Next Article in Journal
Role of Internet of Things and Artificial Intelligence in Water Distribution Networks
Previous Article in Journal
Bulk Decay Coefficient Assessment for Different Water Temperatures: Ensemble Temperature State Estimation Approach
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
This is an early access version, the complete PDF, HTML, and XML versions will be available soon.
Article

A Multi-Objective Trade-Off Analysis with NSGA-II and Pareto Strategies for Total Phosphorus Load Allocation and Engineering Configuration in Yangcheng Lake Basin

1
School of Hydraulic and Ocean Engineering, Changsha University of Science and Technology, Changsha 410114, China
2
State Key Laboratory of Simulation and Regulation of Water Cycle in River Basin, China Institute of Water Resources and Hydropower Research, Beijing 100038, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Water 2026, 18(12), 1391; https://doi.org/10.3390/w18121391
Submission received: 22 April 2026 / Revised: 28 May 2026 / Accepted: 1 June 2026 / Published: 6 June 2026
(This article belongs to the Topic Environmental Pollutant Management and Control)

Abstract

Yangcheng Lake, the third largest freshwater lake in the Taihu Plain (118.68 km2), serves critical functions in drinking water supply, aquaculture, and ecological regulation. This study aims to address the challenge of optimizing total phosphorus load allocation and engineering project configuration in the Yangcheng Lake basin by developing a multi-objective optimization model that integrates environmental, social, and economic dimensions with the goal of achieving three specific objectives: (1) maximizing ecological benefits, (2) minimizing life-cycle costs, and (3) minimizing the environmental Gini coefficient. The NSGA-II algorithm was used, with hyperparameters calibrated via orthogonal experiments and HV-GD evaluation. Under a normal flow year scenario, total phosphorus (TP) load allocation was optimized for an agricultural watershed where livestock manure contributes 86.5% of TP pollution. Five selection strategies (Economic Priority, Ecological Priority, Equity Priority, Ideal Point Method, Game Theory) were applied to the Pareto front. Results show synergy between ecological and equity objectives, both competing with economic cost. Optimal hyperparameters were a population size of 1000 and 1000 iterations. Among strategies, the Ideal Point Method achieved the best compromise (economic cost: 5772.7; Gini coefficient < 0.30). The proposed framework provides scientific support for pollution load allocation in plain river network regions, helping decision-makers balance economic development, ecological protection, and social equity.
Keywords: NSGA-II; Yangcheng Lake; pollution load allocation; multi-objective optimization; ideal point method; game theory method NSGA-II; Yangcheng Lake; pollution load allocation; multi-objective optimization; ideal point method; game theory method

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Peng, Z.; Yu, Y.; Cheng, Y. A Multi-Objective Trade-Off Analysis with NSGA-II and Pareto Strategies for Total Phosphorus Load Allocation and Engineering Configuration in Yangcheng Lake Basin. Water 2026, 18, 1391. https://doi.org/10.3390/w18121391

AMA Style

Peng Z, Yu Y, Cheng Y. A Multi-Objective Trade-Off Analysis with NSGA-II and Pareto Strategies for Total Phosphorus Load Allocation and Engineering Configuration in Yangcheng Lake Basin. Water. 2026; 18(12):1391. https://doi.org/10.3390/w18121391

Chicago/Turabian Style

Peng, Zijiajie, Yingdong Yu, and Yongzhou Cheng. 2026. "A Multi-Objective Trade-Off Analysis with NSGA-II and Pareto Strategies for Total Phosphorus Load Allocation and Engineering Configuration in Yangcheng Lake Basin" Water 18, no. 12: 1391. https://doi.org/10.3390/w18121391

APA Style

Peng, Z., Yu, Y., & Cheng, Y. (2026). A Multi-Objective Trade-Off Analysis with NSGA-II and Pareto Strategies for Total Phosphorus Load Allocation and Engineering Configuration in Yangcheng Lake Basin. Water, 18(12), 1391. https://doi.org/10.3390/w18121391

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop