Dynamic Maintenance Optimization of the DS306 Detacher: A Preventive Approach and Operational Diagnosis
Abstract
1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Objectives of the Study
- Experimental validation of numerical models:Verify the consistency between the natural frequencies and vibration modes obtained from numerical simulations and the experimental vibration measurements, ensuring that the FEM model accurately represents the rotor’s real dynamic behavior.
- Early detection of mechanical anomalies:Identify and diagnose emerging mechanical faults, such as rotor imbalance, bearing wear, and clearance in bearing housings, through spectral analysis and temporal monitoring of vibrations.
- Assessment of maintenance interventions’ effectiveness:Evaluate the impact of corrective actions (bearing replacement, shaft realignment, and rotor balancing) on reducing vibration amplitudes and stabilizing mechanical operation, confirming their effectiveness in preventing critical failures.
- Support for predictive maintenance and operational optimization:Provide a quantitative basis for implementing predictive maintenance strategies by identifying potential resonance zones and enabling proactive interventions before major failures occur.
2.2. Industrial Case Study: DS306 in Operation
2.2.1. Description of the Studied System
2.2.2. Selection of Vibration Measurement Points
- Frequency range: 2 Hz–10 kHz.
- Resonance frequency: >20 kHz.
- Measurement range: 80 g (with g = 9.81 m/s2).
- Storage and operating temperature: −20 °C to +120 °C.
- The maximum admissible temperature is limited by the cable, between 90 °C and 120 °C.
- The bearing condition, as bearings are typically the first components to exhibit degradation;
- The shaft line dynamics, particularly at the rotor section, which is the critical rotating component under investigation.
- Low-frequency components associated with unbalance and misalignment,
- Mid- to high-frequency bands related to bearing defects, gear meshing, and mechanical looseness [22].
2.3. Mathematical Modeling and Vibratory Behavior of the Mechanical System
- , and are the mass, damping, and stiffness matrices, respectively,
- , and represent the vectors of generalized displacements, velocities, and accelerations,
- denotes the vector of generalized external forces applied to the system as a function of time.
2.3.1. Free Undamped Vibrations
2.3.2. Two-Degree-of-Freedom System Modeling
- A disc of moment of inertia I1 representing the motor pulley,
- A disc of moment of inertia I2 corresponding to the detacher rotor,
- Two torsional stiffnesses K1 and K2 representing the elastic deformation of the shaft between the discs.
3. Results
3.1. Experimental Study
3.1.1. Machine Monitoring History
- Bearing level 02 (Motor Side): The first graph in Figure 4a shows a steady increase in vibration amplitude from approximately 3 mm/s in 2021 to a maximum of 8.02 mm/s in August 2023, followed by a partial reduction after bearing replacement. The dominant fault signatures are associated with rotor imbalance and coupling misalignment, generating low-frequency excitations. After maintenance, vibration decreased to around 5 mm/s but did not return to its original baseline, suggesting residual unbalance or slight shaft misalignment persisted.
- Bearing level 03 (Intermediate Support): The second trend curve, in Figure 4b, displays lower and more stable vibration levels, fluctuating between 1.1 and 3 mm/s throughout the monitoring period. The small amplitude variations reflect transmitted vibration from the upstream motor–rotor assembly rather than local defects. The minor peaks observed around 2023 correspond to the same imbalance event seen on bearing level #02, confirming vibratory propagation along the shaft line but with attenuation due to the bearing stiffness and damping effects. No localized defect was identified at this position.
- Bearing N° 04 (Output Side): In the third graph in Figure 4c, the lowest vibration levels were recorded at this position (<2 mm/s). A slight rise in 2023 (≈1.9 mm/s) indicates a secondary excitation likely caused by the bearing-race clearance and subsequent replacement of the detacher bearings. After corrective maintenance, the vibration amplitude stabilized near 1.7 mm/s, signifying that the restoration procedure was effective and the residual vibration level is within acceptable limits (zone A/B under VDI 2056).
3.1.2. Vibration Diagnosis and Analysis of Results
- Bearing Defects and Alarm Classification: The spectrum acquired at bearing level #02 (motor side, vertical direction) displayed dominant frequency peaks at multiples of the shaft rotational speed (1×, 2×, and 3×), as shown in Figure 5a. The amplitude of the fundamental component exceeded 4 mm/s RMS, corresponding to an overall vibration level of 8.02 mm/s, classified as alarm level under VDI 2056 standards.This spectral signature is characteristic of rotor unbalance combined with coupling misalignment, producing strong low-frequency harmonics. The elevated energy observed between 100 Hz and 200 Hz suggests the onset of defects in the bearing raceways, consistent with the mechanical inspection findings.
- Shaft Impact and Bearing Clearance Effects: The vibration spectra recorded at bearing level #03 and level 04 (Figure 5b,c) exhibited a series of broadband peaks at frequencies above 200 Hz, with sidebands around the bearing characteristic frequencies. These patterns are associated with periodic impacts between the rolling elements and the inner/outer races, indicative of bearing looseness or excessive clearance. The presence of multiple harmonics confirms a non-linear dynamic response, likely caused by transient contact and load redistribution along the rotor line.After bearing replacement and realignment, these high-frequency components decreased significantly, confirming that the observed anomalies were directly related to bearing wear rather than structural resonance.
- Global Vibration Severity Map: The vibration severity map generated by the SOPRAPHIN diagnostic interface is shown in Figure 5d. The color-coded display summarizes the overall condition of each bearing:
- The motor-side bearing (level 02) appears in the red alarm zone, confirming excessive vibration.
- The intermediate and output bearings (level 03, level 04) remain within the green zone, indicating acceptable operation.
3.1.3. Maintenance Actions
- Replacement of bearings (type 21307-E) in the detacher housings (level 03 and level 04), carried out on multiple occasions following abnormal vibration readings;
- Verification and adjustment of alignment between the motor and detacher shafts to minimize coupling-induced misalignment;
- Dynamic balancing of the detacher rotor assembly after each major maintenance operation to correct residual unbalance and ensure uniform load distribution.
3.2. Numerical Simulation and Modal Analysis of Rotor System Results
3.2.1. Modeling and Boundary Conditions
3.2.2. Modal Simulation Results
3.3. Comparison and Validation of Experimental and Numerical Results
Correlation Between Measured and Simulated Frequencies
4. Discussion
4.1. Interpretation of the Modal Results
- The resonant frequencies obtained numerically align closely with the harmonics detected experimentally, validating the finite element model of the rotor–bearing system.
- The presence of torsional resonance near 233 Hz corresponds to imbalance-related excitation, consistent with the vibration peaks observed at 224.5 Hz in the experimental spectra.
- Bearing fault frequencies observed around 138–416 Hz agree with the higher-order torsional and bending modes identified numerically.
4.2. Proposed Corrective Measures
- Redesign the bearing supports using SNH- or SN-type housings to improve rigidity and alignment.
- Re-evaluate bearing sizing to ensure compatibility with dynamic loads and vibration amplitudes.
- Install damping pads or isolation mounts at the machine’s foundation points to reduce structural vibration transmission.
5. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Gupta, R.; Sharma, A. Fundamentals of Size Reduction in Industry. Ind. Eng. J. 2018, 27, 45–52. [Google Scholar]
- Bassey, J.B.; Odesola, I.F.; Olawuyi, J.A. A Comparative Technique for Performance Evaluation of Hammer Mill and Disk Mill in Yam Flour Processing. World J. Eng. Technol. 2022, 10, 613–625. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mugabi, R.; Byaruhanga, Y.B.; Eskridge, K.M.; Weller, C.L. Performance Evaluation of a Hammer Mill during Grinding of Maize Grains. Agric. Eng. Int. CIGR J. 2019, 21, 170–179. [Google Scholar]
- Müller, J.; Hoffmann, K. Mechanical Processing of Solid Materials; Springer: Berlin, Germany, 2020. [Google Scholar]
- Ramírez Cabrera, P.A.; Lozano Pérez, A.S.; Guerrero Fajardo, C.A. Design of a Knife Mill with a Drying Adaptation for Lignocellulose Biomass Milling: Peapods and Coffee Cherry. Designs 2025, 9, 57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Arce, C.; Krátký, L. Investigating the Effect of Process Variables for Ball Milling of Wood Chips: Energy Demand and Particle Size. Biomass Convers. Biorefin. 2025, 15, 3361–3371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pérez, A.S.L.; Mahecha, V.R.; Fajardo, C.A.G. Comparative Analysis of Optimal Reaction Conditions for Hydrothermal Carbonization and Liquid Hot-Water Processes in the Valorization of Peapods and Coffee Cherry Waste into Platform Chemicals. ChemEngineering 2024, 8, 98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Smith, J.; Alvarez, P. Modern Cereal Processing Technologies: Equipment and Optimization. Food Eng. J. 2019, 36, 120–135. [Google Scholar]
- Lee, M.; Kapoor, R. Dynamics and Diagnostics of High-Speed Rotating Machinery; Springer Mechanical Systems Series; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2020. [Google Scholar]
- Durand, L.; Michel, P. Maintenance and Dynamics of Rotary Machines in the Food Industry. J. Mech. Syst. 2021, 14, 89–97. [Google Scholar]
- Stanojević, M.; Milojević, S.; Marić, D.; Stojanović, B. Influence of Gears and Oil Levels Upon Efficiency of Ravigneaux Gearset. Teh. Vjesn. 2025, 32, 2048–2055. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pastukhov, A.; Timashov, E.; Stanojević, D. Temperature conditions and diagnostics of bearings. Appl. Eng. Lett. 2023, 8, 45–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Al-Badri, M.A.; He, D. Sensor Placement Strategies for Effective Fault Detection in Rotating Equipment. J. Vib. Eng. Technol. 2018, 6, 325–337. [Google Scholar]
- Randall, R.B. Vibration-Based Condition Monitoring: Industrial, Aerospace and Automotive Applications; Wiley: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2011. [Google Scholar]
- Mobley, R.K. An Introduction to Predictive Maintenance; Elsevier: Oxford, UK, 2002. [Google Scholar]
- Pavithra, R.; Ramachandran, P. An Overview of Predictive Maintenance for Industrial Machines Using Vibration Analysis. In Proceedings of the 2021 Innovations in Power and Advanced Computing Technologies (i-PACT), Chennai, India, 27–29 November 2021; pp. 1–7. [Google Scholar]
- ISO 10816-3; Mechanical Vibration—Evaluation of Machine Vibration by Measurements on Non-Rotating Parts—Part 3: Industrial Machines with Nominal Power above 15 kW and Nominal Speeds between 120 r/min and 15,000 r/min When Measured In Situ. ISO: Geneva, Switzerland, 2016.
- Wang, G.; Ke, J. Literature Review on the Structural Health Monitoring (SHM) of Sustainable Civil Infrastructure: An Analysis of Influencing Factors in the Implementation. Buildings 2024, 14, 402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Khalyasmaa, A.I.; Stepanova, A.I.; Eroshenko, S.A.; Matrenin, P.V. Review of the Digital Twin Technology Applications for Electrical Equipment Lifecycle Management. Mathematics 2023, 11, 1315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, Y.; Thomas, G. Vibration Analysis for Industrial Equipment Maintenance. J. Mech. Diagn. Progn. 2021, 18, 205–218. [Google Scholar]
- Daga, A.P.; Garibaldi, L. Diagnostics of Rotating Machinery through Vibration Monitoring: Signal Processing and Pattern Analysis. Appl. Sci. 2024, 14, 9276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Magraoui, R.; Zemirline, A.; Ouali, M. Improvement of the Performance of an Industrial Wringer. Rev. Gestão Soc. Ambient. 2024, 18, 38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- VDI 2056; Mechanical Vibration of Machines—Evaluation Guidelines. Verein Deutscher Ingenieure (VDI): Düsseldorf, Germany, 2004.
- Xie, W.; Hua, Y. Structural Vibration Comfort: A Review of Recent Developments. Buildings 2024, 14, 1592. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- ISO 7919; Mechanical Vibration—Evaluation of Machine Vibration by Measurements on Rotating Shafts. International Organization for Standardization: Geneva, Switzerland, 2009.









| Date of Measurement | Vibration Level (mm/s) at Bearing Level 02 | Vibration Level (mm/s) at Bearing Level 03 | Vibration Level (mm/s) at Bearing Level 04 | Remarks | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Before Replacement | After Replacement | Before Replacement | After Replacement | Before Replacement | After Replacement | ||
| 3 June 2021 | - | 2.95 | - | 1.12 | - | 1.10 | (1) |
| 22 May 2023 | 6.95 | 5.25 | 3.88 | 2.99 | 4.10 | 1.26 | (2) |
| 10 August 2023 | 8.02 | 4.22 | 5.77 | 2.68 | 3.68 | 1.95 | (3) |
| 15 May 2024 | 6.84 | 5.20 | 2.99 | 2.22 | 4.19 | 2.02 | (4) |
| 20 November 2024 | - | 4.74 | - | 1.68 | - | 1.56 | (5) |
| 21 May 2025 | 7.73 | 6.12 | 3.29 | 1.70 | 3.01 | 1.77 | (6) |
| Mode Number | Natural Frequency (rad/s) | Natural Frequency (Hz) | Mode Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1466.50 | 233.4 | Torsional |
| 2 | 2418 | 384.83 | Bending |
| 3 | 2420.3 | 385.2 | Bending |
| 4 | 2533 | 403.14 | Torsional |
| 5 | 3080.4 | 490.27 | Torsional |
| 6 | 3740.2 | 595.27 | Bending |
| 7 | 3763.4 | 598.97 | Bending |
| 8 | 3877 | 617.04 | Torsional |
| 9 | 3907.2 | 621.85 | Torsional |
| 10 | 4037.7 | 642.62 | Torsional |
| Mode Number | Simulated Frequency (Hz) | Experimental Frequency (Hz) | Harmonic Correspondence | Interpretation |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 233.4 | 224.5 | 9th harmonic of the motor base frequency (24.75 Hz) | Torsional resonance zone |
| 2 | 384.8 | 325–390 | 20th–24th harmonic of detacher base frequency (16.25 Hz) | Coupled torsion–bending response |
| 3 | 403.1 | 416.2 | 3rd harmonic of bearing cage frequency (138.75 Hz) | Bearing defect excitation |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2026 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license.
Share and Cite
Kebour, O.; Magraoui, R.; Belgroune, N. Dynamic Maintenance Optimization of the DS306 Detacher: A Preventive Approach and Operational Diagnosis. Appl. Mech. 2026, 7, 16. https://doi.org/10.3390/applmech7010016
Kebour O, Magraoui R, Belgroune N. Dynamic Maintenance Optimization of the DS306 Detacher: A Preventive Approach and Operational Diagnosis. Applied Mechanics. 2026; 7(1):16. https://doi.org/10.3390/applmech7010016
Chicago/Turabian StyleKebour, Omar, Rabah Magraoui, and Nadir Belgroune. 2026. "Dynamic Maintenance Optimization of the DS306 Detacher: A Preventive Approach and Operational Diagnosis" Applied Mechanics 7, no. 1: 16. https://doi.org/10.3390/applmech7010016
APA StyleKebour, O., Magraoui, R., & Belgroune, N. (2026). Dynamic Maintenance Optimization of the DS306 Detacher: A Preventive Approach and Operational Diagnosis. Applied Mechanics, 7(1), 16. https://doi.org/10.3390/applmech7010016

