Biomimetic Bonded Restorations for Dental Applications: 2nd Edition

A special issue of Biomimetics (ISSN 2313-7673).

Deadline for manuscript submissions: 20 July 2025 | Viewed by 1467

Special Issue Editor


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Department of Restorative Dentistry & Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry at Houston, University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston, TX, USA
Interests: cariology; biomimetic remineralization; biomimetic restorations; clinical translation
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

This Special Issue, entitled "Biomimetic Bonded Restorations for Dental Applications: 2nd Edition", explores the latest advancements in dentistry that aim to replicate the natural properties and aesthetics of teeth through innovative restoration techniques. This collection offers a comprehensive insight into materials science, adhesive technologies, and the clinical procedures involved in creating restorations that mimic the appearance of natural teeth and their functionality and durability. By focusing on biomimetic approaches, this Special Issue highlights methods that promote the preservation of tooth structure, enhance the bond strength between the restoration material and tooth, and encourage the regeneration of tooth tissues. This Special Issue will also pay particular attention to the development of novel materials that better replicate the mechanical and optical properties of natural teeth. Innovative research on adhesive systems that enhance the performance of these restorations in challenging clinical scenarios is also welcome. Overall, this Special Issue aims to address the need for more natural, durable, and aesthetically pleasing dental restorations, providing valuable insights for researchers and practitioners in dentistry.

Dr. Hamid Nurrohman
Guest Editor

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Biomimetics is an international peer-reviewed open access monthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2200 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • biomimetics
  • dentistry
  • bonded restorations
  • adhesive technology
  • materials science
  • tooth regeneration
  • aesthetic dentistry
  • durability
  • mechanical properties
  • optical properties

Benefits of Publishing in a Special Issue

  • Ease of navigation: Grouping papers by topic helps scholars navigate broad scope journals more efficiently.
  • Greater discoverability: Special Issues support the reach and impact of scientific research. Articles in Special Issues are more discoverable and cited more frequently.
  • Expansion of research network: Special Issues facilitate connections among authors, fostering scientific collaborations.
  • External promotion: Articles in Special Issues are often promoted through the journal's social media, increasing their visibility.
  • e-Book format: Special Issues with more than 10 articles can be published as dedicated e-books, ensuring wide and rapid dissemination.

Further information on MDPI's Special Issue policies can be found here.

Published Papers (2 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

Jump to: Review

13 pages, 9182 KiB  
Article
Effect of Different Luting Methods on the Microtensile Bond Strength of CAD/CAM Resin Blocks
by Alexandra Vinagre, Carla Delgado, Gabriela Almeida, Ana Messias and João Carlos Ramos
Biomimetics 2025, 10(2), 123; https://doi.org/10.3390/biomimetics10020123 - 19 Feb 2025
Viewed by 507
Abstract
The widespread implementation of new CAD/CAM materials has led to the necessity of establishing an adequate luting protocol. The aim of this study was to evaluate the microtensile bond strength (μTBS) and the film thickness of different luting methods on CAD/CAM resin blocks. [...] Read more.
The widespread implementation of new CAD/CAM materials has led to the necessity of establishing an adequate luting protocol. The aim of this study was to evaluate the microtensile bond strength (μTBS) and the film thickness of different luting methods on CAD/CAM resin blocks. Five Brilliant Crios CAD/CAM blocks (Coltene/Whaledent) were sequentially sectioned into two halves, air abraded with 50 µm aluminum oxide, and luted according to five different cementation protocols: Brilliant EverGlow (BEG), Brilliant EverGlow with ultrasound application (BEG-US), preheated Brilliant EverGlow (BEG-H), Brilliant EverGlow Flow (BEGF), and Duo Cem® Trans (DC). Subsequently, the blocks were sectioned to obtain rods, which were then submitted to a microtensile bond strength test (n = 20). The surfaces were examined with optical microscopy to determine the failure mode and the bonding interface was assessed with scanning electron microscope (SEM) analysis. Bond strength values were analyzed using one-way ANOVA and Tukey’s post hoc tests (α = 0.05). The bond strength values varied with the different cementation protocols (p < 0.001): BEG (45.48 ± 18.14 MPa), BEG-US (42.15 ± 14.90 MPa), BEG-H (41.23 ± 15.15 MPa), BEGF (58.38 ± 15.65 MPa), and DC (81.07 ± 8.75 MPa). Regarding bond strength, DC presented significantly higher values than all other experimental groups (p < 0.050), whereas all luting methods using BEG presented similar values (p = 0.894). Adhesive failures were the predominant type. On SEM evaluation, all the luting materials presented a tight and homogeneous cement–block interface with variable film thicknesses. In conclusion, among the cementation protocols, the resin cement (DC) rendered the highest bond strength values. SEM analysis revealed that the lowest film thickness was associated with the flowable composite (BEGF). Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Biomimetic Bonded Restorations for Dental Applications: 2nd Edition)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Review

Jump to: Research

19 pages, 4442 KiB  
Review
Bonding Protocols for Lithium Disilicate Veneers: A Narrative Review and Case Study
by Silvia Rojas-Rueda, Jose Villalobos-Tinoco, Clint Conner, Staley Colvert, Hamid Nurrohman and Carlos A. Jurado
Biomimetics 2025, 10(3), 188; https://doi.org/10.3390/biomimetics10030188 - 19 Mar 2025
Viewed by 747
Abstract
Background: The bonding protocol for lithium disilicate veneers in the esthetic zone plays a crucial role in modern dental restoration techniques, focusing on the replication of natural tooth properties and esthetics. This process involves several meticulous steps on both ceramic and tooth surfaces [...] Read more.
Background: The bonding protocol for lithium disilicate veneers in the esthetic zone plays a crucial role in modern dental restoration techniques, focusing on the replication of natural tooth properties and esthetics. This process involves several meticulous steps on both ceramic and tooth surfaces to optimize material performance and bond strength. Methods: The objective of this article is to provide an updated review of the literature on the clinical steps for bonding lithium disilicate veneers in the anterior dentition and to document a clinical case where these advanced restorative techniques were applied to treat a female patient seeking to improve her smile. A preliminary review was conducted on the existing literature regarding the clinical protocols for bonding lithium disilicate veneers in the esthetic zone. The main advantage of careful bonding procedures is that they maximize the full potential of the materials’ properties. Results: A review of the literature reveals some minor differences in cleaning the veneers prior to cementation and in the number of steps involved when combining certain materials in a single application process. However, well-executed bonding procedures, following the manufacturer’s recommendations, can maximize the adhesion between the ceramic and the tooth, allowing the restorations to meet the patient’s esthetic demands. Conclusions: Effective bonding of lithium disilicate veneers in the esthetic zone requires multiple treatments on both the ceramic and tooth surfaces. When procedures are followed carefully, long-term esthetic and functional outcomes can be achieved. It is essential that clinicians are familiar with these steps. Proper patient selection, thoughtful treatment planning, and methodical execution of the case can lead to highly esthetic results that satisfy the patient’s demands and ensure long-term success. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Biomimetic Bonded Restorations for Dental Applications: 2nd Edition)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop