Next Article in Journal
Degradation-Aware Preliminary Sizing and Control Framework for Regional Aircraft Hybrid Fuel Cell–Battery Systems
Previous Article in Journal
Experimental Results of the Distribution of Halon-Free Cargo Fire Suppression Agents in a Cargo Hold Demonstrator
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Proceeding Paper

Prevention of Contrail Formation in Hydrogen Fuel Cell Aircraft †

by
Raphael Gebhart
* and
Franciscus L. J. van der Linden
German Aerospace Center (DLR), Münchener Straße 20, 82234 Weßling, Germany
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Presented at the 15th EASN International Conference, Madrid, Spain, 14–17 October 2025.
Eng. Proc. 2026, 133(1), 117; https://doi.org/10.3390/engproc2026133117
Published: 11 May 2026

Abstract

Contrail emissions are aviation’s largest non-CO2 contribution to global climate change. According to the Schmidt–Appleman criterion, potential future aircraft propulsion systems may enhance contrail formation relative to conventional engines through three mechanisms: (1) increased overall efficiency, (2) the use of hydrogen as fuel, and (3) external cooling in low-temperature fuel cell propulsion systems, which is the most critical factor. This paper presents the thermodynamic background and a system concept for contrail prevention applicable to conventional gas turbines, hydrogen combustion, and fuel cell propulsion systems. First, it is shown that fuel cell propulsion and hydrogen combustion exhibit equivalent thermodynamic contrail propensity when fuel cell exhaust is mixed with cooling air, analogous to core–bypass mixing in a conventional turbofan engines. Second, contrail mitigation via controlled condensation of exhaust water vapor is analyzed. It is demonstrated that the required cooling for LT-PEM fuel cell systems is 3–5 times lower than for turbofan engines, due to the already extensive thermal management in fuel cells. Since contrail avoidance is only necessary in ice supersaturated regions, a control scheme is proposed that limits condensation to the minimum required amount of water, thereby significantly reducing the overall drag impact. Avoiding contrail formation could provide a substantial climate benefit for future propulsion architectures.
Keywords: contrail mitigation; Schmidt–Appleman criterion; fuel cell propulsion; hydrogen combustion; gas turbine engines; aviation climate impact contrail mitigation; Schmidt–Appleman criterion; fuel cell propulsion; hydrogen combustion; gas turbine engines; aviation climate impact

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Gebhart, R.; van der Linden, F.L.J. Prevention of Contrail Formation in Hydrogen Fuel Cell Aircraft. Eng. Proc. 2026, 133, 117. https://doi.org/10.3390/engproc2026133117

AMA Style

Gebhart R, van der Linden FLJ. Prevention of Contrail Formation in Hydrogen Fuel Cell Aircraft. Engineering Proceedings. 2026; 133(1):117. https://doi.org/10.3390/engproc2026133117

Chicago/Turabian Style

Gebhart, Raphael, and Franciscus L. J. van der Linden. 2026. "Prevention of Contrail Formation in Hydrogen Fuel Cell Aircraft" Engineering Proceedings 133, no. 1: 117. https://doi.org/10.3390/engproc2026133117

APA Style

Gebhart, R., & van der Linden, F. L. J. (2026). Prevention of Contrail Formation in Hydrogen Fuel Cell Aircraft. Engineering Proceedings, 133(1), 117. https://doi.org/10.3390/engproc2026133117

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop