Skip to Content
You are currently on the new version of our website. Access the old version .
AutomationAutomation
  • Article
  • Open Access

15 November 2026

39 Pages

Two-Stage Supervisory MPC for Cooperative UAV Coverage with Fault-Triggered Mission Reconfiguration

Institute of Applied Informatics, Automation and Mechatronics, Slovak University of Technology in Bratislava, Bottova 25, 917 24 Trnava, Slovakia
Automation2026, 7(6), 189;https://doi.org/10.3390/automation7060189 
(registering DOI)
This article belongs to the Special Issue Intelligent Mechatronic Systems: Advances in Automation, Control, and Robotics

Abstract

A two-stage supervisory model predictive control (MPC) framework is developed for cooperative unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) coverage during mission transit and reconfiguration after single-agent loss. A synchronized predictive supervisory layer coordinates sector responsibility and constrained motion planning through a ranked assignment–feasibility architecture: Stage 1 orders candidate sector assignments, and Stage 2 selects an assignment-consistent finite-horizon trajectory. This explicitly links combinatorial task allocation to predictive sensing-service constraints while separating mission coordination from low-level vehicle stabilization. Existence, exact-model interval-wise constraint satisfaction, and conditional post-fault solvability are characterized for the finite-dimensional analytical formulation. A fully specified, reproducible finite-control-library realization is assessed through matched-weight nominal ablations, continuous-time separation checks on executed first-order trajectories, and post-fault task-coverage histories. An additional controlled study tests assignment-conditioned trajectory candidates against frozen-task and universal-library references for five deterministic fault configurations, with matched pre-fault motion within each comparison. The experiments demonstrate a reproducible post-fault redistribution mechanism: candidate responsibilities are coupled to predictive service-feasibility tests, and the resulting motion choices are evaluated against coverage, overlap, terminal progress, and computation. Matched ablations and five paired fault configurations quantify both the sensing effects and the competing objectives of the supervisory policy. A supplementary two-phase completion experiment then switches from the monitoring task to a terminal gathering mode and shows representative nominal and post-fault arrivals to the target region under the same first-order safety model.

Article Metrics

Citations

Article Access Statistics

Article metric data becomes available approximately 24 hours after publication online.