Next Article in Journal
Determinants of Firm’s Export Performance in China’s Automobile Industry
Previous Article in Journal
Influence of Congruency between Ideal Self and Brand Image on Sustainable Happiness
Previous Article in Special Issue
Trade-Old-for-Remanufactured Closed-Loop Supply Chains with Carbon Tax and Government Subsidies
Article Menu
Issue 11 (November) cover image

Export Article

Open AccessArticle
Sustainability 2018, 10(11), 4077; https://doi.org/10.3390/su10114077

Influence of Reduced Ownership on the Environmental Benefits of the Circular Economy

Department of Built Environment, School of Engineering, Aalto University, Otakaari 4, P.O. Box 14100, AALTO-FIN, 00076 Helsinki, Finland
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Received: 4 September 2018 / Revised: 8 October 2018 / Accepted: 30 October 2018 / Published: 7 November 2018
Full-Text   |   PDF [1023 KB, uploaded 7 November 2018]   |  

Abstract

The circular economy has become a popular concept, suggesting economic growth with fewer emissions and reduced ownership as one of its key parameters. Based on the literature, however, it appears that the concept has not been sufficiently contested empirically. This study evaluates the carbon and material footprint implications of reduced ownership in the context of household consumption. We found that the reduced ownership does not automatically reduce the environmental impact of the production–consumption system in the context of households. Reduced ownership in the study did not have any noticeable influence on material footprint, and in the case of carbon footprint, it only had a mild positive influence in low-income households. The result is surprising, since both intuitively as well as based on the literature, moving from ownership to services should increase resource efficiency and reduce environmental impact. In the context of households, actual consumption and investment behavior seem to override the theoretical benefits of reduced ownership. In our study, the circular economy rebound and the willingness to invest in green products seems to explain quite well why the environmental impact of consumption is not reduced when households move from ownership to services. Households appear to spend the money saved from reduced ownership on carbon-intensive services; when they own the products themselves, they invest a more-than-average amount in the life cycle performance of the products. The paper’s implications for the circular economy as a concept for decoupling economic growth from environmental pressure is that one of its primary qualities, sharing and renting services instead of owning things, seems to offer only a partial solution for the dilemma. In order to fully benefit from reduced ownership, the circular economy should emphasize simultaneous change in both the production and consumption of services, as it seems that simply offering products for rent does not automatically reduce the environmental impact of the final demand. View Full-Text
Keywords: circular economy; carbon footprint; material footprint; consumption patterns; household expenditure; sharing economy circular economy; carbon footprint; material footprint; consumption patterns; household expenditure; sharing economy
Figures

Figure 1

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited (CC BY 4.0).
SciFeed

Share & Cite This Article

MDPI and ACS Style

Junnila, S.; Ottelin, J.; Leinikka, L. Influence of Reduced Ownership on the Environmental Benefits of the Circular Economy. Sustainability 2018, 10, 4077.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats

Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Related Articles

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics

1

Comments

[Return to top]
Sustainability EISSN 2071-1050 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert
Back to Top