Abstract
Increasing ocean temperatures are expected to increase the energy needs of marine organisms, therefore increasing food demand to sustain their metabolism. However, food is limited in the aquatic environment and reduced availability may be intensified by the advance of climate change. Despite the importance of these interacting factors, few studies have explored their combined effects, particularly in early stages of the fish. To address this gap, we investigated how increased temperatures and reduced food availability influence agonistic behaviors, risk-taking, exploratory activity, social preference, and shoal structure in the early stages of Sparus aurata (55 dph). Fish were exposed for two weeks to a cross-experimental design involving two temperature conditions (24 °C and 28 °C) and two levels of food availability (9% and 4.5% of body weight). Our findings revealed that temperature and food restriction significantly reduced aggressiveness. Fish subjected to low food availability, regardless of temperature, exhibited bolder behavior, took greater risks, and engaged in more exploration. Higher temperatures independently increased exploratory activity but did not affect risk-taking. Fish from the four treatment conditions demonstrated a preference to associate with shoals. However, under food restriction, fish were more likely to abandon their shoals, and the low food availability in the high temperature treatment led to looser shoal formations. Overall, our results suggest that food availability has a higher impact than temperature. Fish on low food availability reduced energy expenditure on aggressive behaviors, but engaged in riskier behaviors and increased exploration, probably in an effort to locate food resources.
Author Contributions
Conceptualization, J.C.A., A.R.L. and A.M.F.; methodology, J.C.A., A.R.L. and A.M.F.; validation, J.C.A., A.R.L. and A.M.F.; formal analysis, J.C.A.; investigation, J.C.A., A.R.L. and A.M.F.; resources, L.R. and P.P.-F.; data curation, J.C.A., A.R.L. and A.M.F.; writing—original draft preparation, J.C.A.; writing—review and editing, A.R.L., L.R., P.P.-F. and A.M.F.; visualization, J.C.A.; supervision, A.R.L. and A.M.F.; project administration, A.R.L. and A.M.F.; funding acquisition, A.R.L. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Funding
This study had the support of FCT through a PhD grant attributed to João Carlos Almeida (2022.14057.BD), a Junior Researcher contract (CEECIND/00067/2018) awarded to Ana Rita Lopes, and the MicroToxFish project (2022.04136.PTDC).
Institutional Review Board Statement
This study was carried out under the approval of the Direção Geral de Alimentação e Veterinária (DGAV, Portuguese Authority for Animal Health, permit 6249/25). All methods were performed in accordance with the relevant guidelines and regulations and following the recommendations of the ARRIVE guidelines.
Informed Consent Statement
Not applicable.
Data Availability Statement
The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2026 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license.