Skip to Content
MDPIMDPI

Advanced

MicroorganismsMicroorganisms
PDF
  • Review
  • Open Access

27 February 2026

17 Pages

Nontuberculous Mycobacterium Peritonitis in Patients on Peritoneal Dialysis: A Scoping Review

,
,
,
and
Department of Pediatrics, Faculty of Life Sciences, Kumamoto University, 1-1-1 Honjo, Chuo-ku, Kumamoto 860-8556, Japan
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Microorganisms2026, 14(3), 550;https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms14030550
This article belongs to the Section Medical Microbiology
Version Notes
Order Reprints

Abstract

Early and accurate identification of causative microorganisms is essential for improving outcomes in peritoneal dialysis (PD)-associated peritonitis. However, nontuberculous mycobacterial (NTM) peritonitis remains difficult to diagnose and manage, often resulting in delayed treatment and unfavorable clinical outcomes. We conducted a scoping review to summarize the clinical features, microbiological profiles, treatment strategies, and outcomes of PD-associated NTM peritonitis. A total of 107 patients from 81 published reports were identified, including one patient treated at our institution. The mean age was 50.1 years, with a slight male predominance. Diabetes mellitus was the most common underlying cause of end-stage renal disease. Abdominal pain, fever, and cloudy dialysate were the most frequently reported symptoms, and exit-site infection was present in 55% of cases. Rapid-growing NTM species predominated, with Mycobacterium fortuitum being the most frequently identified organism. A substantial delay was observed between symptom onset and initiation of appropriate therapy. The mean duration of antimicrobial treatment was six months. PD catheters were removed in 90% of patients, and 69% were permanently transitioned to hemodialysis. The overall mortality rate during treatment was 18%. These findings suggest that NTM infection should be considered in cases of culture-negative peritonitis unresponsive to standard antibiotics. Early catheter removal combined with prolonged multidrug antimicrobial therapy for at least six months may be beneficial. In pediatric patients, temporary conversion to hemodialysis followed by PD catheter reinsertion or renal transplantation may represent a reasonable management option after successful infection control.

1. Introduction

Peritoneal dialysis (PD)-associated infections, including catheter-related infections and peritonitis, are major complications that can lead to catheter removal, conversion to hemodialysis, and increased mortality [1,2]. Prompt identification of causative microorganisms and early initiation of appropriate antimicrobial therapy are critical for preventing treatment failure and improving clinical outcomes [1,3]. The most common pathogens responsible for PD-associated peritonitis are coagulase-negative staphylococci and Staphylococcus aureus, which are generally identifiable using routine culture methods and respond well to standard antimicrobial regimens [4,5].
In contrast, less common pathogens such as fungi, Mycobacterium tuberculosis, and nontuberculous mycobacteria (NTM) are frequently associated with culture-negative peritonitis and unfavorable outcomes [6,7,8,9]. NTMs are ubiquitous environmental organisms commonly found in soil and water [10]. Their isolation is often difficult in non-specialized laboratories, and routine bacterial cultures frequently fail to detect these organisms, leading to delayed diagnosis. Although PD-associated NTM peritonitis is relatively rare, it represents a clinically important complication with limited standardized diagnostic and therapeutic strategies, and evidence-based guidelines remain insufficient [11]. Given the rarity of this condition and the heterogeneity of published reports, a comprehensive synthesis of available evidence is needed to improve awareness and guide clinical management. Because the existing literature consists predominantly of heterogeneous case reports and small case series with variable diagnostic methods, treatment approaches, and outcome reporting, quantitative synthesis or meta-analysis is not feasible. Therefore, a scoping review was considered the most appropriate design to comprehensively map the current evidence and summarize clinical patterns and management practices. Accordingly, we conducted a scoping review of published case reports and case series of PD-associated NTM peritonitis. The objectives were to characterize patient demographics, clinical manifestations, microbiological features, treatment strategies, and outcomes, and to describe practical management considerations based on the accumulated evidence.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Search Strategy and Study Selection

This scoping review was conducted in accordance with the Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR), and reporting elements were additionally aligned with PRISMA 2020 where applicable [12]. The review protocol was retrospectively registered in the Open Science Framework (OSF) and is publicly available at: https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/GURKP (accessed on 23 February 2026). A systematic literature search was performed using PubMed, Google Scholar, and Ichushi (a major Japanese medical database), including articles published up to 31 December 2024. The search terms included “dialysis”, “peritoneal dialysis”, and “nontuberculous mycobacteria”.
Studies were excluded if they did not involve PD-associated NTM peritonitis, described NTM peritonitis in non-PD patients, involved Mycobacterium tuberculosis, or were conference abstracts. Articles published in languages other than English or Japanese were also excluded.
After initial screening of titles and abstracts, full texts of eligible articles were reviewed. Reference lists of included studies were manually screened to identify additional relevant publications. Only case reports and case series with microbiologically confirmed NTM peritonitis based on positive peritoneal fluid culture were included.
PD catheter removal was defined as removal of the catheter during an active episode of NTM peritonitis. NTM-related mortality was defined as death occurring during the treatment period, regardless of attribution.
For each case, data were extracted on age, sex, cause of end-stage renal disease (ESRD), clinical presentation, time from symptom onset to initiation of anti-NTM therapy, microbiological findings, antimicrobial therapy, catheter management, and clinical outcome. Two independent reviewers screened articles and extracted data, with discrepancies resolved by consensus.
A complete list of historical case reports included in this scoping review is provided in Supplementary Materials.

2.2. Statistical Analysis

Statistical analyses were performed for descriptive and exploratory purposes only to summarize clinical characteristics and to identify potential trends or associations between variables. Categorical variables were summarized as frequencies and percentages. Continuous variables were reported as means with standard deviations or medians with ranges, as appropriate. Group comparisons were conducted using the Mann–Whitney U test. Exploratory logistic regression analyses were performed to examine possible associations with mortality. Because this study was designed as a scoping review of heterogeneous case reports and case series, these analyses were considered hypothesis-generating rather than confirmatory, and no causal inference was intended. Accordingly, results are interpreted descriptively. All analyses were conducted using R version 4.1.3.

3. Results

3.1. Literature Review

The study selection process is shown in Figure 1. A total of 1337 articles were identified, of which 81 publications describing 106 patients met the inclusion criteria. Together with one additional institutional case, 107 patients were included in the final analysis.
Figure 1. Search strategy and selection of studies.

3.2. Clinical Characteristics of Patients with NTM Peritonitis

The clinical characteristics of all patients are summarized in Table 1. The mean age was 50.1 years, and 61% of patients were male. Diabetes mellitus (40%) and glomerulonephritis (19%) were the most common causes of ESRD. None of the reports described prior immunosuppressive therapy.
Table 1. Clinical characteristics of patients with PD-related NTM peritonitis.
The mean duration from initiation of PD to onset of NTM peritonitis was 25.0 months. The most frequently reported symptoms were abdominal pain (69%), fever (64%), and cloudy dialysate (55%). Exit-site infection (ESI) was present in 55% of cases.
Rapid-growing NTM species were the predominant pathogens. Mycobacterium fortuitum (33%) and M. abscessus (28%) were the most frequently identified organisms (Supplementary Table S1).
The mean interval from symptom onset to initiation of appropriate therapy was 16.4 days (median, 12 days). The mean therapy duration was six months (median, four months). PD catheters were removed in 90% of cases, and 69% of patients were permanently transitioned to hemodialysis. Overall mortality during therapy was 18%.

3.3. Comparison Between Rapid-Growing and Slow-Growing NTM Peritonitis

Patients with slow-growing NTM peritonitis experienced a significantly longer delay between symptom onset and initiation of therapy compared with those infected with rapid-growing NTM. Clinical outcomes were also significantly poorer in the slow-growing NTM group (Table 2).
Table 2. Comparison of clinical characteristics between patients with rapid-growing (RGM) and slow-growing (SGM) NTM peritonitis.
For slow-growing NTM infections, rifampin, ethambutol, isoniazid, and macrolides were most frequently used. In contrast, treatment of rapid-growing NTM peritonitis commonly included amikacin, macrolides, and quinolones (Supplementary Table S2).

3.4. Comparison Between Adult and Pediatric Patients

Comparison between adult and pediatric patients revealed a significant difference in the underlying cause of ESRD. Diabetes mellitus was the predominant etiology among adults, whereas congenital anomalies of the kidney and urinary tract were most common in pediatric patients.
Recovery rates were 80% in adults and 92% in pediatric patients. Although fewer pediatric patients required permanent transition to hemodialysis, this difference was not statistically significant (Table 3).
Table 3. Comparison of clinical characteristics between patients with adult and pediatric NTM peritonitis.

3.5. Multivariate Analysis of Treatment Success and Mortality

Multivariate logistic regression analysis identified slow-growing NTM species as the only factor significantly associated with increased mortality (odds ratio 5.48; 95% confidence interval 1.36–22.7; p = 0.03) (Table 4).
Table 4. Multivariate logistic regression analysis of factors associated with mortality.

4. Discussion

This scoping review provides a comprehensive overview of PD-associated NTM peritonitis, highlighting its diagnostic challenges, complex management, and substantial mortality. Although relatively rare, NTM peritonitis appears to be a clinically important complication of PD, frequently resulting in delayed diagnosis, prolonged antimicrobial therapy, PD catheter removal, and permanent transition to hemodialysis.
Impaired cell-mediated immunity in patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) likely contributes to susceptibility to NTM infection [13]. Declining kidney function is associated with reduced B-lymphocyte and CD4-positive T-lymphocyte counts, as well as impaired T-cell and neutrophil function, leading to compromised cellular and humoral immunity. Additional factors, including uremic toxins, oxidative stress, vascular endothelial dysfunction, chronic inflammation, and abnormalities in bone and mineral metabolism, may further weaken host defenses and increase infection risk [14].
Although the precise immune mechanisms protecting the peritoneal cavity are not fully understood, several studies suggest that PD itself may impair phagocytic and lymphocytic activity within peritoneal fluid, thereby increasing susceptibility to infection even with relatively low bacterial loads [13,15]. While some patients with NTM peritonitis had underlying immune-related conditions such as systemic lupus erythematosus or glomerulonephritis, the use of corticosteroids or immunosuppressive agents was not consistently reported. Nevertheless, such therapies are known risk factors for NTM infection. Diabetes mellitus, a condition associated with impaired antibacterial immunity, was the most common cause of ESRD in this cohort, suggesting its potential role as a risk factor. In addition, individuals with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection are at increased risk for NTM disease [16], and two patients in this review were living with HIV. Collectively, these findings suggest that most PD patients who develop NTM peritonitis are immunocompromised to some degree.
Consistent with previous reports [7,17], rapid-growing NTM species—including Mycobacterium fortuitum, M. abscessus, and M. chelonae—were the predominant causative organisms in PD-associated NTM peritonitis. In contrast, slow-growing species such as M. avium, which are the primary pathogens in pulmonary NTM disease [18,19], were relatively uncommon, particularly in cases involving ESI. This difference may reflect variations in environmental niches and routes of exposure among NTM species.
A substantial diagnostic delay was observed, with an average of approximately 17 days between symptom onset and initiation of appropriate therapy. Early diagnosis of NTM peritonitis is particularly challenging because its clinical presentation closely resembles that of bacterial or tuberculous peritonitis [20,21]. Common symptoms—including fever, abdominal pain, and cloudy dialysate—are nonspecific and frequently overlap with other causes of PD-associated peritonitis. Additional symptoms such as anorexia, fatigue, nausea, vomiting, and weight loss have also been reported [22,23]. Laboratory findings, including leukocyte counts and differentials in both peritoneal effluent and peripheral blood, are variable and do not reliably distinguish NTM peritonitis from infections caused by Mycobacterium tuberculosis or conventional bacteria [20,21].
Notably, many patients with NTM peritonitis had concurrent ESI in which organisms other than NTM were initially identified. This may be attributable to routine culture practices, in which exit-site swabs are typically processed using standard bacterial culture methods, while mycobacterial cultures are often reserved for cases with negative results. Common skin flora such as Staphylococcus aureus and coagulase-negative staphylococci grow more rapidly than NTM species, potentially leading to underdiagnosis of NTM in ESI [24,25]. Furthermore, NTM can colonize medical equipment and solutions [25,26,27], and although evidence is limited, person-to-person transmission has been suggested in certain settings [28,29]. NTM peritonitis may also occur following medical procedures; in one of our cases, infection developed after PD catheter replacement [30].
NTM species exhibit intrinsic resistance to many first-line empirical antibiotics commonly used for PD-associated infections. Prior studies have suggested that gentamicin use at the exit site may increase the risk of NTM-related ESI [31]. Although disinfectants such as chlorhexidine and hydrogen peroxide are commonly recommended for exit-site care, some NTM species demonstrate resistance to chlorhexidine. In addition, antiseptics such as povidone–iodine and hydrogen peroxide may cause local skin damage, potentially increasing susceptibility to infection [32,33].
From a microbiological perspective, rapid-growing NTM typically become detectable within 3–5 days of culture, whereas slow-growing species may require at least 7 days or longer. Acid-fast bacillus (AFB) staining of peritoneal effluent can facilitate earlier detection; however, AFB smears may be negative in NTM infection and cannot differentiate NTM from M. tuberculosis. Because routine bacterial cultures are often discarded after 4–5 days, clinicians should notify microbiology laboratories when NTM infection is suspected to ensure prolonged incubation and the use of selective mycobacterial media, such as Löwenstein–Jensen medium [34].
Accurate identification of the causative NTM species appears to be important, as antimicrobial susceptibility patterns vary considerably among species. Although the Runyon classification system remains useful for initial categorization based on growth rate and pigment production [26,27], molecular diagnostic methods—including 16S rRNA sequencing and commercially available probes—are increasingly important for rapid and accurate identification. Rapid-growing NTM may be misidentified as Gram-positive rods, such as diphtheroids or Corynebacterium species, which can delay appropriate diagnosis and therapy [35,36]. This issue has been highlighted in both quality control studies and international PD guidelines [11,34].
The mean treatment duration in this cohort was six months, which is shorter than that recommended for pulmonary NTM disease [27]. Treatment regimens varied widely and were tailored according to species identification and susceptibility testing. Rapid-growing NTM were commonly treated with combinations including aminoglycosides, macrolides, quinolones, carbapenems, and tetracyclines, whereas slow-growing species were often treated with rifampin, ethambutol, isoniazid, and macrolides. Given the lack of standardized regimens and the limited evidence from controlled studies, combination therapy guided by antimicrobial susceptibility testing and clinical response may be appropriate.
Based on our institutional experience, we suggest combination therapy with at least two to three antimicrobial agents, continued for a minimum of six months. Antibiotic selection should consider drug susceptibility, patient age, potential adverse effects, and local resistance patterns. Consultation with specialists experienced in managing NTM infections is particularly important, especially in pediatric patients.
Our analysis of recent case series with PD-associated NTM infections showed that the PD catheters were eventually removed in most patients with NTM peritonitis (95/105, 90%), PD continuation was possible in approximately 21% of the recovered patients (Table 1). However, among the 10 patients whose PD catheter was not removed, 5 died from causes related to NTM peritonitis. In most cases, the PD catheter was removed or replaced, after which the infection resolved, suggesting that catheter removal may play an important role in infection control.
Among the pediatric patients who switched to another modality after hemodialysis, 30% transitioned to PD and 50% renal transplantation (RT). The mean duration of hemodialysis was 2 months for patients who underwent PD and 14 months for those who underwent RT.
In most adult cases the PD catheter was reinserted after 6 months, while in pediatric cases, catheter reinsertion occurred on average 8 weeks after removal.
Complete pathogen eradication before transplantation is critical because NTM infections can recur after a median of 37 months (range 3 days–252 months) following kidney transplantation, indicating the reactivation of latent infection [37].
Immunosuppressive drugs after RT are a potential risk factor for recurrent NTM infection, which can be fatal and can cause rejection because dosages of immunosuppressive drugs are lowered during treatment for NTM infection [38,39].
Although evidence regarding the optimal interval between completion of antimycobacterial therapy and RT remains limited, patients awaiting transplantation may be monitored for at least six months to confirm sustained microbiological cure.
Future research involving large patient cohorts is essential to determine the most effective treatment regimens, appropriate durations as well as the appropriate timing for RT after treatment for NTM peritonitis.
In pediatric patients, temporary conversion to hemodialysis followed by PD catheter reinsertion or kidney transplantation was feasible after infection control. Complete eradication of NTM before transplantation is critical, as recurrence has been reported months to years after RT [37]. Immunosuppressive therapy following transplantation may further increase the risk of recurrent or disseminated NTM infection [38,39]. Although optimal timing remains uncertain, careful monitoring for at least six months after completion of antimycobacterial therapy may be reasonable before proceeding with transplantation.
Based on the available evidence and our clinical experience, we propose a management algorithm for PD-associated NTM peritonitis (Figure 2).
Figure 2. Proposed management algorithm for peritoneal dialysis-associated nontuberculous mycobacterial (NTM) peritonitis.
NTM infection should be suspected in cases of culture-negative peritonitis that are unresponsive to standard empirical antibiotics. When acid-fast bacillus staining is positive, polymerase chain reaction testing is recommended to differentiate Mycobacterium tuberculosis from nontuberculous mycobacteria. PD catheter removal should be considered in patients with confirmed NTM infection, particularly in the presence of ulceration, tunnel infection, or involvement of the deep cuff. Empirical multidrug antimicrobial therapy targeting NTM should be initiated and subsequently adjusted according to antimicrobial susceptibility testing. Prolonged combination therapy for at least six months is generally required. Temporary conversion to hemodialysis may be necessary, with consideration of PD catheter reinsertion after adequate infection control (approximately 8 weeks in pediatric patients and 6 months in adults). Renal transplantation should be considered only after sustained microbiological cure.
Although rare, NTM peritonitis was associated with a high mortality rate (18%) in our review, consistent with previously reported mortality rates of 14.3% and 17.2% despite antimicrobial therapy [7,40]. In our multivariate analysis, the causative organism was identified as the only significant risk factor for mortality. However, univariate analysis comparing rapid-growing and slow-growing NTM also demonstrated a significant difference in the delay to initiation of appropriate therapy. Given the diagnostic difficulty associated with slow-growing NTM, treatment delay itself may contribute to poorer outcomes. However, because comorbid conditions were not fully accounted for, it remains unclear whether mortality was directly attributable to peritonitis, and the observed mortality rate may have been influenced by additional unmeasured confounding factors.
Notably, no deaths were reported among pediatric patients aged ≤15 years. This favorable outcome may reflect the fact that pediatric PD is typically managed in highly specialized medical centers. In contrast, adult patients who required long-term hemodialysis following PD catheter removal were often managed in general hospitals, where delayed pathogen identification and a higher burden of complications may have contributed to worse outcomes [41]. In children, hemodialysis is technically challenging because of difficulties in vascular access and the frequent need for sedation, and therefore can be provided only at a limited number of specialized centers. Consequently, when PD-associated ESI or peritonitis caused by NTM is suspected in pediatric patients, early referral to specialized centers and consultation with clinicians experienced in NTM management of NTM may be beneficial [38].
Several limitations of this study should be acknowledged. The available evidence consisted primarily of retrospective case reports and case series, with substantial heterogeneity in diagnostic approaches, antimicrobial regimens, and outcome reporting. Publication bias and incomplete clinical data limited robust assessment of causal relationships between management strategies and outcomes.

5. Conclusions

Nontuberculous mycobacterial peritonitis remains a rare but clinically significant complication of peritoneal dialysis, often associated with delayed diagnosis, prolonged therapy, frequent catheter removal, and considerable morbidity and mortality. Early recognition, prompt PD catheter removal, and prolonged combination antimicrobial therapy tailored to the causative species appear to be important for successful management. In pediatric patients, temporary conversion to hemodialysis followed by PD catheter reinsertion or kidney transplantation may be considered after adequate infection control. Further prospective studies are required to establish standardized diagnostic and therapeutic strategies.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/microorganisms14030550/s1, Table S1: Classification of causative nontuberculous mycobacterial species in 107 cases of PD-associated peritonitis; Table S2: Literature Review of Treatment of NTM peritonitis. Refs. [17,22,23,40,42,43,44,45,46,47,48,49,50,51,52,53,54,55,56,57,58,59,60,61,62,63,64,65,66,67,68,69,70,71,72,73,74,75,76,77,78,79,80,81,82,83,84,85,86,87,88,89,90,91,92,93,94,95,96,97,98,99,100,101,102,103,104,105,106,107,108,109,110,111,112,113,114,115,116,117,118] are included in the Supplementary Materials.

Author Contributions

H.T. designed the study. H.T. was involved in the clinical management of the patient. H.T., K.F. and H.N. (Hiroko Nagata) provided substantial contribution to data collection and revision of draft. H.T. wrote the first draft. H.N. (Hitoshi Nakazato) and S.K. conducted critical revision of the article. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The authors received no financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Institutional Review Board Statement

This study primarily consisted of a literature-based scoping review and therefore did not require ethical approval.

Data Availability Statement

No new data were created or analyzed in this study. Data sharing is not applicable to this article.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank the patient and his family for their contribution to this study. Generative AI tools (ChatGPT; OpenAI, GPT-4) were used to improve the clarity, grammar, and academic tone of the manuscript. The authors carefully reviewed and edited all content and take full responsibility for the accuracy, originality, and integrity of the work. No AI tools were used to generate scientific content, analyze data, or draw conclusions.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Abbreviations

PDperitoneal dialysis
APDautomated peritoneal dialysis
HDHemodialysis
CHDcontinuous hemodialysis
RTrenal transplantation
NTMnontuberculous Mycobacteria
SGMslow-growing nontuberculous Mycobacteria
RGMrapid-growing nontuberculous Mycobacteria
FSGSfocal segmental glomerulosclerosis
GNGlomerulonephritis
DMdiabetes mellitus
CAKUTCongenital anomalies of the kidney and urinary tract
HTHypertension
HIVHuman Immunodeficiency Virus
ARFacute renal failure
CNSCongenital nephrotic syndrome
HUSHemolytic uremic syndrome
ESIexit-site infection
TItunnel infection
NFLXNorfloxacin
AMKAmikacin
IPM/CSimipenem/cilastatin sodium
CPFXciprofloxacin hydrochloride
CAMClarithromycin
REPRifampin
EBEthambutol
INHIsoniazid
RBTRifabutin
PZAPyrazinamide
TOBTobramycin
AZMAzithromycin Hydrate
EMErythromycin
MFLXMoxifloxacin Hydrochloride
LVFXLevofloxacin Hydrate
MEPMMeropenem Hydrate
DOXYDoxycycline
MINOMinocycline Hydrochloride
TCTetracycline

References

  1. Kam-Tao Li, P.; Chun Szeto, C.; Piraino, B.; de Arteaga, J.; Fan, S.; Figueiredo, A.E.; Fish, D.N.; Goffin, E.; Kim, Y.L.; Salzer, W.; et al. ISPD peritonitis recommendations: 2016 update on prevention and treatment. Perit. Dial. Int. 2016, 36, 481–508, Erratum in Dial. Int. 2018, 38, 313. [Google Scholar]
  2. Szeto, C.C.; Li, P.K. Peritoneal dialysis-associated peritonitis. Clin. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 2019, 14, 1100–1105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  3. Muthucumarana, K.; Howson, P.; Crawford, D.; Burrows, S.; Swaminathan, R.; Irish, A. The relationship between presentation and the time of initial administration of antibiotics with outcomes of peritonitis in peritoneal dialysis patients: The PROMPT study. Kidney Int. Rep. 2016, 1, 65–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  4. Camargo, C.H.; de Souza, M.D.L.R.; Caramori, J.C.T.; Mondelli, A.L.; Montelli, A.C.; Barretti, P. Peritoneal dialysis-related peritonitis due to coagulase-negative staphylococcus: A review of 115 cases in a Brazilian center. Clin. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 2014, 9, 1074–1081. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  5. Szeto, C.C.; Chow, K.M.; Kwan, B.C.H.; Law, M.C.; Chung, K.Y.; Yu, S.; Leung, C.B.; Li, P.K.T. Staphylococcus aureus peritonitis complicates peritoneal dialysis: Review of 245 consecutive cases. Clin. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 2007, 2, 245–251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  6. Cheng, I.K.; Fang, G.X.; Chan, T.M.; Chan, P.C.K.; Chan, M.-K. Fungal peritonitis complicating peritoneal dialysis: Report of 27 cases and review of treatment. Q. J. Med. 1989, 71, 407–416. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  7. Song, Y.; Wu, J.; Yan, H.; Chen, J. Peritoneal dialysis-associated nontuberculous mycobacterium peritonitis: A systematic review of reported cases. Nephrol. Dial. Transplant. 2012, 27, 1639–1644. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  8. Kim, D.K.; Yoo, T.H.; Ryu, D.-R.; Xu, Z.-G.; Kim, H.J.; Choi, K.H.; Lee, H.Y.; Han, D.-S.; Kang, S.-W. Changes in causative organisms and their antimicrobial susceptibilities in CAPD peritonitis: A single center’s experience over one decade. Perit. Dial. Int. 2004, 24, 424–432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  9. Fahim, M.; Hawley, C.M.; McDonald, S.P.; Brown, F.G.; Rosman, J.B.; Wiggins, K.J.; Bannister, K.M.; Johnson, D.W. Culture-negative peritonitis in peritoneal dialysis patients in Australia: Predictors, treatment, and outcomes in 435 cases. Am. J. Kidney Dis. 2010, 55, 690–697. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  10. Falkinham, J.O., III. Environmental sources of nontuberculous mycobacteria. Clin. Chest Med. 2015, 36, 35–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  11. Li, P.K.; Chow, K.M.; Cho, Y.; Fan, S.; E Figueiredo, A.; Harris, T.; Kanjanabuch, T.; Kim, Y.-L.; Madero, M.; Malyszko, J.; et al. ISPD peritonitis guideline recommendations: 2022 update on prevention and treatment. Perit. Dial. Int. 2022, 42, 110–153, Erratum in Dial. Int. 2023, 43, 279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  12. Page, M.J.; McKenzie, J.E.; Bossuyt, P.M.; Boutron, I.; Hoffmann, T.C.; Mulrow, C.D.; Shamseer, L.; Tetzlaff, J.M.; Akl, E.A.; Brennan, S.E.; et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ 2021, 372, n71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  13. Rubin, J.; Lin, L.M.; Lewis, R.; Cruse, J.; Bower, J. Host defense mechanisms in continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis. Clin. Nephrol. 1983, 20, 140–144. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  14. Ishigami, J.; Matsushita, K. Clinical epidemiology of infectious disease among patients with chronic kidney disease. Clin. Exp. Nephrol. 2019, 23, 437–447, Erratum in Clin. Exp. Nephrol. 2019, 23, 723. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  15. Kazancioglu, R. Peritoneal defense mechanisms—The effects of new peritoneal dialysis solutions. Perit. Dial. Int. 2009, 29, S198–S201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  16. Jones, D.; Havlir, D.V. Nontuberculous mycobacteria in the HIV infected patient. Clin. Chest Med. 2002, 23, 665–674. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  17. Jiang, S.H.; Roberts, D.M.; Dawson, A.H.; Jardine, M. Mycobacterium fortuitum as a cause of peritoneal dialysis-associated peritonitis: Case report and review of the literature. BMC Nephrol. 2012, 13, 35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  18. Cook, J.L. Nontuberculous mycobacteria: Opportunistic environmental pathogens for predisposed hosts. Br. Med. Bull. 2010, 96, 45–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  19. Parrish, S.C.; Myers, J.; Lazarus, A. Nontuberculous mycobacterial pulmonary infections in Non-HIV patients. Postgrad. Med. 2008, 120, 78–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  20. Akpolat, T. Tuberculous peritonitis. Perit. Dial. Int. 2009, 29, S166–S169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  21. Talwani, R.; Horvath, J.A. Tuberculous peritonitis in patients undergoing continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis: Case report and review. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2000, 31, 70–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  22. Renaud, C.J.; Subramanian, S.; A Tambyah, P.; Lee, E.J. The clinical course of rapidly growing nontuberculous mycobacterial peritoneal dialysis infections in Asians: A case series and literature review. Nephrology 2011, 16, 174–179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  23. Rho, M.; Bia, F.; Brewster, U.C. Nontuberculous mycobacterial peritonitis in peritoneal dialysis patients. Semin. Dial. 2007, 20, 271–276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  24. Honda, J.R.; Virdi, R.; Chan, E.D. Global environmental non- tuberculous mycobacteria and their contemporaneous manmade and natural niches. Front. Microbiol. 2018, 9, 2029. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  25. Falkinham, J.O.; Norton, C.D.; LeChevallier, M.W. Factors influencing numbers of Mycobacterium avium, Mycobacterium intracellulare, and other Mycobacteria in drinking water distribution systems. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2001, 67, 1225–1231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  26. Jarzembowski, A.J.; Young, M.B. Nontuberculous mycobacterial infections. Arch. Pathol. Lab. Med. 2008, 132, 1333–1341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  27. Griffith, D.E.; Aksamit, T.; Brown-Elliott, B.A.; Catanzaro, A.; Daley, C.; Gordin, F.; Holland, S.M.; Horsburgh, R.; Huitt, G.; Iademarco, M.F.; et al. An official ATS/IDSA statement: Diagnosis, treatment, and prevention of nontuberculous mycobacterial diseases. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 2007, 175, 367–416. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  28. Bryant, J.M.; Grogono, D.M.; Rodriguez-Rincon, D.; Everall, I.; Brown, K.P.; Moreno, P.; Verma, D.; Hill, E.; Drijkoningen, J.; Gilligan, P.; et al. Emergence and spread of a human-transmissible multidrug-resistant nontuberculous mycobacterium. Science 2016, 354, 751–757. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  29. Johnson, M.M.; Odell, J.A. Nontuberculous mycobacterial pulmonary infections. J. Thorac. Dis. 2014, 6, 210–220. [Google Scholar]
  30. Sakaguchi, T.; Tamura, H.; Furuie, K.; Kuraoka, S.; Nakazato, H. Mycobacterium fortuitum Peritoneal Dialysis-Related Peritonitis in a Child: A Case Report. Biomed. Hub. 2024, 9, 128–133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  31. Tse, K.C.; Lui, S.L.; Cheng, V.C.-C.; Yip, T.P.-S.; Lo, W.K. A cluster of rapidly growing mycobacterial peritoneal dialysis catheter exit-site infections. Am. J. Kidney Dis. 2007, 50, e1–e5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  32. Szeto, C.-C.; Chow, K.-M.; Wong, T.Y.-H.; Leung, C.-B.; Wang, A.Y.-M.; Lui, S.-F.; Li, P.K.-T. Feasibility of resuming peritoneal dialysis after severe peritonitis and Tenckhoff catheter removal. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 2002, 13, 1040–1045. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  33. Kawaguchi, Y.; Hasegawa, T.; Nakayama, M.; Kubo, H.; Shigematu, T. Issues affecting the longevity of the continuous peritoneal dialysis therapy. Kidney Int. Suppl. 1997, 62, S105–S107. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  34. Htay, H.; Cho, Y.; Pascoe, E.M.; Darssan, D.; Hawley, C.; Clayton, P.A.; Borlace, M.; Badve, S.V.; Sud, K.; Boudville, N.; et al. Outcomes of Corynebacterium peritonitis: A multicenter registry analysis. Perit. Dial. Int. 2017, 37, 619–626. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  35. Von Graevenitz, A.; Punter-Streit, V. Failure to recognize rapidly growing mycobacteria in a proficiency testing sample without specific request: A wider diagnostic problem? Eur. J. Epidemiol. 1998, 14, 519–520. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  36. Williamson, J.C.; Miano, T.A.; Morgan, M.R.; Palavecino, E.L. Fatal Myco- bacterium abscessus endocarditis misidentified as Coryne- bacterium spp. Scand. J. Infect. Dis. 2010, 42, 222–224. [Google Scholar]
  37. Song, Y.; Zhang, L.; Yang, H.; Liu, G.; Huang, H.; Wu, J.; Chen, J. Nontuberculous mycobacterium infection in renal transplant recipients: A systematic review. Infect. Dis. 2018, 50, 409–416. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  38. Fadlallah, J.; Rammaert, B.; Laurent, S.; Lanternier, F.; Pol, S.; Franck, N.; Mamzer, M.; Dupin, N.; Lortholary, O. Mycobacterium avium complex disseminated infection in a kidney transplant recipient. Transpl. Infect. Dis. 2016, 18, 105–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  39. Singh, S.; Yosypiv, I.V.; Iorember, F.M. Disseminated mycobacterium avium complex infection in a pediatric renal transplant recipient. Clin. Pediatr. 2012, 51, 892–895. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  40. Washida, N.; Itoh, H. The Role of Non-Tuberculous Mycobacteria in Peritoneal Dialysis-Related Infections: A Literature Review. In Recent Advances in Dialysis Therapy in Japan; Contributions to Nephrology; Karger Publishers: Basel, Switzerland, 2018; Volume 196, pp. 155–161. [Google Scholar]
  41. Pérez-Fontán, M.; Rodríguez-Carmona, A.; Rodríguez-Carmona, A. Peritoneal catheter removal for severe peritonitis: Landscape after a lost battle. Perit. Dial. Int. 2007, 27, 155–158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  42. Pulliam, J.P.; Vernon, D.D.; Alexander, S.R.; Hartstein, A.I.; Golper, T.A. Nontuberculous mycobacterial peritonitis associated with continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis. Am. J. Kidney Dis. 1983, 2, 610–614. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  43. Linton, I.M.; Leahy, S.I.; Thomas, G.W. Mycobacterium gastri peritonitis in a patient undergoing continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis. Aust. New Zealand J. Med. 1986, 16, 224–225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  44. LaRocco, M.T.; Mortensen, J.E.; Robinson, A. Mycobacterium fortuitum peritonitis in a patient undergoing chronic peritoneal dialysis. Diagn. Microbiol. Infect Dis. 1986, 4, 161–164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  45. Woods, G.L.; Hall, G.S.; Schreiber, M.J. Mycobacterium fortuitum Peritonitis Associated with Continuous Ambulatory Peritoneal Dialysis. J. Clin. Microbiol. 1986, 23, 786–788. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  46. Merlin, T.L.; Tzamaloukas, A.H. Mycobacterium chelonae peritonitis associated with continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis. Am. J. Clin. Pathol. 1989, 91, 718–720. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  47. Soriano, F.; Rodriguez-Tudela, J.L.; Gómez-Garcés, J.L.; Velo, M. Two Possibly Related Cases of Mycobacterium fortuitum Peritonitis Associated with Continuous Ambulatory Peritoneal Dialysis. Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 1989, 8, 895–897. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  48. Sennesael, J.J.; Maes, V.A.; Pierard, D.; Debeukelaer, S.H.; Verbeelen, D.L. Streptomycin pharmacokinetics in relapsing Mycobacterium xenopi peritonitis. Am. J. Nephrol. 1990, 10, 422–425. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  49. Dunmire, R.B.; Breyer, J.A. Nontuberculous mycobacterial peritonitis during continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis: Case report and review of diagnostic and therapeutic strategies. Am. J. Kidney Dis. 1991, 18, 126–130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  50. Giladi, M.; Lee, B.E.; Berlin, O.G.W.; Panosian, C.B. Peritonitis caused by Mycobacterium kansasii in a patient undergoing continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis. Am. J. Kidney Dis. 1992, 19, 597–599. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  51. Kolmos, H.J.; Brahm, M.; Bruun, B. Peritonitis with Mycobacterium fortuitum in a patient on continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis. Scand. J. Infect. Dis. 1992, 24, 801–803. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  52. Perlino, C.A. Mycobacterium avium complex: An unusual cause of peritonitis in patients undergoing continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis. Clin. Infect. Dis. 1993, 17, 1083–1084. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  53. White, R.; Abreo, K.; Flanagan, R.; Gadallah, M.; Krane, K.; Ei-Shahawy, M.; Shakamuri, S.; McCoy, R. Nontuberculous Mycobacterial Infections in Continuous Ambulatory Peritoneal Dialysis Patients. Am. J. Kidney Dis. 1993, 22, 581–587. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  54. Perazella, M.; Eisen, T.; Brown, E. Peritonitis associated with disseminated Mycobacterium avium complex in an acquired immunodeficiency syndrome patient on chronic ambulatory peritoneal dialysis. Am. J. Kidney Dis. 1993, 21, 319–321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  55. Choi, C.W.; Cha, D.R.; Kwon, Y.J.; Cho, W.Y.; Pyo, H.J.; Kim, H.K. Mycobacterium fortuitum peritonitis associated with continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis. Korean J. Intern. Med. 1993, 8, 25–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  56. Gehr, T.W.; Walters, B.A. Catheter-Related Mycobacterium chelonei infection in a CAPD patient. Perit. Dial. Int. J. Int. Soc. Perit. Dial. 1994, 14, 278–279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  57. Irizarry, L.; Rupp, J.; Smart, J.; Nwosu, A.; Tzamaloukas, A. Diagnostic difficulties with mycobacteria peritonitis in a CAPD patient. Perit. Dial. Int. J. Int. Soc. Perit. Dial. 1996, 16, 427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  58. Harro, C.; Braden, G.L.; Morris, A.B.; Lipkowitz, G.S.; Madden, R.L. Failure to cure Mycobacterium gordonae peritonitis associated with continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis. Clin. Infect. Dis. 1997, 24, 955–957. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  59. Paul, E.; Devarajan, P. Mycobacterium phlei peritonitis: A rare complication of chronic peritoneal dialysis. Pediatr. Nephrol. 1998, 12, 67–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  60. Slagle, K.M.; Oblack, D.L. Mycobacterium abscessus peritonitis: A case report. Clin. Lab. Sci. 1998, 11, 206–208. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  61. Vera, G.; Lew, S.Q. Mycobacterium fortuitum peritonitis in two patients receiving continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis. Am. J. Nephrol. 1999, 19, 586–589. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  62. Kawamoto, S.; Otani, K.; Kawaguchi, Y.; Hosoya, T. Mycobacterium Fortuitum peritonitis associated with CAPD: Diagnosis by a molecular biology technique. Perit. Dial. Int. J. Int. Soc. Perit. Dial. 1999, 19, 592–593. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  63. Osada, S.; Hamada, C.; Fukui, M.; Kobata, M.; Shirato, I.; Tomino, Y. A case of Mycobacterium fortuitum peritonitis associated with continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD). Nihon Toseki Igakkai Zasshi 2001, 34, 1251–1255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  64. Youmbissi, J.T.; Malik, Q.T.; Ajit, S.K.; Al Khursany, I.A.; Rafi, A.; Karkar, A. Non Tuberculous mycobacterium peritonitis in continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis. J. Nephrol. 2001, 14, 132–135. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  65. Tang, S.; Tang, A.; Lam, W.; Cheng, Y.; Ho, Y.W. Successful Treatment of Mycobacterium Fortuitum peritonitis without tenckhoff catheter removal in CAPD. Perit. Dial. Int. J. Int. Soc. Perit. Dial. 2003, 23, 304–305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  66. Ando, T.; Ryuzaki, M.; Handa, M.; Sekita, T.; Sakurai, T. Mycobacterium fortuitum Peritonitis in a Patient Undergoing Continuous Ambulatory Peritoneal Dialysis. Hong Kong J. Nephrol. 2003, 5, 101–104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  67. Ferrara, E.; Lemire, J.; Grimm, P.C.; Reznik, V.M.; Mendoza, S.A.; Leake, J.A.; Benador, N.M. Mycobacterial peritonitis in pediatric peritoneal dialysis patients. Pediatr. Nephrol. 2004, 19, 114–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  68. Keenan, N.; Jeyaratnam, D.; Sheerin, N.S. Mycobacterium simiae: A previously undescribed pathogen in peritoneal dialysis peritonitis. Am. J. Kidney Dis. 2005, 45, e75–e78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  69. Kameyama, H.; Mori, Y.; Kimura, T.; Sugishita, C.; Adachi, T.; Sonomura, K.; Kusaba, T.; Tanda, S.; Kishimoto, N.; Okigaki, M.; et al. A Case Report of Mycobacterium abscessus Peritonitis in a Peritoneal Dialysis Patient. Ther. Apher. Dial. 2007, 11, 449–451. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  70. Hod, T.; Kushnir, R.; Paitan, Y.; Korzets, Z. Mycobacterium fortuitum infection in continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis. Clin. Nephrol. 2008, 70, 546–553. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  71. Lee, K.-F.; Chen, H.-H.; Wu, C.-J. Mycobacterium chelonae peritonitis in a patient on peritoneal dialysis. Ren. Fail. 2008, 30, 335–338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  72. Curry, E.; Yehia, M.; Roberts, S. CAPD Peritonitis caused by Mycobacterium rhodesiae. Perit. Dial. Int. J. Int. Soc. Perit. Dial. 2008, 28, 97–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  73. Falcone, E.; Alam, A.; Tangri, N. Mycobacterium avium complex-associated peritonitis in a patient on continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis. Clin. Nephrol. 2008, 69, 387–391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  74. Maeda, Y.; Uno, T.; Yoshida, A.; Takahashi, A.; Inaba, N.; Shiigai, T. Nontuberculous mycobacterial Peritonitis in a Patient Undergoing Continuous Ambulatory Peritoneal Dialysis. J. Rural. Med. 2009, 4, 75–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  75. Chung, J.-W.; Cha, Y.-J.; Oh, D.-J.; Nam, W.-J.; Kim, S.-H.; Lee, M.-K.; Kim, H.-R. Disseminated Mycobacterium avium complex infection in a Non-HIV-infected patient undergoing continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis. Ann. Lab. Med. 2010, 30, 166–170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  76. Patil, R.; Patil, T.; Schenfeld, L.; Massoud, S. Mycobacterium porcinum peritonitis in a patient on continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis. J. Gen. Intern. Med. 2011, 26, 346–348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  77. Chan, W.W.; Murray, M.C.; Tang, P.; Romney, M.G. Mycobacterium heckeshornense peritonitis in a peritoneal dialysis patient: A case report and review of the literature. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 2011, 17, 1262–1264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  78. Jiang, S.H.; Senanayake, S.; Talaulikar, G.S. Peritoneal dialysis-related peritonitis due to Mycobacterium smegmatis. Perit. Dial. Int. 2011, 31, 215–216. [Google Scholar]
  79. Simbli, M.A.; Niaz, F.A.; Al-Wakeel, J.S. Encapsulating Peritoneal Sclerosis in a Peritoneal Dialysis Patient Presenting with Complicated Mycobacterium fortuitum peritonitis. Saudi J. Kidney Dis. Transpl. 2012, 23, 635–641. [Google Scholar]
  80. Siddiqi, N.; Sheikh, I. Peritonitis Caused by Mycobacterium abscesses in Patients on Continuous Ambulatory Peritoneal Dialysis. Saudi J. Kidney Dis. Transpl. 2012, 23, 321–324. [Google Scholar]
  81. Jo, A.; Ishibashi, Y.; Hirohama, D.; Takara, Y.; Kume, H.; Fujita, T. Early Surgical Intervention May Prevent Peritonitis in Cases with Tenckhoff Catheter Infection by Nontuberculous Mycobacterium. Perit. Dial. Int. J. Int. Soc. Perit. Dial. 2012, 32, 227–229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  82. Lo, M.-W.; Mak, S.-K.; Wong, Y.-Y.; Lo, K.-C.; Chan, S.-F.; Tong, G.M.; Lo, K.-Y.; Wong, P.-N.; Tse, C.W.; Kam, K.-M.; et al. Atypical mycobacterial exit-site infection and peritonitis in peritoneal dialysis patients on prophylactic exit-site gentamicin cream. Perit. Dial. Int. J. Int. Soc. Perit. Dial. 2013, 33, 267–272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  83. Sangwan, J.; LathwaL, S.; KuMar, S.; JuyaL, D. Mycobacterium fortuitum Peritonitis in a Patient on Continuous Ambulatory Peritoneal Dialysis (CAPD): A Case Report. J. Clin. Diagn. Res. 2013, 7, 2950–2951. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  84. Miyasato, Y.; Adachi, M.; Fujie, Y.; Nakashima, Y.; Yamasaki, T.; Watanabe, M.; Sakanashi, A.; Tasaki, H.; Mizumoto, T.; Onoue, T.; et al. Severe Mycobacterium fortuitum infection due to inappropriate exit-site care using mountain spring water in a patient on continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD). Nihon Toseki Igakkai Zasshi 2013, 46, 937–942. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  85. Ranganathan, D.; Fassett, R.; John, G.T. Mycobacterium fortuitum Peritonitis in a Patient Receiving Continuous Ambulatory Peritoneal Dialysis. Saudi J. Kidney Dis. Transpl. 2013, 24, 1003–1004. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  86. Jiang, S.H.; Roberts, D.M.; Clayton, P.A.; Jardine, M. Non-tuberculous mycobacterial PD peritonitis in Australia. Int. Urol. Nephrol. 2013, 45, 1423–1428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  87. Miyashita, E.; Yoshida, H.; Mori, D.; Nakagawa, N.; Miyamura, T.; Ohta, H.; Seki, M.; Tomono, K.; Hashii, Y.; Ozono, K. Mycobacterium avium complex-associated peritonitis with CAPD after unrelated bone marrow transplantation. Pediatr. Int. 2014, 56, e96–e98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  88. Kunin, M.; Knecht, A.; Holtzman, E.J. Mycobacterium chelonae peritonitis in peritoneal dialysis. Literature review. Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 2014, 33, 1267–1271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  89. Hamade, A.; Pozdzik, A.; Denis, O.; Tooulou, M.; Keyzer, C.; Jacobs, F.; Khabbout, J.; Nortier, J.L. Mycobacterium fortuitum and Polymicrobial Peritoneal Dialysis-Related Peritonitis: A Case Report and Review of the Literature. Case Rep. Nephrol. 2014, 2014, 323757. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  90. Zewinger, S.; Meier, C.-M.; Fliser, D.; Klingele, M. Mycobacterium fortuitum peritonitis in peritoneal dialysis and its effects on the peritoneum. Clin. Nephrol. 2014, 82, 341–346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  91. Yamada, T.; Ushijima, K.; Uemura, O. A hospital-acquired outbreak of catheter-related nontuberculous mycobacterial infection in children on peritoneal dialysis. CEN Case Rep. 2015, 4, 43–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  92. Yang, T.-K.; Lee, J.-J.; Lu, P.-L.; Kuo, H.-T.; Kuo, M.-C.; Chen, H.-C. Peritoneal Dialysis-Associated Peritonitis Caused by Mycobacterium abscessus. Perit. Dial. Int. J. Int. Soc. Perit. Dial. 2015, 35, 369–371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  93. Inagaki, K.; Mizutani, M.; Nagahara, Y.; Asano, M.; Masamoto, D.; Sawada, O.; Aono, A.; Chikamatsu, K.; Mitarai, S. Successful Treatment of Peritoneal Dialysis-related Peritonitis due to Mycobacterium iranicum. Intern. Med. 2016, 55, 1929–1931. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  94. Choi, H.-S.; Bae, E.-H.; Ma, S.-K.; Kim, S.-W. Peritoneal Dialysis-Related Peritonitis Caused by Microbacterium paraoxydans. Jpn. J. Infect. Dis. 2017, 70, 195–196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  95. Fujikura, H.; Kasahara, K.; Ogawa, Y.; Hirai, N.; Yoshii, S.; Yoshihara, S.; Ogawa, T.; Yonekawa, S.; Imakita, N.; Nishioka, Y.; et al. Mycobacterium wolinskyi Peritonitis after Peritoneal Catheter Embedment Surgery. Intern. Med. 2017, 56, 3097–3101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  96. Chan, G.C.W.; Mok, M.M.Y.; Hung, D.L.L.; Chan, J.F.W.; Kwan, L.P.Y.; Ma, M.K.M.; Yap, D.Y.H.; Tang, S.C.W. Mycobacterium chlorophenolicum: An uncommon cause of peritonitis in a peritoneal dialysis patient. Nephrology 2017, 22, 498–499. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  97. Mooren, V.H.; Bleeker, M.W.; van Ingen, J.; Hermans, M.H.; Wever, P.C. Disseminated Mycobacterium abscessus infection in a peritoneal dialysis patient. IDCases 2017, 9, 6–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  98. Chin, H.H.; Chin, Y.H.; Yap, Y.L.; Chang, A.; Chua, H.H. Case Report: Two Cases of Mycobacterium abscessus Peritonitis in Patients on Continuous Ambulatory Peritoneal Dialysis (CAPD). J. Nephrol. Res. 2018, 4, 135–138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  99. Yoshimura, R.; Kawanishi, M.; Fujii, S.; Yamauchi, A.; Takase, K.; Yoshikane, K.; Egawa, M.; Shiina, H.; Ito, T. Peritoneal dialysis-associated infection caused by Mycobacterium abscessus: A case report. BMC Nephrol. 2018, 19, 341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  100. Ono, E.; Uchino, E.; Mori, K.P.; Yokoi, H.; Toda, N.; Koga, K.; Kasahara, M.; Matsubara, T.; Yanagita, M. Peritonitis due to Mycobacterium abscessus in peritoneal dialysis patients: Case presentation and mini-review. Ren. Replace. Ther. 2018, 4, 52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  101. Inoue, H.; Washida, N.; Morimoto, K.; Shinozuka, K.; Kasai, T.; Uchiyama, K.; Tokuyama, H.; Wakino, S.; Itoh, H. Non-Tuberculous Mycobacterial Infections Related to Peritoneal Dialysis. Perit. Dial. Int. J. Int. Soc. Perit. Dial. 2018, 38, 147–149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  102. Jheeta, A.S.; Rangaiah, J.; Clark, J.; Makanjuola, D.; Somalanka, S. Mycobacterium abscessus—An uncommon, but important cause of peritoneal dialysis-associated peritonitis—Case report and literature review. BMC Nephrol. 2020, 21, 491. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  103. Jung, J.H.; Ahn, S.-H. Peritoneal Dialysis Catheter-Related Infection due to Mycobacterium abscessus Confused with Rhodococcus. J. Korean Med. Sci. 2020, 35, e44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  104. Seki, M.; Kamioka, Y.; Takano, K.; Imai, H.; Shoji, M.; Hariu, M.; Oikawa, N.; Kabutoya, Y.; Watanabe, Y. Mycobacterium abscessus Associated Peritonitis with CAPD Successfully Treated Using a Linezolid and Tedizolid Containing Regimen Suggested Immunomodulatory Effects. Am. J. Case Rep. 2020, 21, e924642-1–e924642-5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  105. Klomjit, N.; Chewcharat, A.; D’uScio, M.; Kattah, A.G. Mycobacterium septicum associated peritonitis: A case report. Perit. Dial. Int. J. Int. Soc. Perit. Dial. 2020, 40, 600–602. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  106. Imam, O.; Al-Zubaidi, K.; Janahi, M.; Imam, A.; Leghrouz, B.; Dobson, S.; Sundararaju, S.; Tsui, K.M.; Hasan, M.R.; Perez-Lopez, A. Peritoneal Dialysis–Associated Peritonitis Caused by Mycobacterium abscessus in Children—A Case Report. Open Forum Infect. Dis. 2021, 8, ofaa579. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  107. Hamada, S.; Takata, T.; Kitaura, T.; Teraoka, C.; Aono, A.; Taniguchi, S.; Mae, Y.; Isomoto, H.; Chikumi, H.; Mitarai, S. Peritoneal dialysis-associated peritonitis caused by Mycobacteroides massiliense: The first case and review of the literature. BMC Nephrol. 2021, 22, 90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  108. Lu, J.; Jiang, Z.; Wang, L.; Mou, S.; Yan, H. Mycobacteria avium-related peritonitis in a patient undergoing peritoneal dialysis: Case report and review of the literature. BMC Nephrol. 2021, 22, 345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  109. Pinapala, A.; Koh, L.J.; Ng, K.-H.; Tambyah, P.A.; Yap, H.-K. Clofazimine in Mycobacterium abscessus peritonitis: A pediatric case report. Perit. Dial. Int. J. Int. Soc. Perit. Dial. 2021, 41, 104–109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  110. Yokota, S.; Nishi, K.; Ishiwa, S.; Uda, K.; Shoji, K.; Kamei, K. Mycobacterium avium complex peritonitis in a pediatric patient on peritoneal dialysis: A case report. Medicine 2021, 100, e26321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  111. Chang, Z.Y.; Tok, P.L.; Teo, B.W.; Hong, W.; Tambyah, P.A.; Lee, M.B.-H. Non-tuberculous mycobacteria infections in peritoneal dialysis: Lessons from a 16-year single-centre experience. Ann. Acad. Med. Singap. 2021, 50, 724–728. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  112. Masuda, K.; Yamasaki, Y. A successfully treated case of PD-related peritonitis caused by Mycobacterium wolinskyi. Nihon Toseki Igakkai Zasshi 2022, 55, 249–253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  113. Haubrich, K.; Mammen, C.; Sekirov, I.; Mitchell, H. Mycobacterium fortuitum peritoneal dialysis-related peritonitis in a child: A case report and review of the literature. Off. J. Assoc. Med. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. Can. 2022, 7, 125–130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  114. Hayat, A.; Sakhrani, B.; Rubin, M. Mycobacterium chelonae-related peritoneal dialysis peritonitis: A case report and its potential complications. Int. Urol. Nephrol. 2022, 54, 1769–1771. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  115. Nakano, S.; Yamamura-Miyazaki, N.; Michigami, T.; Yazawa, K.; Yanagihara, I.; Yamamoto, K. A case of a preschool child with a successful kidney transplant following the long-term administration of antibiotics to treat peritoneal dialysis-related ESI/peritonitis by Mycobacterium abscessus. CEN Case Rep. 2022, 11, 408–411. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  116. Rouhani, S.; Adunuri, N. Refractory Peritonitis and Small Bowel Ileus: A Case of Encapsulating Peritoneal Sclerosis Secondary to Mycobacterium abscessus Peritonitis. Eur. J. Case Rep. Intern. Med. 2022, 9, 003173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  117. Ueda, Y.; Okamoto, T.; Sato, Y.; Hayashi, A.; Takahashi, T.; Kamada, K.; Honda, S.; Hotta, K. Kidney transplantation after peritoneal dialysis-associated peritonitis and abdominal abscesses caused by Mycobacterium massiliense: Lesson for the clinical nephrologist. J. Nephrol. 2022, 35, 1907–1910. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  118. Chen, X.; Zhu, J.; Liu, Z.; Ye, J.; Yang, L.; Zhang, Z. Mixed infection of three nontuberculous mycobacteria species identified by metagenomic next-generation sequencing in a patient with peritoneal dialysis-associated peritonitis: A rare case report and literature review. BMC Nephrol. 2023, 24, 95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Article Metrics

Citations

Article Access Statistics

Journal Statistics
Multiple requests from the same IP address are counted as one view.
Synergistic Efficiency of a Novel Temperate Phage YF1204 and Amikacin Against Carbapenem-Resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Its Biofilms
Previous
Genetic Control of Gut Microbial Diversity Enhances Host Resistance to Pathogenic Infections in C. elegans
Next