Skip to Content
  • 7.4
    Impact Factor
  • 7.2
    CiteScore
  • 20 days
    Submission to First Decision
  • 4 days
    Acceptance to Publication

Analytica

Analytica is an international, peer-reviewed, open access journal on analytical chemistry and chemical analysis published quarterly online by MDPI.

Get Alerted

Add your email address to receive forthcoming issues of this journal.

All Articles (287)

  • Article
  • Open Access

Standardized interpretation of analytical responses in multi-herb formulations remains difficult: constituent measurements, composition ratios, and extraction conditions are rarely integrated quantitatively. Effect Factor (EF) provides a dimensionless, endpoint-aware index for matched-condition referencing, but constituent-level EF descriptors do not directly yield formulation-level expectations. Using an EF-indexed resource comprising 271 herbal materials and 22 multi-herb formulations with paired water and 30% ethanol extracts, we developed an EF-guided quantitative herbal medicine composition–activity relationship (QHMCAR) framework. Additive theoretical formulation EFs for 2,2′-azino-bis(3-ethylbenzothiazoline-6-sulfonic acid) (ABTS), 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH), total phenolic content (TPC), and total flavonoid content (TFC) were derived from constituent EFs, composition ratios, and solvent-matched extraction yields. Analyses included predictor screening, least-squares calibration, additive-deviation analysis, diagnostics, fixed-form refitting, nested leave-one-prescription-identity-out (LOPO), and solvent sensitivity. Retained full-data models showed apparent R2 of 0.748–0.830; fully nested grouped LOPO yielded Q2 of 0.543–0.809. Against a grouped-LOPO untransformed linear baseline, transformation screening modestly improved DPPH prediction, matched ABTS, and yielded lower Q2 for TPC and TFC. Positive additive deviations were endpoint-dependent, most pronounced for ABTS; solvent-sensitivity analysis identified limited additional variation except for an ABTS-specific intercept shift. QHMCAR enables transparent formulation-level expectation, calibration, and internal validation without implying pharmacological synergy, therapeutic efficacy, or external predictive validity.

Analytica

3 November 2026

Overall workflow of the EF-guided QHMCAR framework. Solvent-matched constituent HM EF values, extraction yields, and prescription composition ratios were integrated to construct additive theoretical HMP EF values, followed by endpoint-specific predictor-transformation screening, ordinary least-squares regression, and internal assessments including additive-deviation analysis, regression diagnostics, fixed-form grouped identity-level stability refitting, fully nested grouped LOPO validation, transformation-selection sensitivity analysis, and solvent-sensitivity analysis. Arrows indicate workflow progression; the pie chart illustrates prescription composition ratios; and the green and orange symbols in the two-track panel denote functional potency and compositional content endpoints, respectively. The miniature plots and the summation in panel 3 are schematic; Equations (1) and (2) provide the full mathematical definitions of the additive theoretical HMP EF.
  • Article
  • Open Access

Honey is recognized as a valuable tool for environmental biomonitoring, while its contaminant content is relevant to food safety, requiring analytical methods for the simultaneous determination of multiple contaminants. In this study, an ultrasound–vortex-assisted dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction (UVA-DLLME) procedure coupled with gas chromatography–ion trap mass spectrometry (GC–IT/MS) was developed for the simultaneous determination of pesticides, polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs), and polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) in honey. The extraction solvent composition was optimized using different n-heptane/toluene mixtures, and the selected conditions were validated in terms of linearity, recovery, sensitivity, and precision. The optimized method provided recoveries between 70.2 and 112%, coefficients of determination (R2) from 0.9389 to 0.9998, limits of detection ranging from 0.40 to 21 ng g−1, and intraday and interday relative standard deviations below 15%. The environmental performance of the sample preparation procedure was evaluated using the AGREEprep metric, giving an overall score of 0.52. Application of the method to 21 artisanal honey samples showed a generally low occurrence of the investigated contaminants, with PAHs being the most frequently detected compounds, whereas pesticides and PCBs were mostly below the limits of detection or quantification. The proposed method represents a solvent-efficient analytical procedure suitable for the multiclass determination of organic contaminants in honey.

