You are currently viewing a new version of our website. To view the old version click .

Econometrics

Econometrics is an international, peer-reviewed, open access journal on econometric modeling and forecasting, as well as new advances in econometrics theory, and is published quarterly online by MDPI. 

Quartile Ranking JCR - Q3 (Economics)

All Articles (500)

Difference in Differences (DiD) is a useful statistical technique employed by researchers to estimate the effects of exogenous events on the outcome of some response variables in random samples of treated units (i.e., units exposed to the event) ideally drawn from an infinite population. The term “effect” should be understood as the discrepancy between the post-event realisation of the response and the hypothetical realisation of that same outcome for the same treated units in the absence of the event. This theoretical discrepancy is clearly unobservable. To circumvent the implicit missing variable problem, DiD methods utilise the realisations of the response variable observed in comparable random samples of untreated units. The latter are samples of units drawn from the same population, but they are not exposed to the event under investigation. They function as the control or comparison group and serve as proxies for the non-existent untreated realisations of the responses in treated units during post-treatment periods. In summary, the DiD model posits that, in the absence of intervention and under specific conditions, treated units would exhibit behaviours that are indistinguishable from those of control or untreated units during the post-treatment periods. For the purpose of estimation, the method employs a combination of before–after and treatment–control group comparisons. The event that affects the response variables is referred to as “treatment.” However, it could also be referred to as “causal factor” to emphasise that, in the DiD approach, the objective is not to estimate a mere statistical association among variables. This review introduces the DiD techniques for researchers in economics, public policy, health research, management, environmental analysis, and other fields. It commences with the rudimentary methods employed to estimate the so-called Average Treatment Effect upon Treated (ATET) in a two-period and two-group case and subsequently addresses numerous issues that arise in a multi-unit and multi-period context. A particular focus is placed on the statistical assumptions necessary for a precise delineation of the identification process of the cause–effect relationship in the multi-period case. These assumptions include the parallel trend hypothesis, the no-anticipation assumption, and the SUTVA assumption. In the multi-period case, both the homogeneous and heterogeneous scenarios are taken into consideration. The homogeneous scenario refers to the situation in which the treated units are initially treated in the same periods. In contrast, the heterogeneous scenario involves the treatment of treated units in different periods. A portion of the presentation will be allocated to the developments associated with the DiD techniques that can be employed in the context of data clustering or spatio-temporal dependence. The present review includes a concise exposition of some policy-oriented papers that incorporate applications of DiD. The areas of focus encompass income taxation, migration, regulation, and environmental management.

30 September 2025

Effects of the treatment on E[y] in treated units. Notes The two solid lines are the mean values of the response y. Line BD refers to the control units (not subjected to treatment) and the upper broken line refers to the treated units. The vertical line indicates when the treatment was introduced. BB’ is drawn for pure graphical reference. CH is the mean effect of the treatment. By observing the broken line alone, one cannot be sure that the new path is due to the treatment or to something else. It is the comparison with the control group that might give us the perception (possibly just the optical illusion) that the treatment can be the cause of the change in the broken line path.

This paper considers the problem of constructing confidence intervals (CIs) for nonlinear functions of parameters, particularly ratios of parameters a common issue in econometrics and statistics. Classical CIs (such as the Delta method and the Fieller method) often fail in small samples due to biased parameter estimators and skewed distributions. We extended the Delta method using the Edgeworth expansion to correct for skewness due to estimated parameters having non-normal and asymmetric distributions. The resulting bias-corrected confidence intervals are easy to compute and have a good coverage probability that converges to the nominal level at a rate of O(n1/2) where n is the sample size. We also propose bias-corrected estimators based on second-order Taylor expansions, aligning with the “almost unbiased ratio estimator” . We then correct the CIs according to the Delta method and the Edgeworth expansion. Thus, our new methods for constructing confidence intervals account for both the bias and the skewness of the distribution of the nonlinear functions of parameters. We conduct a simulation study to compare the confidence intervals of our new methods with the two classical methods. The methods evaluated include Fieller’s interval, Delta with and without the bias correction interval, and Edgeworth expansion with and without the bias correction interval. The results show that our new methods with bias correction generally have good performance in terms of controlling the coverage probabilities and average length intervals. They should be recommended for constructing confidence intervals for nonlinear functions of estimated parameters.

20 September 2025

This study explores the new insights into the integration and dynamic asymmetric volatility risk spillovers between Bitcoin, currency pairs (USD/ZAR, GBP/ZAR and EUR/ZAR), and traditional financial assets (ALSI, Bond, and Gold) in South Africa using daily data spanning the period from 2010 to 2024 and employing Time-Varying Parameter Vector Autoregression (TVP-VAR) and wavelet coherence. The findings revealed strengthened integration between traditional financial assets and currency pairs, as well as weak integration with BTC/ZAR. Furthermore, BTC/ZAR and traditional financial assets were receivers of shocks, while the currency pairs were transmitters of spillovers. Gold emerged as an attractive investment during periods of inflation or currency devaluation. However, the assets have a total connectedness index of 28.37%, offering a reduced systemic risk. Distinct patterns were observed in the short, medium, and long term in time scales and frequency. There is a diversification benefit and potential hedging strategies due to gold’s negative influence on BTC/ZAR. Bitcoin’s high volatility and lack of regulatory oversight continue to be deterrents for institutional investors. This study lays a solid foundation for understanding the financial dynamics in South Africa, offering valuable insights for investors and policymakers interested in the intricate linkages between BTC/ZAR, currency pairs, and traditional financial assets, allowing for more targeted policy measures.

19 September 2025

This study aimed to forecast the gross domestic product (GDP) of the South Caucasian nations (Armenia, Azerbaijan, and Georgia) by scrutinizing the accuracy of various econometric methodologies. This topic is noteworthy considering the significant economic development exhibited by these countries in the context of recovery post COVID-19. The seasonal autoregressive integrated moving average (SARIMA), exponential smoothing state space (ETS) model, neural network autoregressive (NNAR) model, and trigonometric exponential smoothing state space model with Box–Cox transformation, ARMA errors, and trend and seasonal components (TBATS), together with their feasible hybrid combinations, were employed. The empirical investigation utilized quarterly GDP data at market prices from 1Q-2010 to 2Q-2024. According to the results, the hybrid models significantly outperformed the corresponding single models, handling the linear and nonlinear components of the GDP time series more effectively. Rolling-window cross-validation showed that hybrid ETS-NNAR-TBATS for Armenia, hybrid ETS-NNAR-SARIMA for Azerbaijan, and hybrid ETS-SARIMA for Georgia were the best-performing models. The forecasts also suggest that Georgia is likely to record the strongest GDP growth over the projection horizon, followed by Armenia and Azerbaijan. These findings confirm that hybrid models constitute a reliable technique for forecasting GDP in the South Caucasian countries. This region is not only economically dynamic but also strategically important, with direct implications for policy and regional planning.

10 September 2025

News & Conferences

Issues

Open for Submission

Editor's Choice

Get Alerted

Add your email address to receive forthcoming issues of this journal.

XFacebookLinkedIn
Econometrics - ISSN 2225-1146Creative Common CC BY license