Next Article in Journal
Heat Stress and Thermal Perception amongst Healthcare Workers during the COVID-19 Pandemic in India and Singapore
Previous Article in Journal
The Food Bank of Madrid: A Linear Model for Optimal Nutrition
Previous Article in Special Issue
Fostering Attachment Security: The Role of Interdependent Situations
Project Report

The Dual Function Model of Attachment Security Priming: Theoretical Framework and Empirical Evidence

1
Department of Psychology, University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS 66045, USA
2
Department of Psychology, Deakin University, Melbourne 3125, Australia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17(21), 8093; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17218093
Received: 8 August 2020 / Revised: 27 October 2020 / Accepted: 29 October 2020 / Published: 3 November 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in Fostering Attachment Security)
According to attachment theory, security providing attachment figures fulfill two main functions: (1) safe haven—providing safety and comfort and reducing stress—helping people regain a sense of security; and (2) secure base—providing resources and a base from which people can spring into action. According to the Dual Function of Security Priming Model, security priming can result in one of two outcomes paralleling these two functions. Which outcome is likely to present itself depends on the level of stress imposed by the context. Here we describe the Dual Function Model of Security Priming (DFSP) Model and provide evidence from a study examining the effects of attachment security priming on hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal activity. In the study, participants were exposed to security-related cues under high or low/no-stress conditions, while their salivary cortisol concentrations were measured. Cortisol is a suitable index as it is released not only in response to stress, but also more generally when energy needs to be mobilized. We found that while security priming led to significant decreases in salivary cortisol concentrations when presented after a stressor (stress reduction), it led to a significant increase in salivary cortisol concentrations when presented before the stressor (energy mobilization). View Full-Text
Keywords: attachment security; priming; salivary cortisol; dual function model attachment security; priming; salivary cortisol; dual function model
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Ai, T.; Gillath, O.; Karantzas, G.C. The Dual Function Model of Attachment Security Priming: Theoretical Framework and Empirical Evidence. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17, 8093. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17218093

AMA Style

Ai T, Gillath O, Karantzas GC. The Dual Function Model of Attachment Security Priming: Theoretical Framework and Empirical Evidence. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2020; 17(21):8093. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17218093

Chicago/Turabian Style

Ai, Ting, Omri Gillath, and Gery C. Karantzas. 2020. "The Dual Function Model of Attachment Security Priming: Theoretical Framework and Empirical Evidence" International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 17, no. 21: 8093. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17218093

Find Other Styles
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Back to TopTop