Analytica

2 November 2026

Schematic representation of the optimized analytical workflow for the extraction and GC–IT/MS determination of pesticides, PAHs, and PCBs in honey samples. Adapted from [34]. Licensed under CC BY 4.0.
  • Review
  • Open Access

Diffuse reflectance infrared Fourier transform spectroscopy (DRIFTS) offers organic solvent-free powder analysis with high solid-state sensitivity. This positions the technique at the intersection of green analytical chemistry, solid form control, and ICH Q14-aligned, science- and risk-based method development. Despite these advantages, it remains marginal in regulated quality control. This review assesses the DRIFTS literature from Kubelka–Munk theory to current uses in pharmaceutical assays, solid-form quantification, drug-excipient interactions and medicines quality control, and asks why these favourable ergonomics have not been translated into regulatory acceptance. Seven of the nine univariate DRIFTS assays identified operate within a window of about 0.1–3.5% w/w analyte in KBr; two exceed it, with one reaching 30% w/w. Contrary to the common characterisation of the field as univariate, eighteen multivariate DRIFTS assay methods were identified together with a further nine multivariate solid-form methods, published continuously since 1988; what has remained univariate is the single-analyte tablet assay built on peak-area integration. This range is best read as an empirically observed working window for the systems reviewed rather than as a universal limit. Robustness evidence is dominated by single-laboratory, single-instrument, single-lot studies; where multi-lot performance was tested for polymorphic impurities, calibration models transferred poorly and standard outlier diagnostics disagreed. Reports are systematically silent on particle size distribution, packing protocol, diluent water content and ambient humidity. DRIFTS is well-suited to bounded roles: identity confirmation, solid-form screening, compatibility studies and in-house assay of formulations with a known, stable matrix. To advance the field, future efforts must prioritise rigorous evidentiary discipline over the development of new instrumentation.

Analytica

2 November 2026

Methodological milestones in the development of DRIFTS for pharmaceutical analysis. Only events verified against a retrieve3d source are shown, and the horizontal axis is ordinal rather than linear in time. The timeline is a record of methodological development, not a measure of publication activity; no bibliometric claim is made or implied. Created in BioRender. Bhongade, B. (2026) https://BioRender.com/tkckqpd.
  • Article
  • Open Access

Highly Sensitive Lateral Flow Assay for Colistin Detection in Meat Products

  • Lyubov V. Barshevskaya,
  • Anastasia V. Bartosh and
  • Anatoly V. Zherdev
  • + 3 authors

Colistin is an antibiotic of critical importance in human medicine, while its use in animal production may result in the occurrence of residues in food products and contribute to the spread of antimicrobial resistance. Therefore, rapid and sensitive methods for monitoring colistin residues in meat are required. In this study, competitive lateral flow immunoassays (LFIAs) based on direct and indirect antibody labeling were developed and comparatively evaluated for the detection of colistin. In the direct format, gold nanoparticles (GNPs) were conjugated with specific anti-colistin antibodies, whereas the indirect format employed free specific antibodies and GNPs conjugated with anti-species antibodies. The direct LFIA provided visual and instrumental detection limits of 1.85 and 0.13 ng/mL, respectively. The indirect format demonstrated improved sensitivity, achieving visual and instrumental detection limits of 0.6 and 0.07 ng/mL, respectively. The developed assays were further evaluated using spiked chicken meat extracts. With four-fold dilution of the extracts in PBST, colistin recoveries ranged from 91 to 105% for the direct LFIA and from 90 to 117% for the indirect LFIA. The developed assay provides a rapid and sensitive approach for monitoring colistin residues in chicken meat and demonstrates the potential of indirect labeling as a strategy for improving the sensitivity of competitive lateral flow assays.

Analytica

1 November 2026

Scheme of the formation of immune complexes in LFIA with direct and indirect antibody labeling.

Highly Accessed Articles

News & Conferences

Latest Issues

Open for Submission

Journal Sections

XFacebookLinkedIn
Analytica - ISSN 2673-4532