Skip to Content
You are currently on the new version of our website. Access the old version .
  • Review
  • Open Access

10 November 2026

40 Pages

The Biodegradability Paradox: Hidden Toxicological and Additive-Driven Risks of Mismanaged Bioplastics

,
,
,
,
,
,
and
1
Australian Plastics Research and Innovation Lab (APRIL), Global Innovative Centre for Advanced Nanomaterials (GICAN), College of Engineering, Science and Environment, The University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW 2308, Australia
2
ICAR Central Soil Salinity Research Institute RRS Lucknow, Lucknow 226002, India
3
Advanced Polymers and Composites Group, Chemicals Cluster, Council for Scientific and Industrial Research (CSIR), Meiring Naude Road, Brummeria, Pretoria 0184, South Africa
4
Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Science, Nelson Mandela University, Port Elizabeth 6001, South Africa
Clean Technol.2026, 8(6), 186;https://doi.org/10.3390/cleantechnol8060186 
(registering DOI)

Highlights

What are the main findings?
  • Incomplete biodegradation and improper disposal of bioplastics can generate bio-micro- and nanoplastics (MNPs).
  • Bio-MNPs and associated chemical additives can affect organisms and disrupt ecological functions.
What is the implication of the main finding?
  • Environmental safety assessments should include particles, leachate, and long-term environmental effects.
  • Stronger certification, clear labelling, and proper disposal can improve bioplastics safety.

Abstract

The global surge in plastic pollution, particularly from microplastics (MPs), has raised concerns about long-term implications for terrestrial and aquatic ecosystems. In response, biodegradable plastics are widely considered promising replacements for conventional plastics and are often marketed under labels such as “bio-based,” “biodegradable,” “compostable,” and “eco-friendly.” However, growing evidence suggests that the mismanagement of these materials contributes to the formation of microplastics derived from biodegradable plastics, which may pose ecological hazards depending on material composition and exposure conditions. This review integrates evidence on environmental fate and ecotoxicological effects with bioplastic formulation chemistry, including intentionally added substances, non-intentionally added substances and polymer degradation products. It links material composition and chemical release to biological responses, and highlights uncertainties in distinguishing particle-associated effects from chemical-mixture toxicity. The synthesis examines effects on soil properties, microbial and mesofaunal communities, and aquatic organisms, considering the limitations of extrapolating experimental findings to environmental exposure. This review identifies key knowledge gaps and emerging risks, challenging the perception that all biodegradable plastics are inherently environmentally benign. It highlights the need for regulatory oversight, standardized definitions, and transparent labelling to ensure that biodegradability claims align with real-world degradation conditions. Without sustainable end-of-life strategies, bioplastics may shift rather than solve the microplastic crisis. This work underscores the need for a precautionary approach to biopolymer development, grounded in life cycle thinking and ecological safety.

Article Metrics

Citations

Article Access Statistics

Multiple requests from the same IP address are counted as one view.