Next Article in Journal
Building on Foundations: Venetoclax-Based Combinations in the Treatment of Acute Myeloid Leukemia
Next Article in Special Issue
Rapid Classification of Sarcomas Using Methylation Fingerprint: A Pilot Study
Previous Article in Journal
Mirtazapine versus Megestrol in the Treatment of Anorexia–Cachexia Syndrome in Patients with Advanced Cancer: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Controlled Phase II Clinical Trial
Previous Article in Special Issue
What Is the Significance of Indeterminate Pulmonary Nodules in High-Grade Soft Tissue Sarcomas? A Retrospective Cohort Study
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Systematic Review

Soft Tissue Sarcoma Mimicking Melanoma: A Systematic Review

by
Fortunato Cassalia
1,†,
Francesco Cavallin
2,†,
Andrea Danese
3,
Paolo Del Fiore
4,*,
Claudia Di Prata
5,
Marco Rastrelli
4,5,
Anna Belloni Fortina
6 and
Simone Mocellin
4,5
1
Unit of Dermatology, Department of Medicine, University of Padua, 35121 Padua, Italy
2
Independent Researcher, 36020 Solagna, Italy
3
Unit of Dermatology, Department of Integrated Medical and General Activity, University of Verona, 37100 Verona, Italy
4
Soft-Tissue, Peritoneum and Melanoma Surgical Oncology Unit, Veneto Institute of Oncology IOV-IRCCS, 35128 Padua, Italy
5
Department of Surgical, Oncological and Gastroenterological Sciences (DISCOG), University of Padua, 35128 Padua, Italy
6
Pediatric Dermatology Unit, Department of Medicine DIMED, University of Padua, 35121 Padua, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Cancers 2023, 15(14), 3584; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers15143584
Submission received: 20 June 2023 / Revised: 8 July 2023 / Accepted: 10 July 2023 / Published: 12 July 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in Soft Tissue and Bone Sarcoma)

Abstract

:

Simple Summary

Sarcoma may show similarities to malignant melanoma, making it difficult to differentiate between these two neoplasms. This systematic review summarizes evidence on cases of sarcoma that were initially diagnosed as melanoma to help clinicians in the diagnostic process. A comprehensive search of key databases identified 23 case reports and 4 case series with a total of 34 patients. Heterogeneous clinical presentation and frequent immunohistochemistry positivity contributed to the initial misdiagnosis. The second assessment was performed due to unusual presentation or uncertain diagnosis, and the final diagnosis was clear cell sarcoma (50%) or other soft tissue sarcomas (50%). EWSR1 translocation was investigated in 50% of cases, among which 94% were found to be positive. This systematic review suggests that a second diagnosis should be considered in cases of atypical lesions, and ESWR1 translocation should be investigated.

Abstract

Background: Sarcoma may show similarities to malignant melanoma in terms of morphologic and immunohistochemical aspects, making it difficult to differentiate between these two neoplasms during the diagnostic process. This systematic review aims to summarize available evidence on cases of sarcoma that were initially diagnosed as melanoma. Methods: A comprehensive search of the MEDLINE/Pubmed, EMBASE, and SCOPUS databases was conducted through March 2023. We included case series and case reports of sarcoma patients that were initially diagnosed as malignant melanoma. PRISMA guidelines were followed. Results: Twenty-three case reports and four case series with a total of 34 patients were included. The clinical presentation was heterogeneous, and the most involved anatomical regions were lower limbs (24%), head/neck (24%), and upper limbs (21%). IHC positivity was reported for S100 (69%), HMB45 (63%), MelanA (31%), and MiTF (3%). The main reasons for a second assessment were unusual presentation (48%) and uncertain diagnosis (28%). EWSR1 translocation was investigated in 17/34 patients (50%) and found to be positive in 16/17 (94%). The final diagnosis was clear cell sarcoma (50%) or other soft tissue sarcomas (50%). Conclusions: Melanoma and some histotypes of sarcoma share many similarities. In cases of atypical lesions, a second diagnosis should be considered, and ESWR1 translocation should be investigated.

1. Introduction

The 2020 World Health Organization (WHO) Classification of Soft Tissue Tumors indicates sarcomas as rare tumors that are further subclassified into approximately 70 subtypes, each characterized by a distinct morphology that often translates into a specific clinical behavior, as well as into specific therapeutic approaches [1,2]. They can occur anywhere in the body, affecting the extremities in 50% of cases, the trunk and retroperitoneum in 40% of cases, and the head and neck in 10% of cases [3].
Some of these neoplasms can be confused with cutaneous melanoma, since they share similar clinical, histological, and immunohistochemical features [4]. In addition, they are rare tumors that are often overlooked by clinicians who do not pose the diagnostic suspicion to the pathologist [2,5,6]. Therefore, healthcare specialists may encounter some difficulties in differentiating between sarcoma and melanoma during the diagnostic process. For example, clear cell sarcoma (CCS) clinically presents as a deep and small (<5 cm) soft tissue lesions, often juxtaposed with tendons, fascia, or aponeurosis, which may mistakenly suggest some forms of melanoma, such as acral melanoma, nodular melanoma, or amelanotic melanoma [7,8]. Moreover, CCS shows a phenotype identical to that of conventional melanoma characterized by strong expression of S100 protein in 100% of cases and variable expression of HMB-45, Melan A, and MiTF. As a matter of fact, CCS can be genetically differentiated from melanoma due to some peculiarities, including (i) the typical reciprocal translocation t(12;22) (q13;q12) that gives rise to the EWSR1-ATF1 oncogene and (ii) the absence of BRAF/NRAS mutations that can often characterize melanoma [4]. Other examples include malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor (MPNST) and Kaposi’s sarcoma. MPNST usually arises from peripheral nerves and may be associated with patients with neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1). The clinical presentation involves the development of a painful and/or rapidly expanding mass with associated neurological deficits. The biological behavior of MPNSTs has been described as unpredictable, and the differential diagnosis includes several tumors, particularly spindle cell/desmoplastic melanoma, which serves as the main differential because of its higher incidence, remarkably similar morphology, and overlapping immunochemical markers [9,10]. Kaposi’s sarcoma is typical of immunocompromised patients and may also present as a single papular skin lesion, clinically mimicking melanoma, which can be distinguished by histologic and immunohistochemical appearance [11].
The clinical presentation of such a neoplasm may mislead the physician, with potential implications for therapeutic strategy and prognosis. For example, surgical widening of the margins varies according to the neoplasm under treatment (melanoma or sarcoma); chemoradiotherapy may be offered for sarcoma, but melanoma patients may benefit from a different first-line approach, such as immunotherapy or target therapy or both, whereas sentinel lymph node biopsy is routinely performed in the diagnostic workup of melanoma but is still under debate for soft tissue sarcoma [12,13,14].
Awareness of the similarities between sarcoma and melanoma and the ability to recognize the two entities play a crucial role in patient care. However, a clinician may have little to no direct experience in this matter and may retrieve only limited information from a case report or a small case series.
The aim of this systematic review was to summarize available evidence on cases of sarcoma that were initially diagnosed as malignant melanoma to help clinicians in the diagnostic process and to improve patient care.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Study Design

This is a systematic review of case series and case reports describing cases of sarcoma that were initially diagnosed as malignant melanoma. The review was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines [15]. The review protocol was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42023403882).

2.2. Search Strategy

We systematically searched MEDLINE/PubMed, EMBASE, and SCOPUS to detect eligible studies. The search strategy was conducted without language restrictions through March 2023. In PubMed, the following search strategy was used: sarcoma mimicking melanoma OR sarcoma resembling melanoma OR melanoma-like. The search strategy was tailored to conform to the other electronic sources. The lists from each source were joined, and the duplicates were removed. Two investigators (F.C. and A.D.) separately evaluated titles and abstracts of the records and removed those that fell outside the scope of the review. The full texts of all potentially eligible records were examined to dismiss those not fulfilling the inclusion criteria. Finally, the reference lists of included records were hand-searched to detect further studies of interest. Any disagreement was solved by consensus with a third investigator (P.D.F.). Studies not including human subjects were excluded. No language restrictions were applied.

2.3. Data Collection

Two investigators (F.C. and A.D.) independently extracted relevant data from the included articles. For each article, study features, patient characteristics, tumor information, and outcome measures were collected. A third investigator (A.B.F.) checked the extracted data. Any inconsistency was solved by consensus.

2.4. Assessment of the Quality of Included Studies

The quality of the included studies was assessed according to eight criteria: (i) clear criteria for inclusion of the patient(s); (ii) valid methods for identification of the initial condition; (iii) valid methods for identification of the final condition; (iv) in a case series, consecutive inclusion of patients; (v) clear reporting of demographics; (vi) clear reporting of clinical information; (vii) reporting of the time of the second assessment; and (viii) reporting of the reason for the second assessment. The criteria were adapted from the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) critical appraisal tool [16] to fit the context under evaluation (case series and case reports describing cases of sarcoma that were initially diagnosed as malignant melanoma). Two investigators (F.C. and M.A.) independently appraised the risk of bias of the included studies, and any inconsistency was solved by consensus with all authors.

2.5. Data Synthesis

The selection procedure was presented in a flow chart. Pertinent data were extracted from included studies and summarized in tables. The inclusion of case reports and very small case series precluded the feasibility of a meaningful meta-analysis; hence, a narrative synthesis of included studies was conducted.

3. Results

3.1. Search Results

The comprehensive search of key databases yielded 365 non-duplicate records. We excluded 321 records according to the title or the abstract, and we identified 43 potentially eligible records for the full-text review. During this phase, 24 records satisfied the inclusion criteria, while 19 records were excluded due to different design (n = 4), different topic (n = 12), or different participants (n = 1) or because we could not find the full text (n = 2) (Supplementary Table S1). Three additional eligible records were identified via hand search. Finally, 27 records [9,11,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39,40,41] were included in the narrative synthesis (Figure 1).

3.2. Narrative Synthesis of the Findings

The synthesis included 23 case reports (85%) and 4 case series (15%). A total of 3 studies (11%) were published in 1989–2000, 7 (26%) in 2001–2011, and 17 (63%) in 2012–2022. Study and patient characteristics are summarized in Table 1 and Table 2.
Overall, the studies reported on a total of 34 patients (aged 12–86 years), including 25 males (74%) and 9 females (26%). The initial diagnosis was melanoma (24 patients, 71%) or suspected melanoma (10 patients, 29%). The clinical presentation was heterogeneous (Table 1), and the involved anatomical regions included lower limbs (8/33 patients, 24%), head/neck (8/33 patients, 24%), upper limbs (7/33 patients, 21%), visceral area (4/33 patients, 12%), trunk (3/33 patients, 9%), and genital area (3/33 patients, 9%) (the information was not available for one patient).
IHC positivity was reported for S100 (22/32 patients, 69%), HMB45 (20/32 patients, 63%), MelanA (10/32 patients, 31%), and MiTF (1/32 patients, 3%).
The reasons for a second assessment and/or diagnostic re-evaluation included unusual presentation (12/25, 48%), uncertain diagnosis (7/25, 28%), expert opinion (2/25, 8%), no response to treatment (1/25, 4%), search for EWSR1 translocation (1/25, 4%), review after surgery (1/25, 4%), and review after death (1/25, 4%), while the information was not reported in nine patients.
EWSR1 translocation was investigated in 17/34 patients (50%) and found to be positive in 16 CCS patients and 1 MPNST patient.
The final diagnosis was clear cell sarcoma in 17 patients (50%) and soft tissue sarcoma in 17 patients (50%). The latter included sarcoma of perivascular epithelioid cells (n = 4), malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor (n = 4), Kaposi’s sarcoma (n = 1), chondroid syringoma (n = 1), cutaneous angiosarcoma (n = 1), cutaneous epithelioid angiosarcoma (n = 1), epithelioid malignant schwannoma (n = 1), malignant giant cell tumor of soft tissue (n = 1), malignant schwannoma (n = 1), myeloid sarcoma (n = 1), and pleomorphic sarcoma (n = 1).
An overview of the main findings is displayed in Figure 2.

3.3. Critical Appraisal of the Quality of Included Studies

Table 3 summarizes the quality assessment of the included studies. All studies (27/27, 100%) reported clear criteria for inclusion of the patient(s). Valid methods for identification of the initial (melanoma) and final (sarcoma) conditions were described by 16/27 (59%) and 18/27 (67%) studies, respectively. All case series (4/4, 100%) included consecutive patients. Clear reporting of demographics and clinical information were found in 27/27 (100%) and 24/27 (89%) studies, respectively. Only one study (4%) specified the timing of the second assessment, and 17/27 studies (63%) clearly reported the reason for the second assessment.

4. Discussion

This systematic review evaluated the available evidence on cases of sarcoma that were initially diagnosed as malignant melanoma. Our search yielded only case reports and small case series [9,11,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39,40,41], which, individually, can provide sparce information to healthcare providers; however, summarizing data from such sources may allow for a better understanding of the topic. Most of the studies were published in the last decade, which may suggest a rising interest in differentiating sarcoma from melanoma during the diagnostic process.
Overall, the clinical presentation of such cases was heterogeneous, and some sarcomas were initially misdiagnosed because several aspects, such as clinical factors, localization of the lesion, and histologic appearance, suggested a malignant melanoma [9,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,32,33,34,35,39,40,41]. In some cases, the clinician considered other diagnoses but finally opted for melanoma [29,30,31,36,37,38]. Furthermore, immunohistochemistry is not helpful for differentiating sarcoma from melanoma, which was suggested by the positivity of some markers, such as S100, HBMG-45, and MelanA [9,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,26,27,29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39]. Hence, the rarity of cases of sarcoma mimicking melanoma likely played an important role in opting for melanoma as the reasonable initial diagnosis of choice. The reader should be aware that we assume such rarity given the few cases in the literature, but we do not have robust information about the real magnitude of cases of sarcoma mimicking melanoma.
In fact, the main reasons for the second assessment leading to a diagnosis of sarcoma were unusual presentation and uncertainty about the diagnosis, which suggested further investigations to the clinicians [9,18,19,20,21,22,23,29,30,32,33,35,38]. In a few cases, the second assessment was performed because the patient did not respond to the treatment [17] or during a retrospective review of cases [21,24].
This implies that the correct identification of a sarcoma mimicking melanoma relies on the healthcare provider being aware of the possibility of such a case and being able to identify when unusual features merit further investigation.
This also means that the prevalence of such cases is unknown because the literature does not include episodes when the healthcare provider did not feel the need for further investigations, and no systematic investigations have been conducted in large series of melanoma patients.
We believe that misdiagnosing a sarcoma as a melanoma may have potential implications for patient care because of the use of different therapeutic approaches, including sentinel node biopsy, first-line therapy, and surgical therapy [12,13,14]. Unfortunately, available information is insufficient to assess the prognostic effect of such misdiagnosis.
Interestingly, half of the sarcomas found at the second assessment were CCS [17,18,19,20,21,22,23,26,29,30,31,32,33]. We believe that the common features shared by CCS and melanoma [7,8] and the lower incidence of CCS were likely to be responsible for the initial misdiagnosis. When investigated, EWSR1 translocation was found to be positive in almost all cases [17,18,19,20,21,22,26,29,30,31,32,33]; hence, clinicians may benefit from the investigation of EWSR1 translocation in the initial diagnostic process.
This systematic review has some limitations that should be considered by the reader. First, the research topic was prone to be described in case reports and very small case series, limiting the available information and the potential for further analyses. Second, the lack of epidemiological studies prevented any considerations of the prevalence of cases of sarcoma that were initially diagnosed as melanoma. Third, information about the timing of the second assessment would provide interesting information but was largely missing in the literature. Fourth, the role of EWSR1 translocation in the identification of CCS could not be investigated because of selected reporting (the included studies reported some CCS cases with positive EWSR1 and one MPNST cases with negative EWSR1).
Within its limitations, our systematic review underlines an underreported problem in the diagnosis of melanoma and sarcoma, informs physicians about features that can make differential diagnosis difficult, and highlights the importance of searching for EWSR1 translocation in the diagnostic process. Due to the rarity of sarcoma, healthcare providers possess a heterogeneous level of experience and expertise in managing such diseases. Therefore, it is crucial for physicians to ensure that pathologists are appropriately guided to relevant diagnostic procedures, especially when excising suspicious melanoma lesions in centers without specialized knowledge of sarcoma. The histologic and immunohistochemical similarities between melanoma and sarcoma can occasionally present a challenge for less experienced pathologists, increasing the risk of misdiagnosis. Therefore, effective collaboration among physicians, surgeons, and pathologists is essential to accurately guide the diagnostic process and assist pathologists in reaching a definitive histologic diagnosis. Physicians should consider sarcoma—particularly CCS, as mentioned—as a plausible differential diagnosis when encountering lesions that lack the typical clinical features of melanoma, especially those located deep within or near tendons and/or aponeurosis, particularly in young patients. It is noteworthy that the definitive diagnosis of CCS often relies on identifying EWSR1 translocation. Therefore, physicians should provide explicit guidance to pathologists, enabling them, when necessary, to actively search for EWSR1 translocation to definitively confirm the diagnosis. Alternatively, in the absence of clear guidance from the physician, a less experienced pathologist facing difficulties in reaching a definitive diagnosis for a suspected melanoma lesion should seek a second opinion from more experienced colleagues. This proactive approach may facilitate the timely implementation of appropriate therapeutic interventions, ultimately leading to improved patient outcomes and, potentially, prognosis.

