Next Article in Journal
Life Cycle Assessment of Fused Filament Fabrication Using Recycled Plastic and Carbon Fiber Composites
Next Article in Special Issue
The Effect of PDMS Incorporation on the Physicochemical Properties of Acrylate-Based Resins for SLA-Based 3D Printing
Previous Article in Journal
Investigation on Ontology-Driven Semantic Simulation of PVC Composite Sustainable Manufacturing: Lifecycle Assessment Approach and Industrial Case Study with Reinforced Agro-Industrial Waste Fillers
Previous Article in Special Issue
Impact Absorption Behaviour of 3D-Printed Lattice Structures for Sportswear Applications
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

High-Silica Fiber Felt/Ti3SiC2 Reinforced Phenolic Aerogel Composites for High-Temperature Thermal and Mechanical Performance

School of Materials Science and Engineering, Wuhan University of Technology, Wuhan 430070, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Polymers 2026, 18(5), 659; https://doi.org/10.3390/polym18050659
Submission received: 14 February 2026 / Revised: 2 March 2026 / Accepted: 6 March 2026 / Published: 8 March 2026

Abstract

To address the critical limitation of insufficient high-temperature structural stability in traditional formaldehyde-resorcinol aerogels for thermal protection applications, this study designed and fabricated a high-silica fiber felt-reinforced phenolic aerogel composite capable of in situ ceramization. The thermal insulation performance, structural stability, mechanical properties, and oxidation resistance mechanism after heat treatment at 1000 °C for 600 s were systematically investigated. Results demonstrated tunable density (0.398–0.629 g·cm−3), low room-temperature thermal conductivity (0.0414 W·m−1·K−1), and a stabilized back temperature of 408.6 °C during butane torch flame testing. After high-temperature treatment, the composite series exhibited a minimum volume shrinkage of 13.9% and a maximum mass retention of 77.6%. Specifically, the compressive strength and specific strength of the HS/C-75 sample reached 4.39 and 1.96 times those of the HS/C-0 sample, respectively. Further analysis revealed that the synergistic effect between the skeletal support of high-silica fibers and the in situ-formed ceramic phase effectively suppressed thermal shrinkage and improved oxidation resistance, achieving an optimized balance between thermal insulation and mechanical integrity. This work provides a theoretical foundation and viable technical pathway for developing advanced thermal protection materials with enhanced stability and reliability.

1. Introduction

With the rapid advancement of high-speed aerospace technology, particularly in the hypersonic domain, the continuously increasing Mach numbers pose significant challenges to thermal protection systems (TPS) during service [1,2,3]. Hypersonic vehicles, defined as those operating at Mach numbers exceeding 5, represent one of the critical frontiers in 21st-century aerospace research and development [4,5]. As flight velocity increases, aerodynamic heating intensifies. For instance, when the flight speed rises from Mach 3 to Mach 6, the stagnation point temperature at the vehicle’s nose can increase by a factor of 4.49 [6], leading to a rapid surge in surface temperatures beyond 2000 °C within a short duration. Due to high heat flux density and dynamic pressure [7], critical TPS components such as nose cones, leading edges, scramjet combustion chambers, and nozzles are subjected to extreme aerodynamic heating. Under such severe thermal conditions, the thermal shock resistance, high-temperature mechanical properties, and oxidation resistance of existing TPS materials are increasingly inadequate to meet operational demands [8,9]. Therefore, further research and exploration are essential to develop thermal protection materials that combine excellent thermal shock resistance, oxidation resistance, and high-temperature mechanical performance.
Thermal protection materials are broadly categorized into ablative and non-ablative types. In non-ablative systems, thermal insulation materials serve as the primary barrier against heat flux, demanding ultralow thermal conductivity, minimal density, and exceptional thermal stability. Aerogels, particularly organic variants, exhibit compelling potential in this regard due to their nanoscale porous architecture and tunable composition [10,11,12,13,14,15]. However, conventional resorcinol-formaldehyde (RF) aerogels suffer from severe structural collapse, obvious shrinkage (>30%), and rapid oxidative degradation above 600 °C [16,17], critically limiting their applicability in sustained extreme-temperature environments. This instability necessitates structural reinforcement and high-temperature functionalization.
To address these limitations, two primary modification pathways have emerged. Fiber reinforcement (e.g., silica, carbon fibers) enhances mechanical properties while effectively suppressing macroscopic deformation [18,19], yet weak fiber-matrix interfaces often lead to debonding under thermal environments. Ceramic-phase integration—such as boron-modified resins [20] or catalytic pore-structure optimization [21,22]—improves thermal resistance but typically sacrifices flexibility or fails to establish a continuous protective network. Existing strategies typically optimize individual properties in isolation, overlooking the synergy between structural reinforcement and high-temperature functionalization. Without an in situ ceramic barrier, the organic matrix remains vulnerable to oxidation during prolonged heating—a critical bottleneck in aerogel thermal protection design.
MAX phases (Mn+1AXn, where M is an early transition metal, A is an A-group element, and X is C/N) are a family of layered hexagonal ceramics combining metallic and ceramic characteristics. Their nanolaminated structure (strong M–X bonds interleaved with relatively weak M–A bonds) endows them with high thermal stability, damage tolerance, and good thermal/electrical transport, making them attractive for high-temperature structural and functional applications [23,24]. At elevated temperatures in oxidizing environments, many MAX phases form adherent oxide scales (typically Al2O3, SiO2, or mixed oxides depending on the A element), which can act as diffusion barriers and improve oxidation resistance. These structure–property relationships motivate the incorporation of MAX phases as “reactive/ceramizable” fillers in polymer-derived ceramic systems to tailor microstructure evolution and high-temperature durability [25]. Building on MAX-phase and polymer-derived ceramic concepts, this study employs a composite strategy for phenolic aerogels: high-silica fiber felt provides structural support to suppress shrinkage, while Ti3SiC2 (a representative MAX-phase material) acts as the ceramic functional phase [26]. Upon pyrolysis above 800 °C, Ti3SiC2 decomposes to generate a continuous multi-phase ceramic layer (SiO2/TiO2-rich) that (i) consumes ambient oxygen via oxidation reactions, (ii) forms a dense barrier inhibiting further oxidative diffusion, and (iii) enables microcrack self-healing through viscous flow of silica phases. Critically, the in situ ceramizable system bonds with the high-silica fiber skeleton, synergistically enhancing mechanical properties, thermal insulation, and oxidation resistance. Accordingly, a series of high-silica fiber felt-reinforced, Ti3SiC2-containing phenolic aerogel composites (HS/FRF-x) were fabricated via sol–gel polymerization and ambient-pressure drying. This study systematically investigates (i) room-temperature thermal insulation performance; (ii) dimensional stability, mass retention, and mechanical properties after 1000 °C heat treatment; and (iii) the evolution of the ceramic phase and oxidation-resistant mechanism through multi-technique characterization (SEM, EDS, XRD, XPS, and Raman). This study provides a practical strategy for developing aerogel composites suited to extreme thermal environments, offering a reference for thermal protection material design in aerospace and high-temperature industrial applications.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Materials

Formaldehyde (37wt%, AR), resorcinol (≥99%, AR), and furfural (≥99%, AR) were purchased from Shanghai Aladdin Biochemical Technology Co., Ltd. (Shanghai, China). Deionized water was supplied by the laboratory. Trifluoroacetic acid (CF3COOH, ≥99%, AR) was purchased from Macklin Biochemical Co., Ltd. (Shanghai, China). and used as a catalyst. Ti3SiC2 filler (200 mesh, 98%) was provided by Forsman Technology (Beijing, China) Co., Ltd. (Beijing, China). High-silica fiber felt was purchased from Jiangsu Tianniao High-tech Co., Ltd. (Yixing, China). and was used as the reinforcement, with a density of approximately 0.12 g·cm−3 and a thickness of 15 mm. All chemicals were used as received without further purification.

2.2. Preparation of the Composite Materials

Formaldehyde, resorcinol, furfural, and deionized water were mixed in varying proportions through physical blending. Different amounts (calculated relative to a solid content of 1 for the precursor solution) of the ceramic-forming functional component Ti3SiC2 were added to the prepared precursor solution, followed by mixing at 30 °C using a magnetic stirrer for 30 min. The solution was then poured into a mold containing high-silica fiber felt using an impregnation method. After the suspension underwent gelation and aging at room temperature, the resulting hydrogel was dried in a forced-air drying oven (using a drying program of 50 °C for 24 h, 70 °C for 24 h, and 90 °C for 24 h) to obtain high-silica fiber felt-reinforced in situ ceramizable aerogel composites. The specific formulations are detailed in Table 1, and the preparation process is illustrated in Figure 1. The high-silica fiber felt-reinforced in situ ceramizable aerogel composites were subjected to high-temperature heat treatment in a muffle furnace at 1000 °C for 10 min. The corresponding samples after heat treatment are designated as HS/C-x, where x represents the addition amount of the ceramic-forming functional component Ti3SiC2.

2.3. Characterization

The density of samples of high-silica fiber felt reinforced in situ ceramizable aerogel composites (before and after heat treatment) is calculated using Formula (1).
ρ = m a   ×   b   ×   h
In the formula, a—length of sample (mm); b—width of composite (mm); h—height of composite (mm); and m—weight of composite (g).
The density of high-silica fiber felt reinforced in situ ceramizable phenolic aerogel composites, and the samples after high-temperature heat treatment were measured by the geometric method, and the volume shrinkage of carbonation was calculated according to Formula (2).
S V = ( V V ) V × 100 %
In the formula, SV—carbonization shrinkage rate (%); V—volume of composite material (mm3) before high-temperature treatment; and V′—volume of composite material after high-temperature treatment (mm3).
A comprehensive thermal analyzer (STA449F3, NETZSCH, Waldkraiburg, Germany) was used to test the thermal stability of aerogel composites. A butane torch was employed as the heat source. Samples of high-silica fiber felt-reinforced in situ ceramicizable phenolic aerogel composite, measuring 80 mm × 80 mm, were tested with the nozzle positioned 10 cm away. The test duration was set at 10 min. A THERMAL CAMERA (H21Pro+ HIKMICRO, Hangzhou, China) was placed 0.5 m from the rear surface of the sample to record the temperature distribution, measure the steady-state backside temperature, and evaluate the thermal insulation performance.
The morphology and microstructure of the samples were characterized by field emission scanning electron microscopy (SEM) coupled with an X-Max N80 energy spectrometer (ZEISS, Jena, Germany). The thermal conductivity was determined at 25 °C by the transient plate heat source method using the thermal constant analyzer TPS 2500 S (Hot Disk AB, Goteborg, Sweden). A comprehensive thermal analyzer (STA449F3) was used to test the thermal stability of aerogel composites. Characterization of the chemical bond energies within the samples was conducted using a laser confocal micro-Raman spectrometer (Lab RAM Odyssey, HORIBA, Palaiseau, France). The phase composition of the ceramic component in high-silica fiber felt-reinforced in situ ceramized aerogel composite samples before and after high-temperature heat treatment was determined by X-ray diffraction using a rotating anode X-ray diffractometer (D8 Advance, Bruker, Karlsruhe, Germany) over a 2θ scanning range of 5° to 80°. X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) analysis was performed on the ceramic component of the high-silica fiber felt-reinforced in situ ceramized aerogel composite after high-temperature heat treatment using an X-ray photoelectron spectrometer (AXIS Supra+, Kratos Analytical, Manchester, UK) to investigate the chemical changes occurring during the oxidation process. The compressive strength of the sample was tested by an electronic universal testing machine. The sample was a structured cuboid of 20 mm (a) × 20 mm (b) × 10 mm (h), and the test speed was 2.0 mm·min−1.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Density and Mechanical Properties

Table 2 presents the density of the high-silica fiber felt-reinforced in situ ceramizable phenolic aerogel composites. The density of the composites shows a positive correlation with the content of the ceramic functional component Ti3SiC2, although the overall density remains relatively low. The density of HS/FRF-0 is 0.398 g·cm−3, and with increasing Ti3SiC2 addition, the density reaches a maximum of 0.629 g·cm−3, corresponding to an increase of 30.9%. The rise in density is primarily attributed to the high intrinsic density of Ti3SiC2 (4.52 g·cm−3). Additionally, Ti3SiC2 can occupy micropores formed by the evaporation of water and small molecules during heating.
Figure 2 presents the stress–strain curves (a) and the compressive strength and specific compressive strength plots (b) of the high-silica fiber felt-reinforced in situ ceramizable phenolic aerogel composites. As shown in Figure 2a, the stress–strain curve of HS/FRF exhibits a serrated pattern with abrupt changes at high strain stages. In the low-strain region, the high-silica fiber felt primarily functions as the reinforcing skeleton to bear compressive loads. As strain increases, the fiber felt becomes compacted, and its mechanical contribution diminishes. Consequently, internal pores within the material gradually compress, transferring the load to the aerogel matrix and the ceramic-forming functional component. This leads to significant stress fluctuations at certain stages, resulting in the serrated appearance of the curve. The incorporation of solid ceramic-forming functional components provides structural support during high-strain stages, effectively bearing loads. As a result, the stress–strain curve progressively rises and becomes more regularized with increasing content of the ceramic-forming functional component.
According to Figure 2b, the compressive strength of HS/FRF increases positively with the rising content of the ceramic-forming functional component. The compressive strength of HS/FRF-0 is 1.330 MPa, while that of HS/FRF-75 reaches 2.747 MPa, marking an improvement of 106.3%. This significant enhancement is largely attributed to the reinforcing support and stress-bearing capacity provided by the rigid ceramic-forming functional components. However, the specific compressive strength peaks at HS/FRF-25, reaching 4.670 N·m/g, as the influence of density on specific strength becomes more pronounced when the content of the ceramic-forming functional component is higher. The peak specific strength of HS/FRF-25 stems from an optimized compositional balance between the ceramic phase and the high-silica fiber felt framework. At this formulation, the ceramic component delivers sufficient rigidity and reinforcement to enhance compressive strength, while the skeletal framework of the high-silica fiber felt remains fully effective in load distribution. Critically, the density increase induced by the ceramic content remains moderate, thereby avoiding the specific strength reduction typically associated with excessive densification. This synergy achieves an ideal trade-off between structural reinforcement and mass efficiency. Beyond this threshold, the accelerating density growth outweighs the marginal strength improvement, thereby reducing specific strength.

3.2. Thermal Stability and Insulation

Table 3 presents the thermal conductivity of the high-silica fiber felt-reinforced in situ ceramizable phenolic aerogel composites, while Figure 3 illustrates the thermal conduction mechanism within these composites. The thermal conductivity of HS/FRF-0 is as low as 0.0414 W·m−1·K−1. With an increase in the content of the ceramic-forming functional component, the thermal conductivity of the composites progressively rises to 0.0644 W·m−1·K−1, 0.0938 W·m−1·K−1, and 0.1017 W·m−1·K−1, representing increases of 55.8%, 126.7%, and 145.9%, respectively, compared to the sample without the ceramic-forming functional component.
As depicted in Figure 3, heat transfer in the high-silica fiber felt-reinforced in situ ceramizable phenolic aerogel composites primarily comprises three pathways: solid-phase conduction (through the aerogel skeleton, ceramic-forming functional component, and high-silica fiber felt, indicated by red dashed arrows), gas-phase conduction (via heat transfer between gas molecules, shown by blue arrows), and radiation (thermal radiation, represented by purple wavy arrows). Solid-phase conduction dominates the overall thermal conductivity. This solid-phase conduction is influenced by the structure of the aerogel skeleton (red circles), as well as the presence of the ceramic-forming functional component (yellow circles) and the high-silica fiber felt (white lines).
The increasing trend in thermal conductivity is primarily attributed to the high thermal conductivity of the ceramic-forming functional component Ti3SiC2 and the additional solid-phase conduction pathways it introduces. Nevertheless, the overall thermal conductivity of the composites remains relatively low. This can be attributed to two key factors: first, the uniform distribution of high-silica fiber felt within the aerogel provides structural support, reduces density concentration, and minimizes solid-phase conduction. Simultaneously, it helps prevent the collapse of the aerogel’s porous structure upon the addition of the ceramic-forming functional component, thereby enhancing the contribution of gas-phase conduction. Second, the microporous framework formed by the fibers creates minute air interlayers, which significantly impede heat transfer [27] and help maintain a low thermal conductivity.
The high-temperature thermal insulation performance of the high-silica fiber felt-reinforced in situ ceramizable phenolic aerogel composites was evaluated using a butane torch, with thermal imaging conducted via a THERMAL CAMERA (H21Pro+, HIKMICRO, Hangzhou, China).
Figure 4 presents the steady-state backside temperature images captured by the THERMAL CAMERA (H21Pro+, HIKMICRO, Hangzhou, China). For HS/FRF-0, the pyrolysis of the aerogel matrix on the tested surface resulted in structural damage. The residual pyrolytic carbon partially retained thermal insulation properties, yielding a steady-state backside temperature of 408.6 °C. Upon the incorporation of the ceramic-forming functional component Ti3SiC2, its relatively high thermal conductivity enhanced heat transfer efficiency, significantly influencing the time and temperature required to reach a steady-state backside temperature. On one hand, the oxidation of Ti3SiC2 under heating impedes inward oxygen diffusion, while the resulting oxidation products form a protective layer on the surface. This layer shields the internal matrix and pyrolytic carbon, thereby improving thermal insulation and reducing the steady-state backside temperature. On the other hand, the high thermal conductivity of Ti3SiC2 and its oxidation products increases the overall thermal conductivity, which tends to elevate the steady-state backside temperature. In HS/FRF-25 and HS/FRF-50, the effect of increased thermal conductivity due to Ti3SiC2 and its oxidation products dominated, leading to steady-state backside temperatures of 421.2 °C and 474.0 °C, respectively. In HS/FRF-75, the extensive protective layer formed by the oxidation products of Ti3SiC2 effectively mitigated inward oxygen diffusion and protected the internal matrix, resulting in a reduced steady-state backside temperature of 457.5 °C.

3.3. High-Temperature Resistance and Phase Analysis

The high-silica fiber felt-reinforced in situ ceramizable phenolic aerogel composites were subjected to high-temperature heat treatment at 1000 °C for 10 min. The microstructure and mechanical properties of the composites after heat treatment were investigated, along with an exploration of their oxidation resistance mechanism. Figure 5 shows physical images of the composites before and after heat treatment, with the top row displaying the original samples and the bottom row showing the samples after heat treatment.
In the original samples in Figure 5, the surfaces show no exposed fibers or visible ceramic particles, indicating that the in situ ceramizable phenolic aerogel uniformly coats the high-silica fiber felt. In the heat-treated samples in Figure 6, the composite without the ceramic-forming functional component exhibits noticeable fiber exposure on the surface. This suggests that the aerogel matrix undergoes pyrolysis and oxidation in the high-temperature oxidative environment, converting into gaseous products that escape.
In contrast, the surfaces of composites containing the ceramic-forming functional component show no significant fiber exposure. Instead, ceramic particles are observable on the surface. This occurs because the particles generated from the reaction of the ceramic-forming functional component encapsulate both the aerogel matrix and the fiber surfaces. This protective layer shields the aerogel matrix and fibers, limiting them to thermal pyrolysis that produces pyrolytic carbon. This process achieves carbon fixation and preserves the cross-linked structure that bonds the fibers together.
The properties of the samples after heat treatment are partially summarized in Table 4. Following high-temperature heat treatment, the high-silica fiber felt-reinforced in situ ceramizable phenolic aerogel composites exhibit volumetric shrinkage. HS/C-0 shows a volumetric shrinkage of 32.2%, whereas HS/C-75 demonstrates a significantly lower shrinkage of only 13.9%, representing a reduction of 56.8%. This difference is attributed to the degradation of the aerogel skeleton under high-temperature oxidative conditions, which diminishes its structural support. However, the presence of the high-silica fiber felt provides mechanical reinforcement to the overall composite structure, resulting in generally lower volumetric shrinkage after heat treatment.
The residual weight ratio of the composites is positively correlated with the content of the ceramic-forming functional component. HS/C-0 exhibits a residual weight ratio of 52.9%, while HS/C-75 achieves 77.6%, marking an increase of 46.6%. This substantial improvement can be attributed to two main factors: first, the reaction of the ceramic-forming functional component upon heating is mass-gaining, contributing directly to weight retention; second, the ceramic particles generated from the oxidation of the functional component adhere to the surfaces of the aerogel matrix and high-silica fibers, forming a protective layer that inhibits further internal oxidation.
After high-temperature heat treatment, the density of the samples remains positively correlated with the addition amount of the ceramic-forming functional component. This is because the increase in residual weight ratio is more pronounced. Although volumetric shrinkage is mitigated, its effect is less significant compared to the change in mass.
Figure 6 presents the stress–strain curves (a) and the compressive strength and specific compressive strength plots (b) of HS/C after high-temperature heat treatment. According to Figure 6a, when the content of the ceramic-forming functional component is zero or low, the stress–strain curves approximate a linear relationship. This behavior is attributed to the pyrolysis and oxidation of the aerogel matrix, which diminishes its load-bearing capacity. Under these conditions, the fiber felt can withstand a certain degree of deformation while maintaining its fundamental mechanical properties, resulting in a nearly linear stress–strain response.
In contrast, when the ceramic functional component content is high (as in HS/C-75), the ceramic particles formed from the reaction of the functional component also contribute to load-bearing. This leads to a significantly elevated and non-linear stress–strain curve for HS/C-75.
Overall, the mechanical properties of the composites after high-temperature heat treatment are substantially lower compared to those before heat treatment. For instance, the compressive strength and specific strength of HS/C-0 are 0.180 MPa and 0.579 N·m/g, respectively, representing only 13.6% and 17.3% of their pre-treatment values. However, as the content of the ceramic-forming functional component increases, both compressive strength and specific strength improve. HS/C-75 achieves values 4.39 times and 1.96 times higher than those of HS/C-0 in compressive strength and specific strength, respectively. This enhancement is due to the combined effects of the fiber felt, which supports the overall structure, and the ceramic oxidation products, which not only protect the internal matrix but also provide additional mechanical reinforcement, thereby improving compressive strength. In addition, we have systematically calculated and compiled the compressive strength data of both the original samples and those subjected to heat treatment at 1000 °C for 10 min. The results are presented in a supplementary table (Supporting Information, Table S1), which clearly quantitatively characterizes the evolution of structural stability of the materials under high-temperature conditions.
The microstructure after high-temperature heat treatment is shown in Figure 7. SEM images reveal severe matrix loss on the fiber surface of HS/C-0 after heat treatment, indicating that the pyrolytic carbon from the phenolic aerogel decomposition at high temperatures was almost completely oxidized and escaped as gaseous oxides, leading to a significant reduction in adhesion between fibers. In contrast, composites containing the ceramic-forming functional component exhibit markedly less fiber exposure. This is attributed to the chemical reactions of the ceramic particles attached to the fibers, which consume oxygen in situ. The in situ generated ceramic phases, such as TiO2 from the functional component, encapsulate the internal phenolic aerogel matrix, thereby isolating it from oxygen. This encapsulation limits the matrix to thermal pyrolysis, producing pyrolytic carbon without further oxidation. This mechanism achieves carbon fixation and preserves the cross-linked structure that bonds the fibers together.
Energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS) was employed to analyze the distribution of ceramic elements. The specific elemental compositions are presented in Figure 8. Based on the elemental distribution, the exposed fiber regions in HS/C-25 are primarily composed of carbon. This is attributed to the pyrolysis of the aerogel matrix at high temperatures, which generates pyrolytic carbon adhering to the fiber surface. However, this carbon layer provides limited protection and support to the fibers and the internal aerogel matrix.
In HS/C-25, distinct distributions of silicon (Si) and titanium (Ti) elements are observed coating the high-silica fibers, which can be attributed to the oxidation of the ceramic-forming functional component Ti3SiC2 under high-temperature oxidative conditions. As described in Equations (3)–(8), Ti3SiC2 undergoes a series of oxidation and redox reactions in oxygen- or water vapor-containing atmospheres, producing oxide phases such as SiO2, TiO2, Ti2O3, and TiO, accompanied by the release of CO2 and H2. These reaction products preferentially form and deposit in situ on the fiber and matrix surfaces, leading to the development of a continuous ceramic phase structure. The resulting ceramic-phase products not only isolate the internal matrix from oxygen but also act as binders for the pyrolytic carbon. Moreover, as the content of the ceramic-forming functional component increases, its protective effect on both the fibers and the matrix becomes more pronounced.
Ti3SiC2 (s) + 4.5O2(g) = 3TiO (s) + SiO2 (s) + 2CO2(g)
Ti3SiC2 (s) + 6O2(g) = 3TiO2 (s) + SiO2 (s) + 2CO2(g)
Ti3SiC2 (s) + 5.25O2(g) = 1.5Ti2O3 + SiO2 + 2CO2(g)
Ti3SiC2 (s) + 9H2O(g) = 3TiO (s) + SiO2 (s) + 2CO2(g) + 9H2(g)
Ti3SiC2 (s) + 12H2O(g) = 3TiO2 (s) + SiO2 (s) + 2CO2(g) + 12H2(g)
Ti3SiC2 (s) + 10.5H2O(g) = 1.5Ti2O3 (s) + SiO2 (s) + 2CO2(g) + 10.5H2(g)
To investigate the oxidation resistance mechanism of the composites, X-ray diffraction (XRD) analysis was conducted on the composites before and after high-temperature heat treatment, in conjunction with EDS spectra. Figure 9a presents the XRD patterns of HS/FRF-50 and HS/C-50. Based on the XRD results, the primary crystalline phase in HS/FRF-50 before heat treatment is Ti3SiC2, with only peaks corresponding to Ti3SiC2 detected in the sample.
After heat treatment, the Ti3SiC2 peaks in HS/C-50 are significantly weakened, indicating consumption of the ceramic-forming functional component under oxidative conditions and a consequent reduction in its content. The appearance of diffraction peaks corresponding to TiO2 and TiC suggests that reactions primarily forming these phases occurred at high temperatures. Possible reactions leading to TiC formation include Equations (9)–(11).
2TiO + 3C = 2TiC + CO2(g)
Ti2O3 + 3.5C = 2TiC + 1.5CO2(g)
TiO2 + 2C = TiC + CO2(g)
Raman spectroscopy was employed to analyze the pyrolytic carbon in HS/C-50, with the corresponding spectrum presented in Figure 9b. The results indicate that the pyrolytic carbon generated from the reaction is of low purity, suggesting incomplete conversion of the phenolic matrix into pyrolytic carbon during thermal pyrolysis. Peak fitting of the Raman spectrum reveals the presence of a D band (associated with disordered graphitic structures, centered at 1359.20 cm−1) and a G band (corresponding to graphitic carbon, centered at 1603.75 cm−1). The intensity ratio of the D band to the G band (ID/IG) is commonly used to assess the degree of graphitization. A low ID/IG ratio indicates fewer defects and a higher proportion of ordered sp2 structures, whereas a high ratio suggests a greater concentration of defects, structural disorder, or a higher content of amorphous carbon. For the HS/C-50 sample, the ID/IG ratio is approximately 1.03, indicating that the porous pyrolytic carbon is predominantly amorphous and has not undergone a high degree of graphitization.
X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) analysis was performed on the heat-treated composite HS/C-50, with the results shown in Figure 10. In addition, a weak F1s signal was observed in the survey spectrum. This peak is attributed to trace fluorine-containing residues originating from the CF3COOH (trifluoroacetic acid) catalyst used during precursor preparation. Despite the 1000 °C/10 min heat treatment, XPS is highly surface-sensitive; therefore, trace-level surface species may still be detectable. Through peak deconvolution and fitting of the C1s spectrum, the carbon chemical states were identified as adsorbed carbon (284.80 eV), C–C (284.00 eV), C–O (286.19 eV), C=O (287.78 eV), and π–π* transition (290.00 eV). For the Ti 2p spectrum, peak fitting revealed a high proportion of Ti(IV) states (458.99 eV and 464.68 eV), indicating the presence of TiO2. Additionally, a small amount of Ti(III) (457.71 eV and 462.71 eV) was detected. The fitting analysis reveals that the relative content ratio of Ti(III) to Ti(IV) is 0.185 (i.e., Ti(III) accounts for approximately 15.6% of the total Ti content, while Ti(IV) accounts for approximately 84.4%). This quantitative result further confirms that under the heat treatment condition of 1000 °C, Ti3SiC2 has undergone significant oxidation, with the majority of titanium existing as Ti(IV) in the form of TiO2 and TiC, and only a small amount of Ti(III) remaining (which may correspond to incompletely oxidized Ti3SiC2 or intermediate oxidation states). Peak fitting of the Si2p spectrum confirmed the presence of a significant amount of SiO2. However, this phase was not observed in the XRD pattern, indicating that the SiO2 did not form a crystalline phase.

4. Conclusions

This work developed a high-silica fiber felt-reinforced, in situ ceramizable phenolic aerogel composite using high-silica fiber felt as the reinforcing phase and Ti3SiC2 as the ceramic functional phase. The thermal insulation properties, mechanical behavior, and thermal stability of the composites were systematically evaluated at room temperature and after muffle furnace treatment at 1000 °C, with concurrent elucidation of the synergistic interaction between the high-silica fiber felt-reinforced phase and the Ti3SiC2 ceramic functional phase. The key findings are summarized as follows: Comprehensive evaluation under room temperature conditions and after heat treatment revealed tunable density (0.398–0.629 g·cm−3), ultralow thermal conductivity (0.0414 W·m−1·K−1), and stable back temperature of 408.6 °C during butane torch exposure. After high-temperature treatment, incorporating Ti3SiC2 in the composites markedly suppressed volume shrinkage (32.2% for HS/C-0, 13.9% for HS/C-75), with the compressive strength and specific strength of HS/C-75 reaching 4.39 and 1.96 times those of HS/C-0, respectively. Multi-technique characterization (SEM, EDS, XRD, XPS, Raman) confirmed that the in situ formed multi-phase ceramic network establishes a dense protective barrier, substantially enhancing oxidation and ablation resistance. The aerogel composites provide high-performance support for extreme thermal environment protection through its synergistic advantages in multiple properties.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/polym18050659/s1, Table S1: Compressive strength retention at 10% strain (x = 0, 25, 50, 75); Table S2: Toughness of HS/FRF-x and HS/C-x at 10% strain (x = 0, 25, 50, 75); Table S3: HS/FRF-x compressive strength and thermal conductivity percentage increase relative to HS/FRF-0 (x = 0, 25, 50, 75) and specific compressive strength of HS/FRF-x at 10% strain; Table S4: Specific strength/thermal conductivity ratio of HS/FRF-x (x = 0, 25, 50, 75) at 10% strain.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, M.S. and Z.H.; formal analysis, G.W. and W.C.; investigation, G.W., W.C., D.Z. and K.W.; resources, M.S. and Z.H.; writing—original draft preparation, G.W., W.C. and D.Z.; writing—review and editing, G.W., W.C., K.W., M.S. and Z.H.; supervision, M.S. and Z.H.; project administration, M.S. and Z.H.; funding acquisition, M.S. and Z.H. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the Wuhan Science and Technology Project, grant number 2024010702030141.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in this study are included in the article/Supplementary Material. Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding authors.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Sziroczak, D.; Smith, H. A review of design issues specific to hypersonic flight vehicles. Prog. Aerosp. Sci. 2016, 84, 1–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Savino, R.; de Stefano Fumo, M.; Paterna, D.; Serpico, M. Aerothermodynamic study of UHTC-based thermal protection systems. Aerosp. Sci. Technol. 2005, 9, 151–160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Gao, Z.H.; Xu, J.J.; Zhang, Z.W.; Qian, Y.H.; Li, M.S. Effects of ZrB2 and SiC dual addition on the oxidation resistance of graphite at 1600–2000 °C. Corros. Sci. 2013, 76, 182–191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Lv, Z.; Xu, J.; Song, G.; Li, R.; Ge, J. Review on the aerodynamic issues of the exhaust system for scramjet and turbine based combined cycle engine. Prog. Aerosp. Sci. 2023, 143, 100956. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Li, X.; Li, Z.; Yang, J.; An, Y. Research on the concept and key issues of near space equipment system. J. Equip. Command Technol. Coll. 2007, 4, 72–77. [Google Scholar]
  6. Zou, J.; Li, W.; Liu, B.; Zhan, W.; Zhao, Y. Development trends of thermal protection materials for aircraft. Aerosp. Mater. Technol. 2015, 45, 10–15. [Google Scholar]
  7. Squire, T.H.; Marschall, J. Material property requirements for analysis and design of UHTC components in hypersonic applications. J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 2010, 30, 2239–2251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Arai, Y.; Inoue, R.; Goto, K.; Kogo, Y. Carbon fiber reinforced ultra-high temperature ceramic matrix composites: A review. Ceram. Int. 2019, 45, 14481–14489. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Badea, T.A.; Crisan, A.-A.; Maier, L.R. Advanced thermal protection systems enabled by additive manufacturing of hybrid thermoplastic composites. Polymers 2025, 17, 2974. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Wang, L.; Wang, Y. Research progress and trend analysis of thermal protection technology for hypersonic aircraft. Aerosp. Mater. Technol. 2016, 46, 1–6. [Google Scholar]
  11. Kelly, H.N.; Blosser, M.L. Active cooling from the sixties to NASP. In Proceedings of the NASA Conference Publication, F, Cleveland, OH, USA, 17–19 November 1992; NASA: Washington, DC, USA, 1992. Available online: https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/19940033030 (accessed on 5 January 2026).
  12. Du, C. Research progress on comprehensive thermal management and key technologies of hypersonic aircraft. Equip. Environ. Eng. 2023, 20, 43–51. [Google Scholar]
  13. Suzuki, T.; Aoki, T.; Ogasawara, T.; Fujita, K. Nonablative lightweight thermal protection system for Mars Aeroflyby Sample collection mission. Acta Astronaut. 2017, 136, 407–420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Wang, X.; Jia, X.; Shi, B.; Guo, D.; Zhou, N.; Xu, B. Lightweight and thermally insulating carbon-bonded carbon fiber/graphite composite with enhanced in-plane heat-leading functionality for efficient thermal protection materials. Compos. Commun. 2024, 51, 102052. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Xie, W.; Han, G.; Meng, S.; Yang, Q.; Jin, H. Development status and trends of thermal protection structures for return capsule/space probes. Acta Aeronaut. Sin. 2019, 40, 6–22. [Google Scholar]
  16. Wang, C.; Bai, L.; Xu, H.; Qin, S.; Li, Y.; Zhang, G. A review of high-temperature aerogels: Composition, mechanisms, and properties. Gels 2024, 10, 286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. René, T.; Marina, S.; Lorenz, R. Reduction of shrinkage and brittleness for resorcinol-formaldehyde aerogels by means of a pH-controlled sol–gel process. J. Supercrit. Fluids 2015, 106, 57–61. [Google Scholar]
  18. Zhong, Y.; Shao, G.; Wu, X.; Kong, Y.; Wang, X.; Cui, S.; Shen, X. Robust monolithic polymer(resorcinol-formaldehyde) reinforced alumina aerogel composites with mutually interpenetrating networks. RSC Adv. 2019, 9, 22942–22949. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Wang, A.; Li, R.; Liu, X. Analysis of the tensile properties and probabilistic characteristics of large-tow carbon fiber-reinforced polymer composites. Polymers 2024, 16, 2197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Gao, W.; Wang, Z.; Zhang, Y.; Shen, C.; Wang, Y.; Zhan, L. High-energy B-O bonds enable the phenolic aerogel with enhanced thermal stability and low thermal conductivity. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2024, 669, 160459. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Zhan, Y.; Zhang, C.; Li, L.; Huang, M.; Chen, S.; Jiang, Y.; Feng, J.; Hu, Y.; Feng, J. A novel phenolic resin aerogel modified by SiO2-ZrO2 for efficient thermal protection and insulation. Gels 2025, 11, 1018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Yuan, C.; Wang, D.; Zhang, Y.; Li, K.; Ding, J. Research progress on preparation, modification, and application of phenolic aerogel. Nanotechnol. Rev. 2023, 12, 20230109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Ma, G.; Zhang, A.; Wang, Z.; Wang, K.; Zhang, J.; Xu, K.; Xu, Y.; Zhou, S.; Wang, A. MAX phase coatings: Synthesis, protective performance, and functional characteristics. Mater. Horiz. 2025, 12, 1689–1710. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Martin, D.; Michel, W.B.; Johanna, R. MAX phases—Past, present, and future. Mater. Today 2024, 72, 1–24. [Google Scholar]
  25. Ali, R.; Song, P.; Khan, M.; Ali, S.; Kamli, M.R.; Sabir, J.S.; Huang, T.; Deifalla, A.; Lu, J. Tribological and oxidation resistance performance of Ti2AlC MAX-phase generated by reactive spark plasma sintering. J. Mater. Res. Technol. 2023, 26, 8309–8326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Su, K.; Tian, X.; Li, Z.; Liu, X. Oxidation behavior of Ti3SiC2 powder synthesized by using biochar, Si and Ti. Ceram. Int. 2023, 49, 4863–4871. [Google Scholar]
  27. Yang, T.; Wang, Z.; Wang, H.; Yu, P.; Wang, Y. Numerical study of flow and heat transfer in a three-dimensional metal foam considering different direction micropores in skeleton structure. Int. Commun. Heat Mass Transf. 2022, 134, 106052. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Flowchart of preparation of in situ ceramizable phenolic aerogel composites reinforced by high-silica fiber felt.
Figure 1. Flowchart of preparation of in situ ceramizable phenolic aerogel composites reinforced by high-silica fiber felt.
Polymers 18 00659 g001
Figure 2. Stress–strain curves (a) and compressive strength and specific compressive strength plots (b) of HS/FRF-x (x = 0, 25, 50, 75).
Figure 2. Stress–strain curves (a) and compressive strength and specific compressive strength plots (b) of HS/FRF-x (x = 0, 25, 50, 75).
Polymers 18 00659 g002
Figure 3. Thermal conductivity mechanism of high-silica fiber felt reinforced in situ ceramizable phenolic aerogel composites.
Figure 3. Thermal conductivity mechanism of high-silica fiber felt reinforced in situ ceramizable phenolic aerogel composites.
Polymers 18 00659 g003
Figure 4. Steady state back temperature distribution of HS/FRF-x (x = 0, 25, 50, 75).
Figure 4. Steady state back temperature distribution of HS/FRF-x (x = 0, 25, 50, 75).
Polymers 18 00659 g004
Figure 5. Images before (a) and after (b) heat treatment of HS/FRF-x (x = 0, 25, 50, 75).
Figure 5. Images before (a) and after (b) heat treatment of HS/FRF-x (x = 0, 25, 50, 75).
Polymers 18 00659 g005
Figure 6. Stress–strain curves (a) and compressive strength and specific compressive strength plots (b) of HS/C-x (x = 0, 25, 50, 75).
Figure 6. Stress–strain curves (a) and compressive strength and specific compressive strength plots (b) of HS/C-x (x = 0, 25, 50, 75).
Polymers 18 00659 g006
Figure 7. Microstructure after heat treatment: (a) HS/C-0, (b) HS/C-25, (c) HS/C-50, (d) HS/C-75.
Figure 7. Microstructure after heat treatment: (a) HS/C-0, (b) HS/C-25, (c) HS/C-50, (d) HS/C-75.
Polymers 18 00659 g007
Figure 8. SEM-EDS spectra and element contents of composites after heat treatment: panels (a1a3,b1b3,c1c3) are EDS spectra of HS/C-25, HS/C-50 and HS/C-75, respectively, and panels (a4c4) are element contents of corresponding spectra.
Figure 8. SEM-EDS spectra and element contents of composites after heat treatment: panels (a1a3,b1b3,c1c3) are EDS spectra of HS/C-25, HS/C-50 and HS/C-75, respectively, and panels (a4c4) are element contents of corresponding spectra.
Polymers 18 00659 g008
Figure 9. (a) X-ray diffraction pattern of HS/C-50 and HS/FRF-50; (b) Raman spectrum of HS/C-50.
Figure 9. (a) X-ray diffraction pattern of HS/C-50 and HS/FRF-50; (b) Raman spectrum of HS/C-50.
Polymers 18 00659 g009
Figure 10. Full spectrum (a), C1s fine spectrum (b), Ti2p fine spectrum (c) and Si2p fine spectrum (d) of HS/C-50.
Figure 10. Full spectrum (a), C1s fine spectrum (b), Ti2p fine spectrum (c) and Si2p fine spectrum (d) of HS/C-50.
Polymers 18 00659 g010
Table 1. Formulation of in situ ceramizable phenolic aerogel composites reinforced by high-silica fiber felt.
Table 1. Formulation of in situ ceramizable phenolic aerogel composites reinforced by high-silica fiber felt.
SamplesWeight
Precursor Solution (%)High-Silica Oxygen Fiber Felt (%)Ti3SiC2 (wt%)
HS/FRF-0100300
HS/FRF-251003025
HS/FRF-501003050
HS/FRF-751003075
Table 2. The density of high-silica fiber felt reinforced in situ ceramizable phenolic aerogel composites.
Table 2. The density of high-silica fiber felt reinforced in situ ceramizable phenolic aerogel composites.
SamplesHS/FRF-0HS/FRF-25HS/FRF-50HS/FRF-75
Density (g·cm−3)0.3980.4840.5380.629
Table 3. Thermal conductivity of high-silica fiber felt reinforced in situ ceramizable phenolic aerogel composites.
Table 3. Thermal conductivity of high-silica fiber felt reinforced in situ ceramizable phenolic aerogel composites.
SamplesHS/FRF-0HS/FRF-25HS/FRF-50HS/FRF-75
Thermal conductivity (W·m−1·K−1)0.04140.06440.09380.1017
Table 4. Partial properties of the sample after heat treatment.
Table 4. Partial properties of the sample after heat treatment.
SamplesVolume Shrinkage Rate (%)Residual Weight Rate (%)Density (g/cm3)
HS/C-032.252.90.312
HS/C-2525.862.20.407
HS/C-5019.969.40.467
HS/C-7513.977.60.567
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Wan, G.; Cao, W.; Zhao, D.; Wan, K.; Shi, M.; Huang, Z. High-Silica Fiber Felt/Ti3SiC2 Reinforced Phenolic Aerogel Composites for High-Temperature Thermal and Mechanical Performance. Polymers 2026, 18, 659. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym18050659

AMA Style

Wan G, Cao W, Zhao D, Wan K, Shi M, Huang Z. High-Silica Fiber Felt/Ti3SiC2 Reinforced Phenolic Aerogel Composites for High-Temperature Thermal and Mechanical Performance. Polymers. 2026; 18(5):659. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym18050659

Chicago/Turabian Style

Wan, Guangbing, Wenjing Cao, Dongmei Zhao, Kaizhen Wan, Minxian Shi, and Zhixiong Huang. 2026. "High-Silica Fiber Felt/Ti3SiC2 Reinforced Phenolic Aerogel Composites for High-Temperature Thermal and Mechanical Performance" Polymers 18, no. 5: 659. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym18050659

APA Style

Wan, G., Cao, W., Zhao, D., Wan, K., Shi, M., & Huang, Z. (2026). High-Silica Fiber Felt/Ti3SiC2 Reinforced Phenolic Aerogel Composites for High-Temperature Thermal and Mechanical Performance. Polymers, 18(5), 659. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym18050659

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop