Next Article in Journal
Postoperative Assessment of the Quality of Life in Patients with Colorectal Endometriosis
Next Article in Special Issue
A Comprehensive Approach to Clinical Staging of Bladder Cancer
Previous Article in Journal
Detection of Human Papillomavirus DNA in Paired Peripheral Blood and Cervix Samples in Patients with Cervical Lesions and Healthy Individuals
Previous Article in Special Issue
Prevalence of Perineal Tear Peripartum after Two Antepartum Perineal Massage Techniques: A Non-Randomised Controlled Trial
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Effectiveness of Magnetic Stimulation in the Treatment of Urinary Incontinence: A Systematic Review and Results of Our Study

1
Department of Gynecology, Division of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Ljubljana University Medical Center, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia
2
Center for Social Informatics, Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Ljubljana, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia
3
Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ljubljana, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
J. Clin. Med. 2021, 10(21), 5210; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm10215210
Submission received: 30 September 2021 / Revised: 29 October 2021 / Accepted: 4 November 2021 / Published: 8 November 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Current Trends in Urogynecology)

Abstract

Urinary incontinence (UI) is becoming an increasingly common health problem. UI treatment can be conservative or surgical. This paper focuses on the effectiveness of magnetic stimulation (MS) in the treatment of UI. We performed a systematic review in order to combine and compare results with results from our clinical study. A clinical prospective non-randomized study was carried out at the Ljubljana University Medical Center’s Gynecology Division. It included 82 randomly selected female patients, irrespective of their UI type. The success rate of using MS in treating UI was based on standardized ICIQ-UI SF questionnaires. Patients completed 10 therapy sessions on MS, and follow-up was performed 3 months after the last therapy session. UI improved after treatment with MS. The ICIQ-UI SF score improved in patients regardless of the type of UI. However, the greatest decrease in post-treatment assessment ICIQ-UI SF scores was seen in patients with stress urinary incontinence (SUI). Based on the findings described above, it can be concluded that MS is a successful non-invasive conservative method for treating UI. Future studies are necessary, all of which should include a large sample size, a control group, an optimal research protocol, pre-treatment analyses, standardization, and longer follow-ups.
Keywords: urinary incontinence; treatment; magnetic stimulation urinary incontinence; treatment; magnetic stimulation

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Lukanović, D.; Kunič, T.; Batkoska, M.; Matjašič, M.; Barbič, M. Effectiveness of Magnetic Stimulation in the Treatment of Urinary Incontinence: A Systematic Review and Results of Our Study. J. Clin. Med. 2021, 10, 5210. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm10215210

AMA Style

Lukanović D, Kunič T, Batkoska M, Matjašič M, Barbič M. Effectiveness of Magnetic Stimulation in the Treatment of Urinary Incontinence: A Systematic Review and Results of Our Study. Journal of Clinical Medicine. 2021; 10(21):5210. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm10215210

Chicago/Turabian Style

Lukanović, David, Tina Kunič, Marija Batkoska, Miha Matjašič, and Matija Barbič. 2021. "Effectiveness of Magnetic Stimulation in the Treatment of Urinary Incontinence: A Systematic Review and Results of Our Study" Journal of Clinical Medicine 10, no. 21: 5210. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm10215210

APA Style

Lukanović, D., Kunič, T., Batkoska, M., Matjašič, M., & Barbič, M. (2021). Effectiveness of Magnetic Stimulation in the Treatment of Urinary Incontinence: A Systematic Review and Results of Our Study. Journal of Clinical Medicine, 10(21), 5210. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm10215210

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop