Skip to Content
You are currently on the new version of our website. Access the old version .
ProceedingsProceedings
  • Abstract
  • Open Access

1 February 2024

2 Pages

Dietary Polyphenol Intake in Relation to Ultra-Processed Food Consumption in a Mediterranean Population-Based Cohort: Findings from the Moli-Sani Study †

,
,
,
,
,
and
1
Department of Epidemiology and Prevention, IRCCS NEUROMED, 86077 Pozzilli, Italy
2
Mediterranea Cardiocentro, 80122 Napoli, Italy
3
Department of Medicine and Surgery, LUM University “Giuseppe Degennaro”, Casamassima, 70010 Bari, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.

Abstract

Background and objectives: Ultra-processed foods (UPFs) have been consistently associated with the increased risk of premature mortality and diseases in numerous cohorts worldwide, possibly due to their poor nutritional composition. However, UPFs could also be deficient in several bioactive compounds, such as polyphenols, which are otherwise largely present in a variety of fresh foods, such as fruit, vegetables, and cereals. We therefore examined the dietary polyphenol content in relation to the degree of processing according to the Nova classification. Methods: The data were from the Moli-sani Study established in 2005–2010, including 22,939 men and women (mean age 55.4 y ± 11.7). Dietary data were collected using a 188-item food frequency questionnaire, and the polyphenol intake was calculated by matching the food consumption data with the Phenol-Explorer database regarding the polyphenol content of each reported food. NOVA classification was used to categorize the foods according to the levels of processing as unprocessed/minimally processed foods (e.g., fruits; meat) or UPFs (e.g., processed meat; packaged snacks). Results: The average (SD) weight contributions of the unprocessed/minimally processed foods and UPFs to the diet were 63.1% (±11.8) and 11.0% (±6.7), respectively. The mean intake of polyphenols was 665 (±265) mg/day. In multivariable-adjusted linear regression analysis controlled for the sociodemographic, behavioral and clinical factors, more UPF intake was associated with fewer dietary polyphenols (β = −59.2; 95% CI: from −62.1 to −56.3 mg/day of polyphenols for 1-SD increase in UPF). On the contrary, unprocessed/minimally processed food consumption was linked to more polyphenols in the diet (β = 25.5; 95% CI: 22.2 to 28.7). Discussion: In this large cohort of Italian adults, an increasing dietary share of UPFs would provide lower amounts of polyphenols in the diet, while consuming fresh and minimally processed foods is associated with a higher intake of polyphenols. Future studies are needed to test whether a low dietary polyphenol content has an effect on UPF–disease relationship.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, E.R. and M.B.; methodology, E.R. and A.d.C.; validation, S.C.; formal analysis, E.R. and S.E.; data curation, S.C. and E.R.; writing—original draft preparation, E.R.; writing—review and editing, G.d.G., M.B. and L.I.; supervision, M.B. and L.I. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded under the National Recovery and Resilience Plan (NRRP), Mission 4 Component 2 Investment 1.3—Call for tender No. 341 of 15/03/2022 of the Italian Ministry of University and Research funded by the European Union—NextGenerationEU. Project code PE0000003, Concession Decree No. 1550 of 11/10/2022 adopted by the Italian Ministry of University and Research, CUP D93C22000890001, Project title “Research and innovation network on food and nutrition Sustainability, Safety and Security–Working ON Foods” (ONFoods). The present analyses were also supported by the Italian Ministry of Health (Ricerca Corrente 2022–2024).

Institutional Review Board Statement

The Moli-sani study was granted the approval of the Ethics Committee of the Catholic University in Rome, Italy, ID Prot. pdc. P.99 (A.931/03-138-04)/C.E./2004.

Data Availability Statement

The data underlying this abstract will be shared on reasonable request to the corresponding author.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Article Metrics

Citations

Article Access Statistics

Multiple requests from the same IP address are counted as one view.