Skip to Content

Tomography

Tomography is an international, peer-reviewed open access journal on imaging technologies published monthly online by MDPI (from Volume 7, Issue 1 - 2021).

Indexed in PubMed | Quartile Ranking JCR - Q2 (Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Medical Imaging)

Get Alerted

Add your email address to receive forthcoming issues of this journal.

All Articles (1,049)

Objectives: This study evaluated the test–retest repeatability of semi-quantitative and volumetric features derived from artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted lesion segmentation on 18F-DCFPyL Prostate Specific Membrane Antigen (PSMA)-PET/CT imaging of patients with prostate cancer (PCa). Specifically, we assessed the reliability of maximum, minimum and total standardized uptake values (SUVmax, SUVmean, SUVtotal) and lesion volume measurements across varying lesion sizes and explored the implications of variability for clinical decision-making. Methods: We analyzed 18F-DCFPyL PSMA-PET/CT images from 22 patients with metastatic PCa. Lesion segmentation was performed using the AI-guided TRAQinform IQ technology, followed by a manual review to eliminate potential false-positive sites of uptake. Lesion-level test–retest repeatability was evaluated using 95% limits of agreement (LOA), intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC), within-subject coefficient of variation (wCOV) and Bland–Altman analysis for SUV and volumetric parameters. Lesions were stratified by size (>1 cm3 and >1.5 cm3) to assess the impact of lesion volume cut-offs on measurement variability. Results: A total of 297 lesions were analyzed, including 191 lesions > 1 cm3 and 161 lesions > 1.5 cm3. Test–retest variability was higher in smaller lesions, with narrower LOA and lower wCOV for larger lesions. SUVmax and SUVmean exhibited lower variability than SUVtotal and lesion volume. The 95% LOA for SUVmax ranged from −33.81% to +38.02% for all lesions, improving to −31.82% to +31.01% for lesions > 1.5 cm3. Similar trends were observed for SUVmean, SUVtotal, and volume. Bland–Altman plots confirmed reduced variability in larger lesions, with no significant systematic bias. Conclusions: The test–retest repeatability of AI-assisted PSMA-PET/CT features varies by feature type, with semi-quantitative features demonstrating improved repeatability relative to volumetric features. Additionally, repeatability is influenced by lesion size, with larger lesions exhibiting greater reliability. These findings highlight the importance of lesion size-dependent thresholds in response assessment and variability-aware feature selection in prognostic models. Current algorithms may be better optimized for larger lesions and higher volumes of disease, with limitations remaining in the robust detection and segmentation of smaller/more subtle lesions.

11 March 2026

Workflow of the study from image upload to feature extraction and repeatability analysis.

Background/Objectives: This study aimed to compare in vivo cerebral gadolinium (Gd3+) accumulation, associated unfolded protein response (UPR), and oxidative stress parameters in rats after exposure to gadolinium-based contrast agents (GBCAs). Methods: This study was designed as a controlled, experimental animal study to evaluate the accumulation of Gd3+ in the basal ganglia of rats following the administration of 0.6 mmol/kg gadopentetate dimeglumine (linear) and gadoterate meglumine (macrocyclic). Male Sprague–Dawley rats were exposed to the contrast agents for 24 and 72 h, and then the basal ganglia tissues were collected postmortem. The tissue levels of Gd3+ accumulation, activating transcription factor-6 (ATF6), inositol-requiring enzyme-1 (IRE-1), protein kinase RNA-like endoplasmic reticulum kinase (PERK), damage-inducible transcript-3 (DDIT3), total antioxidant status (TAS), and total oxidant status (TOS) were determined. Results: Linear GBCA-treated rats had persistent Gd3+ levels over time, whereas a significant reduction from 24 to 72 h was observed in macrocyclic GBCA-treated rats (p < 0.001). PERK, DDIT3, and ATF6 expressions were significantly elevated after linear GBCA exposure (p < 0.05), while no significant increase was observed in the macrocyclic GBCA-treated group. However, IRE-1, TAS, and TOS levels were not significantly different in either group. Conclusions: Linear and macrocyclic GBCAs demonstrated distinct patterns of cerebral Gd3+ accumulation and UPR levels in rats. Accordingly, GBCA administration should be reserved for instances where it is necessary, such as when contrast enhancement is clinically required.

5 March 2026

Graphical representation of UPR protein levels in Magnevist- and Dotarem-treated rats compared with the control group (* p &lt; 0.05; ** p &lt; 0.01). M-24, Magnevist at 24 h; M-72, Magnevist at 72 h; D-24, Dotarem at 24 h; D-72, Dotarem at 72 h; IRE-1, inositol-requiring enzyme 1; PERK, protein kinase RNA-like endoplasmic reticulum kinase; DDIT3, DNA damage-inducible transcript 3 (CHOP); ATF6, activating transcription factor 6.

