Minimally Invasive and Robotic Surgery in Head and Neck Cancer

A special issue of Journal of Clinical Medicine (ISSN 2077-0383). This special issue belongs to the section "Oncology".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (30 October 2019) | Viewed by 2528

Special Issue Editors


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Otorhinolaryngology Unit, Humanitas University, Rozzano, Italy
Interests: head and neck surgery; minimally invasive surgery; reconstructive surgery; head and neck oncology; robotic surgery

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Otorhinolaryngology Unit, Humanitas University, Rozzano, Italy
Interests: head and neck surgery; minimally invasive surgery; reconstructive surgery; head and neck oncology; robotic surgery

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

Minimally invasive surgery has been adopted in many areas of surgery to reduce patient morbidity during surgical resection. To achieve this, endoscopic and robotic instrumentation coupled with improved imaging tools and localisation techniques have been developed, to enable adequate resection of tumours with minimum damage to surrounding tissues. Minimally invasive surgery is a fast growing research field and in in the last two decades there has been much new research and many applications have been acquired in different fields of head and neck surgery.

For example, 4K and 3D endoscopes now allow for a better definition of surgical narrow fields. Extracorporeal video microscopes, or "exoscopes", provide a high-definition view of the operative field and are alternatives to the operating microscope or loupes for large-corridor surgical approaches. Surgical robots arose from the need to reproduce the same movements and type of dissection performed in open surgery, maintaining the advantages of minimally invasive surgery. This is made possible by instruments capable of performing 360° movements thanks to the degrees of freedom of the robotic arms and articulated tools. Moreover, by means of robotics it is possible to limit the tremor of the hands and amplify the vision ten times in three dimensions, therefore performing movements of extreme precision.

In head and neck surgery, numerous studies have shown an equivalence of minimally invasive surgery compared to open surgery in terms of oncological radicality, however, other studies have confirmed that the minimally invasive approach is superior in terms of post-operative quality of life and the earlier resumption of normal life. While in the initial stages of head and neck cancer, minimally invasive surgery—manual and robotic—is today the standard of treatment. The future interests of minimally invasive surgeons in the coming years will be addressed to more complex procedures including the treatment of locally advanced cancers after chemotherapy. In this Special Issue we will review the techniques, indications and results of the application of minimally invasive surgery in the head and neck, focusing not only on the current standard, but also evaluating future applications and new perspectives.

Dr. Armando De Virgilio
Prof. Dr. Giuseppe Spriano
Guest Editors

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Journal of Clinical Medicine is an international peer-reviewed open access semimonthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2600 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • Head and Neck Surgery
  • Minimally Invasive Surgery
  • Head and Neck Oncology
  • Reconstructive Surgery
  • Robotic Surgery

Published Papers (1 paper)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

9 pages, 182 KiB  
Article
Transoral Robot-Assisted Surgery in Supraglottic and Oropharyngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: Laser Versus Monopolar Electrocautery
by Marco Benazzo, Pietro Canzi, Simone Mauramati, Fabio Sovardi, Antonio Occhini, Eugenia Maiorano, Giuseppe Trisolini and Patrizia Morbini
J. Clin. Med. 2019, 8(12), 2166; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm8122166 - 07 Dec 2019
Cited by 6 | Viewed by 2144
Abstract
Background: Monopolar electrocautery (EC) is the surgical cutting and haemostatic tool most commonly used for transoral robotic surgery (TORS). The aim of this study was to retrospectively compare EC efficacy in the treatment of patients affected by T1 or T2 oropharyngeal and supraglottic [...] Read more.
Background: Monopolar electrocautery (EC) is the surgical cutting and haemostatic tool most commonly used for transoral robotic surgery (TORS). The aim of this study was to retrospectively compare EC efficacy in the treatment of patients affected by T1 or T2 oropharyngeal and supraglottic squamous cell carcinomas with the more recently introduced laser fibres. Methods: We considered all TORS patients admitted to our department from January 2010 to June 2019. The outcomes of patients treated with Thulium: yttrium aluminium garnet (YAG) laser (TY-TORS), CO2 laser (CO2-TORS) and EC (EC-TORS) were analysed in order to assess surgical performances, functional outcomes and postoperative complications. Results: Twenty patients satisfied the enrolling criteria, of which nine underwent laser-TORS, and the remaining 11 underwent EC-TORS. In all candidates, TORS procedures were completed without the need for microscopic/open conversion. Close or positive margins were significantly more frequent in EC-TORS (p = 0.028). A considerable difference was found in overall functional parameters: times of nasogastric tube and tracheostomy removal and time of hospital discharge were significantly shorter in laser-TORS (p = 0.04, p = 0.05, p = 0.04, respectively). Conclusions: Laser-TORS showed better results in comparison with EC-TORS in term of tumour resection margins and patient functional outcomes. Our findings can be justified with the greater tissue thermal damage caused by EC-TORS, despite prospective randomized trials and increased patient numbers being needed to confirm these preliminary conclusions. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Minimally Invasive and Robotic Surgery in Head and Neck Cancer)
Back to TopTop