Next Article in Journal
Values of Reused Unused Space Under Bridges
Previous Article in Journal
Polymeric Matrices for Mangiferin Delivery: Ways to Enhance Bioavailability and Therapeutic Effect
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Editorial

Statement of Peer Review

Department of Engineering, Università degli Studi della Campania Luigi Vanvitelli, 81031 Aversa, Italy
Eng. Proc. 2025, 96(1), 12; https://doi.org/10.3390/engproc2025096012
Published: 13 June 2025
In submitting conference proceedings to Engineering Proceedings, the Volume Editors certify to the publisher that all papers published in this volume have undergone peer review administered by the Volume Editors. Reviews were conducted by expert referees according to the professional and scientific standards expected of a proceedings journal.
  • Type of peer review: Single-blind peer review
  • Conference submission management system: University repository and e-mail
  • Number of submissions sent for review: 12
  • Number of submissions accepted: 10
  • Acceptance rate (number of submissions accepted/number of submissions received): 83%
  • Average number of reviews per paper: 2 (First Review) + 1 (Second Review)
  • Total number of reviewers involved: 18
  • Additional information on the review process: In the first review round, two reviewers are assigned to each paper to conduct a single-blind review. If both reviewers recommend rejection, the paper is rejected. Reviewers’ comments are compiled and communicated to the authors for revision. In the second review round, one reviewer is assigned to assess whether the authors have adequately addressed all comments. If the revisions are found satisfactory, the paper is forwarded to the Academic Editor, who makes the final decision on its acceptance for publication in the conference proceedings, and to the Volume Editor for final communication.

Conflicts of Interest

The author declares no conflicts of interest.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Rossi, A. Statement of Peer Review. Eng. Proc. 2025, 96, 12. https://doi.org/10.3390/engproc2025096012

AMA Style

Rossi A. Statement of Peer Review. Engineering Proceedings. 2025; 96(1):12. https://doi.org/10.3390/engproc2025096012

Chicago/Turabian Style

Rossi, Adriana. 2025. "Statement of Peer Review" Engineering Proceedings 96, no. 1: 12. https://doi.org/10.3390/engproc2025096012

APA Style

Rossi, A. (2025). Statement of Peer Review. Engineering Proceedings, 96(1), 12. https://doi.org/10.3390/engproc2025096012

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop