You are currently viewing a new version of our website. To view the old version click .
Geosciences
  • Erratum
  • Open Access

20 May 2021

Erratum: Merisalu et al. A Framework for Risk-Based Cost–Benefit Analysis for Decision Support on Hydrogeological Risks in Underground Construction. Geosciences 2021, 11, 82

MDPI AG, St. Alban-Anlage 66, 4052 Basel, Switzerland
The Geosciences Editorial Office would like to make the following change to this paper [1].
  • In page 5: A “)” must be added after “(Figure 4”, and should have read: “(Figure 4)”.
  • In page 7: The sentences “Schematic description of staircase and continuous risk functions indicated by red circles and black solid line together with an interval for uncertainty indicated by dashed lines. “P” and “C” indicate probability and consequence, respectively. (a) The risk curve; (b) the risk curve after retrieval of more information resulting in less uncertainty; and (c) “the risk curve after implementation of risk-reducing measures resulting in reduced total risk.” in the main text should be deleted. The paragraph should have read: “As illustrated by Figure 6a, the risk function includes both high-probability ...”.
  • In Page 16: “Data Availability Statement: None of these three parts are relevant for this study.” should be changed to “Data Availability Statement: Not relevant for this study.”
We apologize for any inconvenience caused to the readers by this change. The change does not affect the scientific results.

Reference

  1. Merisalu, J.; Sundell, J.; Rosén, L. A Framework for Risk-Based Cost–Benefit Analysis for Decision Support on Hydrogeological Risks in Underground Construction. Geosciences 2021, 11, 82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Article Metrics

Citations

Article Access Statistics

Multiple requests from the same IP address are counted as one view.