Statement of Peer Review †
- Type of peer review: 2–3 reviews by double-blind;
- Conference submission management system: online submission system on conference homepage;
- Number of submissions sent for review: 40;
- Number of submissions accepted: 18;
- Acceptance rate: 0.45;
- Total number of reviewers involved: 15;
- Any additional information on the review process: Please refer to Figure 1.
Conflicts of Interest
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2025 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Meen, T.-H.; Yang, H.-H.; Yang, C.-F. Statement of Peer Review. Eng. Proc. 2025, 91, 19. https://doi.org/10.3390/engproc2025091019
Meen T-H, Yang H-H, Yang C-F. Statement of Peer Review. Engineering Proceedings. 2025; 91(1):19. https://doi.org/10.3390/engproc2025091019
Chicago/Turabian StyleMeen, Teen-Hang, Hsi-Hsien Yang, and Cheng-Fu Yang. 2025. "Statement of Peer Review" Engineering Proceedings 91, no. 1: 19. https://doi.org/10.3390/engproc2025091019
APA StyleMeen, T.-H., Yang, H.-H., & Yang, C.-F. (2025). Statement of Peer Review. Engineering Proceedings, 91(1), 19. https://doi.org/10.3390/engproc2025091019