+F_{tf}\end{array}\right.$$

(3)

According to the grinding force model proposed by T. W. Hwang [50], the friction components (F_nf and F_tf) are linearly related to the contact area (A), and this relationship is determined by the friction coefficient (μ) between workpiece and wear surface and constant pressure (P). Based on this, the calculation formula of grinding force can be further expressed as follows:

$$\left\{\begin{array}{l}{F}_n=F_{nc}+\mathsf{\mu }\cdot P\cdot A\\ F_t=F_{nt}+P\cdot A\end{array}\right.$$

(4)

Thus, the calculation formula of μ is obtained as follows:

$$\mathsf{\mu }={\displaystyle \frac{F_t-F_{tc}}{F_n-F_{nc}}}$$

(5)

Since the grinding condition is minimum quantity lubrication grinding, the grinding process is dominated by “friction”, and the contribution of chip formation can be ignored. Therefore, the calculation formula of μ can be expressed as follows:

$$\mathsf{\mu }={\displaystyle \frac{F_t}{F_n}}$$

(6)

Figure 6 shows the influence of grinding parameters on the friction coefficient. It can be seen that, under all grinding parameters, the friction coefficient under UVAG-HPGW-MQL is larger than that under HPGW-MQL. The friction coefficient under UVAG-HPGW-MQL ranges from 0.25 to 0.33, while that under HPGW-MQL ranges from 0.21 to 0.31, with a maximum increase of 27.27%. This is mainly because the high-frequency vibration caused by ultrasound will produce a cavitation effect, leading to the generation, growth, and collapse of micro-bubbles inside the lubricating oil film adsorbed on the workpiece surface, as shown in Figure 7. This intense physical process may cause local rupture, thinning, or uneven distribution of the lubricating film, increasing the direct contact area between the abrasive grains and the workpiece surface, thereby increasing friction and leading to an increase in the friction coefficient.

4.2. Workpiece Surface Roughness

Figure 8 shows the surface morphology and surface roughness of processed workpiece observed using a Sensofar S Neox 3D confocal microscope under two working conditions when v_s = 25 m/s, v_w = 80 mm/min, and a_p = 0.1 mm and 0.25 mm, respectively. It can be found that, when a_p = 0.1 mm, workpiece surface roughness (R_a) measured under HPGW-MQL and UVAG-HPGW-MQL is 0.260 μm and 0.296 μm, respectively; the R_a value increases by 14.85% after adding ultrasonic vibration. When a_p = 0.25 mm, R_a measured under HPGW-MQL and UVAG-HPGW-MQL is 0.297 μm and 0.310 μm, respectively; the R_a value increases by 4.19% after adding ultrasonic vibration. From the above analysis of the friction coefficient, it is known that the high-frequency vibration caused by ultrasound will damage the lubricating oil film adsorbed on the workpiece surface by MQL, weakening the lubrication effect and increasing the friction coefficient, which also corresponds to the final deterioration of the workpiece surface quality.

5. Conclusions

In this study, comparative grinding experiments were conducted on the nickel-based superalloy Inconel 718 under two grinding conditions (HPGW-MQL and UVAG-HPGW-MQL). Influences of grinding parameters (i.e., grinding speed v_s, workpiece feed speed v_w, and grinding depth a_p) on grinding force, grinding force ratio, grinding temperature, specific grinding energy, friction coefficient, and workpiece surface roughness were studied. The main conclusions are as follows:

• When grinding the nickel-based superalloy Inconel 718, compared with HPGW-MQL, UVAG-HPGW-MQL realizes intermittent grinding with periodic “contact-separation” between grains and workpiece by adding tangential ultrasonic vibration to workpiece. This dynamic process shortens the contact length between grains and workpiece, leading to maximum reductions of 43.85%, 30.77%, 22.15%, 34.16%, and 30.77% in normal force per unit width, tangential force per unit width, grinding force ratio, grinding temperature, and specific grinding energy, respectively, effectively reducing energy consumption and grinding heat accumulation during grinding process.
• The intermittent cutting behavior caused by ultrasonic vibration can reduce grinding heat generation from the source; however, the cavitation effect generated by ultrasonic vibration atomizes the lubricating oil film adsorbed on the workpiece surface, resulting in a maximum increase of 27.27% in the friction coefficient and deteriorating the surface quality of processed workpiece and ultimately increasing the workpiece surface roughness value by 4.19%.
• Considering comprehensively in UVAG-HPGW-MQL, UVAG and MQL reduce grinding heat generation from the source, and HPGW further effectively conducts the generated grinding heat. The three work synergistically to control grinding temperature and reduce the probability of thermal damage. Although the friction coefficient increases compared with HPGW-MQL, the range is not large. Therefore, UVAG-HPGW-MQL has better grinding performance in the processing of Inconel 718, which is more in line with the requirements of green grinding processing.