Background: Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is increasingly performed in fluoroscopy-intensive environments, raising concerns about occupational eye lens dose (equivalent dose to the eye lens, Hp (3)) and the risk of radiation-induced cataract, particularly after the reduction of recommended annual eye lens dose limits to 20 mSv. Purpose: To summarize evidence on eye lens radiation exposure during TAVI, identify procedural and occupational determinants, and review strategies to reduce exposure with a focus on imaging optimization. Methods: We performed a narrative review of observational and prospective studies reporting direct eye-level dose measurements or validated surrogate eye lens dose estimates (head-level, chest-level, or DAP-normalized) during TAVI and related structural heart procedures. This approach was chosen to provide a qualitative synthesis of the available evidence rather than a formal systematic review. Results: Reported operator eye lens doses typically ranged from 30 to 110 µSv per procedure, with higher exposure during transapical/transaortal access and among staff working close to the patient (e.g., anesthesiologists and circulating nurses). Additional shielding and lead-free drapes reduced normalized eye dose by approximately 25–40%, and RADPAD® use reduced operator eye-level dose from 24.3 to 14.8 µSv per procedure (p = 0.008). At these levels, cumulative exposure may approach recommended regulatory limits after approximately 150–300 procedures, depending on role, access route, and shielding practices. Conclusion: In conclusion, Occupational eye lens exposure during TAVI is clinically relevant and strongly influenced by access route, staff positioning, and imaging-system use. Dose reduction should combine routine eye protection and dedicated eye-level dosimetry with imaging optimization (low pulse-rate fluoroscopy, minimized Digital-Subtraction-Angiography (DSA)/cine acquisitions, tight collimation, avoidance of unnecessary magnification, and correct positioning of ceiling-suspended shields and table skirts).

4 March 2026

Conceptual schematic of imaging-driven occupational eye lens dose during TAVI, showing patient-generated scatter radiation and the protective role of ceiling-suspended shielding and table-mounted lead drapes. The C-arm is the C-shaped fluoroscopic unit that supports the X-ray tube (positioned under the table in this configuration) and the detector. Yellow arrows represent the primary X-ray beam and patient-scattered radiation. Blue curved arrows indicate C-arm rotation/angulation, while blue horizontal arrows denote spatial orientation relative to the operator’s eye(Created by the authors).

Purpose: The present study aimed to assess the radiation dose associated with low-dose (LD) CT pelvimetry compared with conventional radiography and to evaluate the adequacy of the resulting image quality. Methods: The absorbed dose was measured using thermoluminescent dosimeters positioned in an anthropomorphic female phantom, including uterine locations, to estimate the fetal dose. Conventional radiographic pelvimetry and LD-CT pelvimetry were performed using clinically implemented protocols. Effective dose was calculated using Monte Carlo–based modeling applying acquisition parameters and retrospective patient dose registry data. Image quality of LD-CT pelvimetry was independently evaluated in 14 consecutive clinical cases using a four-point ordinal scale. Results: LD-CT pelvimetry reduced the mean absorbed pelvic dose by approximately 50% compared with conventional pelvimetry (0.18 vs. 0.39 mGy) and decreased estimated fetal dose by 40% (0.21 vs. 0.37 mGy). These estimates were based on standardized single acquisitions and did not incorporate additional radiation from retakes commonly observed in conventional practice. CT demonstrated substantially more homogeneous dose distribution, whereas conventional pelvimetry exhibited marked heterogeneity with peak values up to 2.3 mGy. The maternal effective dose was lower for LD-CT (0.16 mSv) than for conventional pelvimetry (0.36 mSv); inclusion of retakes increased the conventional effective dose to 0.71 mSv. All CT examinations were diagnostically adequate, and no recalls were required. Conclusions: Optimized low-dose CT pelvimetry significantly reduces radiation dose compared with conventional radiographic pelvimetry while maintaining reliable diagnostic image quality. These results support the clinical adoption of CT-based pelvimetry as a dose-efficient and reproducible alternative to conventional techniques.

4 March 2026

(a) The Alderson Radiation Therapy (ART) female phantom (the arrow indicates TLD placement for measuring the dose to the uterus); (b) slab No. 26 with 16 holes for TLD insertions; and (c) the ART phantom with the water container (10 L) simulating a 60 kg pregnant female.

News & Conferences

Issues

Open for Submission

Editor's Choice

Reprints of Collections

AI in Medical Imaging and Image Processing
Reprint

AI in Medical Imaging and Image Processing

Volume II
Editors: Karolina Nurzynska, Michał Strzelecki, Adam Piórkowski, Rafał Obuchowicz
AI in Medical Imaging and Image Processing
Reprint

AI in Medical Imaging and Image Processing

Volume I
Editors: Karolina Nurzynska, Michał Strzelecki, Adam Piórkowski, Rafał Obuchowicz
XFacebookLinkedIn
Tomography - ISSN 2379-139X