When is an unknown, confined environment traversable for a specific ground robot using only touch? We answer by (i) giving an environment-anchored definition of traversability, expressed through the max-min value
[...] Read more.
When is an unknown, confined environment traversable for a specific ground robot using only touch? We answer by (i) giving an environment-anchored definition of traversability, expressed through the max-min value
, where the bottleneck margin
aggregates the clearance, curvature (
), slope/step, and friction constraints, and (ii) introducing an on-policy, tactile certificate (TC) that maintains a conservative, monotone lower bound
using partial contact histories. The TC fuses pessimistic free-space from contacts and the body envelope, the M3 decaying contact memory as a risk prior, and local bend/FSR proxies; a certificate is issued when
and the explored corridor graph connects
S to
G. Relative to Papers 1–2 (tactile traversal; offline software assurance), this work formalizes traversability itself and provides a tactile-only, online certificate computable during runs. In a retrospective analysis of 660 trials across Indoor/Outdoor/Dark lighting environments, (H1) the early TC margin predicts success and traversal time better than contact/dwell heuristics (higher AUC/
), (H2) the TC predictivity is lighting-invariant, and (H3) speed-gating M3 by a TC margin recovers part of the CB-V speed gap without degrading success. Artifacts include the TC implementation, explored-corridor graphs, and per-trial TC time series added to the Paper-1 log bundle; these materials are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
Full article