Next Article in Journal
Rapid Modeling Method and Analysis of Factors Affecting the Dynamics of On-Orbit Launch Systems for Micro-Spacecraft
Previous Article in Journal
Characterizations of Swept Shock/Boundary Layer Interactions: A Comparison Between Planar Shock, Curved Shock, and Isentropic Compression
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Shock Control on a Double-Fuselage Aircraft with a Natural Laminar Flow Wing

1
College of Aerospace Engineering, Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Nanjing 210016, China
2
Huzhou Institute of Zhejiang University, Huzhou 313000, China
3
Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Sheffield, Sheffield S1 3JD, UK
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Aerospace 2026, 13(6), 540; https://doi.org/10.3390/aerospace13060540
Submission received: 28 April 2026 / Revised: 4 June 2026 / Accepted: 8 June 2026 / Published: 10 June 2026
(This article belongs to the Section Aeronautics)

Abstract

This paper presents the design of shock control bumps on a double-fuselage aircraft with a natural laminar flow (NLF) wing section. Both two-dimensional (2D) and three-dimensional (3D) bumps were investigated to identify the high-impact factors on both shock control and natural laminar flow for the aircraft, and to understand the associated flow physics. Firstly, two key geometric parameters, namely the bump crest location and the bump height, were optimized to trade off shock control and laminar flow. The optimized 2D bump results in 8.19% total drag reduction in the wing section, specifically, 8.61% pressure drag reduction and 6.23% viscous drag reduction. The total drag coefficient of the aircraft reduces by 8.12 counts while the lift slightly increases. Then, the robustness of the bump at off-design conditions was verified as well. Finally, the 2D bump was converted to 3D bumps according to the transonic area rule to explore more alternative designs, and it was found that the two have similar performances, confirming the effectiveness of the transonic area rule applied in the shock-control-bump design.
Keywords: drag reduction; shock control bump; natural laminar flow; aircraft; double fuselage drag reduction; shock control bump; natural laminar flow; aircraft; double fuselage

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Deng, F.; Yi, J.; Chen, G.; Qin, N. Shock Control on a Double-Fuselage Aircraft with a Natural Laminar Flow Wing. Aerospace 2026, 13, 540. https://doi.org/10.3390/aerospace13060540

AMA Style

Deng F, Yi J, Chen G, Qin N. Shock Control on a Double-Fuselage Aircraft with a Natural Laminar Flow Wing. Aerospace. 2026; 13(6):540. https://doi.org/10.3390/aerospace13060540

Chicago/Turabian Style

Deng, Feng, Jianmiao Yi, Guanhua Chen, and Ning Qin. 2026. "Shock Control on a Double-Fuselage Aircraft with a Natural Laminar Flow Wing" Aerospace 13, no. 6: 540. https://doi.org/10.3390/aerospace13060540

APA Style

Deng, F., Yi, J., Chen, G., & Qin, N. (2026). Shock Control on a Double-Fuselage Aircraft with a Natural Laminar Flow Wing. Aerospace, 13(6), 540. https://doi.org/10.3390/aerospace13060540

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop