Skip to Content
MDPIMDPI

Advanced

CancersCancers
PDF
  • Comment
  • Open Access

9 March 2026

5 Pages

Global Re-Analysis Confirms Absence of the DNAJB1::PRKACA Fusion in Hepatoblastoma. Comment on Fleifil et al. DNAJB1-PKAc Kinase Is Expressed in Young Patients with Pediatric Liver Cancers and Enhances Carcinogenic Pathways. Cancers 2025, 17, 83

,
,
,
,
,
,
and
1
Department of Oncology, Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21231, USA
2
Laboratory of Cellular Biophysics, The Rockefeller University, New York, NY 10065, USA
3
Department of Pediatric Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA
4
Department of Pathology, Boston Children’s Hospital, Boston, MA 02115, USA
Cancers2026, 18(5), 877;https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers18050877
This article belongs to the Section Molecular Cancer Biology
Version Notes
Order Reprints

Simple Summary

The DNAJB1::PRKACA gene fusion is a well-established marker of fibrolamellar carcinoma, a rare liver cancer. A recent study reported that this fusion is also present in most hepatoblastomas, the most common liver cancer in children, which would have important diagnostic implications. To reassess this claim, we analyzed 148 hepatoblastoma samples using multiple independent and rigorous methods. We found no evidence of the fusion in any case, while it remained consistently detectable in fibrolamellar carcinoma. These results confirm that DNAJB1::PRKACA is specific to fibrolamellar carcinoma.

Abstract

Fleifil et al. recently reported the DNAJB1::PRKACA fusion in 70% of hepatoblastomas (HB), suggesting its diagnostic relevance beyond fibrolamellar carcinoma (FLC). Here, an international consortium re-examined this claim using 225 independent assays across 148 HB samples from five institutions. We found no evidence of the DNAJB1::PRKACA fusion in any HB case, in contrast to 286/290 FLC samples. These findings demonstrate that the fusion remains specific to FLC and underscore the need for rigorous validation before clinical interpretation of molecular findings in pediatric liver tumors.
Fibrolamellar carcinoma (FLC) is a rare liver cancer affecting adolescents and young adults. Diagnosis initially relied upon specific histological features, including the presence of oncocytic tumor cells and intratumoral fibrosis arranged in a lamellar fashion [1]. Our understanding of FLC biology was accelerated by the identification of a recurrent transcript fusion, DNAJB1::PRKACA, resulting from a ~400 kb deletion on chromosome 19. The hallmark study identifying this fusion demonstrated its presence in 100% of tumors in a cohort of 14 FLC patients [2]. Follow-up analyses have indicated that this fusion was pathognomonic of FLC among all other liver tumors, including a large number of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), cholangiocarcinoma, hepatocellular adenoma, and hepatoblastoma [3,4]. In other organs, the DNAJB1::PRKACA fusion was only identified in 26% of intraductal oncocytic papillary neoplasms of the pancreas and bile duct, a rare entity [5]. Conversely, tumors diagnosed as FLC in patients older than 40 years old, which often show mixed HCC/FLC histological features, were found to lack the fusion [6]. It was later shown that these tumors are instead more consistent with BAP1-HCC, a group of tumors driven by biallelic loss of the BAP1 tumor suppressor, representing ~5% of adult HCC cases [7]. BAP1-HCC activates protein kinase A through the combined loss of its regulatory subunit PRKAR2A and gains/amplifications of its catalytic subunit PRKACA, as opposed to deletion leading to the DNAJB1::PRKACA fusion in younger onset FLC [7]. Rare reports of FLC in patients with Carney complex, in the absence of the DNAJB1::PRKACA fusion but with the loss of another regulatory subunit, PRKAR1A, further highlight the driving role of PKA activation in at least some tumors with fibrolamellar features [8].
We read with great interest the article by Fleifil et al. (Cancers 2024, 17, 83) [9], which reports the presence of the DNAJB1::PRKACA fusion in 70% of hepatoblastomas (HB) and even in adjacent non-tumor tissue. This claim is based on three methods: (i) the presence of an extra band on Western blot with an antibody targeting native PKA, compatible with the DNAJB1-PKAc fusion protein; (ii) qRT-PCR to detect the fusion transcript; and (iii) a positive signal with an in-house fusion-specific antibody. While this result is intriguing, it contradicts all previous reports. Furthermore, despite having RNA sequencing (RNAseq) data from some fusion-positive HB samples, the authors did not use RNAseq-based fusion detection tools to validate the presence of the fusion in HB patients, even though this is the current gold standard for transcript fusion detection.
The lack of validation in an external cohort in Feifil et al. prompted us to assemble an international working group of five institutions in the USA and France, all experts in genomics of pediatric liver tumors. We routinely analyze FLC and HB samples for research and/or clinical purposes. We independently reviewed data generated in our different institutions, utilizing multiple technical and analytical experiments for fusion detection at the DNA and RNA levels (whole-genome sequencing, bulk RNAseq, RT-PCR with specific probes, Sanger sequencing), most of which have been previously published [2,7,8,10,11,12,13,14,15,16]. Institutional and ethical review board approvals were obtained at each institution for this work. In a de-identified fashion, we collaboratively shared our results within this global team of investigators.
In a total of 148 different HB samples analyzed in 225 independent experiments, we confirm the complete absence of the DNAJB1::PRKACA (0/148), giving an upper limit of 2.5% for the prevalence of the fusion in HB. We can thus reject the claim by Fleifil et al. of a 70% prevalence of the fusion in HB (binomial test, p < 2.2 × 10−16). Table 1 shows the breakdown of our analyses by group and by method, highlighting the concordance of our results. For seven HB cases, the absence of the DNAJB1::PRKACA fusion was confirmed across three spatially distinct tumor regions. We further emphasize the use of the same analytical pipeline to detect the DNAJB1::PRKACA fusion in 286/290 FLC samples and to confirm its absence in HB samples, highlighting the sensitivity of these methods. We may add that FLC samples have typically lower tumor purity than HB samples due to the abundant stromal cells composing the fibrolamellar features [15], as well as normal and immune cells, excluding a possible lack of sensitivity in HB.
Table 1. Multi-institutional, multi-method detection of the DNAJB1::PRKACA fusion in HB and FLC samples. Each row corresponds to one detection method applied by a single research group. The same method was used to assess both HB and FLC samples. For the overall analysis, we summed non-overlapping HB and FLC samples.
In summary, our comprehensive analyses across five expert centers conclusively reject the hypothesis of a prevalent DNAJB1::PRKACA fusion in HB. This conclusion is supported by 225 independent assays showing a complete absence of the fusion in 148 HB samples, despite consistent detection in 199/203 FLC cases. We reaffirm that DNAJB1::PRKACA remains specific to fibrolamellar carcinoma among liver tumors and caution against its use as a diagnostic marker for hepatoblastoma without rigorous validation in external cohorts. We chose to comment on this issue to avoid confusion about the diagnostic significance of the DNAJB1::PRKACA fusion in pediatric liver tumors.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, S.M.S., A.F.O., D.H.L.-T., M.Y., J.Z.-R. and T.Z.H.; methodology, W.A., S.M.S., A.F.O., J.P., D.H.L.-T., M.Y., J.Z.-R. and T.Z.H.; formal analysis, T.Z.H.; investigation, W.A., S.M.S., A.F.O., J.P., D.H.L.-T., M.Y., J.Z.-R. and T.Z.H.; resources, W.A., S.M.S., A.F.O., J.P., D.H.L.-T., M.Y., J.Z.-R. and T.Z.H.; data curation, W.A., S.M.S., A.F.O., J.P., D.H.L.-T., M.Y., J.Z.-R. and T.Z.H.; writing—original draft preparation, T.Z.H.; writing—review and editing, A.F.O., D.H.L.-T., J.Z.-R. and T.Z.H.; supervision, J.Z.-R. and T.Z.H. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the THRIVE EU Horizon funding Mission Cancer (EU-HORIZON-MISS-2023-CANCER-01), the SIRIC CARPEM, the Ligue Nationale contre le Cancer (Equipe Labellisée), CisMutHep InCa High-Risk High-Gain (Institut National du Cancer), and NIH/NCI P50CA210964.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this Comment originate from previous publications as detailed in Table 1.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Abbreviations

The following abbreviations are used in this manuscript:
FLCFibrolamellar carcinoma
HBHepatoblastoma
HCCHepatocellular carcinoma
PKAProtein kinase A
RT-PCRReverse transcription polymerase chain reaction

References

  1. Craig, J.R.; Peters, R.L.; Edmondson, H.A.; Omata, M. Fibrolamellar Carcinoma of the Liver: A Tumor of Adolescents and Young Adults with Distinctive Clinico-Pathologic Features. Cancer 1980, 46, 372–379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  2. Honeyman, J.N.; Simon, E.P.; Robine, N.; Chiaroni-Clarke, R.; Darcy, D.G.; Lim, I.I.P.; Gleason, C.E.; Murphy, J.M.; Rosenberg, B.R.; Teegan, L.; et al. Detection of a Recurrent DNAJB1-PRKACA Chimeric Transcript in Fibrolamellar Hepatocellular Carcinoma. Science 2014, 343, 1010–1014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  3. Graham, R.P.; Jin, L.; Knutson, D.L.; Kloft-Nelson, S.M.; Greipp, P.T.; Waldburger, N.; Roessler, S.; Longerich, T.; Roberts, L.R.; Oliveira, A.M.; et al. DNAJB1-PRKACA Is Specific for Fibrolamellar Carcinoma. Mod. Pathol. 2015, 28, 822–829. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  4. Griffith, O.L.; Griffith, M.; Krysiak, K.; Magrini, V.; Ramu, A.; Skidmore, Z.L.; Kunisaki, J.; Austin, R.; McGrath, S.; Zhang, J.; et al. A Genomic Case Study of Mixed Fibrolamellar Hepatocellular Carcinoma. Ann. Oncol. 2016, 27, 1148–1154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  5. Singhi, A.D.; Wood, L.D.; Parks, E.; Torbenson, M.S.; Felsenstein, M.; Hruban, R.H.; Nikiforova, M.N.; Wald, A.I.; Kaya, C.; Nikiforov, Y.E.; et al. Recurrent Rearrangements in PRKACA and PRKACB in Intraductal Oncocytic Papillary Neoplasms of the Pancreas and Bile Duct. Gastroenterology 2019, 158, 573–582. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  6. Malouf, G.G.; Tahara, T.; Paradis, V.; Fabre, M.; Guettier, C.; Yamazaki, J.; Long, H.; Lu, Y.; Raynal, N.J.M.; Jelinek, J.; et al. Methylome Sequencing for Fibrolamellar Hepatocellular Carcinoma Depicts Distinctive Features. Epigenetics 2015, 10, 872–881. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  7. Hirsch, T.Z.; Negulescu, A.; Gupta, B.; Caruso, S.; Noblet, B.; Couchy, G.; Bayard, Q.; Meunier, L.; Morcrette, G.; Scoazec, J.-Y.; et al. BAP1 Mutations Define a Homogeneous Subgroup of Hepatocellular Carcinoma with Fibrolamellar-like Features and Activated PKA. J. Hepatol. 2020, 72, 924–936. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  8. Graham, R.P.; Lackner, C.; Terracciano, L.; González-Cantú, Y.; Maleszewski, J.J.; Greipp, P.T.; Simon, S.M.; Torbenson, M.S. Fibrolamellar Carcinoma in the Carney Complex: PRKAR1A Loss Instead of the Classic DNAJB1-PRKACA Fusion. Hepatology 2018, 68, 1441–1447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  9. Fleifil, Y.; Gulati, R.; Jennings, K.; Miethke, A.; Bondoc, A.; Tiao, G.; Geller, J.I.; Karns, R.; Timchenko, L.; Timchenko, N. DNAJB1-PKAc Kinase Is Expressed in Young Patients with Pediatric Liver Cancers and Enhances Carcinogenic Pathways. Cancers 2025, 17, 83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  10. Simon, E.P.; Freije, C.A.; Farber, B.A.; Lalazar, G.; Darcy, D.G.; Honeyman, J.N.; Chiaroni-Clarke, R.; Dill, B.D.; Molina, H.; Bhanot, U.K.; et al. Transcriptomic Characterization of Fibrolamellar Hepatocellular Carcinoma. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2015, 112, E5916–E5925. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  11. Parsons, D.W.; Roy, A.; Yang, Y.; Wang, T.; Scollon, S.; Bergstrom, K.; Kerstein, R.A.; Gutierrez, S.; Petersen, A.K.; Bavle, A.; et al. Diagnostic Yield of Clinical Tumor and Germline Whole-Exome Sequencing for Children with Solid Tumors. JAMA Oncol. 2016, 2, 616. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  12. Haines, K.; Sarabia, S.F.; Alvarez, K.R.; Tomlinson, G.; Vasudevan, S.A.; Heczey, A.A.; Roy, A.; Finegold, M.J.; Parsons, D.W.; Plon, S.E.; et al. Characterization of Pediatric Hepatocellular Carcinoma Reveals Genomic Heterogeneity and Diverse Signaling Pathway Activation. Pediatr. Blood Cancer 2019, 66, e27745. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  13. Hirsch, T.Z.; Pilet, J.; Morcrette, G.; Roehrig, A.; Monteiro, B.J.E.; Molina, L.; Bayard, Q.; Trépo, E.; Meunier, L.; Caruso, S.; et al. Integrated Genomic Analysis Identifies Driver Genes and Cisplatin-Resistant Progenitor Phenotype in Pediatric Liver Cancer. Cancer Discov. 2021, 11, 2524–2543. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  14. Requena, D.; Medico, J.A.; Soto-Ugaldi, L.F.; Shirani, M.; Saltsman, J.A.; Torbenson, M.S.; Coffino, P.; Simon, S.M. Liver Cancer Multiomics Reveals Diverse Protein Kinase A Disruptions Convergently Produce Fibrolamellar Hepatocellular Carcinoma. Nat. Commun. 2024, 15, 10887. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  15. Shirani, M.; Levin, S.; Shebl, B.; Requena, D.; Finkelstein, T.M.; Johnson, D.S.; Ng, D.; Lalazar, G.; Heissel, S.; Hojrup, P.; et al. Increased Protein Kinase A Activity Induces Fibrolamellar Hepatocellular Carcinoma Features Independent of DNAJB1. Cancer Res. 2024, 84, 2626–2644. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  16. Saltsman, J.A.; Hammond, W.J.; Narayan, N.J.C.; Requena, D.; Gehart, H.; Lalazar, G.; LaQuaglia, M.P.; Clevers, H.; Simon, S. A Human Organoid Model of Aggressive Hepatoblastoma for Disease Modeling and Drug Testing. Cancers 2020, 12, 2668. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Article Metrics

Citations

Article Access Statistics

Journal Statistics
Multiple requests from the same IP address are counted as one view.
Multidisciplinary Treatment of Inguinoscrotal Sarcomas: Analysis of 39 Cases Treated by Surgical Approach
Previous
Pediatric Hepatoblastoma: From Developmental Molecular Mechanisms to Innovative Therapeutic Strategies
Next