Previous Article in Journal
Characterisation of the Patient Population Attending the Interstitial Lung Disease Clinic at Hospital Garcia de Orta: Implications for Pulmonary Rehabilitation
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Medical Sciences Forum
Volume 35
Issue 1
10.3390/msf2025035011
msf-logo
Submit to this Journal
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Editorial

Statement of Peer Review †

by
Manuel Simões
1,* and
Marc Maresca
2
1
Department of Chemical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, University of Porto, 4099-002 Porto, Portugal
2
CNRS, Aix-Marseille University, Centrale Marseille, iSm2, 13331 Marseille, France
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
All papers published in the volume are presented at the 4th International Electronic Conference on Antibiotics, 21–23 May 2025; Available online: https://sciforum.net/event/ECA2025.
Med. Sci. Forum 2025, 35(1), 11; https://doi.org/10.3390/msf2025035011
Published: 22 September 2025
(This article belongs to the Proceedings of The 4th International Electronic Conference on Antibiotics)
Versions Notes
In submitting conference proceedings to Medical Sciences Forum, the volume editors of the proceedings certify to the publisher that all papers published in this volume have been subjected to peer review administered by the volume editors. Reviews were conducted by expert referees to the professional and scientific standards expected of a proceedings journal.
  • Type of peer review: single-blind
  • Conference submission management system: SUSY
  • Number of submissions sent received: 14
  • Number of submissions sent for review: 12
  • Number of submissions accepted: 9
  • Acceptance rate (number of submissions accepted/number of submissions received): 0.64
  • Average number of reviews per paper: 1.8
  • Total number of reviewers involved: 22
  • Any additional information on the review process: The review process was conducted in a single-blind manner, with the entire procedure administered through the MDPI Submission System. Evaluations were performed by reviewers from various universities and countries. Based on their feedback, revisions were made to each article, encompassing thorough examinations of the structure, content and writing.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Simões, M.; Maresca, M. Statement of Peer Review. Med. Sci. Forum 2025, 35, 11. https://doi.org/10.3390/msf2025035011

AMA Style

Simões M, Maresca M. Statement of Peer Review. Medical Sciences Forum. 2025; 35(1):11. https://doi.org/10.3390/msf2025035011

Chicago/Turabian Style

Simões, Manuel, and Marc Maresca. 2025. "Statement of Peer Review" Medical Sciences Forum 35, no. 1: 11. https://doi.org/10.3390/msf2025035011

APA Style

Simões, M., & Maresca, M. (2025). Statement of Peer Review. Medical Sciences Forum, 35(1), 11. https://doi.org/10.3390/msf2025035011

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop