Next Article in Journal
Simulation and Experiment for Retractable Four-Point Flexible Gripper for Grape Picking End-Effector
Previous Article in Journal
Reliable Gene Expression Normalization in Cucumber Leaves: Identifying Stable Reference Genes Under Drought Stress
Previous Article in Special Issue
Efficiency of a Double-Phase Medium in Micropropagation of Serviceberry (Amelanchier sp.)
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

In Vitro Propagation of Sweet Rowanberry Cultivar Discolor as an Alternative Fruit Crop Resource

Research and Breeding Institute of Pomology Holovousy Ltd., Holovousy 129, 508 01 Holovousy, Czech Republic
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Agronomy 2025, 15(12), 2812; https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy15122812 (registering DOI)
Submission received: 10 November 2025 / Revised: 1 December 2025 / Accepted: 5 December 2025 / Published: 7 December 2025

Abstract

Developing reliable in vitro propagation methods for rowanberry genotypes is essential for their use in breeding and horticultural programs. While different rowanberry species and cultivars are primarily valued for their ornamental and forestry properties, poor seed germination and the low success rate of conventional vegetative techniques constrain their propagation. Micropropagation offers a practical approach to obtaining uniform, disease-free plant material for selection, hybridization, and the subsequent horticultural use of particular valuable genotypes. Shoot multiplication of a prospective sweet rowanberry cultivar ‘Discolor’ was studied on a Murashige and Skoog (MS) medium supplemented with 6-benzylaminopurine (BAP) at concentrations of 1, 2, and 4 mg L−1, thidiazuron (TDZ) at concentrations of 0.5 and 1 mg L−1, and 6-(γ,γ-dimethylallylamino)purine (2iP) at a concentration of 10 mg L−1. Root induction was evaluated on a half-strength MS medium (50% MS) supplemented with 1 mg L−1 of naphthaleneacetic acid (NAA), indole-3-butyric acid (IBA), or indole-3-acetic acid (IAA). TDZ at 1 mg L−1 yielded the highest multiplication coefficient. However, media with TDZ at a lower concentration (0.5 mg L−1) or BAP (2–4 mg L−1) provided the best balance between proliferation rate and shoot quality. These media promoted the growth of vigorous, well-elongated shoots with minimal callus formation. In contrast, the phytohormone 2iP did not elicit physiological response in the in vitro multiplication of explants. The best rooting results were obtained using a 50% MS medium supplemented with 1 mg L−1 IAA, which provided the highest rooting percentage and root quality. IBA produced slightly lower, though comparable, results, while NAA resulted in weak, sporadic root formation. The established protocol enables the efficient in vitro propagation of the studied cultivar. This system supports its application in breeding and fruit production programs, as well as in maintaining valuable genetic resources within the genus Sorbus.

1. Introduction

The genus Sorbus (Rosaceae) comprises a diverse group of temperate woody plants with increasing promise for agricultural and food applications. Several Sorbus species, including S. domestica, S. aucuparia, and S. aria, produce edible fruits that are rich in phenolic compounds, flavonoids, anthocyanins, and organic acids that contribute to their antioxidant, nutraceutical, and functional value [1,2,3,4]. These bioactive properties highlight the potential of Sorbus spp. as alternative fruit crops that can be cultivated under marginal environmental conditions, supporting diversification and sustainability in temperate horticulture [5].
Despite this potential, the agricultural utilization of Sorbus species is limited by biological constraints, including irregular seed germination, low seed viability, and the low success rate of conventional vegetative propagation methods such as grafting or cutting [6,7]. In vitro micropropagation provides a practical solution by enabling rapid clonal multiplication, producing disease-free plants, and maintaining uniform propagation material for orchard establishment and breeding purposes [8,9].
In addition to supporting agricultural production, micropropagation also plays an essential role in the ex situ conservation of woody species and valuable cultivars. This ensures the long-term maintenance of valuable germplasm for breeding and restoration programs [10,11,12]. However, developing reproducible micropropagation systems for woody plants is challenging due to high levels of phenolic oxidation, recalcitrance to rooting, and genotype-specific responses to culture media and plant growth regulators [13,14,15,16]. Advances such as temporary immersion systems and optimized cytokinin/auxin ratios have improved shoot multiplication and rooting efficiency in several fruit trees, including those in the Prunus genus and S. domestica [17,18].
Micropropagation is widely used in fruit crops such as apple, pear, and cherry but has been less explored in Sorbus spp., despite similar propagation challenges and agricultural potential [7,19].
Protocols for microclonal propagation were initially developed for economically important species of the genus Sorbus. These species hold significant value from both economic and industrial value, particularly the valuable timber species whose wood is used in the furniture industry and ornamental horticulture. Examples include S. torminalis, S. aucuparia, and S. domestica [20,21,22,23].
Material maintained in Czech pomological germplasm collections in the Research and Breeding Institute of Pomology Holovousy Ltd. (RBIP) under the cultivar name ‘Discolor’ represents a long-established, morphologically stable sweet rowanberry genotype. Based on comparative observations and the current understanding of hybridization processes in Euro-Asian Sorbus taxa [22], ‘Discolor’ can be considered as part of the Sorbus aucuparia/S. discolor complex.
The rowanberry ‘Discolor’ is valued in Czech fruit genetic-resource collections for its edible berries and favorable sensory attributes. It is examined in terms of content of phenolic compounds, flavonoids and other antioxidants [4]. These traits, combined with its striking autumn foliage, underscore both its horticultural appeal and its potential as a source of functional food ingredients and breeding material for rowanberry improvement programs.
However, efficient in vitro propagation methods for rowanberry ‘Discolor’ variety have yet to be described. Establishing a reliable micropropagation system is essential for maintaining genetically valuable clones, ensuring pathogen-free propagation material, and supporting both breeding and conservation objectives [9]. Previous in vitro studies on related Sorbus species, such as S. aucuparia and S. domestica, have demonstrated that optimizing the combination of cytokinin and auxin is critical for successful shoot initiation, proliferation, and rooting [7,18].
Micropropagation trials with ‘Discolor’ began in January 2012 as part of a comprehensive strategic initiative to conserve rare and valuable berry fruit germplasm for agricultural use. This initiative aimed at the future utilization of these plants in commercial cultivation and breeding programs tailored to the diverse fruit-growing sector. After the in vitro propagation and root development stages, the plantlets were acclimated gradually and grown under greenhouse conditions for two years before being transplanted into the field. After a prolonged juvenile period, the plants began fruiting. Over five consecutive years of fruit collection, consistent the fruit coloration and an absence of somaclonal variation were confirmed, suggesting that the applied micropropagation methodology did not induce genetic alterations. After this was confirmed, the micropropagation dataset underwent detailed statistical analysis in 2025.
The objectives of this study were therefore to develop an in vitro propagation protocol for the rowanberry ‘Discolor’ cultivar by (i) defining the optimal combinations of media and plant growth regulators for shoot initiation and multiplication, and (ii) optimizing rooting conditions in controlled culture environments. Factorial experiments were conducted using different cytokinins and auxin treatments to assess their influence on proliferation and root induction.
These results are expected to establish the first methodological framework for the in vitro propagation of the ‘Discolor’ rowanberry, which will contribute to the long-term conservation, selection, and agricultural utilization of the Sorbus genus worldwide.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. In Vitro Culture Initiation

The rowanberry cultivar ‘Discolor’ used in this study originated in Czech fruit germplasm collections as standard, tree-form specimens grafted onto European rowan S. aucuparia seedling rootstocks. It is characterized by the distinctly light red color of its fruits. Micropropagation experiments were conducted at RBIP. In the winter, dormant shoots were collected from healthy mother plants and rinsed with running tap water to remove surface debris and microorganisms. The shoots were then trimmed into 20–25 cm segments, with diagonal cuts on the basal ends. The segments were placed in water at 22 °C for 2–3 weeks to promote bud sprouting. Next, 52 protruding shoot tips (5–10 mm) with a differentiated apical meristem were aseptically excised in a laminar flow cabinet. Bud scales and any leaf primordia were removed. The resulting explants were surface-sterilized in a 0.15% mercuric chloride solution containing Tween 20 for 1 min, followed by a rinse with sterile distilled water. Five explants were placed in each 100 mL Erlenmeyer flask containing 25 mL of agar solidified Murashige and Skoog (MS) medium [24]. The medium contained 30 g L−1 sucrose (Sigma-Aldrich, Steinheim, Germany) and 7 g L−1 agar type A (Sigma-Aldrich, Steinheim, Germany). prior to adding the agar and autoclaving at 120 °C and 100 kPa for 15 min, the pH of the medium was adjusted to a value of 5.8. To initiate the culture, the medium was supplemented with 1.5 mg L−1 6-benzylaminopurine (BAP) and 0.1 mg L−1 indole-3-butyric acid (IBA). After 24 h, explants exuding phenolics were transferred to fresh medium and malformed or contaminated cultures were discarded. One week after sterilization, the cultures were examined for contamination and survival. Developing shoots were subcultured every four weeks for six passages to establish a uniform stock for multiplication experiments.
From the beginning of the initiation phase, all cultures were maintained in a high-capacity cultivation room at a temperature of 22 ± 1 °C. Cultures were exposed to cool, neutral-white fluorescent light (Sylvania F18W/840-TB, Erlangen, Germany) at an intensity of 60 μmol·m−2·s−1 and with a photoperiod of 16 h of light and 8 h of darkness. The light sources were positioned 30 cm above the cultures. All manipulations were performed aseptically in a laminar flow cabinet.

2.2. Multiplication Phase

To promote multiplication, actively growing shoots (10–15 mm including the apex) were excised from stock cultures 6 months after culture initiation and transferred to a fresh MS medium supplemented with 30 g L−1 sucrose and 7 g L−1 agar (pH 5.8), under the same cultivation conditions as in the initiation phase. We studied the effect of various concentrations of 6-benzylaminopurine (BAP, 1, 2, and 4 mg L−1), thidiazuron (TDZ, 0.5 and 1 mg L−1), and 6-(γ,γ-dimethylallylamino) purine (2iP, 10 mg L−1) in MS medium on shoot multiplication. The concentrations of BAP tested (1, 2 and 4 mg L−1) were selected to represent low, intermediate and high practical levels used in micropropagation trials of woody species. This approach enables the identification of an economically viable optimum rather than exhaustive gradient screening. TDZ was included as a strong reference cytokinin known to induce high multiplication, and 2iP was tested to evaluate genotype sensitivity to an alternative aromatic cytokinin. The TDZ and 2iP were filter-sterilized through 25 mm, 0.2 µm Supor® Membrane (Pall Corporation, Port Washington, NY, USA) filtration membranes and added aseptically after autoclaving. Each treatment included 25 explants with four replicates. After 30 days, the proliferation rate was calculated as the average number of shoots greater than 10 mm per explant. Callus formation and shoot morphology, including leaf development and the presence of a differentiated apex were also recorded.

2.3. Rooting and Acclimatization

Uniform shoots (15–25 mm) obtained from the multiplication phase, which lasted 4 to 6 subcultures were transferred to half-strength MS medium supplemented with 30 g L−1 sucrose and 7 g L−1 agar to initiate in vitro rooting. Prior to autoclaving at 120 °C and 100 kPa for 15 min, the pH of the medium was adjusted to 5.8 and agar was added. The rooting medium was supplemented with indole-3-butyric acid (IBA), indole-3-acetic acid (IAA), or α-naphthaleneacetic acid (NAA) at a concentration of 1 mg L−1. These auxins were filter-sterilized through 0.2 µm Supor® membranes and added aseptically to the medium after autoclaving. Rooting cultures were maintained under conditions identical to those used during the initiation and multiplication phases: controlled temperature, light intensity, and photoperiod. Each treatment included 100 replicates, and rooting success was evaluated after 30 days. Rooting efficiency was assessed as the percentage of rooted shoots and the average number of roots per explant. The rooted plantlets were rinsed to remove the agar and then transplanted into pre-soaked peat pellets (Jiffy 7, AS Jiffy Products, Kristiansand, Norway). The pellets were pre-soaked in water for 30 min to ensure adequate moisture prior to planting. The plantlets were misted with sterile water and placed in trays covered with transparent lids to maintain nearly 100% humidity. The trays were kept at 22 °C under a 16 h light/8 h dark cycle with an irradiance of 60 μmol·m−2·s−1. Over 14 days, the lids were gradually opened to allow the plantlets to acclimate to ex vitro conditions.

2.4. Statistical Evaluation of Multiplication and Rooting

The experiment was performed using a completely randomized design. The independent variables were the plant growth regulators used and their concentrations. The dependent variables were the number of shoots (>10 mm) per explant and the number of roots per explant, as well as the proportion of rooted shoots, which were used for multiplication and rooting evaluation, respectively. We examined the data for residual normality and homogeneity of variance using the exact Shapiro–Wilk and Levene tests, respectively. Since both datasets were characterized as non-normally distributed, they were processed using non-parametric Kruskal–Wallis test. Then a Mann–Whitney test was used to compare the treatments. To characterize the variability of the populations within particular treatments, standard deviation (SD) and standard error (SE) were calculated. Outliers observed in the data for both multiplication and rooting were maintained for the statistical analyses. The proportion of rooted explants among the treatments was analyzed using Chi-squared test. All results were considered statistically significant at p < 0.05. The analysis of outlier occurrence was performed using the interquartile range, as described by in the following equation:
OL < Q1 − 1.5 × IQR; Q3 + 1.5 × IQR < OL
where OL is the outlier, Q1 is the first quartile, IQR is the interquartile range, and Q3 is the third quartile.
All statistical analyses were performed using the R statistical computer software (R Development Core Team, 2010, version 2025) [25].

3. Results

3.1. In Vitro Culture Initiation

The results of the culture initiation process are summarized in Table 1. Of the 52 explants initially cultured on MS medium supplemented with 1.5 mg L−1 BAP and 0.1 mg L−1 IBA, 18 explants (34.6%) were lost due to microbial contamination that occurred within the first week. Of the remaining uncontaminated explants, only one failed to develop shoots. It gradually turned yellow and ceased growth. The rest (63.5%) successfully initiated shoot development within three to four weeks after culture establishment (Figure 1).
Shoot initiation was characterized by the swelling of the initial buds and the emergence of green apical meristems. This was followed by the elongation of new shoots, which reached lengths of 5–10 mm during the first subculture period. Browning, caused by the oxidation of polyphenolic compounds, was first observed 2 days after culture establishment. These phenolic substances were released from the cut surfaces of the explants into the agar medium. However, subculturing onto fresh medium immediately minimized this effectively. The healthy cultures established during this period were subsequently used as source material for the multiplication phase.

3.2. Multiplication Phase

The multiplication coefficient ranged from 1.11 to 3.39, depending on the type and concentration of applied cytokinin (Table 2).
In our experiments, the highest multiplication coefficient 3.39 was produced by TDZ at 1.0 mg L−1. This effect was statistically superior to those of the other treatments (Kruskal–Wallis test, followed by a pairwise Mann–Whitney test, p < 0.05). Halving the TDZ concentration from 1.0 mg L−1 to 0.5 mg L−1 reduced the mean multiplication coefficient from 3.39 to 2.88, representing a 21.3% decrease in newly formed shoots ((3.39 − 1; baseline initial explant is subtracted) − (2.88 − 1))/(3.39 − 1)). This decrease was also confirmed as statistically significant. A higher concentration of TDZ (1.0 mg L−1) at caused small stunted leaves and callus formation at the explant base. Treatments with BAP yielded relatively stable, more moderate responses with mean multiplication coefficients of 2.53, 2.70, and 2.86 at BAP concentrations of 1, 2, and 4 mg L−1, respectively. Explants cultured on all three tested BAP concentrations produced morphologically well-developed leaves, differentiated apical meristems, and showed no callus formation at the base (Figure 2). These results indicate a consistent, albeit less pronounced stimulatory effect than that of TDZ. The lowest multiplication coefficient 1.11 was recorded for 2iP at 10 mg L−1. Explants cultured on medium containing 10 mg L−1 2iP exhibited no morphogenetic response with regard to shoot multiplication. After one month, the explants remained unchanged, maintaining the original single shoot with green leaves. After additional 2 weeks on the 2iP medium beyond the standard one-month multiplication interval, the plants began to show signs of yellowing, likely due to the depletion and degradation of the mineral nutrients and other supportive substances originally contained in the MS medium.
In our experiments, we occasionally identified individuals with unexpectedly high multiplication coefficients within most of the treatments (Figure 3). Among outliers, explants treated with BAP showed a relative increase in shoot number and an increased concentration of the compound within the MS medium.

3.3. Rooting and Acclimatization

The effect of auxin type on rooting was assessed using the mean number of roots per explant and the percentage of explants that produced roots (n = 100 replicates per treatment; Table 3). The mean number of roots ranged from 1.00 (NAA) to 2.13 (IAA) across treatments. These differences were not statistically significant (non-parametric Kruskal–Wallis test followed by pairwise Mann–Whitney comparisons, p ≥ 0.05), indicating that none of the auxins reliably produced a greater number of roots per rooting explant under these conditions. In contrast, the proportion of rooted explants differed markedly among treatments. IAA (1 mg L−1) yielded the highest rooting percentage 31% (Figure 4), while IBA (1 mg L−1) produced a comparable percentage (26%). NAA (1 mg L−1) resulted in a substantially lower rooting (4%). Chi-square analysis confirmed that the proportions for IAA and IBA did not differ significantly from each other and were both significantly higher than the proportion observed for NAA (χ2, p < 0.05). Thus, although the mean root counts per explant did not differ significantly, IAA and IBA increased the likelihood that an explant would root compared to NAA. IAA produced the numerically highest rooting success rate and mean number of roots in this study (see Table 3 for means, standard deviation, and pairwise groupings). All explants that developed roots in vitro were successfully acclimated to standard cultivation ex vitro conditions through a gradual reduction in humidity achieving a 100% survival rate. Resulting plants were cultivated to standard nursery stock quality during one growing season (Figure 5).

4. Discussion

Given that woody Sorbus material is generally prone to contamination and exhibits limited regenerative potential during the early stages of in vitro culture, an overall initiation success rate of 63.5%, can be considered satisfactory. Similar initiation frequencies have been reported for S. domestica and S. aucuparia [7], confirming that the sterilization and establishment protocols are effective for this genus.
The efficiency of growth regulators, particularly of the class of hormones known as auxins, of cytokinins, is a crucial determinant of success in the vitro propagation of Sorbus species. The type and concentration of the applied cytokinins strongly influence morphogenetic responses, shoot multiplication, and regeneration capacity. Since genotypic sensitivity varies considerably among Sorbus taxa, it is necessary to evaluate and subsequently optimize cultivation parameters for each genotype [26,27].
The present study found that TDZ significantly stimulates shoot multiplication. Multiplication coefficients of 3.39 and 2.88 were obtained at concentrations of 1.0 and 0.5 mg L−1, respectively. These results align with the general trend reported by Chalupa (2002) [6], who documented a positive correlation between TDZ concentration and multiplication rate. However, in our experiment, TDZ at a concentration of 1.0 mg L−1 induced the occurrence of slightly dwarfed leaves and callus formation at the base of the explants (Figure 6). These responses suggest that increasing the TDZ concentration further could elevate the risk of somaclonal variation or undesirable morphogenetic deviations. While TDZ effectively stimulated shoot formation, these results underscore the importance of balancing morphogenetic efficiency with morphological stability when optimizing levels of the cytokinin.
In contrast, the results showed that 2iP did not stimulate shoot proliferation or cause phytotoxicity (Figure 7). Due to its limited efficacy and the absence of any visible morphogenetic response, further testing of higher 2iP concentrations was discontinued for economic and practical reasons.
Within the tested concentration range, BAP acted as a more conservative and robust treatment for the production of plant tissue cultures, providing high multiplication together with good shoot quality, stable morphology and an absence of basal callus formation. In cases of individual very high multiplication coefficients (outliners), such as a tenfold increase in a single explant in medium containing 4 mg L−1 BAP, this can likely be attributed to an uneven distribution of endogenous native phytohormones among the initial explants. This uneven distribution is caused by the subdivision and cutting of these explants during subcultivation, and their correlation with the externally added synthetic growth regulator.
While the present study did not compare different genotypes, previous research has shown that genotype strongly influences in vitro multiplication efficiency in Sorbus species. Reported average multiplication coefficients in Sorbus species vary widely (approximately 1.1–7.8), reflecting the high level of genetic heterogeneity within the genus [7,28]. This variation supports the hypothesis that the optimal type and concentration of the cytokinin must be determined for each genotype individually rather than applying a uniform protocol. In other Sorbus taxa, combinations of cytokinins, particularly BAP with kinetin, have enhanced shoot induction, achieving multiplication coefficients of up to 7.2 [29]. Similarly, the type of explant and its physiological state play critical roles in determining the success of shoot proliferation. Arrillaga et al. [30] reported that S. domestica apical explants cultured on a medium containing 22.2 µM 6-BAP produced the highest proliferation rate (8.5 shoots per explant).
The contrasting behavior of TDZ and BAP in this study likely reflects their different levels of cytokinin activity and the specific sensitivity of the ‘Discolor’ genotype. TDZ is known as a potent cytokinin in woody plants. In our material, even moderate increase in TDZ concentrations rapidly shifted the response from favorable stimulation of shoot number to the formation of compact shoot clusters and basal callus. TDZ-based protocols that have been successful in other Sorbus taxa [6,27] probably benefited from different genotypes, explant types, levels of internal phytohormones, and medium compositions. These factors allow for a balance between TDZ high stimulatory potential and the risk of morphological disturbance.
Regarding root induction, the literature identifies IBA as the most commonly used and generally effective auxin for rhizogenesis in Sorbus species [6,20,31,32]. However, our results showed that IBA and IAA produced similar outcomes: 26% and 31% of the explants formed roots, respectively, whereas NAA produced roots in only 4% of the explants. There were statistically significant differences between IAA and IBA were statistically significant compared to NAA, but not between IAA and IBA. These results suggest that these auxins exhibit similar physiological activity in ‘Discolor’ under the conditions of our experiment. The highest average number of roots (2.13 per explant) was obtained with IAA at 1 mg L−1, confirming its effectiveness in inducing moderate yet consistent rooting under the tested conditions.
Our results are consistent with those of Dinçer [29], who observed a positive response to IAA at the same concentration (62% rooting) in S. aucuparia. Variability in auxin efficacy has been reported across Sorbus species. For example, Arrillaga [30] discovered that IAA was the least effective auxin for rooting S. domestica, with rooting percentage ranging from 6% to 44%. However, higher IAA concentrations (26–52 µM) reduced rooting efficiency and promoted callus formation [30]. In contrast, IBA or NAA at concentrations of 5.2–26 µM in modified Heller’s medium resulted in 80–87% rooting, demonstrating the strong genotype dependence of auxin responsiveness.
From a methodological perspective, the applied rooting procedure was both efficient and conservative. Although the rooting percentages were moderate, all non-rooted explants remained physiologically healthy after one month of exposure in auxin-containing media and showed no signs of chlorosis or necrosis. These results suggests that the rooting stage can safely be extended or repeated with modified auxin treatments to provide additional opportunities for root induction without compromising explant viability.
In addition to hormonal factors, mineral nutrition significantly impacts morphogenetic outcomes. For example, the addition of non-chelated iron sulfate (FeSO4) or iron ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (Fe-EDTA) has been demonstrated to substantially increase biomass accumulation and organ formation. These supplements increase shoot and root numbers by up to 2.5- and 2-fold, respectively, compared to untreated controls [33].
In vitro propagation of Sorbus species is successful when a complex interaction is achieved among the balance of cytokinin and auxin, genotype, explant type, and nutrient medium composition. This study confirms that carefully optimizing these parameters for each genotype is crucial for achieving stable morphogenetic outcomes, high multiplication coefficients, and reliable root system formation, while minimizing the risk of somaclonal variation and maintaining economic efficiency in establishing cultures. Our single-factor design focuses on the practical selection of individual hormones and concentrations for an applied propagation protocol aimed at usable and economically feasible methods.
Due to the agricultural and horticultural potential of Sorbus species as alternative fruit crops that are rich in bioactive compounds, the developed micropropagation system is a key step toward the sustainable use and conservation of the valuable genetic resources of this genus. The Research and Breeding Institute of Pomology is currently evaluating the bioactive compound profiles of additional Sorbus species that are of interest to agriculture and the food industry. Based on these evaluations, the RBIP is systematically investigating micropropagation possibilities and assessing genetic stability following micropropagation. The goal is to support breeding programs and genetic resource preservation in these taxa. The institute also aims to diversify and enrich the portfolio of agriculturally cultivated crops, contributing to the development of valuable new fruit crop alternatives. Sorbus species are recognized for their resilience and adaptability to environmental stressors, making them ideal candidates for future sustainable and climate-resilient agricultural and horticultural systems. These characteristics make them robust candidates for future sustainable and climate-resilient agricultural and horticultural systems.

5. Conclusions

This study successfully established a reliable protocol for the in vitro micropropagation of the sweet rowanberry cultivar ‘Discolor’, demonstrating the significant impact of various types and concentrations of cytokinin on shoot multiplication and the influence of different types of auxin on rooting efficiency. In our study, TDZ induced a strong morphogenetic response, but it also posed a clear risk of undesirable changes at 1 mg L−1 (e.g., dwarfed leaves and basal callus formation). In contrast, BAP behaved as a more conservative and robust option within the tested concentration range, consistently providing high multiplication, good shoot quality and stable morphology across subcultures. The optimal combination for proliferation was TDZ at a lower concentration (0.5 mg L−1) or BAP (2–4 mg L−1), and the optimal concentration for root induction was 1 mg L−1 IAA. This combination yielded efficient production of well-developed, differentiated explants and rooting success, supporting the effective clonal propagation of this cultivar. These findings underscore the importance of genotype-specific responses in micropropagation protocols and offer valuable insights into the morphogenetic behavior of Sorbus species under controlled culture conditions.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, J.S.; methodology, J.S. and M.M. (Martin Mészáros); software, M.M. (Martin Mészáros); validation, J.S.; formal analysis, J.S., M.M. (Martin Mészáros), L.P., M.M. (Michaela Marklová) and B.K.; investigation, J.S., M.M. (Martin Mészáros), L.P., M.M. (Michaela Marklová) and B.K.; resources, J.S. and B.K.; data curation, J.S. and M.M. (Martin Mészáros); writing—original draft preparation, J.S., M.M. (Martin Mészáros), L.P., M.M. (Michaela Marklová) and B.K.; writing—review and editing, J.S., M.M. (Martin Mészáros), L.P., M.M. (Michaela Marklová) and B.K.; visualization, M.M. (Martin Mészáros); supervision, J.S.; project administration, J.S. and B.K.; funding acquisition, J.S. and B.K. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by National Programme on Conservation and Utilization of Plant Genetic Resources and Agrobiodiversity, No.: MZE-62216/2022-13113/6.2.4 and grant No. RO1525.

Data Availability Statement

The raw data supporting the conclusions of this article will be available by the authors on request.

Conflicts of Interest

Authors Jiří Sedlák, Martin Mészáros, Liliia Pavliuk, Michaela Marklová and Boris Krška were employed by the company Research and Breeding Institute of Pomology Holovousy Ltd. All authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of this study, the collection, analyses, or interpretation of the data, the writing of the manuscript, or the decision to publish the results.

References

  1. Zymone, K.; Raudone, L.; Raudonis, R.; Marksa, M.; Ivanauskas, L.; Janulis, V. Phytochemical Profiling of Fruit Powders of Twenty Sorbus L. Cultivars. Molecules 2018, 23, 2593. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Poljak, I.; Vahčić, N.; Liber, Z.; Tumpa, K.; Pintar, V.; Zegnal, I.; Vidaković, A.; Valković, B.; Kajba, D.; Idžojtić, M. Morphological and Chemical Diversity and Antioxidant Capacity of the Service Tree (Sorbus domestica L.) Fruits from Two Eco-Geographical Regions. Plants 2021, 10, 1691. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Arvinte, O.; Senila, L.; Becze, A.; Amariei, S. Rowanberry—A Source of Bioactive Compounds and Their Biopharmaceutical Properties. Plants 2023, 12, 3225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Orsavova, J.; Jurikova, T.; Bednaříková, R.; Mlček, J. Total Phenolic and Total Flavonoid Content, Individual Phenolic Compounds and Antioxidant Activity in Sweet Rowanberry Cultivars. Antioxidants 2023, 12, 913. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Korić, E.; Milutinović, V.; Hajrudinović-Bogunić, A.; Bogunić, F.; Kundaković-Vasović, T.; Gušić, I.; Radović Selgrad, J.; Durić, K.; Nikšić, H. Phytochemical Characterisation of Sorbus Species: Unveiling Flavonoid Profiles Related to Ploidy and Hybrid Origin. Plants 2025, 14, 119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Chalupa, V. In Vitro Propagation of Mature Trees of Sorbus aucuparia L. and Field Performance of Micropropagated Trees. J. For. Sci. 2002, 48, 529–535. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Šedivá, J.; Velebil, J.; Zahradník, D. Micropropagation as a Tool for the Conservation of Autochthonous Sorbus Species of Czechia. Plants 2023, 12, 488. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Bettoni, J.C.; Wang, M.-R.; Li, J.-W.; Fan, X.; Fazio, G.; Hurtado-Gonzales, O.P.; Volk, G.M.; Wang, Q.-C. Application of Biotechniques for In Vitro Virus and Viroid Elimination in Pome Fruit Crops. Phytopathology® 2024, 114, 930–954. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Sota, V.; Wilms, H.; Yücesan, B.; Mendi, Y.Y.; Christie, B.; Nisler, J.; Aslan, Ş.E.; Purmale-Trasune, L.; Silvestri, C.; Werbrouck, S.P.O.; et al. Challenges in the Micropropagation of Economically Important Fruit Species in Europe. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult. (PCTOC) 2025, 162, 53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Tarraf, W.; Carlo, A. In Vitro Biotechnology for Conservation and Sustainable Use of Plant Genetic Resources. Plants 2024, 13, 1897. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Gaidamashvili, M.; Benelli, C. Threatened Woody Plants of Georgia and Micropropagation as a Tool for In Vitro Conservation. Agronomy 2021, 11, 1082. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Regni, L.; Facchin, S.; Silva, D.; Proietti, P.; Silvestri, C.; Micheli, M. Optimization of the In Vitro Proliferation of an Ancient Pear Tree Cultivar (‘Decana d’Inverno’) through the Use of Neem Oil. Plants 2023, 12, 1593. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Martini, A.N.; Papafotiou, M.; Vemmos, S.N. Season and Explant Origin Affect Phenolic Content, Browning of Explants, and Micropropagation of × Malosorbus Florentina (Zucc.) Browicz. HortScience 2013, 48, 102–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Khatoon, S.; Liu, W.; Ding, C.; Liu, X.; Zheng, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Chen, X.; Rauf, M.; Alghabari, F.; Shah, Z. In Vitro Evaluation of the Effects of BAP Concentration and Pre-Cooling Treatments on Morphological, Physiological, and Biochemical Traits of Different Olive (Olea euorpea L.) Cultivars. Horticulturae 2022, 8, 1108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Kulus, D.; Tymoszuk, A. Advancements in In Vitro Technology: A Comprehensive Exploration of Micropropagated Plants. Horticulturae 2024, 10, 88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Hatzilazarou, S.; Kantere, C.; Kotoula, A.-A.; Economou, A.; Bertsouklis, K.; Darras, A.; Kostas, S. In Vitro Propagation and Genetic Stability Assessment Using the ISSR Markers of Stachys byzantina K. Koch, a Promising Ornamental Species. Horticulturae 2025, 11, 530. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Gago, D.; Sanchez, C.; Aldrey, A.; Christie, B.; Bernal, M.; Vidal, N. Micropropagation of Plum (Prunus domestica L.) in Bioreactors Using Photomixotrophic and Photoautotrophic Conditions. Horticulturae 2022, 8, 286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Gianguzzi, V.; Sottile, F. Temporary Immersion System as an Innovative Approach for In Vitro Propagation of Sorbus domestica L. Horticulturae 2024, 10, 164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Mendler-Drienyovszki, N.; Magyar-Tábori, K. Response of Rowan Berry (Sorbus redliana) Shoot Culture to Slow Growth Storage Conditions. Plants 2023, 12, 1287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Malá, J.; Máchová, P.; Cvrčková, H.; Čížková, L. Use of Micropropagation for Gene Resources Reproduction of Noble Deciduous Species (Malus sylvestris, Pyrus pyraster, Sorbus torminalis, S. aucuparia and Prunus avium). Rep. For. Res. 2005, 50, 219–224. [Google Scholar]
  21. Malá, J.; Máchová, P.; Cvrčková, H.; Karady, M.; Novák, O.; Mikulík, J.; Hauserová, E.; Greplová, J.; Strnad, M.; Doležal, K. Micropropagation of Wild Service Tree (Sorbus torminalis [L.] Crantz): The Regulative Role of Different Aromatic Cytokinins During Organogenesis. J. Plant Growth Regul. 2009, 28, 341–348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Malá, J.; Cvrčková, H.; Máchová, P.; Dostál, J. Mikropropagace Jeřábu Oskeruše (Sorbus domestica L.) Certifikovaná Metodika; Forestry and Game Management Research Institute: Strnady, Czech Republic, 2011; ISBN 978-80-7417-047-8. [Google Scholar]
  23. Lall, S.; Mandegaran, Z.; Roberts, A. Shoot Multiplication and Adventitious Regeneration in Sorbus aucuparia. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult. 2006, 85, 23–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Murashige, T.; Skoog, F. A Revised Medium for Rapid Growth and Bioassays with Tobacco Tissue Cultures. Physiol. Plant 1962, 15, 473–497. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. R Core Team. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing (Version 4.5.2) [Computer Software]. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. 2025. Available online: https://www.R-Project.Org/ (accessed on 9 October 2025).
  26. Nikolaou, P.; Zagas, D.; Scaltsoyiannes, V.; Balas, E.; Xilogianni, V.; Tsoulpha, P.; Tsaktsira, M.; Voulgaridou, E.; Iliev, I.; Triantafyllou, K. Advances in the Micropropagation of Service Tree (Sorbus domestica L.). Propag. Ornam. Plants 2008, 8, 154–157. [Google Scholar]
  27. Jeong, B.R.; Sivanesan, I. Micropropagation of Sorbus Commixta Hedl. Propag. Ornam. Plants 2015, 15, 142–146. [Google Scholar]
  28. Nebykov, M.; Nebykova, T. Micropropagation of Mountain Ash (Sorbus spp.) Specimens of the National Dendrological Park “Sofiyivka” Collection. J. Nativ. Alien Plant Stud. 2022, 18, 137–155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Dinçer, D. Determination of Optimal Plant Growth Regulators for Breaking Seed Dormancy and Micropropagation of Sorbus aucuparia L. Balt. For. 2023, 29, id679. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Arrillaga, I.; Marzo, T. Micropropagation of Juvenile and Adult Sorbus domestica L. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult. 1991, 27, 341–348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Yang, L.; Li, Y.; Shen, H. Somatic Embryogenesis and Plant Regeneration from Immature Zygotic Embryo Cultures of Mountain Ash (Sorbus pohuashanensis). Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult. (PCTOC) 2012, 109, 547–556. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Emam, M.; Ghamarizare, A. Influence of Plant Growth Regulators and Media on In Vitro Propagation of Sorbus aucuparia L. J. Med. Plants By-Prod. 2013, 2, 53–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Xiao, J.; Park, Y.G.; Guo, G.; Jeong, B.R. Effect of Iron Source and Medium pH on Growth and Development of Sorbus commixta In Vitro. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Uncontaminated in vitro culture of rowanberry cultivar ‘Discolor’ successfully established in initiation phase (photo taken by Jiří Sedlák).
Figure 1. Uncontaminated in vitro culture of rowanberry cultivar ‘Discolor’ successfully established in initiation phase (photo taken by Jiří Sedlák).
Agronomy 15 02812 g001
Figure 2. Multiplication experiment with rowanberry cultivar ‘Discolor’ on MS medium with BAP 4 mg L−1 resulting in the formation of morphologically well-developed new shoots (photo taken by Jiří Sedlák).
Figure 2. Multiplication experiment with rowanberry cultivar ‘Discolor’ on MS medium with BAP 4 mg L−1 resulting in the formation of morphologically well-developed new shoots (photo taken by Jiří Sedlák).
Agronomy 15 02812 g002
Figure 3. Boxplots of the number of shoots (left) and roots (right) per explant of in vitro rowanberry ‘Discolor’. The plots show the mean, Q1, Q3, SD, and red-colored outliers.
Figure 3. Boxplots of the number of shoots (left) and roots (right) per explant of in vitro rowanberry ‘Discolor’. The plots show the mean, Q1, Q3, SD, and red-colored outliers.
Agronomy 15 02812 g003
Figure 4. In vitro rooting cultures of rowanberry cultivar ‘Discolor’ on a half-strength MS medium supplemented with 1 mg L−1 IAA with the roots spread at the base of the culture vessel (photo taken by Jiří Sedlák).
Figure 4. In vitro rooting cultures of rowanberry cultivar ‘Discolor’ on a half-strength MS medium supplemented with 1 mg L−1 IAA with the roots spread at the base of the culture vessel (photo taken by Jiří Sedlák).
Agronomy 15 02812 g004
Figure 5. Finished nursery stock of rowanberry cultivar ‘Discolor’ originating from micropropagation, ready for autumn planting (photo taken by Jiří Sedlák).
Figure 5. Finished nursery stock of rowanberry cultivar ‘Discolor’ originating from micropropagation, ready for autumn planting (photo taken by Jiří Sedlák).
Agronomy 15 02812 g005
Figure 6. In vitro multiplication experiment with rowanberry cultivar ‘Discolor’ on an MS medium containing 1 mg L−1 TDZ with callus formation at the explant base. (photo taken by Jiří Sedlák).
Figure 6. In vitro multiplication experiment with rowanberry cultivar ‘Discolor’ on an MS medium containing 1 mg L−1 TDZ with callus formation at the explant base. (photo taken by Jiří Sedlák).
Agronomy 15 02812 g006
Figure 7. In vitro multiplication experiment with rowanberry cultivar ‘Discolor’ on an MS medium containing 10 mg L−1 2iP exhibiting no morphogenetic response with regard to new shoot formation (photo taken by Jiří Sedlák).
Figure 7. In vitro multiplication experiment with rowanberry cultivar ‘Discolor’ on an MS medium containing 10 mg L−1 2iP exhibiting no morphogenetic response with regard to new shoot formation (photo taken by Jiří Sedlák).
Agronomy 15 02812 g007
Table 1. Culture initiation of rowanberry ‘Discolor’ using sterilization by 0.15% HgCl2.
Table 1. Culture initiation of rowanberry ‘Discolor’ using sterilization by 0.15% HgCl2.
Total Number of Sterilized Initial ExplantsContaminated Discarded ExplantsUncontaminated Explants Which Did Not Develop ShootsUncontaminated Explants Which Developed Shoots
No.(%)No.(%)No.(%)
521834.611.93363.5
Table 2. Multiplication coefficient of in vitro rowanberry ‘Discolor’ cultures using different types and concentrations of cytokinin.
Table 2. Multiplication coefficient of in vitro rowanberry ‘Discolor’ cultures using different types and concentrations of cytokinin.
Treatment, mg L−1Shoot No.
MeanSDSE
BAP 12.53 b0.950.10
BAP 22.70 b1.120.11
BAP 42.86 b1.520.15
TDZ 0.52.88 b1.610.16
TDZ 1 *3.39 a1.580.16
2iP 101.11 c0.340.03
Note: Mean number of shoots per explant for each treatment was processed by the Mann–Whitney test. Different letters in the column Mean indicate significant differences among treatments (p < 0.05). SD—standard deviation, SE—Standard error; * Callus formation was observed at the base of the explants in this treatment.
Table 3. The mean number of roots per explant and the proportion of rooting on ½ MS medium.
Table 3. The mean number of roots per explant and the proportion of rooting on ½ MS medium.
TreatmentRoot No.Rooting Explants, %
MeanSDSE
1 mg L−1 IAA2.13 a1.680.3031 a
1 mg L−1 IBA1.58 a0.790.1626 a
1 mg L−1 NAA1.00 a0.000.004 b
Note: Different letters in the column Rooting explants, % indicate significant differences among treatments (p < 0.05). SD—standard deviation, SE—Standard error.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Sedlák, J.; Mészáros, M.; Pavliuk, L.; Marklová, M.; Krška, B. In Vitro Propagation of Sweet Rowanberry Cultivar Discolor as an Alternative Fruit Crop Resource. Agronomy 2025, 15, 2812. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy15122812

AMA Style

Sedlák J, Mészáros M, Pavliuk L, Marklová M, Krška B. In Vitro Propagation of Sweet Rowanberry Cultivar Discolor as an Alternative Fruit Crop Resource. Agronomy. 2025; 15(12):2812. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy15122812

Chicago/Turabian Style

Sedlák, Jiří, Martin Mészáros, Liliia Pavliuk, Michaela Marklová, and Boris Krška. 2025. "In Vitro Propagation of Sweet Rowanberry Cultivar Discolor as an Alternative Fruit Crop Resource" Agronomy 15, no. 12: 2812. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy15122812

APA Style

Sedlák, J., Mészáros, M., Pavliuk, L., Marklová, M., & Krška, B. (2025). In Vitro Propagation of Sweet Rowanberry Cultivar Discolor as an Alternative Fruit Crop Resource. Agronomy, 15(12), 2812. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy15122812

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Article metric data becomes available approximately 24 hours after publication online.
Back to TopTop