Antenna Performance and Effects of Concealment Within Building Structures: A Comprehensive Review
Abstract
1. Introduction
Review Methodology
2. Background and Theoretical Foundations
2.1. Electromagnetic Principles of Antenna Concealment
2.2. Material-Antenna Interactions
2.3. Performance Metrics for Concealed Antennas
3. Electromagnetic Performance Impacts of Concealment
3.1. Resonant Frequency Shifts and Impedance Matching
3.2. Gain and Efficiency Degradation
3.3. Radiation Pattern Alterations
3.4. Bandwidth Considerations
4. Building Material Impacts on Antenna Performance
4.1. Concrete and Cementitious Materials
4.2. Glass and Transparent Substrates
4.3. Multi-Layer Wall Structures
4.4. Comparative Material Analysis
5. Concealment Technologies and Design Approaches
5.1. Transparent Conductive Oxide Antennas
5.2. Antenna-on-Glass Integration
5.3. Structural Embedding in Walls
5.4. Camouflage and Low-Visibility Designs
5.5. Metasurface-Enhanced Windows
5.6. Multi-Band Concealed Antenna
6. Applications and Use Cases
6.1. 5G and Beyond-5G Cellular Networks
6.2. Internet of Things and Smart Cities
6.3. Structural Health Monitoring
6.4. Indoor Coverage Enhancement
7. Discussion
7.1. Design Tradeoffs and System-Level Optimization
7.2. Performance Recovery Techniques
7.3. Limitations of Current Approaches
8. Future Research Directions
8.1. Advanced Materials and Fabrication
8.2. Multi-Band and Reconfigurable Systems
8.3. Integration with Building Information Modeling
8.4. Standardization and Regulatory Frameworks
9. Conclusions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Lin, J.C. Controversy over Cellular Mobile-Telecommunication Base-Station-Antenna Installations. IEEE Antennas Propag. Mag. 2004, 46, 155–156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vaha-Savo, L.; Haneda, K.; Icheln, C.; Lu, X. Electromagnetic-Thermal Analyses of Distributed Antennas Embedded into a Load-Bearing Wall. IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag. 2023, 71, 6849–6858. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Sreevidya, S.; Subramanian, N. Aesthetic Appraisal of Antenna Towers. J. Archit. Eng. 2003, 9, 102–108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Park, S.-H.; Park, C.-K.; Yoo, H.; Kim, B.; Chae, C.-B. Window-Type and AR Glass-Type Transparent Antenna Systems for B5G/6G. In Proceedings of the 2023 IEEE 20th Consumer Communications & Networking Conference (CCNC); IEEE: New York, NY, USA, 2023; pp. 937–938. [Google Scholar]
- Alieldin, A.; Huang, Y.; Stanley, M.; Xu, Q. 5G Camouflage Antenna for Pico-Cell Base Stations. IET Microw. Antennas Propag. 2020, 14, 1696–1699. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Green, R.B.; Ding, K.; Avrutin, V.; Ozgur, U.; Topsakal, E. Optically Transparent Antenna Arrays for the Next Generation of Mobile Networks. IEEE Open J. Antennas Propag. 2022, 3, 538–548. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Alieldin, A.; El-Agamy, A.F.; Mowafy, M.; El-Akhdar, A.M. An Invisible MIMO Pair of Back-to-Back Antennas for 5G Siganl Boosters. In Proceedings of the 2021 International Telecommunications Conference, ITC-Egypt 2021—Proceedings; Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc.: New York, NY, USA, 2021. [Google Scholar]
- Gietema, W.; Harlan, R.R. System and Method of Integrating and Concealing Antennas, Antenna Subsystems and Communications Subsystems. U.S. Patent 6222503B1, 9 January 1998. [Google Scholar]
- Reineck, M.J.; Wedholm, K.M. Building Elements and Support Structure for Enclosing an Antenna. U.S. Patent 5852424A, 20 May 1997. [Google Scholar]
- Nemeth, J.J.; Mclernon, S. Antenna Concealment Structures Incorporating Fabric Concealment Shells. U.S. Patent 2013/0113680 A1, 8 November 2012. [Google Scholar]
- Dureja, M.K. Stealth Wireless Pole System and Platform. U.S. Patent 20170237146A1, 20 January 2016. [Google Scholar]
- Green, R.B. Optically Transparent Antennas and Filters for Smart City Optically Transparent Antennas and Filters for Smart City Communication Communication Downloaded from Downloaded From. Ph.D. Thesis, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, USA, 2019. [Google Scholar]
- Aliqab, K.; Nadeem, I.; Khan, S.R. A Comprehensive Review of In-Body Biomedical Antennas: Design, Challenges and Applications. Micromachines 2023, 14, 1472. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Ndoumbe, J.; Tchuenbou, N.; Kom, C.H. Modeling and Simulation of High Frequency Electromagnetics Wave Propagation on Vivaldi Antenna Using Finite Element Method. Open J. Antennas Propag. 2023, 11, 49–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dinkic, J.; Stevanovic, M.N.; Djordjevic, A. Physical Models for Influence of Substrate Permittivity on the Gain of Microstrip Antennas. IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag. 2023, 71, 9078–9083. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Oh, S.; Lee, H.; Shin, M. Miniaturization of a Microstrip Antenna by Using Transformation Electromagnetics. IEEE Antennas Wirel. Propag. Lett. 2016, 15, 366–369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Jiang, X.; Xiao, S. Research on New Electromagnetic Radiation Method for Antenna Miniaturization. In Proceedings of the 2019 Cross Strait Quad-Regional Radio Science and Wireless Technology Conference (CSQRWC); IEEE: New York, NY, USA, 2019; pp. 1–3. [Google Scholar]
- Kumar, A.; Yaduvanshi, R.S. Miniaturization of Rectangular Dielectric Resonator Antenna. In Proceedings of the 2020 2nd International Conference on Advances in Computing, Communication Control and Networking (ICACCCN); IEEE: New York, NY, USA, 2020; pp. 574–577. [Google Scholar]
- Farahani, S. RF Propagation, Antennas, and Regulatory Requirements. In ZigBee Wireless Networks and Transceivers; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2008; pp. 171–206. [Google Scholar]
- Wen, H.; Weng, B.; Wang, B.; Xiao, W.; Liu, X.; Wang, Y.; Zhang, M.; Huang, H. Advancements in Transparent Conductive Oxides for Photoelectrochemical Applications. Nanomaterials 2024, 14, 591. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Guo, C.; Wu, P.; Liu, Y.; Fan, T. Radio-Frequency Conductivity Evaluation Method Based on Surface/Interface Scattering of Metallic Coatings. Coatings 2024, 14, 599. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Pawłowski, S.; Plewako, J.; Korzeniewska, E.; Sobczyński, D. The Influence of the Skin Phenomenon on the Impedance of Thin Conductive Layers. Electronics 2023, 12, 4834. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Morozov, P.; Morozov, F.; Lazarev, M.; Bogolyubov, L.; Popov, A. Characterization of Antenna Radiation Pattern and Penetration Depth in Ground Penetrating Radar Field Missions. Remote Sens. 2023, 15, 5452. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Kamal, S.; Sen, P. Printed Multiple Input Multiple Output Antennas Powered by Passive Metamaterial and Defected Ground for Diverse Sixth Generation Applications. Sci. Rep. 2025, 15, 22723. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Jansen, C.; Piesiewicz, R.; Mittleman, D.; Kurner, T.; Koch, M. The Impact of Reflections From Stratified Building Materials on the Wave Propagation in Future Indoor Terahertz Communication Systems. IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag. 2008, 56, 1413–1419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Guo, M.; Han, Z.; Shi, G.; Chen, R.; Li, J.; Guo, S. Construction of Gradient Layered Structure for Microwave Absorbing Composite Materials with Strong Absorption and High Bandwidth. Polym. Test. 2025, 144, 108729. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Maniak, K.; Mydlikowski, R. Laboratory Measurements of Electromagnetic Wave Attenuation of Building Materials in the W-Band (75–110 GHz). Appl. Sci. 2025, 15, 13178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Soutsos, M.N.; Bungey, J.H.; Millard, S.G.; Shaw, M.R.; Patterson, A. Dielectric Properties of Concrete and Their Influence on Radar Testing. NDT E Int. 2001, 34, 419–425. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Fleury, J.; Burnier, L.; Lanini, M.; Di Domenico, M.; Zimmermann, E.; Genoud, C.; Salvadé, A.; Schueler, A. Novel Microwave Transparent Low Emissivity Coating for Energy-Efficient Glazing: Towards 5G Frequencies. J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 2019, 1343, 012199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Cai, L.; Wu, J.; Lamberson, L.; Streltsova, E.; Daly, C.; Zakharian, A.; Borrelli, N.F. Glass for 5G Applications. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2021, 119, 082901. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Zhang, N.; Geng, Z.; Ni, Y.; Cheng, Y.; Du, X.; Shen, Y.; Ryu, T.; Yin, X.; Luo, Y. 5G/6G Wave Efficient Window Glass Utilising Surface Mount Passive Metasurface for Enhancing Microwave Transmission. IET Microw. Antennas Propag. 2025, 19, e12546. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Chen, C.; Zou, L.; Bi, C.; Wang, A. Effect of Dielectric Layer on Miniaturized Patch Antenna Sensor. Sensors 2024, 24, 7608. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Solyom, K.; Lopez, P.R.; Esquivel, P.; Lucia, A.; Vásquez-Caicedo. Effect of Temperature and Moisture Contents on Dielectric Properties at 2.45 GHz of Fruit and Vegetable Processing by-Products. RSC Adv. 2020, 10, 16783–16790. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Mair, D.; Fischer, M.; Konzilia, J.; Renzler, M.; Ussmueller, T. Evolutionary Optimization of Antennas for Structural Health Monitoring. IEEE Access 2023, 11, 4905–4913. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Nunna, P.K.; Kuchhal, P.; Varshney, A. Wearables and Implantables in MICS—A Review. Alex. Eng. J. 2023, 79, 73–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Vähä-Savo, L.; Veggi, L.; Vitucci, E.M.; Icheln, C.; Degli-Esposti, V.; Haneda, K. Analytical Characterization of a Transmission Loss of an Antenna-Embedded Wall. IEEE Open J. Antennas Propag. 2023, 5, 1765–1772. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Sissoko, A.; Sanogo, C.O.; Diourté, B. A Review on Conductive and Transparent Materials Used in the Design of Transparent Antennas. Open J. Antennas Propag. 2023, 11, 11–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ng, J.P.S.; Sum, Y.L.; Soong, B.H.; Monteiro, P.J.M. Investigation of Material Loading on an Evolved Antecedent Hexagonal CSRR-Loaded Electrically Small Antenna. Sensors 2023, 23, 8624. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Luo, Y.; Pu, L.; Wang, J.; Howard, I.L. Enhancing In-Situ Structural Health Monitoring Through RF Energy-Powered Sensor Nodes and Mobile Platform. IEEE Trans. Mob. Comput. 2025, 24, 1999–2013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Perkins, B.; Walters, D.; Green, R. Antennas Made from Transparent Conductive Oxides Require Multiple Optimization Criteria. In Proceedings of the 2025 United States National Committee of URSI National Radio Science Meeting (USNC-URSI NRSM); IEEE: New York, NY, USA, 2025; p. 351. [Google Scholar]
- Beckford, J.; Behera, M.K.; Yarbrough, K.; Obasogie, B.; Pradhan, S.K.; Bahoura, M. Gallium Doped Zinc Oxide Thin Films as Transparent Conducting Oxide for Thin-Film Heaters. AIP Adv. 2021, 11, 075208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Goh, Y.Z.; Neve, M.J.; Rowe, G.B. Effects of Complex Wall Structures on Antenna Radiation Characteristics. In Proceedings of the 2018 IEEE International Symposium on Antennas and Propagation & USNC/URSI National Radio Science Meeting; IEEE: New York, NY, USA, 2018; pp. 2485–2486. [Google Scholar]
- Das, D.; Jana, R.; Gangwar, R.K.; Maithani, S. Back-to-Back DRA Using Single/Double Layered Substrates for Bidirectional Radiation with a Choice of Versatile Polarizations. IETE J. Res. 2025, 71, 2740–2749. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Chu, Q.-X.; Wen, D.-L.; Luo, Y. A Broadband ±45° Dual-Polarized Antenna With Y-Shaped Feeding Lines. IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag. 2015, 63, 483–490. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Park, S.-H.; Kim, S.-M.; Kim, S.; Yoo, H.; Kim, B.; Chae, C.-B. Demo: A Transparent Antenna System for In-Building Networks. In Proceedings of the 2022 IEEE International Conference on Communications Workshops (ICC Workshops); IEEE: New York, NY, USA, 2022; pp. 1–2. [Google Scholar]
- Ismail, M.Y.; Abbasi, M.I. Analysis of Design Optimization of Bandwidth and Loss Performance of Reflectarray Antennas Based on Material Properties. Mod. Appl. Sci. 2009, 4, 28–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Alibakhshikenari, M.; Virdee, B.S.; Shukla, P.; Wang, Y.; Azpilicueta, L.; Naser-Moghadasi, M.; See, C.H.; Elfergani, I.; Zebiri, C.; Abd-Alhameed, R.A.; et al. Impedance Bandwidth Improvement of a Planar Antenna Based on Metamaterial-Inspired T-Matching Network. IEEE Access 2021, 9, 67916–67927. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Song, G.; Yoo, J.; Son, H.; Kim, E.; Lee, I. Bandwidth Enhancement of a Low-profile Monopole Antenna Embedded in a Circular Cavity on a Manhole Cover. Int. J. RF Microw. Comput.-Aided Eng. 2022, 32, e23017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Yang, W.; Li, J.; Chen, D.; Cao, Y.; Xue, Q.; Che, W. Advanced Metasurface-Based Antennas: A Review. IEEE Open J. Antennas Propag. 2025, 6, 6–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Zheng, J.; Zheng, H.; Pang, Y.; Qu, B.; Xu, Z. A Metasurface Glass for Energy Saving and 5G Mobile Communication Signal Enhancement. Small 2025, 21, 2408598. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Jeske, M.; Aloise, D.; Sansò, B.; Nascimento, M.C.V. Reference Signal Received Power Prediction Accuracy in Wireless Outdoor Settings: A Comprehensive Feature Importance Study. IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag. 2025, 73, 8022–8037. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Sehrai, D.A.; Asif, M.; Shah, W.A.; Khan, J.; Ullah, I.; Ibrar, M.; Jan, S.; Alibakhshikenari, M.; Falcone, F.; Limiti, E. Metasurface-Based Wideband MIMO Antenna for 5G Millimeter-Wave Systems. IEEE Access 2021, 9, 125348–125357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Khan, H.Z.; Jabbar, A.; Kazim, J.u.R.; Ur Rehman, M.; Imran, M.A.; Abbasi, Q.H. Multi-Band Ultrathin Reflective Metasurface for Linear and Circular Polarization Conversion in Ku, K, and Ka Bands. Commun. Eng. 2024, 3, 124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Wu, Z.; Wong, H.S.; Buenfeld, N.R. Transport Properties of Concrete after Drying-Wetting Regimes to Elucidate the Effects of Moisture Content, Hysteresis and Microcracking. Cem. Concr. Res. 2017, 98, 136–154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Teng, K.; Kot, P.; Muradov, M.; Shaw, A.; Hashim, K.; Gkantou, M.; Al-Shamma’a, A. Embedded Smart Antenna for Non-Destructive Testing and Evaluation (NDT&E) of Moisture Content and Deterioration in Concrete. Sensors 2019, 19, 547. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Liu, B.; Luo, G.; Xie, Y. Effect of Curing Conditions on the Permeability of Concrete with High Volume Mineral Admixtures. Constr. Build. Mater. 2018, 167, 359–371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Malmqvist, R.; Rantakari, P.; Samuelsson, C.; Lahti, M.; Cheng, S.; Saijets, J.; Vaha-Heikkila, T.; Rydberg, A.; Varis, J. RF MEMS Based Impedance Matching Networks for Tunable Multi-Band Microwave Low Noise Amplifiers. In Proceedings of the 2009 International Semiconductor Conference; IEEE: New York, NY, USA, 2009; pp. 303–306. [Google Scholar]
- Ssejjuuko, P.; Donelli, M.; Iannacci, J. Exploiting RF MEMS Switches for Pattern Reconfigurable Parasitic Antennas. In Micro and Nanoelectronics Devices, Circuits and Systems; Springer: Singapore, 2022; pp. 1–12. [Google Scholar]
- Di Florio Di Renzo, A.; Trovarello, S.; Afif, O.; Tartagni, M.; Masotti, D.; Costanzo, A. A Predictive-Model-Assisted Moisture Content Sensor by Monitoring the DC-Unstable States of a Microwave Self-Oscillating Antenna. IEEE Trans. Microw. Theory Tech. 2025, 73, 5580–5591. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Hasanuzzaman, M.; Rafferty, A.; Sajjia, M.; Olabi, A.-G. Properties of Glass Materials. In Encyclopedia of Materials: Technical Ceramics and Glasses; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2016; pp. 647–657. [Google Scholar]
- Pereira, J.; Teixeira, H.; Gomes, M.d.G.; Moret Rodrigues, A. Performance of Solar Control Films on Building Glazing: A Literature Review. Appl. Sci. 2022, 12, 5923. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Hussain, M.; Zahra, H.; Abbas, S.M.; Zhu, Y. Flexible Dielectric Materials: Potential and Applications in Antennas and RF Sensors. Adv. Electron. Mater. 2024, 10, 2400240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Rmili, H.; Miane, J.; Zangar, H.; Olinga, T. Design of Microstrip-fed Proximity-coupled Conducting-polymer Patch Antenna. Microw. Opt. Technol. Lett. 2006, 48, 655–660. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Rodriguez, I.; Nguyen, H.C.; Jorgensen, N.T.K.; Sorensen, T.B.; Mogensen, P. Radio Propagation into Modern Buildings: Attenuation Measurements in the Range from 800 MHz to 18 GHz. In Proceedings of the 2014 IEEE 80th Vehicular Technology Conference (VTC2014-Fall); IEEE: New York, NY, USA, 2014; pp. 1–5. [Google Scholar]
- Ahmadi, A.; Dehkhoda, P.; Tavakoli, A.; Dehmollaian, M. Transmission and Reflection Characteristics of a Multi-Layered Wall with Doubly Periodic Interfaces. AEU—Int. J. Electron. Commun. 2020, 117, 153087. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Caldcirinha, R.F.S.; Ferreira, D.; Fernandes, T.R.; Cuinas, I. A Multilayer EM Simulation Tool to Assess RF Transparency Control of Building Wall Structures. In Proceedings of the 2018 International Workshop on Computing, Electromagnetics, and Machine Intelligence (CEMi); IEEE: New York, NY, USA, 2018; pp. 89–90. [Google Scholar]
- Savov, S.V.; Herben, M.H.A.J. Application of the Modal Transmission-Line Method to Radiowave Propagation through Building Walls. IEE Proc.—Sci. Meas. Technol. 2002, 149, 258–261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Chen, L.; Wei, Z.; Ma, S.; Chen, Y.; Xie, Y.; Li, C.; He, S.; Yuan, H. Electro-Thermal Co-Design and Verification of TGV Transmission Structures for High-Power High-Frequency Applications. Micromachines 2026, 17, 253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Vaha-Savo, L.; Atienza, A.G.; Cziezerski, C.; Heino, M.; Haneda, K.; Icheln, C.; Lu, X.; Viljanen, K. Passive Antenna Systems Embedded into a Load Bearing Wall for Improved Radio Transparency. In Proceedings of the 2020 50th European Microwave Conference (EuMC); IEEE: New York, NY, USA, 2021; pp. 424–427. [Google Scholar]
- Das, H.S.; Mishra, S.; Dash, M.K.; Nandi, P.K.; Maity, S.K.; Khatua, D.; Chatterjee, A.; Guo, Z.; Xu, B.; Roymahapatra, G. Transparent Conducting Gallium-Doped Zinc Oxide Thin Films on Glass Substrate for Optoelectronic Device Applications. ES Mater. Manuf. 2023, 22, 841. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Syed Feroze Hussain, S.; Thiripurasundari, D. A Review on Optically Transparent Antenna Fabricated with Conductive Nano-Material Oxides. J. Electron. Mater. 2022, 51, 6707–6734. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Chishti, A.R.; Aziz, A.; Qureshi, M.A.; Abbasi, M.N.; Algarni, A.M.; Zerguine, A.; Hussain, N.; Hussain, R. Optically Transparent Antennas: A Review of the State-of-the-Art, Innovative Solutions and Future Trends. Appl. Sci. 2022, 13, 210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Mazur, M.; Domaradzki, J.; Kaczmarek, D.; Moh, S.; Placido, F. Sheet Resistance and Optical Properties of ITO Thin Films Deposited by Magnetron Sputtering with Different O. In Proceedings of the 2010 International Students and Young Scientists Workshop “Photonics and Microsystems”; IEEE: New York, NY, USA, 2010; pp. 60–63. [Google Scholar]
- Chen, Z.; Li, W.; Li, R.; Zhang, Y.; Xu, G.; Cheng, H. Fabrication of Highly Transparent and Conductive Indium–Tin Oxide Thin Films with a High Figure of Merit via Solution Processing. Langmuir 2013, 29, 13836–13842. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Mohd Ali, N.I.; Misran, N.; Mansor, M.F.; Jamlos, M.F. Transparent Solar Antenna of 28 GHz Using Transparent Conductive Oxides (TCO) Thin Film. J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 2017, 852, 012036. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Dominguez, B.; Silva, F.; Baghel, A.; Albuquerque, D.; Pinho, P. Optically Transparent Antennas for 5G and Beyond: A Review. Electronics 2025, 14, 1616. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Sharme, R.K.; Quijada, M.; Terrones, M.; Rana, M.M. Thin Conducting Films: Preparation Methods, Optical and Electrical Properties, and Emerging Trends, Challenges, and Opportunities. Materials 2024, 17, 4559. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Mohammed Ali, M.K.; Ibrahim, K.; Pakhuruddin, M.Z.; Faraj, M.G. Optical and Electrical Properties of Indium Tin Oxide (ITO) Thin Films Prepared by Thermal Evaporation Method on Polyethylene Terephthalate (PET) Substrate. Adv. Mat. Res. 2012, 545, 393–398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Lunca-Popa, P.; Chemin, J.-B.; Adjeroud, N.; Kovacova, V.; Glinsek, S.; Valle, N.; El Hachemi, M.; Girod, S.; Bouton, O.; Maris, J.P. Study of Gallium-Doped Zinc Oxide Thin Films Processed by Atomic Layer Deposition and RF Magnetron Sputtering for Transparent Antenna Applications. ACS Omega 2023, 8, 5475–5485. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- De, S.; Higgins, T.M.; Lyons, P.E.; Doherty, E.M.; Nirmalraj, P.N.; Blau, W.J.; Boland, J.J.; Coleman, J.N. Silver Nanowire Networks as Flexible, Transparent, Conducting Films: Extremely High DC to Optical Conductivity Ratios. ACS Nano 2009, 3, 1767–1774. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Khrapach, I.; Withers, F.; Bointon, T.H.; Polyushkin, D.K.; Barnes, W.L.; Russo, S.; Craciun, M.F. Novel Highly Conductive and Transparent Graphene-Based Conductors. Adv. Mater. 2012, 24, 2844–2849. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Zarei, M.; Mohammadi, K.; A Mahmood, A.; Li, M.; Leu, P.W. Flexible Embedded Metal Meshes by Nanosphere Lithography for Very Low Sheet Resistance Transparent Electrodes, Joule Heating, and Electromagnetic Interference Shielding. ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. 2025, 7, 4266–4278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Sun, Y.-X.; Wu, D.; Fang, X.S.; Ren, J. On-Glass Grid Structure and Its Application in Highly-Transparent Antenna for Internet of Vehicles. IEEE Trans. Veh. Technol. 2023, 72, 93–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Yang, L.-L.; Wang, X.-F.; Xie, X.; Xu, K.; Yang, W.-W.; Chen, J.-X. Independently Controllable Hybrid-Designed Transparent Antenna for Shared-Aperture Array. In Proceedings of the 2025 IEEE International Workshop on Electromagnetics: Applications and Student Innovation Competition (iWEM); IEEE: New York, NY, USA, 2025; pp. 272–273. [Google Scholar]
- Yu, S.; Lee, S.; Lee, H.; Park, Y.B. Study of Mesh Pattern for Optically Transparent Flexible Antenna with Feedline. Appl. Sci. 2021, 11, 10002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Ye, D.; Xie, H.; Tian, Y.; Wen, J.; Shi, Z.; An, K.; Zhang, Y.; Huang, Y. Electrohydrodynamic Lithography of Metallic Mesh for Optically Transparent Flexible and Conformal Antennas. Sci. China Technol. Sci. 2023, 66, 2–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Yao, Y.; Shao, Y.; Zhang, J.; Zhang, J. Design of Glass-Integrated Grid Antenna Using CMA for Multiband Indoor Network. In Proceedings of the 2020 International Symposium on Antennas and Propagation (ISAP); IEEE: New York, NY, USA, 2021; pp. 481–482. [Google Scholar]
- Ibrahim, I.M.; Abdellatif, A.G.; Ahmed, M.I.; Elsherbini, M.M.; Badawi, M.B.; Ansari, S.; Shawky, M.A. Next-Gen Wireless Unleashed: Coplanar Waveguide Antennas on Glass for 5G and Beyond. AEU—Int. J. Electron. Commun. 2025, 202, 156055. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Aziz, M.; El Hassan, A.; Hussein, M.; Zaneldin, E.; Al-Marzouqi, A.H.; Ahmed, W. Characteristics of Antenna Fabricated Using Additive Manufacturing Technology and the Potential Applications. Heliyon 2024, 10, e27785. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Vähä-Savo, L.; Icheln, C.; Lü, X.; Palermo, A.; Marzani, A.; Haneda, K. Antenna-Embedded Building Elements as Futuristic Cellular Infrastructure: Introduction to a Multiphysics Study. IEEE Antennas Propag. Mag. 2025, 2–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Vaha-Savo, L.; Koivumaki, P.; Haneda, K.; Icheln, C.; Chen, J. 3-D Modeling of Human Hands for Characterizing Antenna Radiation from a 5G Mobile Phone. In Proceedings of the 2022 16th European Conference on Antennas and Propagation (EuCAP); IEEE: New York, NY, USA, 2022; pp. 1–5. [Google Scholar]
- Mehmood, F.; Mehmood, A. Recent Advancements in Millimeter-Wave Antennas and Arrays: From Compact Wearable Designs to Beam-Steering Technologies. Electronics 2025, 14, 2705. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Gui, B.; Wang, J.; Zhang, L.; Zhu, Y.; Jia, Y.; Xu, C.; Yan, M.; Chu, Z.; Wang, J.; Qu, S. Design of Scene-Adaptive Infrared Camouflage Emitter Based on Au-VO2-Al2O3-Au Metamaterials. Opt. Commun. 2022, 512, 128016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Gao, Y.; Long, L.; Liu, Y.; Tang, Z.; Ye, H. Low-Emissivity Patterned Camouflage for Visible and Infrared Stealth. Adv. Eng. Mater. 2024, 26, 2400520. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Anwar, R.; Mao, L.; Ning, H. Frequency Selective Surfaces: A Review. Appl. Sci. 2018, 8, 1689. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Zhang, Q.; Chai, B.; Chen, J.; Yang, W. A Compact Aperture-Sharing Sub-6 GHz/Millimeter-Wave Dual-Band Antenna. Sensors 2023, 23, 4400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Huang, W.; He, Y.; Khan, A. A Novel Sub-6 GHz and Millimeter Wave Shared-Aperture 5G Base Station Antenna. In Proceedings of the 2023 International Applied Computational Electromagnetics Society Symposium (ACES-China); IEEE: New York, NY, USA, 2023; pp. 1–3. [Google Scholar]
- Rao, J.; Zhang, Y.; Tang, S.; Li, Z.; Ming, Z.; Zhang, J.; Chiu, C.-Y.; Murch, R. A Shared-Aperture Dual-Band Sub-6 GHz and MmWave Reconfigurable Intelligent Surface With Independent Operation. IEEE Trans. Microw. Theory Tech. 2025, 73, 4116–4132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Oinas-Kukkonen, H.; Karppinen, P.; Kekkonen, M. 5G and 6G Broadband Cellular Network Technologies as Enablers of New Avenues for Behavioral Influence with Examples from Reduced Rural-Urban Digital Divide. Urban Sci. 2021, 5, 60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Ganame, H.; Yingzhuang, L.; Ghazzai, H.; Kamissoko, D. 5G Base Station Deployment Perspectives in Millimeter Wave Frequencies Using Meta-Heuristic Algorithms. Electronics 2019, 8, 1318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Hong, W.; Jiang, Z.H.; Yu, C.; Hou, D.; Wang, H.; Guo, C.; Hu, Y.; Kuai, L.; Yu, Y.; Jiang, Z.; et al. The Role of Millimeter-Wave Technologies in 5G/6G Wireless Communications. IEEE J. Microw. 2021, 1, 101–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Syed, A.S.; Sierra-Sosa, D.; Kumar, A.; Elmaghraby, A. IoT in Smart Cities: A Survey of Technologies, Practices and Challenges. Smart Cities 2021, 4, 429–475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Khan, S.; Mazhar, T.; Shahzad, T.; Bibi, A.; Ahmad, W.; Khan, M.A.; Saeed, M.M.; Hamam, H. Antenna Systems for IoT Applications: A Review. Discov. Sustain. 2024, 5, 412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Chilamkurthy, N.S.; Pandey, O.J.; Ghosh, A.; Cenkeramaddi, L.R.; Dai, H.-N. Low-Power Wide-Area Networks: A Broad Overview of Its Different Aspects. IEEE Access 2022, 10, 81926–81959. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Wang, Y.; Wang, Z. Edge Computing Integration in 5G Core on Real-Time Data Processing for Smart Applications. Internet Technol. Lett. 2025, 8, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Emon, E.I.; Islam, A.M.; Bashar, M.S.; Ahmed, A. Design, Fabrication, and Performance Analysis of a Silicon Solar Cell Integrated Transparent Antenna for Wireless Communications. Eng. Sci. Technol. Int. J. 2025, 61, 101915. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Gomasa, R.; Talakokula, V.; Kalyana Rama Jyosyula, S.; Bansal, T. A Review on Health Monitoring of Concrete Structures Using Embedded Piezoelectric Sensor. Constr. Build. Mater. 2023, 405, 133179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Wilson, C.L.; Lonkar, K.; Roy, S.; Kopsaftopoulos, F.; Chang, F.-K. 7.20 Structural Health Monitoring of Composites. In Comprehensive Composite Materials II; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2018; pp. 382–407. [Google Scholar]
- Sum, Y.L.; Rheinheimer, V.; Soong, B.H.; Monteiro, P.J.M. Effects of Cement Paste Enhanced with Iron-Based Magnetic Particles on an Embedded Small Resonator Antenna. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 15185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Arinze, S.N.; Obi, E.R.; Ebenuwa, S.H.; Nwajana, A.O. RF Energy-Harvesting Techniques: Applications, Recent Developments, Challenges, and Future Opportunities. Telecom 2025, 6, 45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Luo, Y.; Pu, L.; Wang, G.; Zhao, Y. RF Energy Harvesting Wireless Communications: RF Environment, Device Hardware and Practical Issues. Sensors 2019, 19, 3010. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Khan, L.U.; Yaqoob, I.; Tran, N.H.; Kazmi, S.M.A.; Dang, T.N.; Hong, C.S. Edge-Computing-Enabled Smart Cities: A Comprehensive Survey. IEEE Internet Things J. 2020, 7, 10200–10232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Khalifeh, A.; Darabkh, K.A.; Khasawneh, A.M.; Alqaisieh, I.; Salameh, M.; AlAbdala, A.; Alrubaye, S.; Alassaf, A.; Al-HajAli, S.; Al-Wardat, R.; et al. Wireless Sensor Networks for Smart Cities: Network Design, Implementation and Performance Evaluation. Electronics 2021, 10, 218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Muller, M.K.; Taranetz, M.; Rupp, M. Analyzing Wireless Indoor Communications by Blockage Models. IEEE Access 2017, 5, 2172–2186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Sudhamani, C.; Roslee, M.; Tiang, J.J.; Rehman, A.U. A Survey on 5G Coverage Improvement Techniques: Issues and Future Challenges. Sensors 2023, 23, 2356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Lin, Z.; Zhang, D.; Ding, W.; Feng, J.; Yu, L.; Wang, Z.; Zhang, N.; Guo, Q.; Yang, J. Electromagnetic (EM) Metasurface with Wireless Signal Control Function Fabricated by 3D Printing. Microsyst. Nanoeng. 2026, 12, 1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Shamim, S.; Mohsin, A.S.M.; Rahman, M.M.; Hossain Bhuian, M.B. Recent Advances in the Metamaterial and Metasurface-Based Biosensor in the Gigahertz, Terahertz, and Optical Frequency Domains. Heliyon 2024, 10, e33272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Alzubaidi, O.T.H.; Alheejawi, S.; Hindia, M.N.; Dimyati, K.; Noordin, K.A. Interference Mitigation Strategies in Beyond 5G Wireless Systems: A Review. Electronics 2025, 14, 2237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- IEEE Std 149; IEEE Recommended Practice for Antenna Measurements—Redline. IEEE: New York, NY, USA, 2021.
- Holloway, C.L.; Kuester, E.F.; Gordon, J.A.; O’Hara, J.; Booth, J.; Smith, D.R. An Overview of the Theory and Applications of Metasurfaces: The Two-Dimensional Equivalents of Metamaterials. IEEE Antennas Propag. Mag. 2012, 54, 10–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Sun, S.; He, Q.; Xiao, S.; Xu, Q.; Li, X.; Zhou, L. Gradient-Index Meta-Surfaces as a Bridge Linking Propagating Waves and Surface Waves. Nat. Mater. 2012, 11, 426–431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Rappaport, T.S.; Heath, R.W., Jr.; Daniels, R.C.; Murdock, J.N. Millimeter Wave Wireless Communications; Pearson Education: London, UK, 2015. [Google Scholar]
- Yang, Y.; Mao, M.; Xu, J.; Liu, H.; Wang, J.; Song, K. Millimeter-Wave Antennas for 5G Wireless Communications: Technologies, Challenges, and Future Trends. Sensors 2025, 25, 5424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Liu, X.; Zeng, X.; Hao, C.; Zhang, H.; Yu, Z.; Lv, T.; Li, M.; Zhang, Z. Design of Ka-Band Phased Array Antenna with Calibration Function. Comput. Mater. Contin. 2023, 74, 6251–6261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Kerminen, J.; Xie, B.; Mela, L.; Karakoç, A.; Ruttik, K.; Jäntti, R. Low-Cost Thin Film Patch Antennas and Antenna Arrays with Various Background Wall Materials for Indoor Wireless Communications. Flex. Print. Electron. 2023, 8, 025013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Yao, Y.; Shao, Y.; Zhang, J.; Zhang, J. A Transparent Antenna Using Metal Mesh for UWB MIMO Applications. IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag. 2023, 71, 3836–3844. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Egels, M.; Venouil, A.; Hannachi, C.; Pannier, P.; Benwadih, M.; Serbutoviez, C. Screen-Printed 1 × 4 Quasi-Yagi-Uda Antenna Array on Highly Flexible Transparent Substrate for the Emerging 5G Applications. Electronics 2025, 14, 2850. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Mebrahtom, M.; Fissha, Y.; Ali, M.; Gebretsadik, A.; Kide, Y.; Nguse, Z.; Gebrehiwot, Z.; Flores, E.S.; Avudaiappan, S.; Ikeda, H. Comparative Study of Eco-Friendly Wire Mesh Configurations to Enhance Sustainability in Reinforced Concrete Structures. Sci. Rep. 2024, 14, 8818. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Guo, S.; Chen, J.; Zhang, Y.; Liu, J. Graphene-Based Films: Fabrication, Interfacial Modification, and Applications. Nanomaterials 2021, 11, 2539. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Zhou, X.; Leng, T.; Pan, K.; Hu, Z. A Dual-Band Flexible Printed Graphene Antenna Array for 2.4 and 5 GHz WLAN IoE Applications. In Proceedings of the 2021 51st European Microwave Conference (EuMC); IEEE: New York, NY, USA, 2022; pp. 522–525. [Google Scholar]
- Zhou, X.; Leng, T.; Pan, K.; Abdalla, M.A.; Hu, Z. Graphene Printed Flexible and Conformal Array Antenna on Paper Substrate for 5.8GHz Wireless Communications. In Proceedings of the 2020 14th European Conference on Antennas and Propagation (EuCAP); IEEE: New York, NY, USA, 2020; pp. 1–4. [Google Scholar]
- Song, H.J.; Schaffner, J.H.; Bekaryan, A.; Oconnor, K.; Tombs, T.; Talty, T.; Carper, D.; Yasan, E. Roll-to-Roll Printed Transparent Applique Antennas. In Proceedings of the 2018 IEEE International Symposium on Antennas and Propagation & USNC/URSI National Radio Science Meeting; IEEE: New York, NY, USA, 2018; pp. 1671–1672. [Google Scholar]
- Yang, W.; Dong, Z.; Guo, Z.; Sun, H. Copper Particle-Free Ink with Enhanced Performance for Inkjet-Printed Flexible UWB Antennas. J. Mater. Chem. C Mater. 2023, 11, 14429–14438. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Chang, H.; Lai, F.-P.; Chen, Y.-S. Design and Fabrication of Optically Transparent Transmitarrays Using Inkjet-Printing Technology. Int. J. Microw. Wirel. Technol. 2024, 16, 1162–1172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Wang, X.; Kuznetcov, M.; Jiang, W.; Tang, Z.; Wei, Z.; Zhang, A.; Wei, N.; Li, X. Printed RFID Systems for Sustainable IoT: Synergistic Advances in Conductive Inks, Antenna Architectures, and Scalable Manufacturing. Front. Electron. 2025, 6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Yuan, J. Testing Standards. In Flexible Electronic Packaging and Encapsulation Technology; Wiley: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2024; pp. 239–269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Ellmer, K. Past Achievements and Future Challenges in the Development of Optically Transparent Electrodes. Nat. Photonics 2012, 6, 809–817. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Hecht, D.S.; Hu, L.; Irvin, G. Emerging Transparent Electrodes Based on Thin Films of Carbon Nanotubes, Graphene, and Metallic Nanostructures. Adv. Mater. 2011, 23, 1482–1513. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]





| Performance Aspect | Key Observations | Quantitative Impact | Primary Causes | Mitigation Strategies | Refs. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Resonant Frequency Shift | Systematic downward shift due to dielectric loading; highly sensitive to material permittivity and moisture | 10–44% frequency shift (up to 44% in fresh concrete) | High materials, moisture content, embedding depth | Pre-compensation design, wideband antennas, adaptive tuning | [2,38,39,40] |
| Impedance Matching Degradation | Detuning and mismatch increase in complex and multi-layer environments | Broader S11 response but degraded matching stability | Frequency-dependent material properties, multi-mode effects | Matching networks, tuning circuits, broadband topologies | [2,40] |
| Gain Reduction | Significant degradation in transparent and embedded antennas compared to copper | Up to 10–13 dB loss (e.g., −10.87 dBi vs. 2.18 dBi) | High sheet resistance of Transparent Conductive Oxides (TCOs), dielectric absorption | Array configurations, hybrid conductors, optimized feed networks | [5,6,41] |
| Radiation Efficiency Loss | Strong efficiency reduction, especially in lossy or high-moisture materials | Efficiency as low as ~8% (GZO); severe loss in concrete | Ohmic losses, dielectric loss tangent, moisture-induced conductivity | Material optimization, low-loss substrates, shallow embedding | [6,34,41] |
| Array-Based Gain Recovery | Partial recovery of gain through coherent combining | ~10–12 dB improvement (e.g., 4 × 1 array gain increase) | Increased aperture size and constructive interference | Optimized array spacing, coupling control, efficient feeding | [5,6,41] |
| Radiation Pattern Distortion | Pattern deformation, nulls, and polarization changes due to structural interaction | Angular distortion and coverage non-uniformity | Multi-layer reflections, asymmetric dielectric loading | Strategic placement, pattern shaping, dual-layer configurations | [42,43,44] |
| Back-Lobe Interference | Indoor interference from window-mounted antennas | SINR degradation in indoor zones | Bidirectional radiation, poor isolation | Directional design, shielding, optimized placement | [2] |
| Transmission Enhancement (Walls) | Embedded antennas improve signal penetration through walls | Up to 22 dB improvement (2.6–8 GHz) | Controlled coupling and re-radiation through structures | Spiral antennas, embedded arrays, co-design with materials | [2] |
| Bandwidth Expansion (Transparent Antennas) | Wider bandwidth due to resistive damping | Up to 112.5% bandwidth (GZO vs. ~7.6% copper) | Reduced Q-factor from resistive materials | Accept efficiency tradeoff, use for multi-band systems | [6,41,48] |
