Nutrient Retention in Restored Streams and Rivers: A Global Review and Synthesis
AbstractExcess nitrogen (N) and phosphorus (P) from human activities have contributed to degradation of coastal waters globally. A growing body of work suggests that hydrologically restoring streams and rivers in agricultural and urban watersheds has potential to increase N and P retention, but rates and mechanisms have not yet been analyzed and compared across studies. We conducted a review of nutrient retention within hydrologically reconnected streams and rivers, including 79 studies. We developed a typology characterizing different forms of stream and river restoration, and we also analyzed nutrient retention across this typology. The studies we reviewed used a variety of methods to analyze nutrient cycling. We performed a further intensive meta-analysis on nutrient spiraling studies because this method was the most consistent and comparable between studies. A meta-analysis of 240 experimental additions of ammonium (NH4+), nitrate (NO3−), and soluble reactive phosphorus (SRP) was synthesized from 15 nutrient spiraling studies. Our results showed statistically significant relationships between nutrient uptake in restored streams and specific watershed attributes. Nitrate uptake metrics were significantly related to watershed surface area, impervious surface cover, and average reach width (p < 0.05). Ammonium uptake metrics were significantly related to discharge, velocity, and transient storage (p < 0.05). SRP uptake metrics were significantly related to watershed area, discharge, SRP concentrations, and chl a concentrations (p < 0.05). Given that most studies were conducted during baseflow, more research is necessary to characterize nutrient uptake during high flow. Furthermore, long-term studies are needed to understand changes in nutrient dynamics as projects evolve over time. Overall analysis suggests the size of the stream restoration (surface area), hydrologic connectivity, and hydrologic residence time are key drivers influencing nutrient retention at broader watershed scales and along the urban watershed continuum. View Full-Text
- Supplementary File 1:
PDF-Document (PDF, 498 KB)
Share & Cite This Article
Newcomer Johnson, T.A.; Kaushal, S.S.; Mayer, P.M.; Smith, R.M.; Sivirichi, G.M. Nutrient Retention in Restored Streams and Rivers: A Global Review and Synthesis. Water 2016, 8, 116.
Newcomer Johnson TA, Kaushal SS, Mayer PM, Smith RM, Sivirichi GM. Nutrient Retention in Restored Streams and Rivers: A Global Review and Synthesis. Water. 2016; 8(4):116.Chicago/Turabian Style
Newcomer Johnson, Tamara A.; Kaushal, Sujay S.; Mayer, Paul M.; Smith, Rose M.; Sivirichi, Gwen M. 2016. "Nutrient Retention in Restored Streams and Rivers: A Global Review and Synthesis." Water 8, no. 4: 116.
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.