Submit to Special Issue Submit Abstract to Special Issue Review for Applied Sciences Propose a Special Issue

Journal Menu

Journal Browser

Recent Advances in Digital Dentistry and Oral Implantology

Print Special Issue Flyer
Special Issue Editors
Special Issue Information
Keywords
Benefits of Publishing in a Special Issue
Published Papers

A special issue of Applied Sciences (ISSN 2076-3417). This special issue belongs to the section "Applied Dentistry and Oral Sciences".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: 20 April 2026 | Viewed by 32373

Share This Special Issue

Special Issue Editors

Dr. Mario Taba Jr.

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor

School of Dentistry of Ribeirão Preto, University of São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto 14040-900, SP, Brazil
Interests: periodontal; regeneration; periodontitis; peri-implantitis; biologic; scaffold
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals

Dr. Erick Ricardo Silva

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor

Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery and Periodontology, Faculty of Dentistry of Ribeirão Preto, University of São Paulo, São Paulo 14040-904, Brazil
Interests: bone substitute biomaterial; dental implants

Dr. Ester Alves Ferreira Bordini

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor

Department of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics, Ribeirão Preto School of Dentistry, University of São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brazil
Interests: dental materials; oral rehabilitation

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

The transformative impact of digital technologies in dentistry, particularly in the field of oral implantology, reflects our pursuit of excellence in patient care. The integration of digital workflows has not only streamlined diagnostic and treatment planning processes but has also introduced a new era of precision and predictability in dental procedures. The advent of cone beam computed tomography and intra-oral scanners has been pivotal, providing clinicians with detailed three-dimensional images that facilitate meticulous planning and execution for dental implants. The synergy of virtual planning and artificial intelligence has further augmented the capabilities of dental professionals, offering tools that simulate various clinical scenarios and enhance decision-making processes. This fusion of technology and expertise is revolutionizing educational paradigms, equipping students with an enhanced understanding of complex procedures through virtual simulations. The comprehensive approach enabled through virtual implant planning extends to prosthetic setup and guided implant surgery, ensuring that each phase of treatment is executed with the utmost accuracy.

Going forward, the continuous evolution of digital dentistry will continue to attract researchers and practitioners and remain at the forefront of technological advancements. Staying updated on these developments represents a commitment to delivering superior care.

In light of this, this Special Issue, “Recent Advances in Digital Dentistry and Oral Implantology”, will serve as a platform for sharing innovative research and clinical experiences, fostering a collaborative environment where knowledge and expertise converge to achieve new standards in dental practice.

Prof. Dr. Mario Taba Jr.
Dr. Erick Ricardo Silva
Dr. Ester Alves Ferreira Bordini
Guest Editors

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 250 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for assessment.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Applied Sciences is an international peer-reviewed open access semimonthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2400 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

digital workflow
dental implants
implantology
treatment plan

Benefits of Publishing in a Special Issue

Ease of navigation: Grouping papers by topic helps scholars navigate broad scope journals more efficiently.
Greater discoverability: Special Issues support the reach and impact of scientific research. Articles in Special Issues are more discoverable and cited more frequently.
Expansion of research network: Special Issues facilitate connections among authors, fostering scientific collaborations.
External promotion: Articles in Special Issues are often promoted through the journal's social media, increasing their visibility.
Reprint: MDPI Books provides the opportunity to republish successful Special Issues in book format, both online and in print.

Further information on MDPI's Special Issue policies can be found here.

Published Papers (11 papers)

Download All Papers

Order results

Result details

Show export options Show export options

Select all

Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

Jump to: Review, Other

13 pages, 647 KB

Open AccessArticle

The Effect of Gingival Color on the Accuracy of Different Intraoral Scanners in Partially Edentulous Patients: An In Vitro Study

by Burak AK, Damla Eda Yapıcı Gülbey, Büşra Üstün and Özgür Ozan Tanrıkut

Appl. Sci. 2026, 16(2), 798; https://doi.org/10.3390/app16020798 - 13 Jan 2026

Viewed by 97

Abstract

Objective: This in vitro study evaluated the accuracy and precision of five intraoral scanners (IOSs) by examining the interaction between gingival model color and linear measurement distances. Materials and Methods: Seven color-distinct models were scanned to obtain absolute deviation data from six linear distances between four reference points. Measurements were analyzed using Zeiss Inspect software v2025.3.3.4. Due to non-normal data distribution, all factors (Scanner, Model, Pair) and their interactions were assessed using Aligned Rank Transform (ART) ANOVA. Accuracy was defined as median absolute deviation, and precision as the coefficient of variation (CV%). Results: Statistical analysis identified significant differences in absolute deviation across all main factors and their three-way interactions (p < 0.001). The Medit i700 and Trios 5 demonstrated the lowest overall median deviation (0.09 mm), followed closely by Trios 3 (0.10 mm), with no statistically significant differences among them. The P5 model yielded lower deviations, while extreme colors increased variability. In terms of precision, values varied significantly based on specific interactions; the highest precision was recorded for the Shining scanner on the White model (A–C pair, CV: 7.33%), whereas the lowest precision was observed for the Sirios scanner on the Black model (A–D pair, CV: 158.10%). Conclusions: Within the limitations of this in vitro study, deviation values varied according to gingival color and pair distance. Gingival colors with a higher pink saturation (P5) and shorter distances yielded lower deviations, whereas extreme colors and longer distances were associated with reduced precision. Full article

(This article belongs to the Special Issue Recent Advances in Digital Dentistry and Oral Implantology)

► Show Figures

Figure 1

15 pages, 2750 KB

Open AccessArticle

Accuracy of Miniscrew Insertion with Fully Guided Dynamic Navigation Versus Freehand: An In Vitro Experimental Study

by Cristina De-la-Rosa-Gay, David Mesalles-Cervera, Adrià Jorba-García, Víctor Ruiz-Romero, Tania Moya-Martínez, Octavi Camps-Font, Marina Crego-Ruiz, Eduard Valmaseda-Castellón and Rui Figueiredo

Appl. Sci. 2025, 15(21), 11682; https://doi.org/10.3390/app152111682 - 31 Oct 2025

Viewed by 680

Abstract

The placement of miniscrews in orthodontics enhances dental and skeletal movements with reduced need for patient cooperation but may lead to complications such as incorrect positioning or damage to adjacent teeth. Computer-assisted surgery techniques have shown improved accuracy and reduced risks. This study aimed to compare the accuracy of the X-Guide^® dynamic navigation system with the freehand method for orthodontic miniscrew insertion and to assess the influence of screw position and side on accuracy. The main hypothesis was that the X-Guide^® system would yield superior accuracy in the primary variable (3D apical deviation) compared to the freehand technique. Secondary hypotheses were that the X-Guide^® system would also demonstrate superior accuracy in the secondary parameters (3D entry deviation, angular deflection, apical depth, and 2D entry deviation) and that screw position and side would not significantly affect any of the outcomes. An in vitro, randomized, and blinded experimental design was used with 10 maxillary models divided into two groups: experimental (X-Guide^®) and control (freehand). In each model, six miniscrews were planned using cone beam computed tomography (CBCT): three were inserted freehand and three with navigation. A trained novice clinician performed all insertions. Post-placement CBCT scans were used to compare 3D deviations between planned and actual positions. Wilcoxon signed-rank tests and Friedman’s ANOVA were applied. In conclusion, the results supported the main hypothesis regarding the primary variable: the X-Guide^® system significantly improved miniscrew placement accuracy in terms of 3D apical deviation, even when used by a novice operator. However, the results partially rejected the secondary hypotheses related to precision, showing a significant improvement in 3D entry deviation with dCAS, but not in angular deflection or 2D measured parameters. Furthermore, the results supported the secondary hypothesis regarding screw position, which did not affect the outcomes. Nevertheless, with dCAS, a significantly greater deviation was found on the right side for 3D entry deviation, 2D entry deviation, and angular deflection. Full article

(This article belongs to the Special Issue Recent Advances in Digital Dentistry and Oral Implantology)

► Show Figures

Figure 1

17 pages, 2470 KB

Open AccessArticle

Texture Components of the Radiographic Image Assist in the Detection of Periapical Periodontitis

by Marta Borowska, Bożena Antonowicz, Ewelina Magnuszewska, Łukasz Woźniak, Kamila Łukaszuk and Jan Borys

Appl. Sci. 2025, 15(19), 10521; https://doi.org/10.3390/app151910521 - 28 Sep 2025

Viewed by 751

Abstract

Objectives: Periapical periodontitis, which is a periodontal dysfunction, is a current clinical problem. Due to the frequency of occurrence and the adverse effects they cause, they are considered a social disease. They require detailed diagnostics to implement appropriate treatment. Mathematical calculations based on data obtained from radiological images used in routine clinical practice may help differentiate the forms of periodontitis. This study aimed to evaluate the areas affected by periodontitis in comparison to the healthy tissues of the periapical area. Methods: The study analyzed texture components using the gray-level co-occurrence matrix (GLCM) and the gray-level run-length matrix (GRLM) on an orthopantomogram (OPG) from 50 patients with clinically confirmed periodontitis treated at the Department of Maxillofacial and Plastic Surgery, University of Bialystok. Texture analysis was performed on defined regions of interest (ROIs) to distinguish diseased from healthy tissues. We employed four classification algorithms to assess model performance. Results: The data set included 50 patients, with 76 cases of periodontitis and 50 healthy ROIs. The reference standard was clinical diagnosis confirmed by two specialist doctors. The best-performing algorithm achieved an AUC of 98%. Conclusions: The obtained results showed significant statistical differences in the inflamed regions compared to the control, which may aid in diagnosing and selecting the treatment method for periodontitis. Full article

(This article belongs to the Special Issue Recent Advances in Digital Dentistry and Oral Implantology)

► Show Figures

Figure 1

15 pages, 9399 KB

Open AccessArticle

Analysis of 3D-Printed Zirconia Implant Overdenture Bars

by Les Kalman and João Paulo Mendes Tribst

Appl. Sci. 2025, 15(15), 8751; https://doi.org/10.3390/app15158751 - 7 Aug 2025

Viewed by 1843

Abstract

Dental implant components are typically fabricated using subtractive manufacturing, often involving metal materials that can be costly, inefficient, and time-consuming. This study explores the use of additive manufacturing (AM) with zirconia for dental implant overdenture bars, focusing on mechanical performance, stress distribution, and fit. Solid and lattice-structured bars were designed in Fusion 360 and produced using LithaCon 210 3Y-TZP zirconia (Lithoz GmbH, Vienna, Austria) on a CeraFab 8500 printer. Post-processing included cleaning, debinding, and sintering. A 3D-printed denture was also fabricated to evaluate fit. Thermography and optical imaging were used to assess adaptation. Custom fixtures were developed for flexural testing, and fracture loads were recorded to calculate stress distribution using finite element analysis (ANSYS R2025). The FEA model assumed isotropic, homogeneous, linear-elastic material behavior. Bars were torqued to 15 Ncm on implant analogs. The average fracture loads were 1.2240 kN (solid, n = 12) and 1.1132 kN (lattice, n = 5), with corresponding stress values of 147 MPa and 143 MPa, respectively. No statistically significant difference was observed (p = 0.578; α = 0.05). The fracture occurred near high-stress regions at fixture support points. All bars demonstrated a clinically acceptable fit on the model; however, further validation and clinical evaluation are still needed. Additively manufactured zirconia bars, including lattice structures, show promise as alternatives to conventional superstructures, potentially offering reduced material use and faster production without compromising mechanical performance. Full article

(This article belongs to the Special Issue Recent Advances in Digital Dentistry and Oral Implantology)

► Show Figures

Figure 1

15 pages, 1695 KB

Open AccessArticle

Reconstructive Therapy in Patients with Peri-Implantitis in a University Dental Hospital: A Preliminary Retrospective Case Series Focusing on Complications

by Ahmad Alahmari, Xavier Costa-Berenguer, Rui Figueiredo, Eduard Valmaseda-Castellón, Alba Sánchez-Torres and Marta García-García

Appl. Sci. 2025, 15(14), 8040; https://doi.org/10.3390/app15148040 - 18 Jul 2025

Viewed by 3038

Abstract

Peri-implantitis is an inflammatory disease-causing bone loss around dental implants, often requiring reconstructive surgical therapies to reduce probing depth and regenerate bone. However, such surgeries are frequently complicated by postoperative issues. This retrospective case series aimed to identify the main postoperative complications following the reconstructive treatment of peri-implant bone defects in peri-implantitis patients. Data from 14 patients with 21 affected implants were analyzed, including demographics, oral hygiene, surgical techniques, and complications such as wound dehiscence, membrane exposure, and infections. Wound dehiscence was measured using Image J^® software version 1.54. Descriptive and bivariate analyses were performed. The results showed that 11 implants (52.4%; 95% confidence interval (95%CI): 29% to 76%) in nine patients (57.1%; 95%CI = 27% to 87%) developed soft tissue dehiscence after one week, with membrane exposure observed in 4 implants. Dehiscence was significantly associated with mandibular implant location (p = 0.003), poor interproximal hygiene (p = 0.008), and membrane exposure (p = 0.034). No postoperative infections were recorded. In conclusion, more than half of peri-implantitis patients undergoing reconstructive surgery experience wound dehiscence, particularly in cases involving mandible, poor hygiene, and membrane exposure. This complication might compromise bone regeneration and reduce the treatment success rate. These results should be interpreted cautiously due to study design limitations (retrospective design, lack of a control group, and small sample size). Full article

(This article belongs to the Special Issue Recent Advances in Digital Dentistry and Oral Implantology)

► Show Figures

Figure 1

15 pages, 2489 KB

Open AccessArticle

Trueness of Implant Positioning Using Intraoral Scanning and Dental Photogrammetry for Full-Arch Implant-Supported Rehabilitations: An In Vitro Study

by João Carlos Faria, Manuel António Sampaio-Fernandes, Susana João Oliveira, Rodrigo Malheiro, João Carlos Sampaio-Fernandes and Maria Helena Figueiral

Appl. Sci. 2025, 15(14), 8016; https://doi.org/10.3390/app15148016 - 18 Jul 2025

Viewed by 2530

Abstract

This in vitro study aims to compare the trueness of digital impressions obtained using two intraoral scanners (IOS) and one photogrammetry device for full-arch implant-supported rehabilitations. According to the Caramês Classification I, three models were produced with Straumann implants arranged in different spatial distributions: Option A with six implants and Options B and C with four implants each. The three models were scanned using a 12-megapixel scanner to create digital master casts. For each reference model, 30 digital impressions were acquired: 10 with the 3Shape Trios 3 intraoral scanner, 10 with the Medit i500 intraoral scanner, and 10 with the PIC Dental photogrammetry device. Trueness was assessed through best-fit superimpositions between the digital master casts and the corresponding virtual models. The Shapiro–Wilk test was applied to assess the normality of the data distribution, and Levene’s test was used to evaluate the homogeneity of variances. The non-parametric Kruskal–Wallis test was employed to compare group differences, with post hoc adjustments made using the Bonferroni correction. A significance threshold of p = 0.05 was adopted for all statistical tests. Statistically significant differences were observed in the root mean square values among the three devices. The Medit i500 demonstrated the highest trueness, with a median (interquartile range) deviation of 24.45 (18.18) µm, whereas the PIC Dental exhibited the lowest trueness, with a median deviation of 49.45 (9.17) µm. Among the implant distribution, the Option C showed the best trueness, with a median deviation of 19.00 (27.83). Considering the results of this in vitro study, intraoral scanners demonstrated comparable trueness, whereas the photogrammetry-based system exhibited lower trueness values. Additionally, a smaller number of implants and reduced inter-implant distances were associated with improved trueness in digital impressions for full-arch implant rehabilitation. Full article

(This article belongs to the Special Issue Recent Advances in Digital Dentistry and Oral Implantology)

► Show Figures

Figure 1

Review

Jump to: Research, Other

13 pages, 749 KB

Open AccessReview

The Use of Volume Stable Collagen Matrices (VCMXs) for Soft Tissue Augmentation Around Dental Implants: A Comprehensive Review

by Sepideh Goudarzi, Chiara Cinquini, Rossana Izzetti, Niccolò Baldi, Simonetta Santarelli, Mattia Priami, Elisabetta Carli and Antonio Barone

Appl. Sci. 2025, 15(19), 10315; https://doi.org/10.3390/app151910315 - 23 Sep 2025

Cited by 1 | Viewed by 1510

Abstract

Adequate peri-implant hard and soft tissue volume is critical for ensuring implant stability, long-term functionality, and optimal esthetic results. While autogenous connective tissue grafts (CTGs) remain the gold standard for soft tissue augmentation, volume-stable collagen matrices (VCMXs) have emerged as a promising alternative, offering key advantages such as eliminating donor-site morbidity, reducing postoperative pain, and improving patient acceptance. This review summarizes the evidence on VCMXs from studies published between 1995 and 2024, with a focus on mucosal thickness gain, soft tissue stability, and patient-reported outcomes. To date, the evidence on VCMXs is still conflicting. Randomized controlled trials indicate that VCMXs can effectively increase peri-implant mucosal thickness (ranging from 0.3 to 1.0 mm), although the included clinical studies are very heterogeneous in terms of follow-up time. According to the literature, CTGs demonstrate superior long-term volumetric stability, particularly in highly esthetic zones. On the other hand, VCMXs demonstrated comparable mid-term outcomes while offering reduced postoperative discomfort, as confirmed by multicenter noninferiority trials. While VCMXs may yield slightly inferior clinical outcomes compared to CTGs, their patient-centered benefits make them a viable and often preferable option for soft tissue augmentation in implant dentistry. In conclusion, current evidence supports the use of VCMXs as valuable tools in contemporary implant therapy, particularly for specific indications where their benefits outweigh limitations. Full article

(This article belongs to the Special Issue Recent Advances in Digital Dentistry and Oral Implantology)

► Show Figures

Figure 1

13 pages, 513 KB

Open AccessReview

Accuracy of Artificial Intelligence-Designed Dental Crowns: A Scoping Review of In-Vitro Studies

by Hyun-Jun Kong and Yu-Lee Kim

Appl. Sci. 2025, 15(18), 9866; https://doi.org/10.3390/app15189866 - 9 Sep 2025

Viewed by 3080

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI), particularly deep learning, is increasingly applied in dental prosthetics, offering new approaches to dental crown design. This scoping review aimed to summarize current evidence on AI-assisted crown design, focusing on algorithm types, dataset characteristics, and evaluation methods. A comprehensive search of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and IEEE Xplore was conducted in February 2025, covering studies published between January 2010 and February 2025. Ten studies met the inclusion criteria, of which four developed custom AI models—mainly based on generative adversarial networks—while six evaluated commercially available software. All studies used digitized dental models obtained from scanned stone casts or intraoral scans, and dataset sizes varied widely. Morphological accuracy was the most frequently reported outcome, assessed in six studies, followed by design time and occlusal contact evaluation. While most AI-generated crowns demonstrated clinically acceptable precision, only four studies fabricated physical crowns and none conducted in vivo validation. These findings suggest that AI-assisted crown design holds promise for improving anatomical accuracy and workflow efficiency, but methodological heterogeneity and the lack of clinical validation highlight the need for standardized evaluation protocols and further in vivo studies. Full article

(This article belongs to the Special Issue Recent Advances in Digital Dentistry and Oral Implantology)

► Show Figures

Figure 1

15 pages, 690 KB

Open AccessReview

Accuracy of Different Systems of Guided Implant Surgery and Methods for Quantification: A Systematic Review

by Nataly Marquez Bautista, Cristina Meniz-García, Carmen López-Carriches, Luis Sánchez-Labrador, Jorge Cortés-Bretón Brinkmann and Cristina Madrigal Martínez-Pereda

Appl. Sci. 2024, 14(24), 11479; https://doi.org/10.3390/app142411479 - 10 Dec 2024

Cited by 7 | Viewed by 8758

Abstract

The aim of this systematic review was to assess the scientific literature on the accuracy of guided implant surgery and the methods used for its quantification. Two reviewers searched PubMed and the Cochrane Library to identify relevant articles published before 2023. Two methodological quality-assessment tools were used to assess the quality of the studies included. Inter-investigator reliability was verified using kappa statistics. Twenty-three clinical studies out of the 3299 articles initially identified met the inclusion criteria. The “radiographic matching method” and “digital registration method” were used to assess accuracy in guided surgery. The mean angular, coronal, and apical deviations of mucosa-supported guides ranged from 2.7° to 5.14°, 0.87 mm to 2.05 mm, and 1.08 mm to 2.28 mm, respectively. With bone-supported guides, these ranged from 2.49° to 5.08°, 0.71 mm to 1.60, and 0.77 mm to 1.65 mm, respectively. In tooth-supported guides, deviations were from 2.5° to 5.62°, 0.39 mm to 1.63 mm and 0.28 mm, and 1.84 mm, respectively. Regardless of the evaluation method, all systems exhibit some error. The minimum and maximum deviation ranges found between the planned and placed implants show that, although deviations occur, guided surgery is not far from accurate. Full article

(This article belongs to the Special Issue Recent Advances in Digital Dentistry and Oral Implantology)

► Show Figures

Figure 1

Other

Jump to: Research, Review

16 pages, 4574 KB

Open AccessSystematic Review

Intraoral Scanning Versus Conventional Methods for Obtaining Full-Arch Implant-Supported Prostheses: A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis

by Fernanda L. Vieira, Maísa Carnietto, José R. A. Cerqueira Filho, Ester A. F. Bordini, Hiskell F. F. Oliveira, Thiago A. Pegoraro and Joel F. Santiago Junior

Appl. Sci. 2025, 15(2), 533; https://doi.org/10.3390/app15020533 - 8 Jan 2025

Cited by 3 | Viewed by 3349

Abstract

There is still no consensus on whether intraoral scanning for producing full-arch implant-supported prostheses is effective. Therefore, this systematic review aimed to analyze clinical studies that evaluated intraoral scanning versus conventional impression to obtain rehabilitation of full-arch fixed prostheses and removable. Registration was carried out in the PROSPERO database (CRD: 42020152197). Searches were performed in 11 databases. Review Manager 7.2 (2024) software was used for the quantitative analysis stage (α = 0.05). Bias analysis was conducted using the ROBINS-I and ROB scales, and the certainty of the evidence was evaluated using the GRADE scale. The initial search showed 33,975 abstracts and titles, from which, after applying the inclusion/exclusion criteria, 11 clinical studies were selected. Based on the studies collected, it was observed that there was no difference in the comparison between the digital (DG) and conventional (CG) groups for the following criteria: technical and biological complication rates and marginal bone loss (p > 0.05). The analysis of clinical execution time highlights a notable advantage of the DG over the CG at both scanned patient and implant levels (p < 0.05). Nevertheless, CG achieved fewer retakes than the DG (p < 0.05), demonstrating its reliability in execution. It is concluded that the survival rates of full-arch fixed prostheses produced using intraoral scanning are comparable to those achieved with traditional impression techniques, providing a reliable option for patients. However, further clinical studies are necessary due to the variability in clinical protocols. Full article

(This article belongs to the Special Issue Recent Advances in Digital Dentistry and Oral Implantology)

► Show Figures

Figure 1

18 pages, 6904 KB

Open AccessSystematic Review

Regenerating Alveolar Bone for Implant Placement: The Efficacy of Autogenous Mineralized Dentin Matrix—A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

by Madalena Meném, Alexandre Santos and Paulo Mascarenhas

Appl. Sci. 2024, 14(21), 10018; https://doi.org/10.3390/app142110018 - 2 Nov 2024

Cited by 1 | Viewed by 5106

Abstract

The preservation of the alveolar ridge has gained increasing importance for various types of rehabilitation, including dental implant placement. Consequently, researchers have explored different bone grafts, such as mineralized dentin matrix grafts. However, a comprehensive review of the efficacy of autogenous mineralized dentin (AMD) for alveolar ridge preservation remains lacking. In this review, we evaluated the efficacy of AMD as a method for alveolar ridge preservation in cases of delayed implant placement. A comprehensive search through PubMed, Google Scholar, Cochrane Library, and B-on repositories was conducted without time constraints up to July 2024 to identify peer-reviewed human studies. These studies assessed the percentage of newly formed bone and residual graft following bone regeneration with AMD grafts after tooth extraction, specifically in the context of delayed implant placement. Our analysis included four selected studies involving 55 patients and 67 sockets. The findings suggest that AMD grafts resulted in an average (and 95% confidence interval) of 43.8% [36.6%, 50.8%] newly formed bone, and delayed implant placement was a feasible surgical option for all patients. Although the available literature is scarce, AMD grafting has yielded promising outcomes as a method for bone reconstruction. Nevertheless, additional randomized controlled trials with larger sample sizes and longer follow-ups are required to substantiate these findings. Full article

(This article belongs to the Special Issue Recent Advances in Digital Dentistry and Oral Implantology)

► Show Figures

Journal Menu

Journal Browser

Recent Advances in Digital Dentistry and Oral Implantology

Share This Special Issue

Special Issue Editors

Special Issue Information

Keywords

Benefits of Publishing in a Special Issue

Published Papers (11 papers)

Research

Review

Other

Further Information

Guidelines

MDPI Initiatives

Follow MDPI