Error in Table 2
In the original publication [1], there was a mistake in Table 2 as published. For the vocalisation type “Groan”, the frequency range should be 1353 ± 786 Hz, rather than 20,269 ± 111,791 Hz. The corrected Table 2 appears below.
Table 2.
Quantitative description (mean ± SD) of each harbour seal call (n = 403). Proportion of vocalisations (N) per type is also presented.
Error in Table 3
In the original publication [1], there was a mistake in Table 3 as published. For the vocalisation type “8B”, the high frequency should be 449 ± 136 Hz, instead of 2521 ± 32,067 Hz. The corrected Table 3 appears below.
Table 3.
Quantitative description (mean ± SD) of each grey seal call (n = 8554). Proportion of vocalisations (N) per type is also presented.
The authors apologise for any inconvenience caused and state that the scientific conclusions are unaffected. This correction was approved by the Academic Editor. The original publication has also been updated.
Reference
- Pozo Galván, Y.P.; Pérez Tadeo, M.; Pommier, M.; O’Brien, J. Static Acoustic Monitoring of Harbour (Phoca vitulina) and Grey Seals (Halichoerus grypus) in the Malin Sea: A Revolutionary Approach in Pinniped Conservation. J. Mar. Sci. Eng. 2024, 12, 118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2026 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license.