| Bandwidth Enhancement (Metasurfaces) | Frequency-selective enhancement and focusing | 6–15 dB signal improvement (sub-6 GHz) | Engineered surface-wave manipulation | Multi-layer metasurfaces, frequency-selective design | [49,50,51] |
| Material Sensitivity | Strong dependence on environmental and physical conditions | Up to 82 dB attenuation (fresh concrete, 3.5 cm) | Moisture variation, composition, aging | Robust design margins, environmental modeling | [34,39] |
| Material Category | Typical Electromagnetic Properties | Observed Performance Impact | Quantitative Effects | Dominant Physical Mechanisms | Design Implications | Mitigation Strategies | Refs. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Concrete (Fresh/High Moisture) | : 10–20 tan δ: 0.1–0.3 | Severe detuning, high attenuation, unstable performance during curing |
| High content → increased permittivity and conductivity Strong dielectric loss and absorption | Not suitable for stable communication during curing Time-dependent design required | Adaptive tuning, moisture-aware design, post-curing optimization | [39,56] |
| Concrete (Cured/Dry) | : 4–8 tan δ: 0.01–0.1 | Moderate detuning and efficiency degradation |
| Dielectric loading, residual losses, reduced wavelength | Suitable for SHM and short-range systems | Pre-compensation, low-loss substrates, shallow embedding | [34,54,55] |
| Cementitious Composites (Engineered) | Variable and tan δ (depends on additives) | Controlled tuning but sensitive to composition |
| Material heterogeneity, inclusion-based permittivity variation | Enables predictive design if properties are known | EM simulation-based co-design, material characterization | [38] |
| Glass (Standard) | : 4.5–6 tan δ: <0.01 | Minimal impact on radiation, low loss |
| Low dielectric loss, weak absorption | Highly suitable for antenna integration | Direct antenna-on-glass designs | [61] |
| Glass (Low-E/Coated/Laminated) | : 4–7 tan δ: variable | Significant signal attenuation |
| Metallic coatings (IR/thermal control layers) act as RF shields | Limits indoor coverage from outdoor signals | Metasurfaces, FSS, aperture/window design | [62,69] |
| Transparent Substrates (PET, PC, ITO films) | Low , low loss | Moderate efficiency reduction due to conductor limitations |
| Limited conductivity of transparent materials | Suitable for flexible and conformal antennas | Hybrid conductors, thicker films, optimized geometries | [63,64] |
| TCOs | High sheet resistance (10–50 Ω/sq) | Reduced efficiency and gain |
| Ohmic losses dominate radiation | Tradeoff between transparency and RF performance | Arrays, meshed conductors, hybrid metal-TCO designs | [6,63] |
| Multi-Layer Wall Structures | Layer-dependent and tan δ | Strong attenuation and multipath effects |
| Reflection at interfaces, impedance mismatch, absorption | Major limitation for indoor coverage | Embedded antennas, signal-transmissive walls | [65] |
| Signal-Transmissive Walls (Engineered) | Optimized composite structures | Significant improvement in RF penetration |
| Controlled coupling and re-radiation via embedded antennas | Enables dual-function (thermal + RF) structures | Spiral antennas, co-design (thermal + EM) | [2,69] |
| mmWave Wall-Embedded Systems | Frequency-sensitive materials | Higher losses and sensitivity to fabrication |
| Short wavelength → higher sensitivity to geometry/materials | Challenging but feasible for 5G/6G | Precision fabrication, optimized array topology | [70] |
| Material | Sheet Resistance (Ω/sq) | Optical Transmittance (%) | Key Advantages | Key Limitations | Typical Deposition/Fabrication | Ref. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ITO | 10–30 | 80–90 | High conductivity, mature technology, widely used in optoelectronics | Brittle, expensive indium supply, limited flexibility | Sputtering, e-beam evaporation | [78] |
| GZO | 30–50 | 80–90 | Indium-free, good optical properties, cost-effective alternative | Higher resistivity than ITO, lower RF efficiency | RF sputtering, sol–gel methods | [79] |
| Silver Nanowires (AgNW) | 5–20 | 85–95 | Very low sheet resistance, flexible, scalable solution processing | Surface roughness, long-term oxidation stability issues | Solution coating, spray coating, spin coating | [80] |
| Graphene (monolayer/multilayer) | 30–200 | 90–97 | Ultra-thin, flexible, chemically stable, high transparency | Relatively high sheet resistance, difficult large-area uniformity | Chemical Vapor Deposition (CVD) growth, transfer printing | [81] |
| Metal Mesh/Grid Structures | 1–10 (effective) | 70–95 | Excellent conductivity, tunable transparency-performance tradeoff | Pattern visibility at low density, fabrication complexity | Lithography, laser ablation, shadow masking | [82] |
| Technology/Approach | Key Materials/Structures | Performance Characteristics | Advantages | Limitations/Tradeoffs | Typical Applications | Design Recommendations | Refs. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TCO Antennas | ITO, GZO, FTO, AgHT films on glass |
| High optical transparency Direct window integration Mature fabrication methods | High sheet resistance → efficiency loss Tradeoff: transparency vs. conductivity Cost (ITO) and supply issues | Pico-cell BS, smart windows, IoT gateways | Use array configurations Optimize thickness/doping Hybrid feed (metal + TCO) | [5,6,72,73,74,75,76] |
| Meshed/Grid Transparent Antennas | Metallic mesh (Cu, Ag), grid structures |
| Better conductivity than TCO Tunable transparency-performance balance Flexible and conformal | Optical haze and diffraction Fabrication complexity Limited ultra-high frequency scaling | Indoor networks, flexible electronics, smart surfaces | Optimize mesh density Use CMA for multiband design | [86,87] |
| Antenna-on-Glass (CPW/Hybrid) | Glass substrates, CPW-fed structures, hybrid conductors |
| Easy integration with electronics Low-loss substrate Supports multiband operation | Limited by coatings (low-E glass) Moderate gain compared to metal antennas | 5G/6G mmWave, indoor coverage, AR systems | Prefer CPW for mmWave Combine with metasurfaces if coated glass | [4,88] |
| Structural Embedding in Walls | Concrete, insulation layers, embedded patches/spirals |
| Concealment Environmental protection Dual structural + RF function | Severe detuning and loss Time-varying properties (curing) Difficult maintenance | SHM, secure communications, embedded IoT | Design for cured state Use wideband or adaptive tuning Minimize embedding depth | [34,39,89,90,91] |
| Signal-Transmissive Wall Systems | Embedded antenna arrays (spiral, patch), multi-layer walls |
| Improves indoor coverage Maintains thermal insulation System-level optimization | Complex co-design (thermal + EM) Installation constraints | Indoor coverage enhancement, smart buildings | Use spiral/array configurations Co-design with wall materials | [2,69,70,91] |
| Camouflage/Low-Visibility Antennas | Integrated into façades, street furniture, textured surfaces |
| Aesthetic integration Flexible placement No visual clutter | Performance depends on environment Pattern distortion possible | Smart cities, urban infrastructure, street-level 5G | Use simulation-driven placement Combine with transparent or embedded tech | [93,94] |
| Metasurface-Enhanced Windows | Subwavelength periodic structures on glass |
| No active feeding required Maintains transparency Multifunction (thermal + RF) | Frequency-specific design Limited real-world validation Complex fabrication | 5G/6G buildings, retrofit solutions | Use multi-layer metasurfaces Optimize for target bands | [31,50] |
| FSS | Periodic metallic patches/apertures on glass |
| Enables controlled RF transparency Supports shielding + communication | Narrowband behavior Limited experimental validation | Smart windows, EMI control, selective connectivity | Combine with metasurfaces for multi-band operation | [95] |
| Hybrid Transparent-Conductive Systems | Combination of TCO + metal traces or advanced materials |
| Better performance balance Reduced feed losses | Increased design complexity Fabrication challenges | Future 6G, high-performance transparent systems | Use metal feeds + transparent radiators Optimize layout for minimal visibility | [4,72] |
| Study/System | Frequency | Antenna Type/Configuration | Material/Environment | Metric Reported | Value | Test Condition | Method | Refs. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CSRR-loaded embedded antenna | 3.5 GHz | Electrically small antenna | Cement paste with Fe2O3 inclusions | Resonant frequency shift | Downward shift observed | Embedded in cementitious medium | Simulation + Measurement | [38] |
| Concrete-embedded sensor antenna | 915 MHz | Embedded monopole-type | Fresh concrete (high moisture) | Frequency shift | 898 → 510 MHz (≈44%) | Fresh vs. curing concrete (time-varying moisture) | Measurement | [39] |
| Concrete-embedded antenna (dry state) | 868–915 MHz | Optimized embedded antenna | Concrete (4.2% moisture, 157 days) | Gain | −8.4 dBi | Long-term cured concrete | Measurement | [34] |
| Transparent GZO antenna (single element) | ~3–6 GHz | Planar element | Glass substrate with GZO | Efficiency/Gain | 8%, −10.87 dBi | Free-space (transparent conductor) | Simulation | [6] |
| Transparent GZO antenna array (4 × 1) | ~3–6 GHz | Array configuration | Glass + GZO | Gain improvement | 0.34 dBi (~+11 dB vs. single) | Free-space array operation | Simulation | [6] |
| Transparent mesh antenna | GHz range | Meshed conductor | Glass substrate | Transparency vs. gain tradeoff | 70–95% transparency, −0.8 to −2.42 dB gain loss | Variation of mesh density | Simulation | [6,86] |
| ITO transparent antenna array | 3.3–3.8 GHz | 2 × 2 array | Glass with ITO | Gain/Transparency | 13.2 dBi/77% | Pico-cell deployment scenario | Measurement | [5] |
| Signal-transmissive wall | 2.6–8 GHz | Embedded spiral antennas | Multi-layer wall | Transmission improvement | +22 dB | Compared to raw wall structure | Simulation + Measurement | [2,45] |
| Concrete attenuation (early curing) | 915 MHz | Embedded antenna | Fresh concrete | Path loss | 82 dB (3.5 cm depth) | High moisture condition | Measurement | [57] |
| Concrete attenuation (cured) | 915 MHz | Embedded antenna | Cured concrete | Path loss | 29–43 dB | 12 h to 10 days curing | Measurement | [57] |
| Metasurface-enhanced glass | Sub-6 GHz (5G) | Passive metasurface | Glass window | Signal enhancement | 10–15 dB | Near focal region (~150 mm) | Measurement + Simulation | [50] |
| Metasurface window (real-world) | Sub-6 GHz | Passive metasurface | Building window | RSRP improvement | +6–9 dB | Real building environment | Measurement | [51] |
| Multilayer wall system | mmWave/sub-6 GHz | Layered structure | Multi-material wall | Transmission loss | 20–30 dB | Typical building wall | Simulation | [70] |
| Application Domain | Key Use Case | Frequency Range | Performance Requirements | Key Benefits of Concealment | Technical Challenges | Representative Findings | Refs. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5G/B5G/6G Cellular Networks | Pico-cell base stations, façade-integrated antennas, mmWave deployments | Sub-6 GHz (3.3–3.8 GHz), mmWave (28–38 GHz) | High gain, beamforming capability, low interference, dense deployment | Enables dense urban deployment without visual clutter; supports street-level infrastructure integration | High path loss at mmWave, blockage sensitivity, thermal and material losses, placement optimization | Meta-heuristic optimization reduces BS count while improving coverage and outage; transparent arrays achieve practical gains for pico-cells | [5,99,100,101] |
| IoT and Smart Cities | Smart metering, environmental sensing, traffic monitoring, public safety | Sub-GHz to low GHz (LPWAN: LoRa, NB-IoT, Sigfox) | Long-range, low power, moderate efficiency | Seamless integration into urban infrastructure (lamp posts, windows, signage); scalable deployment | Material attenuation, interference in dense deployments, maintenance access | Window-integrated antennas enable distributed access points; supports dense IoT ecosystems with minimal infrastructure | [102,103,104,105,106] |
| SHM | Embedded sensing in concrete, bridges, buildings | UHF (≈860–960 MHz), ISM bands | Reliable short-range communication, robustness, long-term stability | Permanent embedding with environmental protection; enables continuous monitoring | Severe dielectric loading, detuning due to moisture, low efficiency, harsh environments | Embedded antennas achieve stable operation with −8.4 dBi gain; RF energy harvesting enables battery-free sensing | [55,107,108,109,110,111] |
| Indoor Coverage Enhancement | Distributed antenna systems, window-integrated antennas, signal-transmissive walls | Sub-6 GHz and mmWave | Improved penetration, uniform coverage, high SINR | Enhances indoor connectivity without visible infrastructure; compatible with modern buildings | High attenuation from walls/windows, cost of retrofitting, material compatibility | Metasurfaces and transmissive walls improve indoor signal strength; hybrid systems enable adaptive coverage control | [114,115,116,117,118] |
| Smart Infrastructure and Edge Systems | Edge-connected sensing, localized communication nodes | Sub-6 GHz to mmWave | Low latency, reliable connectivity, scalable deployment | Supports real-time processing and localized communication; integrates with building systems | Interference management, placement optimization, integration with edge nodes | Concealed antennas enable efficient edge communication and reduced latency in smart city networks | [105,112,113] |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2026 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license.
Share and Cite
Baig, M.F.; Mhd Noor, E.E. Antenna Performance and Effects of Concealment Within Building Structures: A Comprehensive Review. Technologies 2026, 14, 259. https://doi.org/10.3390/technologies14050259
Baig MF, Mhd Noor EE. Antenna Performance and Effects of Concealment Within Building Structures: A Comprehensive Review. Technologies. 2026; 14(5):259. https://doi.org/10.3390/technologies14050259
Chicago/Turabian StyleBaig, Mirza Farrukh, and Ervina Efzan Mhd Noor. 2026. "Antenna Performance and Effects of Concealment Within Building Structures: A Comprehensive Review" Technologies 14, no. 5: 259. https://doi.org/10.3390/technologies14050259
APA StyleBaig, M. F., & Mhd Noor, E. E. (2026). Antenna Performance and Effects of Concealment Within Building Structures: A Comprehensive Review. Technologies, 14(5), 259. https://doi.org/10.3390/technologies14050259

