Introduction: Sample integrity is a critical factor for the reliability of molecular testing in public health laboratories, especially for epidemiological surveillance data. Inconsistent transport media volume and variations in swab quantity are common pre-analytical challenges that impact the quality and reproducibility of diagnostic results. This study investigated the impact of saline absorption by swabs and the variation in swab numbers, seeking evidence for the standardization and improvement of collection protocols in an active surveillance scenario. Methodology: For this study, six standardized collection kits were used. The initial volume was measured, and the swabs were inserted into the tubes for 24 h. After immersion, the remaining volume was transferred to a microtube and measured again, allowing us to quantify the solution loss. Additionally, we evaluated the impact of the number of swabs (one to three) on molecular test performance. Results: The analysis demonstrated a 37% average loss of the initial saline solution volume, with absorption by the swabs being the primary factor. A maximum variation of 51% in volume loss was observed in one of the kits. This significant volume reduction and the variation in the number of swabs (1 to 3) did not directly impact the molecular test results. Conclusions: The reduction in sample volume due to liquid absorption by swabs is an underestimated pre-analytical factor that can compromise the sensitivity and quality of molecular diagnostics. This study highlights the urgent need to standardize collection materials to ensure the reliability of surveillance data, which is essential for public health decision-making.
Author Contributions
Conceptualization, F.C.M.; methodology, F.C.M.; validation, F.B.L., F.C.M. and F.G.d.O.A.Y.; formal analysis, F.C.M.; investigation, F.C.M.; data curation, E.H.d.P.; writing—original draft preparation, F.C.M.; writing—review and editing, E.H.d.P.; visualization, L.A.A.S.; writing—review, T.P.C.; project administration, E.H.d.P. supervision; F.J.Q.C. and G.A.d.S.; review. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Funding
This research received no external funding.
Institutional Review Board Statement
Not applicable.
Informed Consent Statement
Not applicable.
Data Availability Statement
Data are available in this manuscript.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2026 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license.