5. Conclusions

Atypical skin lesions may be misdiagnosed as melanomas if they share many similarities. Physicians should be aware of such a possibility in the diagnostic process, as it may have potential implications for the treatment strategy. In the case of atypical skin lesions, it may be useful to investigate the presence of EWSR1 translocation, since CSS are the most common histology to be found in case of re-evaluation. Referral to tertiary expert centers may be recommended. Further investigations are required to better understand the epidemiology of misleading diagnosis and to raise awareness of the issue.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/cancers15143584/s1, Table S1: List of excluded records after reading the full-text.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, F.C. (Fortunato Cassalia) and P.D.F.; methodology, F.C. (Francesco Cavallin); formal analysis, F.C. (Francesco Cavallin) and F.C. (Fortunato Cassalia); investigation, F.C. (Fortunato Cassalia) and A.D.; writing—original draft preparation, F.C. (Fortunato Cassalia), F.C. (Francesco Cavallin), A.D. and P.D.F.; writing—review and editing, C.D.P., M.R., S.M. and A.B.F.; supervision, M.R., S.M. and A.B.F. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received “Current Research” funds from the Italian Ministry of Health to cover publication costs.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available within the article.

Acknowledgments

The authors wish to thank “Piccoli Punti ONLUS” and “Fondazione Lucia Valentini Terrani” for their long-lasting support.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Gatta, G.; van der Zwan, J.M.; Casali, P.G.; Siesling, S.; Tos, A.P.D.; Kunkler, I.; Otter, R.; Licitra, L.; Mallone, S.; Tavilla, A.; et al. Rare cancers are not so rare: The rare cancer burden in Europe. Eur. J. Cancer 2011, 47, 2493–2511. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Sbaraglia, M.; Bellan, E.; Tos, A.P.D. The 2020 WHO Classification of Soft Tissue Tumours: News and perspectives. Pathologica 2021, 113, 70–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. American Cancer Society Key Statistics for Soft Tissue Sarcomas. Available online: https://www.cancer.org/cancer/soft-tissue-sarcoma/about/key-statistics.html (accessed on 10 April 2023).
  4. Hisaoka, M.; Ishida, T.; Kuo, T.T.; Matsuyama, A.; Imamura, T.; Nishida, K.; Kuroda, H.; Inayama, Y.; Oshiro, H.; Kobayashi, H.; et al. Clear cell sarcoma of soft tissue: A clinicopathologic, immunohistochemical, and molecular analysis of 33 cases. Am. J. Surg. Pathol. 2008, 32, 452–460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Panagopoulos, I.; Mertens, F.; Isaksson, M.; Mandahl, N. Absence of mutations of the BRAF gene in malignant melanoma of soft parts (clear cell sarcoma of tendons and aponeuroses). Cancer Genet. Cytogenet. 2005, 156, 74–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  6. Patel, R.M.; Downs-Kelly, E.; Weiss, S.W.; Folpe, A.L.; Tubbs, R.R.; Tuthill, R.J.; Goldblum, J.R.; Skacel, M. Dual-color, break-apart fluorescence in situ hybridization for EWS gene rearrangement distinguishes clear cell sarcoma of soft tissue from malignant melanoma. Mod. Pathol. 2005, 18, 1585–1590. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  7. Dim, D.C.; Cooley, L.D.; Miranda, R.N. Clear cell sarcoma of tendons and aponeuroses: A review. Arch. Pathol. Lab Med. 2007, 131, 152–156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Pavlidis, N.A.; Fisher, C.; Wiltshaw, E. Clear-cell sarcoma of tendons and aponeuroses: A clinicopathologic study. Presentation of six additional cases with review of the literature. Cancer 1984, 54, 1412–1417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Biglow, L.R.; Cuda, J.; Dotson, J. A Rare Case of Epithelioid Malignant Peripheral Nerve Sheath Tumor Mimicking Malignant Melanoma. Cureus 2021, 13, e13424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Gaspard, M.; Lamant, L.; Tournier, E.; Valentin, T.; Rochaix, P.; Terrier, P.; Ranchere-Vince, D.; Coindre, J.M.; Filleron, T.; Le Guellec, S. Evaluation of eight melanocytic and neural crest-associated markers in well-characterized series of 124 malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumours (MPNST): Useful to distinguish MPNST from melanoma? Histopathology 2018, 73, 969–982. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Zoufaly, A.; Schmiedel, S.; Lohse, A.; van Lunzen, J. Intestinal Kaposi’s sarcoma may mimic gastrointestinal stromal tumor in HIV infection. World J. Gastroenterol. 2007, 13, 4514–4516. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Shafiq, M.B.; Rafi, I.; Shoaib, A.; Ali, S.; Iqbal, F.; Latif, T.; Mushtaq, U. The Outcome of Extremity Soft Tissue Sarcomas in Terms of Resection Margins: A Study from a Cancer Dedicated Center. Cureus 2022, 14, e26086. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Kollender, R.; Merimsky, O.; Sternheim, A.; Gortzak, Y.; Dadia, S.; Doron, A.; Novikov, I.; Kollender, Y.; Soyfer, V. Radiation Therapy Before Repeat Wide Resection for Unplanned Surgery of Soft Tissue Sarcoma (“Oops” Operation) Results in Improved Disease-Free Survival. Adv. Radiat. Oncol. 2022, 7, 101007. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Keung, E.Z.; Krause, K.J.; Maxwell, J.; Morris, C.D.; Crago, A.M.; Houdek, M.T.; Kane, J.; Lewis, V.; Callegaro, D.; Miller, B.; et al. Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy for Extremity and Truncal Soft Tissue Sarcomas: A Systematic Review of the Literature. Ann. Surg. Oncol. 2023, 30, 958–967. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Page, M.J.; McKenzie, J.E.; Bossuyt, P.M.; Boutron, I.; Hoffmann, T.C.; Mulrow, C.D.; Shamseer, L.; Tetzlaff, J.M.; Akl, E.A.; Brennan, S.E.; et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ 2021, 372, n71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Munn, Z.; Barker, T.H.; Moola, S.; Tufanaru, C.; Stern, C.; McArthur, A.; Stephenson, M.; Aromataris, E. Methodological quality of case series studies: An introduction to the JBI critical appraisal tool. JBI Evid. Synth. 2020, 18, 2127–2133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Potter, A.J.; Dimitriou, F.; Karim, R.Z.; Mahar, A.; Chan, C.; Long, G.V.; Scolyer, R.A. Cutaneous clear cell sarcoma with an epidermal component mimicking melanoma. Pathology 2022, 54, 369–371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Elousrouti, L.T.; Hammas, N.; Elmernissi, F.Z.; Elfatemi, H.; Chbani, L. Clear-Cell Sarcoma with an Unusual Presentation Mimicking Metastatic Melanoma. Cureus 2022, 14, e32010. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Zhang, X.; Zhang, P.J.; Sussman, R.; Litzky, L.A.; Kucharczuk, J.C.; Deshpande, C. Atypical clear cell sarcoma of the pleura presenting as large pleural effusion with 22q12 abnormality: A challenging case with twists and turns. Hum. Pathol. Case Rep. 2021, 24, 200489. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Nawrocki, S.; Fitzhugh, V.A.; Groisberg, R.; Aviv, H.A.; Maghari, A. A rare case of primary dermal clear cell sarcoma with focal epidermotropism: An entity difficult to distinguish from melanoma. J. Cutan. Pathol. 2020, 47, 621–624. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Obiorah, I.E.; Ozdemirli, M. Clear cell sarcoma in unusual sites mimicking metastatic melanoma. World J. Clin. Oncol. 2019, 10, 213–221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Donzel, M.; Zidane-Marinnes, M.; Paindavoine, S.; Breheret, R.; de la Fouchardière, A. Clear cell sarcoma of the soft palate mimicking unclassified melanoma. Pathology 2019, 51, 331–334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Obiorah, I.E.; Brenholz, P.; Özdemirli, M. Primary Clear Cell Sarcoma of the Dermis Mimicking Malignant Melanoma. Balkan Med. J. 2018, 35, 203–207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Curry, J.L.; Tetzlaff, M.T.; Wang, S.A.; Landon, G.; Alouch, N.; Patel, S.P.; Nagarajan, P.; Gupta, S.; Aung, P.P.; Devine, C.E.; et al. Case Report of Myeloid Sarcoma Masquerading as In-Transit Metastasis at a Previous Melanoma Site: Avoiding a Diagnostic Pitfall. Am. J. Dermatopathol. 2018, 40, 831–835. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Leon-Castillo, A.; Chrisinger, J.S.A.; Panse, G.; Samdani, R.T.; Ingram, D.R.; Ravi, V.; Prieto, V.G.; Wang, W.-L.; Lazar, A.J. Index report of cutaneous angiosarcomas with strong positivity for tyrosinase mimicking melanoma with further evaluation of melanocytic markers in a large angiosarcoma series. J. Cutan. Pathol. 2017, 44, 692–697. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Zivanovic, M.; Luzar, B.; Bacchi, C.E.; Calonje, J.E. Cutaneous clear cell sarcoma with intraepidermal component mimicking spitzoid melanoma. