Skip to Content
Remote SensingRemote Sensing
  • Communication
  • Open Access

24 March 2023

11 Pages

Analysis of a Low-Earth Orbit Satellite Downlink Considering Antenna Radiation Patterns and Space Environment in Interference Situations

,
,
,
,
,
and
1
Department of Electronic and Electrical Engineering, Hongik University, Seoul 04066, Republic of Korea
2
Department of AI Convergence Network, Ajou University, Suwon, Gyeonggi-do 16499, Republic of Korea
3
Radar and EW Technology Center Agency for Defense Development, Daejeon 34186, Republic of Korea
4
Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Ajou University, Gyeonggi-do 16499, Republic of Korea

Abstract

This paper investigates a low-Earth orbit (LEO) satellite downlink for high-speed data communication in interference situations. A choke ring horn type antenna is used as the data transmitting antenna with an isoflux pattern in the LEO satellite, which has a beam coverage of ±51.6° and a bore-sight gain of 4.4 dBi at 8 GHz. The receiving antenna on the ground station is a parabolic type antenna with a diameter of 11.3 m, and it has a half-power beam width (HPBW) of 0.2° with a maximum gain of 59 dBi at 8 GHz. The jamming-to-signal ratio (J/S) is calculated assuming that the LEO satellite transmits signals to the ground station, and an elevation angle of the interference source varies from 0° to 90° at an altitude of 10 km. Applying antenna characteristics, such as HPBWs and side lobes, to the calculated space wave path loss makes it possible to predict the J/S results according to the location of the interference source and the satellite. The results show that it is necessary to consider the space environment to accurately analyze the LEO satellite downlink, especially at the low elevation angle of the satellite.

1. Introduction

Low-Earth orbit (LEO) satellites have often been used to acquire image data for Earth observations, such as natural disasters and terrain changes, using synthetic aperture radars (SARs) [1,2]. These LEO satellites have a rapid velocity of around 7.6 km/s at an altitude of 550 km to a fixed point on a ground station and transmit the image data through a downlink which is the X-band (8025 MHz~8400 MHz) for the high-rate data. In order to predict the data transmission situation from LEO satellites in rapidly changing interference situations, many studies have been conducted on the link budget analysis in terms of path loss [3], the elevation angle of the satellite [4], and non-line-of-sight situations [5,6,7]. However, link budget analysis studies on misaligned off-axis and interference situations considering antenna radiation patterns and space environment have not yet been sufficiently performed. In particular, there are no in-depth studies of scenarios where power controllable interference sources are exposed to the side lobe of the receiving antenna. In addition, most previous studies have been conducted considering losses in the near-ground atmosphere [8,9,10], without accounting for the entire space environment.
In this paper, we investigate an analysis of a LEO satellite downlink, considering antenna patterns and the space environment in interference situations where the side lobe of a ground station antenna is exposed to a strong interference signal source. To calculate the link budget, considering the bore-sight error loss between the ground station and the satellite when the LEO satellite moves rapidly over the Earth, antenna patterns of the ground station and the LEO satellite are employed. The ground station antenna is assumed to be a parabolic type, and its radiation pattern is calculated by using methods of geometrical optics (GO) and physical optics (PO) [11]. The radiation pattern of a choke ring antenna, which it is assumed is that used in the LEO satellite, is obtained through a full electric magnetic (EM) simulation. The actual radiation patterns of the receiving and transmitting antennas are obtained and applied to the study, in order to more accurately estimate the data link budget when interference is strong in the side lobe of the receiving antenna. Finally, an analysis of the interference situation based on the space environment is calculated when the interference source moves over the ground station in various interference situations. We employ ray tracing techniques and geometrical optics to analyze the interference situation when the LEO satellite is located at a specific low elevation angle. Jamming-to-signal (J/S) ratio results according to the space environments are examined and they differ by about 3 dB at low elevation angles according to the space environments.

5. Conclusions

We analyzed the LEO satellite downlink, considering antenna patterns and the space environment in interference situations. The actual radiation patterns of the receiving and transmitting antennas were applied to more accurately estimate the data link budget when interference was strong in the side lobe of the receiving antenna. The choke ring horn type antenna with a diameter of 77.4 mm was used as the transmitting antenna in the LEO satellite, which had an HPBW of 103.2° and a maximum gain of 6.6 dBi at 8 GHz. The receiving antenna in the ground station was the parabolic type of antenna with a diameter of 11.3 m and an HPBW of 0.2°, with a maximum gain of 59 dBi at 8 GHz. We applied the space environment by employing the ray tracing technique and geometrical optics to calculate EM wave propagation. To observe the effects of the space environment, we examined the regression model with and without the space environment. To quantify the difference between the two cases, we defined β, which was the average difference between the two models. At θgs = 10°, β was from 1 dB to 4 dB, whereas β was from 0 dB to 1 dB at θgs = 60°. These results demonstrated that the bore-sight error and atmospheric attenuation increase due to the increased ray refraction, especially at low elevation angles, and thus it was important to consider the space environment for LEO satellite downlink analysis in interference situations.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, H.C. and E.K.; methodology, E.K., J.K. and H.C.; soft- ware, E.K.; validation, E.K., J.K. and H.C.; formal analysis, E.K. and H.C.; investigation, E.K. and J.Y.; resources, E.K. and H.C.; data curation, E.K. and W.S.; writing—original draft preparation, E.K. and J.Y; writing—review and editing, Y.B.P., J.K., W.S., Y.P. and H.C.; visualization, E.K. and H.C.; supervision, H.C.; project administration, Y.P.; funding acquisition, H.C. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by Agency for Defense Development-Grant funded by Defense Acquisition Program Administration (UI210013YD).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Lim, J.H.; Lee, J.W.; Lee, T.K.; Lee, H.C.; Lee, S.G.; Ryu, S.B.; Yoon, S.S. Performance evaluation of a modified Sweep SAR mode for quad-pol application in SAR systems. J. Electromagn. Eng. Sci. 2020, 20, 199–206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  2. Kang, Y.G.; Kim, C.K.; Park, S.O. Ocean image formation algorithm using altimeter data for next generation satellite SAR. J. Electromagn. Eng. Sci. 2022, 22, 85–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  3. Jiang, W.; Zong, P. Analysis and validation of a new path loss model for LEO satellite communication systems. In Proceedings of the 2010 2nd International Conference on Computer Engineering and Technology, Chengdu, China, 16–18 April 2010; Volume 2, pp. V2-523–V2-527. [Google Scholar]
  4. Gongora-Torres, J.M.; Vargas-Rosales, C.; Aragon-Zavala, A.; Villalpando-Hernandez, R. link budget analysis for LEO satellites based on the statistics of the elevation angle. IEEE Access 2022, 10, 14518–14528. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  5. Hofmann, C.A.; Knopp, A. Satellite downlink jamming propagation measurements at ku-band. In Proceedings of the MILCOM 2018-2018 IEEE Military Communications Conference, Los Angeles, CA, USA, 29–31 October 2018; pp. 853–858. [Google Scholar]
  6. Morong, T.; Puričer, P.; Kovář, P. Study of the GNSS jamming in real environment. Int. J. Electron. Telecommun. 2019, 65, 65–70. [Google Scholar]
  7. Lichtman, M.; Reed, J.H. Analysis of reactive jamming against satellite communications. Int. J. Satell. Commun. Netw. 2016, 34, 195–210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  8. Garcia, J.R.; Benammar, B.; Dudal, C.; Bompis, O.; Artaud, G.; Issler, J.L.; Guillon, H. Performance Comparison of Low Earth Orbit (LEO) Direct To Earth (DTE) High Data Rate Telemetry in X and Ka Bands; CNES: Toulouse, France, 2016.
  9. Tirkas, P.A.; Wangsvick, C.M.; Balanis, C.A. Propagation model for building blockage in satellite mobile communication systems. IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag. 1998, 46, 991–997. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  10. Lee, H.C. Ku-band link budget analysis of UAV with atmospheric losses. In Proceedings of the 2006 IEEE/AIAA 25TH Digital Avionics Systems Conference, Portland, OR, USA, 15–18 October 2006; pp. 1–8. [Google Scholar]
  11. Merabtine, N.; Boualleg, A.; Benslama, M. Analysis of radiation patterns and feed illumination of the reflector antenna using the physical and geometrical optics. Semicond. Phys. Quant. 2006, 9, 53–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  12. Florio, A.; Avitabile, G.; Coviello, G.A. Linear Technique for Artifacts Correction and Compensation in Phase Interferometric Angle of Arrival Estimation. Sensors 2022, 22, 1427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  13. Satsearch. Available online: https://satsearch.co/products/endurosat-x-band-4x4-patch-array-antenna (accessed on 1 October 2022).
  14. Mao, C.X.; Gao, S.; Wang, Y.; Chu, Q.X.; Yang, X.X. Dual-band circularly polarized shared-aperture array for C/X-band satellite communications, IEEE Antennas Wirel. Propag. Lett. 2017, 65, 5171–5178. [Google Scholar]
  15. García-Aguilar, A.; Inclán-Alonso, J.M.; Vigil-Herrero, L.; Fernández-González, J.M.; Sierra-Pérez, M. Low-profile dual circularly polarized antenna array for satellite communications in the X band. IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag. 2012, 60, 2276–2284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Wettergren, J.; Dimming, P.; Johansson, J.F.; Öhgren, M. A high gain X-band isoflux helix antenna. In Proceedings of the 2016 10th European Conference on Antennas and Propagation, Switzerland, Davos, 10–15 April 2016. [Google Scholar]
  17. Lee, Y.J.; Lu, J.-H.; Tarn, I.-Y.; Chen, S.-L.; Chung, S.-J. An X-band circularly polarized antenna for satellite applications. In Proceedings of the 2014 Asia-Pacific Microwave Conference, Sendai, Japan, 4–7 November 2014. [Google Scholar]
  18. Dubrovka, F.; Martunyuk, S.; Dubrovka, R.; Lytvyn, M.; Lytvyn, S.; Ovsianyk, Y.; Piltyay, S.; Sushko, O.; Zakharchenko, O. Circularly polarised X-band H11- and H21-modes antenna feed for monopulse autotracking ground station. In Proceedings of the 2020 IEEE Ukrainian Microwave Week, Kharkiv, Ukraine, 21–25 September 2020. [Google Scholar]
  19. Cheong, S.S.; Kim, T.-H.; Jung, J.-M.; Lee, S.-G.; Kim, Y.-H. Design of 2-axis gimbal spaceborne x-band antenna for high data rate payload transmission. In Proceedings of the 2013 Asia-Pacific Microwave Conference, Seoul, Korea, 5–8 November 2013. [Google Scholar]
  20. Tomoki, K.; Saito, H. Dual circularly polarization antenna with high XPD for downlink communication of earth observation satellite. In Proceedings of the 2017 IEEE Conference on Antenna Measurements & Applications, Tsukuba, Japan, 4–6 December 2017. [Google Scholar]
  21. Chahat, N.; Amaro, L.R.; Harrell, J.; Wang, C.; Estabrook, P.; Butman, S.A. X-band choke ring horn telecom antenna for interference mitigation on NASA’s SWOT mission. IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag. 2016, 64, 2075–2082. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  22. Arnaud, E.; Dugenet, J.; Elis, K.; Girardot, A.; Guihard, D.; Menudier, C.; Monediere, T.; Roziere, F.; Thevenot, M. Compact isoflux X-band payload telemetry antenna with simultaneous dual circular polarization for LEO satellite applications. IEEE Antennas Wirel. Propag. Lett. 2020, 19, 1679–1683. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  23. Akan, V. Choke ring horn antenna design for satellite payload data transmitters. Microw. Opt. Technol. Lett. 2021, 63, 1913–1919. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  24. Fouany, J.; Thevenot, M.; Arnaud, E.; Torres, F.; Monediere, T.; Adnet, N.; Manrique, R.; Duchesne, L.; Baracco, J.M.; Elis, K. Circurlaly polarized isoflux compact X band antenna for nano-satellites applications. In Proceedings of the 2015 European Radar Conference, Paris, France, 9–11 September 2015; pp. 381–384. [Google Scholar]
  25. El-Hassan, M.A.; Hussein, K.F.A.; Farahat, A.E.; Awadalla, K.H. X-Band isoflux concentric circular antenna arrays for image data download from LEO satellites to ground stations. Appl. Comput. Electromagn. Soc. J. 2019, 34, 1694–1703. [Google Scholar]
  26. Nawaz, W.; Ali, A.S. Improvement of gain in dual fed X band isoflux choke horn antenna for use in LEO satellite mission. In Proceedings of the 2015 Fourth International Conference on Aerospace Science and Engineering, Lahore, Pakistan, 2–4 August 2015; pp. 1–4. [Google Scholar]
  27. ITU. Radiation Diagrams for Use as Design Objectives for Antennas of Earth Stations Operating with Geostationary Satellites; Recommendation ITU-R, S. 580-6; ITU: Geneva, Switzerland, 2003. [Google Scholar]
  28. Kim, C.; Park, Y.B. Prediction of electromagnetic wave propagation in space environments based on geometrical optics. J. Electromagn. Eng. Sci. 2017, 17, 165–167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  29. Balanis, C.A. Advanced Engineering Electromagnetics, 2nd ed.; Wiley: Chichester, UK, 2012; pp. 742–761. [Google Scholar]
  30. Bean, B.R. The radio refractive index of air. Proc. IRE 1962, 50, 260–273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  31. Liebe, H.J. MPM-An atmospheric millimeter-wave propagation model. Int. J. Infrared Millimeter Waves 1989, 10, 631–650. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  32. Atmospheric Soundings–Wyoming Weather Web. Available online: http://weather.uwyo.edu/upperair/sounding.html (accessed on 1 October 2022).
  33. Papas, C.H. Theory of Electromagnetic Wave Propagation; Perlego: New York, NY, USA, 2014; pp. 165–201. [Google Scholar]
  34. ITU. Ionospheric Propagation Data and Prediction Methods Required for the Design of Satellite Networks and Systems; Recommendation ITU-R, P.531-14; ITU: Geneva, Switzerland, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  35. Jang, D.; Youn, S.; Lee, J.Y.; Choo, H. Statistical indoor exclusion zone analysis by investigating electromagnetic fields inside a nuclear power plant. Appl. Sci. 2021, 11, 4199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  36. Fumo, N.; Biswas, M.R. Regression analysis for prediction of residential energy consumption. Renew. Sust. Energ. 2015, 47, 332–343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Article Metrics

Citations

Article Access Statistics

Multiple requests from the same IP address are counted as one view.