Skip to Content
MicroorganismsMicroorganisms
  • Article
  • Open Access

23 March 2026

13 Pages

Association of TLR4 Polymorphisms with Increased Susceptibility to Recurrent Vulvovaginal Candidiasis in Greek Women

,
,
and
1
Department of Microbiology, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 11527 Athens, Greece
2
Department of Microbiology, General Maternity Hospital “Elena Venizelou”, 11521 Athens, Greece
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
These authors contributed equally to this work.

Abstract

Recurrent vulvovaginal candidiasis (RVVC) affects 5–8% of women of reproductive age. Host genetic factors, particularly single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in Toll-like receptors (TLRs), may influence RVVC susceptibility by impairing vaginal mucosal antifungal immunity. The aim of this study was to assess the effect of SNPs in genes encoding TLRs on RVVC susceptibility. Τhe distribution of TLR2 Arg753Gln and TLR4 Asp299Gly/Thr399Ile polymorphisms in Greek women, including RVVC (n = 63), first-episode VVC (n = 37), Gardnerella vaginalis vaginitis (GV, n = 36) patients, and healthy controls (n = 61), was investigated using TaqMan SNP genotyping. Genotype and allele frequencies were analyzed under allelic and dominant models, with odds ratios (ORs), 95% confidence intervals (CIs), and linkage disequilibrium assessed. TLR4 Asp299Gly and Thr399Ile heterozygotes were significantly more frequent in RVVC patients compared with controls and affected RVVC susceptibility (OR: 5.57, 95% CI: 1.17–26.56, p: 0.0172; OR: 4.92, 95% CI: 1.02–23.78, p: 0.0306, respectively). No associations were observed for TLR2 Arg753Gln or for any SNP with GV or first-episode VVC. TLR4 variants co-segregated, indicating a haplotype effect. TLR4 haplotypes, rather than TLR2 polymorphism, confer increased RVVC susceptibility, supporting a genetically distinct, mucosal immunity-driven pathogenesis. Larger, ethnically diverse studies with functional assays are warranted to validate these findings and guide personalized prevention and treatment strategies.

1. Introduction

Vulvovaginal candidiasis (VVC) is a fungal infection affecting the vaginal and vulvar tissues of the female genital system, primarily caused by the opportunistic yeast Candida albicans, which accounts for the majority of reported cases [1,2]. Most women of reproductive age experience at least one episode of VVC in their entire life, whereas approximately 5–8% present with recurrent vulvovaginal candidiasis (RVVC), characterized by the occurrence of three or more symptomatic VVC episodes within a single year [3]. While most women indicate suffering from RVVC for 1 to 2 years, some endure persistent infections for up to 5 years or even for decades [3]. The burden of RVVC extends beyond physical symptoms, as it negatively affects quality of life, leading to high levels of anxiety and depression, social and sexual dysfunction, and significant economic costs, including increased healthcare expenses and loss of productivity [4,5,6,7].
Pathogen exposure alone cannot account for the high recurrence incidence of RVVC, indicating that host-related factors are crucial for both disease susceptibility and persistence [8,9]. Major risk factors of VVC include increased estrogen levels found in pregnant women, uncontrolled diabetes mellitus and treatment with broad-spectrum antibiotics, immunosuppressive drugs and glucocorticosteroids [10,11,12,13,14]. Most RVVC patients, however, are healthy women with no identifiable risk factors that could predispose them to or trigger a new episode [8,15]. Furthermore, not all women who are diagnosed with VVC will eventually develop RVVC, indicating that host susceptibility may be significantly affected by genetic variation [8,16,17,18].
The vaginal mucosa is protected from infections by the innate immune system that provides the first line of defense since it recognizes and responds to microbial pathogens through pattern-recognition receptors (PRRs) [19,20]. Among these, Toll-like receptors (TLRs) detect conserved microbial structures known as pathogen-associated molecular patterns (PAMPs) and activate intracellular signaling cascades through the MyD88-dependent and the TRIF/TRAM-dependent pathways [21,22,23,24,25,26]. These pathways subsequently activate downstream signal transduction cascades, including NF-κB, MAPK, and IRF pathways that stimulate production of inflammatory cytokines and antimicrobial peptides, recruitment of immune cells, and induction of adaptive immune responses, facilitating phagocytosis and the subsequent clearance of the pathogen [21,22,23,24,25,26].
During vulvovaginal infection, TLR2 and TLR4 recognize components of the Candida cell wall, all vital for cell shape, integrity, and host interactions, including phospholipomannan, β-glucans, and mannan, leading to the activation of inflammatory pathways and cytokine production, and the eradication of the fungus [8,27,28,29].
Single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in the genes encoding TLR2 and TLR4 contribute to variations in immune responses and influence susceptibility to a variety of infectious and inflammatory diseases [18,30,31]. The most extensively studied TLR SNPs are the two nonsynonymous, frequently co-segregating polymorphisms, Asp299Gly and Thr399Ile, in the TLR4 gene that have been shown to alter the extracellular region of the receptors, affecting their recognition and ligation capabilities. Additionally, the SNP Arg753Glu in the TLR2 gene has been found to interfere with receptor signaling and decrease cytokine production, compromising host defense mechanisms [18,30,32,33,34].
A growing body of evidence indicates that SNPs in TLR genes can affect the risk of VVC and RVVC by modifying the intensity and efficiency of the immune response to Candida and other vaginal pathogens, allowing Candida to persist, evade clearance, and establish recurrent infection [18,35,36].
The present study aimed to examine the distribution of the TLR2 Arg753Gln (rs5743708), the TLR4 Asp299Gly (rs4986790) and TLR4 Thr399Ile (rs4986791) SNPs in Greek women of reproductive age diagnosed with RVVC, first-episode VVC, Gardnerella vaginalis–associated vaginitis (GV), and in healthy controls, using TaqMan SNP genotyping. In addition, comprehensive statistical analysis was conducted to assess whether these variants are associated with an increased genetic risk of vaginal infections, particularly RVVC.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Ethics Statement

The inclusion of patients and controls in this study, as well as the research protocol, were approved by the Committee on Bioethics and Deontology of the Medical School of the National and Kapodistrian University of Athens (Approval Code: 423, Approval Date: 21 January 2021) and the Scientific Council of the General Hospital “Elena Venizelou” where the clinical samples were collected (Approval Code: 29052, Approval Date: 9 December 2020). Participants provided written informed consent, and the study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki.

2.2. Clinical Samples

Vaginal swabs were collected from 197 women over 18 years of age, during routine gynecological examination as part of preventive gynecological screening or clinical evaluation for recurrent episodes of fungal vaginitis at the General Maternity Hospital “Elena Venizelou” in Athens, Greece. Patients were considered to have recurrent infections if their medical records showed three or more symptomatic episodes in a year, all of which were microbiologically verified and caused by C. albicans. Sixty-three women with RVVC, 37 with first-onset VVC and 36 with non-specific vaginitis caused by Gardnerella vaginalis (GV) were examined for the presence of the TLR2 Arg753Gln (rs5743708) polymorphism and the TLR4 Asp299Gly (rs4986790) and Thr399Ile (rs4986791) polymorphisms. The control group consisted of sixty-one women who had no current gynecological complaints, no history of vaginal infections and were negative for pathogen cultures. Every participant was of reproductive age and Greek nationality. Exclusion criteria for selection included pregnancy, diabetes mellitus, use of immunosuppressive drugs and long-term treatment with broad-spectrum antibiotics.

2.3. Direct Microscopy and Culture of Vaginal Specimens

Vaginal specimens were collected by gynecologists using two sterile cotton swabs from the posterior vaginal fornix, one for direct microscopy examination and the other for microbiological culture. Microscopic examination was performed using a saline wet mount preparation to detect fungal elements. The presence of budding yeast cells was considered suggestive of Candida spp.
All media used for bacterial and fungal culture were commercially purchased and used according to the manufacturer’s instructions. For bacterial culture, the samples were inoculated onto Columbia agar with 5% sheep blood, chocolate agar with vitox and MacConkey agar plates (Oxoid, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Wesel, Germany) and incubated at 37 °C for 24 h under appropriate atmospheric conditions. These media were used to allow detection and differentiation of a broad range of bacterial species commonly associated with vaginal infections.
For fungal isolation, samples were cultured on CHROMID® Candida agar (BioMérieux Inc., Durham, NC, USA) and incubated at 37 °C for 24 h to promote the optimal growth of clinically relevant yeast species, particularly C. albicans which grows efficiently at human body temperature. Following inoculation of CHROMID® Candida agar, the swab was immersed in 1–2 mL thioglycolate enrichment broth (Oxoid, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Wesel, Germany) and was incubated at room temperature (approximately 22–25 °C) for 24 h to enhance the recovery of microorganisms in low numbers. Following enrichment, subculture on CHROMID® Candida agar plates was performed selectively for samples considered suspicious for fungal presence at 37 °C for 24 h. This selection was based either on the patient’s clinical history suggesting possible fungal infection or on the observation of occasional fungal elements during direct microscopic examination. Candida species were identified based on colony morphology and characteristic color development on CHROMID® Candida agar, which allows differentiation of C. albicans from other Candida species.

2.4. Genomic DNA Isolation

The isolation of genomic DNA from nucleated epithelial cells acquired via vaginal swabs was performed with the NucleoSpin® Tissue kit (Macherey-Nagel, Düren, Germany) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. After microscopic examination, each swab was immersed in a sterile tube containing 2 mL of phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) and incubated for approximately 2–3 h at room temperature (approximately 22–25 °C) to facilitate the release of epithelial cells from the swab fibers into the suspension. The tubes were then vortexed briefly to enhance cell detachment. After centrifuging the suspension for 5 min at 13,000× g, the supernatant was carefully discarded, and the pellet, containing epithelial cells, was subjected to genomic DNA extraction using the standard protocol for human or animal tissue and cultured cells provided in the NucleoSpin® Tissue kit. In brief, the pellet was lysed using the provided lysis buffer in the presence of 25 μL proteinase K (56 °C, 1–3 h), allowing digestion of cellular proteins and release of genomic DNA. Following lysis, ethanol (96–100%) was added to promote DNA binding, and the lysate was transferred to a silica membrane spin column, where genomic DNA selectively binds under chaotropic salt conditions. The column was subsequently subjected to sequential washing steps to remove proteins, salts, and other contaminants. Finally, purified genomic DNA was eluted in 100 μL nuclease-free elution buffer and stored at −20 °C until further molecular analysis.

2.5. Purity Control and Quantification of Nucleic Acids

Genomic DNA samples were evaluated for concentration, purity, and suitability for amplification prior to real-time qPCR analysis. By measuring absorbance at 260 nm and calculating the A260/A280 ratio with UV spectrophotometry (NanoPhotometerTM P-Class, Implen GmbH, Munich, Germany), the quantity and purity of DNA were determined. Measurements were performed using 2 μL of undiluted DNA sample, and the spectrophotometer was blanked with the same solution used for DNA elution to ensure accurate baseline correction. All samples were subsequently normalized to a final concentration of 10 ng genomic DNA per reaction using nuclease-free water to ensure uniform amplification conditions across samples and comparability between reactions. To guarantee accurate and repeatable amplification findings, only DNA samples with an A260/A280 ratio between 1.8 and 2.0 and sufficient DNA concentration were included in this qPCR analysis. Additionally, amplification of the human housekeeping ACTB gene (β-actin) was performed by real-time PCR as an internal control to verify the presence and quality of genomic DNA prior to SNP genotyping. Samples failing to amplify the internal control were excluded from further analysis.

2.6. TLR2 and TLR4 SNP Genotyping

The genomic DNA used for genotyping was isolated from nucleated epithelial cells collected from vaginal swabs. Although vaginal specimens may contain microbial DNA, the TaqMan SNP genotyping assays used in this study are highly specific for human genomic sequences, particularly human SNP loci, and they do not amplify fungal DNA. Genotyping of TLR2 Arg753Gln (rs5743708), TLR4 Asp299Gly (rs4986790) and TLR4 Thr399Ile (rs4986791) polymorphisms was performed using pre-designed Taqman SNP genotyping assays (Applied Biosystems, Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA, USA), which include sequence-specific primers and two allele-specific fluorescently labeled Minor Groove Binder (MGB) probes for discrimination between wild-type and variant (mutated-type) alleles (Table 1). Primer and probe sequences are proprietary to the manufacturer. The genotype of the TLR2 Arg753Gln (rs5743708) polymorphism was assessed by applying the TaqMan SNP assay C_27860663_10 (Applied Biosystems, Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA, USA). The genotyping for the TLR4 polymorphisms Asp299Gly (rs4986790) and Thr399Ile (rs4986791) was performed with the TaqMan SNP assay C_11722238_20 and C_11722237_20, respectively (Applied Biosystems, Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA, USA). PCR reactions were carried out in a final volume of 25 μL containing 12.5 μL iQ Supermix (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc., Hercules, CA, USA), 2.5 μL TaqMan SNP genotyping assay mix (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA), 10 ng genomic DNA and nuclease-free water to reach the final volume. The TaqMan qPCR assays were performed on the AriaDx Real-time PCR system (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA). The cycling protocol consisted of an initial enzyme activation step at 95 °C for 10 min, followed by 40 cycles of denaturation at 95 °C for 15 s and combined annealing/extension at 60 °C for 1 min. Allelic discrimination analysis was conducted using the Agilent Aria V2.0 software by evaluating the fluorescence signals of the reporter dyes, allowing classification of samples into homozygous or heterozygous genotypes. A random subset of samples was analyzed in duplicate to ensure reproducibility of the results. Each qPCR run included no-template controls (NTCs) containing nuclease-free water to detect potential contamination.
Table 1. Details regarding the TLR2 and TLR4 SNPs examined, according to the manufacturer (Applied Biosystems, Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA, USA).

2.7. Statistical Analysis

Genotype and allele frequencies were compared between patients and healthy controls using the chi-square test or Fisher’s exact test, as appropriate. Due to small expected cell counts and the absence of minor allele homozygotes, Fisher’s exact test was considered the primary method for assessing statistical significance. The association between SNPs and disease susceptibility was evaluated by calculating odds ratios (ORs) with corresponding 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) under dominant and allelic genetic models. Chi-square test or Fisher’s exact test and calculation of ORs with corresponding 95% CIs were performed using GraphPad Prism v9.0 (Boston, MA, USA). A statistically significant association was considered present when Fisher’s exact test yielded a p-value < 0.05 and the corresponding 95% CIs of the odds ratio did not include 1.0. Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium (HWE) was assessed in both cases and controls using the OEGE online Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium calculator. Linkage disequilibrium (LD) between polymorphisms was evaluated by calculating D and r2 coefficients using standard mathematical formulas based on observed allele and haplotype frequencies. The calculations were implemented in Microsoft Excel (Microsoft Corp., Redmond, WA, USA; version 365).

3. Results

The genotype distributions of TLR2 Arg753Gln, TLR4 Asp299Gly and TLR4 Thr399Ile among patients and healthy individuals are presented in Table 2. No homozygotes for the minor allele were detected for any of the examined SNPs in either patients or controls, indicating a low minor allele (mut/mut) frequency in the studied population. Most individuals in all groups are wild-type (wt/wt), which strengthens the above observation, thus the differences between groups concern exclusively heterozygous individuals (wt/mut).
Table 2. Distribution of TLR2 and TLR4 genotypes among controls and patient groups. Values represent number of individuals (percentage within each group). Percentages were calculated based on the total number of individuals in each group. No homozygous mutant genotype was detected for any of the polymorphisms investigated in the study population.
For TLR2 Arg753Gln, the frequency of the heterozygous genotype was low and comparable across all groups (Controls: 3.3%; GV: 2.8%; VVC: 8.1%; RVVC: 4.8%), suggesting no apparent difference between patients and healthy individuals. In contrast, TLR4 Asp299Gly exhibited a higher frequency of heterozygotes in the RVVC group (15.9%) compared to the control group (3.3%), while the frequencies in GV (5.6%) and VVC groups (5.4%) were comparable to that observed in controls. A similar distribution pattern was observed for TLR4 Thr399Ile, with an increased heterozygous frequency in RVVC (14.3%) compared to controls (3.3%), while GV (5.6%) and VVC (5.4%) showed frequencies similar to the control group. The distribution patterns suggest a potential association of TLR4 Asp299Gly and TLR4 Thr399Ile with RVVC, whereas no clear association is evident for TLR2 Arg753Gln or any of the three SNPs with GV and VVC.
To further investigate the association between the studied polymorphisms and disease susceptibility, odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) were calculated under both allelic and dominant models. Statistical significance was additionally assessed using Fisher’s exact test, and the corresponding p-values were determined for each model. In the dominant genetic model, heterozygous and homozygous variant genotypes were grouped together and compared with the wild-type genotype. Since no individuals were homozygous for the minor allele, the allelic and dominant models yielded nearly identical results, as all minor allele carriers were heterozygotes.
No significant association was observed between TLR2 Arg753Gln and the occurrence of GV (p = 0.6909), VVC (p = 0.3627) or RVVC (p = 0.5154) compared to healthy individuals. Similarly, TLR4 Asp299Gly was not significantly associated with susceptibility to GV (p = 0.4754) or VVC (p = 0.4869). In contrast, a statistically significant association was identified between TLR4 Asp299Gly and susceptibility to RVVC (p = 0.0172). Regarding TLR4 Thr399Ile, no significant association was detected with GV (p = 0.4754) or VVC (p = 0.4869). However, a statistically significant association was observed between TLR4 Thr399Ile and RVVC susceptibility (p = 0.0306).
To determine whether the observed associations resulted in an increased risk of disease occurrence, effect size estimates were obtained through calculation of ORs and 95% CIs. Statistical significance was defined as a 95% CI that did not include 1.0. An OR greater than 1.0 indicates an increased disease risk associated with the genetic variant examined, whereas an OR close to 1.0 suggests no meaningful association.
For TLR2 Arg753Gln, the 95% CI included 1.0 across all disease groups, indicating no significant association with increased risk for GV, VVC, or RVVC (Table 3). For TLR4 Asp299Gly, no significant association was observed with GV or VVC, as the 95% CI included 1.0. In contrast, in RVVC group, the 95% CI excluded 1.0, indicating a statistically significant association and an increased risk of disease occurrence. Individuals carrying the heterozygous genotype exhibited an approximately sixfold increased odds of RVVC (OR: 5.57; 95% CI: 1.17–26.56) compared with wild-type individuals.
Table 3. Genetic association of SNPs in TLR2 and TLR4 genes with GV, VVC or RVVC susceptibility was evaluated by calculating odds ratios (ORs) with corresponding 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) using healthy controls as the reference group. Odds ratios were calculated using the variant allele (A for TLR2 rs5743708, G for TLR4 rs4986790, and T for TLR4 rs4986791) as the risk allele. Allelic and dominant genetic models were applied. In the dominant model, heterozygous and homozygous variant genotypes were grouped together and compared with the wild-type genotype. p-values were calculated using Fisher’s exact test. Statistically significant results (p < 0.05) are shown in bold. * p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
Similarly, for TLR4 Thr399Ile, the 95% CI included 1.0 for GV and VVC, indicating no statistically significant association. However, in RVVC group, the 95% CI excluded 1.0, demonstrating a statistically significant association with increased risk. Carriers of the heterozygous genotype demonstrated approximately fivefold higher odds of developing RVVC (OR: 4.92; 95% CI: 1.02–23.78).
Genotype frequencies of all three polymorphisms were in Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium in both patient and control groups (p > 0.05). In the RVVC group, it was found that among patients who were heterozygous for TLR4 Asp299Gly, 90% were also heterozygous for TLR4 Thr399Ile (Table 2). A significant linkage disequilibrium (D = 0.120, r2 = 0.88) between TLR4 Asp299Gly and TLR4 Thr399Ile was observed, suggesting co-segregation of these variants.

4. Discussion

Host genetic variability, particularly single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), significantly influences innate immune responses and susceptibility to fungal diseases [37]. Variants in genes regulating cytokine production, intracellular signaling, and cell adhesion have been associated with RVVC predisposition [38]. Polymorphisms affecting pattern recognition receptors (PRRs), including TLRs and mannose-binding lectin (MBL), have been identified in women with RVVC and are linked to increased vulnerability to VVC [17,36,39,40,41,42,43,44]. Specifically, TLR2 and TLR4 polymorphisms have been associated with altered immune responses to Candida species, supporting a role for genetic predisposition in RVVC pathogenesis [33,35,36,41].
The contribution of TLR2 and TLR4 polymorphisms to susceptibility to fungal infections has been extensively investigated, although findings vary depending on the pathogen and clinical presentation. In invasive fungal diseases such as aspergillosis, TLR4 polymorphisms (Asp299Gly and Thr399Ile) have been associated with increased susceptibility to infection [37,45]. A significant association was observed between TLR4 Asp299Gly (allele G) and chronic cavitary pulmonary aspergillosis (OR: 3.46, p = 0.003) [37]. Genetic variation in TLR4 significantly increases risk of invasive aspergillosis especially in immunocompromised hosts [45]. Particularly, the Asp299Gly/Thr399Ile haplotype in stem cell donors has been associated with increased susceptibility to invasive aspergillosis in recipients of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplants, although the underlying mechanisms remain unclear [45]. It has been proposed that these variants may alter cytokine production and thereby modulate antifungal immune responses [18,35]. Structural studies indicate that the Asp299Gly substitution induces localized conformational changes on the surface of TLR4, potentially influencing responsiveness to ligands with weak agonistic activity, whereas the Thr399Ile variant appears to a minimal structural and functional impact on TLR4 [18,46].
TLR2 plays a key role in antifungal immunity by recognizing fungal components such as β-glucans and mediating host responses against pathogens like C. albicans and Aspergillus spp. [28,47,48]. Genetic polymorphisms in TLR2 and related innate immune receptors have been associated with increased susceptibility to invasive fungal infections, particularly in immunocompromised individuals, likely through impaired cytokine responses (e.g., reduced IFN-γ and IL-8) [30,37,49,50,51]. Specific variants, such as R753Q TLR2 polymorphism, have been associated with increased risk of candidemia [52]. The TLR2 Pro631His (rs5743704) polymorphism has been associated with an approximately threefold increased risk of RVVC, further supported by experimental evidence showing that TLR2 deficiency impairs antifungal defense [36,53].
Functional studies have demonstrated that the TLR2 Pro631His polymorphism impairs antifungal cytokine responses, including reduced IL-17 and IFN-γ production, although these findings derive primarily from peripheral immune cells [36]. While TLR2 and TLR4 signaling are clearly active in vaginal epithelial cells and regulate local inflammatory responses during C. albicans infection [18,54], the direct impact of TLR2 and TLR4 polymorphisms on epithelial responses in RVVC has not yet been experimentally investigated in the vaginal mucosal context.
Given the crucial role of TLR2 and TLR4 in mediating antifungal and antibacterial immune responses at the vaginal mucosa, this study investigated whether SNPs in genes encoding the innate immune receptors TLR2 and TLR4 contribute to susceptibility to vulvovaginal infections, particularly RVVC, in Greek women. Polymorphisms in genes encoding TLR2 and TLR4 are biologically plausible candidates for modulating host–pathogen interactions on vaginal mucosa considering the established effects of TLR4 Asp299Gly and Thr399Ile variants on ligand recognition and subsequent immunological activation, as well as the impact of the TLR2 Arg753Gln variant on receptor signaling [18].
Three clinically and microbiologically distinct vaginal diseases, including RVVC, first-episode VVC, and nonspecific bacterial vaginosis caused by Gardnerella vaginalis (GV), were simultaneously genetically investigated alongside healthy controls. Although previous genetic studies have either focused exclusively on RVVC [17,36,42,55] or analyzed heterogeneous vaginitis phenotypes as a single group [56,57,58,59], the current study clearly distinguishes among these diseases. Our findings demonstrate a statistically significant association between the TLR4 SNPs, Asp299Gly and Thr399Ile, and susceptibility to RVVC (p = 0.0172 and p = 0.0306, respectively), suggesting that TLR4 genetic variation may play a role in disease pathogenesis. Individuals with the heterozygous Asp299Gly genotype exhibited a 5.57-fold greater risk of RVVC (OR: 5.57; 95% CI: 1.17–26.56), whereas heterozygous Thr399Ile carriers had a 4.92-fold increased risk of developing RVVC (OR: 4.92; 95% CI: 1.02–23.78). It is well known that these SNPs impair innate immune signaling mediated by TLR4 [30,32]. Their strong association with RVVC provides a plausible explanation for the reduced clearance of Candida species observed in affected women [36,41,55,60], despite the absence of systemic immunodeficiency [61] and supports the hypothesis that defective innate mucosal immunity underlies chronic or recurrent disease [8,62].
In European populations, TLR4 Asp299Gly and TLR4 Thr399Ile are often inherited together, forming a haplotype associated with altered TLR4 signaling and modified innate immune responses [30,32,63]. In this study, a strong linkage disequilibrium (D = 0.120, r2 = 0.88) was observed between these two TLR4 SNPs supporting their cosegregation within the study population. Although formal haplotype frequency estimation was not performed in this study, the high r2 value along with the nearly identical distribution of the heterozygous genotypes for the two TLR4 polymorphisms across all study groups strongly suggests that these polymorphisms are frequently co-inherited, which is consistent with previous observations particularly in European (Caucasian) populations [33]. Thus, susceptibility to RVVC may not be attributable to isolated single nucleotide variants, but rather to TLR4 haplotypes that exert a combined effect on TLR4 function and may collectively undermine antifungal innate immune responses at the vaginal mucosal surface. Since all participants were of Greek origin, population stratification is expected to be minimal. However, larger studies including formal haplotype reconstruction would be useful to further clarify the contribution of TLR4 haplotypes to RVVC susceptibility.
In contrast, no association was detected between TLR2 Arg753Gln and RVVC, nor were any of the three studied SNPs associated with GV or VVC. These findings strongly support the concept that RVVC represents a genetically and immunologically distinct clinical entity, rather than a more severe manifestation of sporadic or acute VVC [55,61]. Furthermore, these TLR4 genetic variants likely influence susceptibility in a disease-specific manner, rather than acting as a broad, universal risk factor for vaginal infection in general. The absence of correlation between the TLR2 Arg753Gln and RVVC, VVC, or GV may indicate that alternative pattern recognition receptors in the vaginal mucosa may sufficiently compensate for impaired TLR2 signaling, despite the recognized role of TLR2 in Candida recognition [30]. The cooperative interactions between TLRs and C-type lectin receptors likely maintain the antifungal response when a single signal transduction pathway is disrupted [28,29]. The significant correlation observed between TLR4 variants and RVVC highlights the important role of TLR4-mediated signaling in maintaining antifungal immunity in this anatomical region [55,61]. Furthermore, these findings support the hypothesis that different pathways of the innate immune system do not contribute equally to susceptibility to RVVC and that selective deficiencies may differentially affect disease risk.
Our findings support a host-genetic model of RVVC pathogenesis. The identification of host genetic factors predisposing to RVVC enhances our understanding of disease pathogenesis and may facilitate the development of personalized approaches to prevention, diagnosis, and treatment. Genotypic identification of women carrying TLR4 SNPs could enable early recognition of individuals at increased risk for RVVC, thereby allowing closer monitoring, implementation of targeted preventive measures, or personalized treatment strategies. In the future, therapeutic approaches might include immunomodulators or antifungal therapies tailored to individual genetic profiles aimed at improving TLR4-mediated signaling or compensating for functional deficiencies in genetically susceptible women.
Despite its strengths, the study has certain limitations that should be acknowledged. TLR4 and TLR2 SNPs are relatively uncommon in European populations [32,63], resulting in small numbers of heterozygous individuals, particularly among healthy women and GV or VVC patients. Although the associations with RVVC are statistically significant, the odds ratio estimates are characterized by wide confidence intervals, reflecting limited precision.
In addition, no homozygous mutant genotypes were observed, preventing analysis of gene-dosage effects, recessive inheritance patterns, or whether carrying two mutated alleles would further increase the risk of RVVC. The study also lacked functional immune assays, such as cytokine profiling or TLR expression analysis, which could have provided direct evidence of the biological impact of these SNPs in vaginal tissue. Although TLR4 variants are known to negatively affect immunological signaling, the study could not clearly determine how these mutations affected vaginal mucosa immune responses in the participants. Finally, the study population consisted exclusively of Greek women; therefore, the findings may not be directly generalizable to other ethnic groups, including non-European or non-Mediterranean populations, with different genetic backgrounds. Our findings highlight the need for further studies in different ethnic populations with larger numbers of participants to validate and extend the observed associations.

5. Conclusions

This study supports a host-genetic model of RVVC pathogenesis, in which inherited variations in innate immune signaling pathways contribute to susceptibility. TLR4 SNPs, rather than TLR2 polymorphism, are associated with increased risk of RVVC occurrence. RVVC appears to be a genetically and immunologically distinct condition, rather than a more severe form of sporadic or acute infection.
Future studies in larger, ethnically diverse cohorts combined with functional immune analyses are needed to validate these associations and clarify the biological mechanisms underlying RVVC. Understanding the host-genetic factors that predispose to RVVC and early identification of women carrying high-risk TLR4 variants may facilitate personalized prevention, monitoring, and therapeutic strategies, including immunomodulatory approaches to enhance local antifungal immunity.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, M.M. and J.R.; methodology, M.M. and C.V.; software, M.M.; validation, M.M. and J.R.; formal analysis, M.M.; investigation, M.M. and C.V.; resources, C.V. and A.T.; data curation, M.M. and J.R.; writing—original draft preparation, M.M.; writing—review and editing, M.M., A.T. and J.R.; visualization, M.M.; supervision, M.M. and J.R.; project administration, M.M., C.V. and J.R.; funding acquisition, C.V. and A.T. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki, and approved by the Committee on Bioethics and Deontology of the Medical School of the National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Greece (Approval Code 423, Approval Date: 21 January 2021) and the Scientific Council of the General Hospital “Elena Venizelou” (Approval Code: 29052, Approval Date: 9 December 2020). Participants provided written informed consent, and the study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki.

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in this study are included in the article. Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Kalia, N.; Singh, J.; Sharma, S.; Kaur, M. SNPs in 3′-UTR region of MBL2 increases susceptibility to recurrent vulvovaginal infections by altering sMBL levels. Immunobiology 2019, 224, 42–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  2. Gubran, A.N.M.; Al-Baghdadi, M.A.A.; Al-Haidary, N.M. Vulvovaginal candidiasis and antifungal susceptibility pattern of isolated Candida spp. among women in Aden Governorate, Yemen. BMC Infect. Dis. 2026, 26, 232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  3. Sobel, J.D. Recurrent vulvovaginal candidiasis. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 2016, 214, 15–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  4. Foxman, B.; Muraglia, R.; Dietz, J.P.; Sobel, J.D.; Wagner, J. Prevalence of recurrent vulvovaginal candidiasis in 5 European countries and the United States: Results from an internet panel survey. J. Low. Genit. Tract Dis. 2013, 17, 340–345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  5. Zhu, Y.X.; Li, T.; Fan, S.R.; Liu, X.P.; Liang, Y.H.; Liu, P. Health-related quality of life as measured with the Short-Form 36 (SF-36) questionnaire in patients with recurrent vulvovaginal candidiasis. Health Qual. Life Outcomes 2016, 14, 65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  6. Blostein, F.; Levin-Sparenberg, E.; Wagner, J.; Foxman, B. Recurrent vulvovaginal candidiasis. Ann. Epidemiol. 2017, 27, 575–582.e3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  7. Denning, D.W.; Kneale, M.; Sobel, J.D.; Rautemaa-Richardson, R. Global burden of recurrent vulvovaginal candidiasis: A systematic review. Lancet Infect. Dis. 2018, 18, e339–e347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  8. Rosati, D.; Bruno, M.; Jaeger, M.; Ten Oever, J.; Netea, M.G. Recurrent vulvovaginal candidiasis: An immunological perspective. Microorganisms 2020, 8, 144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  9. Ardizzoni, A.; Wheeler, R.T.; Pericolini, E. It takes two to tango: How a dysregulation of the innate immunity, coupled with Candida virulence, triggers VVC onset. Front. Microbiol. 2021, 12, 692491. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  10. Milsom, I.; Forssman, L. Repeated candidiasis: Reinfection or recrudescence? A review. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 1985, 152, 956–959. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  11. Sobel, J.D. Epidemiology and pathogenesis of recurrent vulvovaginal candidiasis. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 1985, 152, 924–935. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  12. Kent, H.L. Epidemiology of vaginitis. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 1991, 165, 1168–1176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  13. Gonçalves, B.; Ferreira, C.; Alves, C.T.; Henriques, M.; Azeredo, J.; Silva, S. Vulvovaginal candidiasis: Epidemiology, microbiology and risk factors. Crit. Rev. Microbiol. 2016, 42, 905–927. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  14. Disha, T.; Haque, F. Prevalence and risk factors of vulvovaginal candidosis during pregnancy: A review. Infect. Dis. Obstet. Gynecol. 2022, 2022, 6195712. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  15. Donders, G.; Sziller, I.O.; Paavonen, J.; Hay, P.; de Seta, F.; Bohbot, J.M.; Kotarski, J.; Vives, J.A.; Szabo, B.; Cepuliené, R.; et al. Management of recurrent vulvovaginal candidosis: Narrative review of the literature and European expert panel opinion. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 2022, 12, 934353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  16. MacAlpine, J.; Lionakis, M.S. Host-microbe interaction paradigms in acute and recurrent vulvovaginal candidiasis. Cell Host Microbe 2024, 32, 1654–1667. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  17. Lobo, M.; Cerqueira, C.; Rodrigues, A.G.; Lisboa, C. Recurrent vulvovaginal candidosis and its underlying mechanisms: A systematic review. J. Fungi 2025, 11, 357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  18. Routsias, J.; Verra, C.; Tsiakalos, A.; Tsakris, A.; Mavrouli, M. The role of TLR2/TLR4 receptors in host genetic susceptibility to recurrent vulvovaginitis. J. Fungi 2025, 11, 804. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  19. Balakrishnan, S.N.; Yamang, H.; Lorenz, M.C.; Chew, S.Y.; Than, L.T.L. Role of vaginal mucosa, host immunity and microbiota in vulvovaginal candidiasis. Pathogens 2022, 11, 618. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  20. Gaziano, R.; Sabbatini, S.; Monari, C. The interplay between Candida albicans, vaginal mucosa, host immunity and resident microbiota in health and disease: An overview and future perspectives. Microorganisms 2023, 11, 1211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  21. Janssens, S.; Beyaert, R. Role of Toll-like receptors in pathogen recognition. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 2003, 16, 637–646. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  22. Pasare, C.; Medzhitov, R. Toll-like receptors: Linking innate and adaptive immunity. Microbes Infect. 2004, 6, 1382–1387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  23. Blasius, A.L.; Beutler, B. Intracellular toll-like receptors. Immunity 2010, 32, 305–315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  24. Kawai, T.; Akira, S. The role of pattern-recognition receptors in innate immunity: Update on Toll-like receptors. Nat. Immunol. 2010, 11, 373–384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  25. Kawasaki, T.; Kawai, T. Toll-like receptor signaling pathways. Front. Immunol. 2014, 5, 461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  26. Duan, T.; Du, Y.; Xing, C.; Wang, H.Y.; Wang, R.F. Toll-like receptor signaling and its role in cell-mediated immunity. Front. Immunol. 2022, 13, 812774. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  27. Jouault, T.; Ibata-Ombetta, S.; Takeuchi, O.; Trinel, P.A.; Sacchetti, P.; Lefebvre, P.; Akira, S.; Poulain, D. Candida albicans phospholipomannan is sensed through toll-like receptors. J. Infect. Dis. 2003, 188, 165–172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  28. Netea, M.G.; Gow, N.A.R.; Munro, C.A.; Bates, S.; Collins, C.; Ferwerda, G.; Hobson, R.P.; Bertram, G.; Hughes, H.B.; Jansen, T.; et al. Immune sensing of Candida albicans requires cooperative recognition of mannans and glucans by lectin and Toll-like receptors. J. Clin. Invest. 2006, 116, 1642–1650. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  29. Gow, N.A.R.; Hube, B. Importance of the Candida albicans cell wall during commensalism and infection. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 2012, 15, 406–412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  30. Schröder, N.W.; Schumann, R.R. Single nucleotide polymorphisms of Toll-like receptors and susceptibility to infectious disease. Lancet Infect. Dis. 2005, 5, 156–164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  31. Skevaki, C.; Pararas, M.; Kostelidou, K.; Tsakris, A.; Routsias, J.G. Single nucleotide polymorphisms of Toll-like receptors and susceptibility to infectious diseases. Clin. Exp. Immunol. 2015, 180, 165–177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  32. Arbour, N.C.; Lorenz, E.; Schutte, B.C.; Zabner, J.; Kline, J.N.; Jones, M.; Frees, K.; Watt, J.L.; Schwartz, D.A. TLR4 mutations are associated with endotoxin hyporesponsiveness in humans. Nat. Genet. 2000, 25, 187–191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  33. Senhaji, N.; Diakité, B.; Serbati, N.; Zaid, Y.; Badre, W.; Nadifi, S. Toll-like receptor 4 Asp299Gly and Thr399Ile polymorphisms: New data and a meta-analysis. BMC Gastroenterol. 2014, 14, 206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  34. Teräsjärvi, J.; Kainulainen, L.; Peltola, V.; Mertsola, J.; Hakanen, A.; He, Q. Genetic polymorphisms of TLR1, TLR2, TLR3 and TLR4 in patients with recurrent or severe infections. Int. J. Immunogenet. 2024, 51, 242–251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  35. Smeekens, S.P.; van de Veerdonk, F.L.; Kullberg, B.J.; Netea, M.G. Genetic susceptibility to Candida infections. EMBO Mol. Med. 2013, 5, 805–813. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  36. Rosentul, D.C.; Delsing, C.E.; Jaeger, M.; Plantinga, T.S.; Oosting, M.; Costantini, I.; Venselaar, H.; Joosten, L.A.; van der Meer, J.W.; Dupont, B.; et al. Gene polymorphisms in pattern recognition receptors and susceptibility to idiopathic recurrent vulvovaginal candidiasis. Front. Microbiol. 2014, 5, 483. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  37. Carvalho, A.; Cunha, C.; Pasqualotto, A.C.; Pitzurra, L.; Denning, D.W.; Romani, L. Genetic variability of innate immunity impacts human susceptibility to fungal diseases. Int. J. Infect. Dis. 2010, 14, e460–e468. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  38. Omosa-Manyonyi, G.S.; Ponce, I.R.; Rosati, D.; Bruno, M.; Kamau, N.W.; Obimbo, M.M.; Jaeger, M.; van der Ven, A.J.A.M.; Netea, M.G.; Kumar, V.; et al. Genetic susceptibility to recurrent vulvovaginal candidiasis in an African population from Nairobi, Kenya. Sci. Rep. 2025, 15, 12149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  39. Babula, O.; Lazdāne, G.; Kroica, J.; Linhares, I.M.; Ledger, W.J.; Witkin, S.S. Frequency of interleukin-4 (IL-4) -589 gene polymorphism and vaginal concentrations of IL-4, nitric oxide, and mannose-binding lectin in women with recurrent vulvovaginal candidiasis. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2005, 40, 1258–1262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  40. Ferwerda, B.; Ferwerda, G.; Plantinga, T.S.; Willment, J.A.; van Spriel, A.B.; Venselaar, H.; Elbers, C.C.; Johnson, M.D.; Cambi, A.; Huysamen, C.; et al. Human dectin-1 deficiency and mucocutaneous fungal infections. N. Engl. J. Med. 2009, 361, 1760–1767. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  41. Plantinga, T.S.; Johnson, M.D.; Scott, W.K.; Joosten, L.A.; van der Meer, J.W.; Perfect, J.R.; Kullberg, B.J.; Netea, M.G. Human genetic susceptibility to Candida infections. Med. Mycol. 2012, 50, 785–794. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  42. Hammad, N.M.; El Badawy, N.E.; Nasr, A.M.; Ghramh, H.A.; Al Kady, L.M. Mannose-binding lectin gene polymorphism and its association with susceptibility to recurrent vulvovaginal candidiasis. Biomed. Res. Int. 2018, 2018, 7648152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  43. Kalia, N.; Singh, J.; Sharma, S.; Kaur, M. Impact of SNPs interplay across the locus of MBL2, between MBL and Dectin-1 gene, on women’s risk of developing recurrent vulvovaginal infections. Cell Biosci. 2019, 9, 35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  44. Bojang, E.; Ghuman, H.; Kumwenda, P.; Hall, R.A. Immune sensing of Candida albicans. J. Fungi 2021, 7, 119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  45. Bochud, P.Y.; Chien, J.W.; Marr, K.A.; Leisenring, W.M.; Upton, A.; Janer, M.; Rodrigues, S.D.; Li, S.; Hansen, J.A.; Zhao, L.P.; et al. Toll-like receptor 4 polymorphisms and aspergillosis in stem-cell transplantation. N. Engl. J. Med. 2008, 359, 1766–1777. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  46. Ohto, U.; Fukase, K.; Miyake, K.; Shimizu, T. Structural basis of species-specific endotoxin sensing by innate immune receptor TLR4/MD-2. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2012, 19, 7421–7426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  47. Gantner, B.N.; Simmons, R.M.; Canavera, S.J.; Akira, S.; Underhill, D.M. Collaborative induction of inflammatory responses by dectin-1 and Toll-like receptor 2. J. Exp. Med. 2003, 197, 1107–1117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  48. Bellocchio, S.; Montagnoli, C.; Bozza, S.; Gaziano, R.; Rossi, G.; Mambula, S.S.; Vecchi, A.; Mantovani, A.; Levitz, S.M.; Romani, L. The contribution of the Toll-like/IL-1 receptor superfamily to innate and adaptive immunity to fungal pathogens in vivo. J. Immunol. 2004, 172, 3059–3069. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  49. Kesh, S.; Mensah, N.Y.; Peterlongo, P.; Jaffe, D.; Hsu, K.; Van Den Brink, M.; O’reilly, R.; Pamer, E.; Satagopan, J.; Papanicolaou, G.A. TLR1 and TLR6 polymorphisms are associated with susceptibility to invasive aspergillosis after allogeneic stem cell transplantation. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 2005, 1062, 95–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  50. Cunha, C.; Romani, L.; Carvalho, A. Cracking the Toll-like receptor code in fungal infections. Expert Rev. Anti-Infect. Ther. 2010, 8, 1121–1137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  51. Lionakis, M.S.; Netea, M.G. Candida and host determinants of susceptibility to invasive candidiasis. PLoS Pathog. 2013, 9, e1003079. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  52. Woehrle, T.; Du, W.; Goetz, A.; Hsu, H.Y.; Joos, T.O.; Weiss, M.; Bauer, U.; Brueckner, U.B.; Marion Schneider, E. Pathogen specific cytokine release reveals an effect of TLR2 Arg753Gln during Candida sepsis in humans. Cytokine 2008, 41, 322–329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  53. Netea, M.G.; Brown, G.D.; Kullberg, B.J.; Gow, N.A. An integrated model of the recognition of Candida albicans by the innate immune system. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2008, 6, 67–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  54. Pivarcsi, A.; Nagy, I.; Koreck, A.; Kis, K.; Kenderessy-Szabo, A.; Szell, M.; Dobozy, A.; Kemeny, L. Microbial compounds induce the expression of pro-inflammatory cytokines, chemokines and human beta-defensin-2 in vaginal epithelial cells. Microbes Infect. 2005, 7, 1117–1127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  55. Jaeger, M.; Plantinga, T.S.; Joosten, L.A.; Kullberg, B.J.; Netea, M.G. Genetic basis for recurrent vulvo-vaginal candidiasis. Curr. Infect. Dis. Rep. 2013, 15, 136–142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  56. Kalia, N.; Singh, J.; Sharma, S.; Arora, H.; Kaur, M. Genetic and phenotypic screening of mannose-binding lectin in relation to risk of recurrent vulvovaginal infections in women of North India: A prospective cohort study. Front. Microbiol. 2017, 8, 75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  57. Budilovskaya, O.V.; Shipitsina, E.V.; Spasibova, E.V.; Pereverzeva, N.A.; Vorob’eva, N.E.; Tsypurdeeva, N.D.; Grigoryev, A.N.; Savicheva, A.M. Differential expression of local immune response genes in the vagina: Implication for the diagnosis of vaginal infections. Bull. Exp. Biol. Med. 2020, 168, 646–650. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  58. Kalia, N.; Singh, J.; Rauniyar, A.K.; Kaur, M. A meta-analysis of mannose-binding lectin gene polymorphisms with the risk of recurrent vulvovaginal infections. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 6079. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  59. Mutli, E.; Mändar, R.; Koort, K.; Salumets, A.; Team, E.B.R.; Laisk, T. Genome-wide association study in Estonia reveals importance of vaginal epithelium associated genes in case of recurrent vaginitis. J. Reprod. Immunol. 2024, 162, 104216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  60. Netea, M.G.; Wijmenga, C.; O’Neill, L.A. Genetic variation in Toll-like receptors and disease susceptibility. Nat. Immunol. 2012, 13, 535–542. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  61. Fidel, P.L., Jr. History and update on host defense against vaginal candidiasis. Am. J. Reprod. Immunol. 2007, 57, 2–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  62. Ge, G.; Yang, Z.; Li, D.; Zhang, N.; Chen, B.; Shi, D. Distinct host immune responses in recurrent vulvovaginal candidiasis and vulvovaginal candidiasis. Front. Immunol. 2022, 13, 959740. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  63. Ferwerda, B.; McCall, M.B.; Alonso, S.; Giamarellos-Bourboulis, E.J.; Mouktaroudi, M.; Izagirre, N.; Syafruddin, D.; Kibiki, G.; Cristea, T.; Hijmans, A.; et al. TLR4 polymorphisms, infectious diseases, and evolutionary pressure during migration of modern humans. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2007, 104, 16645–16650. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Article Metrics

Citations

Article Access Statistics

Multiple requests from the same IP address are counted as one view.