jcm-logo

Journal Browser

Journal Browser

Recent Advances in Rehabilitation of Patients with Multiple Sclerosis (MS)

A special issue of Journal of Clinical Medicine (ISSN 2077-0383). This special issue belongs to the section "Clinical Neurology".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: 30 July 2025 | Viewed by 1479

Special Issue Editor


E-Mail
Guest Editor

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

This Special Issue aims to highlight the latest research and innovative approaches in the rehabilitation of patients with Multiple Sclerosis (MS). As a complex and progressive neurological disorder, MS presents unique challenges that require individualized rehabilitation strategies.

Contributions to this Special Issue will cover a wide range of topics, including:

  • Innovative Therapeutic Interventions: exploring cutting-edge therapies, such as neuroplasticity-based approaches and technology-assisted rehabilitation, including virtual reality and robotic devices.
  • Multidisciplinary Care Models: examining the effectiveness of integrated care involving neurologists, physical therapists, occupational therapists, and mental health professionals to improve patient outcomes.
  • Patient-Centered Approaches: highlighting the importance of personalized rehabilitation plans that consider each patient's unique needs, preferences, and the psychosocial aspects of living with MS.
  • Outcome Measurement: reviewing the latest tools and methodologies for assessing rehabilitation effectiveness, including patient-reported outcomes and objective measures of functional improvement.
  • Telehealth and Remote Monitoring: investigating the role of telehealth in providing accessible rehabilitation services and monitoring patient progress in real time.

This Special Issue seeks to provide a comprehensive overview of advancements in rehabilitation strategies for MS patients, fostering a deeper understanding of best practices and emerging trends that can significantly enhance quality of life and functional outcomes.

Dr. Viviana Lo Buono
Guest Editor

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Journal of Clinical Medicine is an international peer-reviewed open access semimonthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2600 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • multiple sclerosis
  • rehabilitation
  • virtual reality
  • telerehabilitation
  • quality of life

Benefits of Publishing in a Special Issue

  • Ease of navigation: Grouping papers by topic helps scholars navigate broad scope journals more efficiently.
  • Greater discoverability: Special Issues support the reach and impact of scientific research. Articles in Special Issues are more discoverable and cited more frequently.
  • Expansion of research network: Special Issues facilitate connections among authors, fostering scientific collaborations.
  • External promotion: Articles in Special Issues are often promoted through the journal's social media, increasing their visibility.
  • Reprint: MDPI Books provides the opportunity to republish successful Special Issues in book format, both online and in print.

Further information on MDPI's Special Issue policies can be found here.

Published Papers (2 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Review

Jump to: Other

11 pages, 505 KiB  
Review
Physiotherapy for Sexual Dysfunctions in Multiple Sclerosis Patients: A Review of Clinical Trials
by Michalina Reimus and Mariusz Siemiński
J. Clin. Med. 2025, 14(10), 3509; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14103509 - 16 May 2025
Viewed by 101
Abstract
Multiple Sclerosis (MS) is an inflammatory autoimmune disorder that primarily affects the central nervous system, leading to significant disability in young adults, with a higher prevalence observed in women. The heterogeneous clinical presentation of MS poses substantial challenges in diagnosis and treatment. In [...] Read more.
Multiple Sclerosis (MS) is an inflammatory autoimmune disorder that primarily affects the central nervous system, leading to significant disability in young adults, with a higher prevalence observed in women. The heterogeneous clinical presentation of MS poses substantial challenges in diagnosis and treatment. In recent years, considerable emphasis has been placed on improving the quality of life for MS patients, with sexual health being a key component of this assessment. The literature suggests that sexual dysfunctions affect between 42% and 73% of individuals with MS. While the positive effects of physiotherapy interventions on sexual dysfunction have been extensively studied, there remains a significant gap in understanding the prevalence of these disorders within the MS population and the most effective treatment approaches. This review highlights the critical need to integrate pelvic floor physiotherapists into multidisciplinary MS treatment teams. Six randomized controlled trials (RCTs) meeting the inclusion criteria were identified. These studies included patients diagnosed with MS who reported various sexual dysfunctions, such as orgasmic dysfunction, sexual arousal disorders, and dysfunctions associated with overactive bladder. The outcomes were assessed using sexual function and urological symptom questionnaires. Physiotherapeutic interventions, including manual therapy, kinesiotherapy, and physical therapy elements, have demonstrated positive effects on sexual quality of life, specifically in relation to issues such as desire, arousal, and satisfaction. However, the available data are still preliminary and warrant further investigation. By recognizing the importance of pelvic floor therapy, more targeted and holistic interventions can be implemented, ultimately improving patient outcomes and enhancing the overall standard of care. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Other

Jump to: Review

23 pages, 2526 KiB  
Systematic Review
Effects of Physical Exercise on Neurofilament Light Chain and Glial Fibrillary Acidic Protein Level in Patients with Multiple Sclerosis: A Systematic Review and Bayesian Network Meta-Analysis
by Aitor Blázquez-Fernández, Víctor Navarro-López, Selena Marcos-Antón and Roberto Cano-de-la-Cuerda
J. Clin. Med. 2025, 14(3), 839; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14030839 - 27 Jan 2025
Viewed by 1096
Abstract
Background: The prognosis of people with multiple sclerosis (MS) has improved substantially in recent decades due to advances in diagnosis and treatment. Due to the unpredictable course and heterogenous treatment response in MS, there is a clear need for biomarkers that reflect disease [...] Read more.
Background: The prognosis of people with multiple sclerosis (MS) has improved substantially in recent decades due to advances in diagnosis and treatment. Due to the unpredictable course and heterogenous treatment response in MS, there is a clear need for biomarkers that reflect disease activity in the clinical follow-up of these patients. We conducted a systematic review with Bayesian network meta-analysis with the aim of analyzing the effects of physical exercise on neurofilaments (NfL) and glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) levels in patients with MS. Methods: A systematic review was conducted following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, starting with a PICO (patient/population, intervention, comparison, and outcome) question: what are the clinical effects of physical exercise (with independence of the type) on NfL and/or GFAP levels in patients with MS compared with other interventions or no intervention whatsoever? A systematically comprehensive literature search was conducted from January to March 2024 to identify original studies that answered the PICO question, using the main data sources. The quality of the studies included was assessed using the Quality Index of Downs & Black. For studies included in the systematic review that followed a randomized controlled trial (RCT) design, the methodological quality of each paper was assessed using the Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro) Scale. Risk of bias was also explored by two independent reviewers. Finally, all articles were classified according to the levels of evidence and grades of recommendation for diagnosis studies established by the Oxford Center for Evidence-Based Medicine. For continuous outcome measures with enough comparisons and a methodological quality greater than or equal to good according to the PEDro scale, a Bayesian network meta-analysis (NMA) was applied. The statistical analyses were performed in R (version 4.1.3, R Core Team 2023) using the “BUGSnet” and “gemtc” packages. Bayesian NMA can be used to obtain a posterior probability distribution of all the relative treatment effects, which allows us to quantify the uncertainty of parameter estimates and to rank all the treatments in the network. Results: Eight studies were included in this systematic review and six articles in the NMA, and they were appraised for quality. The characteristics of the included studies, types of training and described protocols, methodological quality, risk of bias, and clinical effects on the studied biomarkers were outlined. Qualitative synthesis, effects of different exercise modalities in NfL with the Bayesian NMA, selection of the final model and model assessment, and ranking of interventions are also shown. Conclusions: Our findings indicated that moderate-intensity exercise is more likely to reduce NfL concentration compared to high-intensity exercise, and, in turn, high-intensity exercise is more likely to reduce NfL concentration than low-intensity exercise. However, the effects of high-intensity exercise on GFAP levels were inconclusive. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop