Changes to Face the Future in Pediatric Dentistry

A special issue of Children (ISSN 2227-9067). This special issue belongs to the section "Pediatric Dentistry".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (5 January 2024) | Viewed by 1877

Special Issue Editors


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Director of the Master of Pediatric Dentistry, Department of Dental Clinical Specialties, Complutense University of Madrid, 28040 Madrid, Spain
Interests: pediatric dentistry; special needs dental care; osteogenesis imperfecta; rare diseases; oral genetics
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Pediatric Dentistry/Special Care Dentistry, School of Medicine and Dentistry, Santiago de Compostela University, Santiago de Compostela, Spain
Interests: special care dentistry; autims; caries prevention; down syndrome; cerebral palsy; general anesthesia

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

Current pediatric dentistry, made up of multidisciplinary teams, follows the concept of “Evidence-Based Dentistry”, integrating the most current scientific knowledge into daily clinical practice. Undoubtedly, the most prevalent disease in pediatric patients continues to be dental caries, however, periodontal disease, dental trauma and malocclusions affect a large number of pediatric patients.

During the last decades, the progress in pediatric dentistry and changes in the dentist–patient–caregiver triangular relationship as a result of scientific and social changes have led to the adaptation of clinical professional activity and the emergence of multiple new materials, therapeutic techniques, and approaches. The latest medical advances have also managed to improve dental care for smaller and more vulnerable groups such as those with "rare diseases" or patients with special needs.

All these changes are what led us to create "new approaches to old problems". Our objective in this Special Issue is to announce the advances in pediatric dentistry, enabling us to share information among professionals from all over the world.

Prof. Dr. Manuel Joaquín De Nova-García
Prof. Dr. Jacobo Limeres Posse
Guest Editors

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Children is an international peer-reviewed open access monthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2400 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • pediatric dentistry
  • pediatrics biomaterials
  • evidence-based dentistry
  • dental care for children
  • child behavior
  • dental research
  • biological caries treatment
  • advances in dentistry
  • dental care for children with special needs

Published Papers (2 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

12 pages, 1431 KiB  
Article
Comparative Analysis of the Comfort of Children and Adolescents in Digital and Conventional Full-Arch Impression Methods: A Crossover Randomized Trial
by Diego Serrano-Velasco, Andrea Martín-Vacas, Patricia Cintora-López, Marta Macarena Paz-Cortés and Juan Manuel Aragoneses
Children 2024, 11(2), 190; https://doi.org/10.3390/children11020190 - 02 Feb 2024
Viewed by 567
Abstract
The aim of this study was to evaluate the comfort of children and adolescents with conventional full-arch dental impression methods compared to two intraoral scanners (iTeroTM and PrimescanTM). Methods: A monocentric, analytical, controlled crossover study was designed to compare conventional [...] Read more.
The aim of this study was to evaluate the comfort of children and adolescents with conventional full-arch dental impression methods compared to two intraoral scanners (iTeroTM and PrimescanTM). Methods: A monocentric, analytical, controlled crossover study was designed to compare conventional impression and digital impression with two intraoral scanners (iTeroTM and PrimescanTM) in children and teenagers. Patient comfort was evaluated using a 100 mm VAS scale adapted to Spanish and for children. A descriptive and analytical statistical method was conducted with a confidence level of 95% (p ≤ 0.05) and asymptotic or bilateral significance. Results: A total of 51 subjects were enrolled in the study (mean age = 12.35 years). Although the group of 10–14-year-olds was the most numerous, gender was equally distributed among the age groups. None of the variables on the VAS scale showed differences between the gender categories (p > 0.05). There were differences (p < 0.05) with respect to the age categories, as the middle adolescent group showed the worst general perception and total comfort during the conventional impression. Statistically significant differences were found between all VAS scale items and the three impression methods (p < 0.05). Conclusions: The digital impression technique is superior in terms of total comfort to the conventional alginate impression in children and adolescents. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Changes to Face the Future in Pediatric Dentistry)
Show Figures

Figure 1

11 pages, 892 KiB  
Article
Analysis of the Influence of Breastfeeding and Bottle-Feeding upon the Origin of Posterior Crossbites
by Antonio Francisco Galán-González, Antonia Domínguez-Reyes, Inés María Marín-Castro, Lourdes Muñoz-Muñoz and María Eugenia Cabrera-Domínguez
Children 2024, 11(2), 182; https://doi.org/10.3390/children11020182 - 02 Feb 2024
Viewed by 619
Abstract
(1) Introduction. An analysis was made of posterior crossbites in deciduous dentition and their relation to the type of feeding received by the child, with the objective of determining the influence of the way in which the child is fed in the early [...] Read more.
(1) Introduction. An analysis was made of posterior crossbites in deciduous dentition and their relation to the type of feeding received by the child, with the objective of determining the influence of the way in which the child is fed in the early stages of life on the development of posterior crossbites. (2) Material and methods. A total of 1401 preschool children between 3 and 6 years of age from Seville (Spain) were included in the study. An intraoral exploration was carried out to assess the presence of crossbites (uni- or bilateral, and functional or not). The study was completed with a parent or legal guardian questionnaire exploring the type of feeding received by the child in the first stages of life, as well as the presence of bad oral habits and their duration. (3) Results. A total of 276 children (19.7%) presented posterior crossbite in occlusion. Uponn centering the midlines, 197 were maintained, indicating that 79 were due to premature contacts (functional crossbites). There were no significant differences in crossbites among the children who had received breastfeeding, though bottle-feeding was seen to favor crossbite. (4) Conclusions. No statistically significant relationship was found between posterior crossbites and breastfeeding, though an association between posterior crossbites and bottle-feeding was observed, with the number of crossbites increasing with the duration of bottle-feeding. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Changes to Face the Future in Pediatric Dentistry)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop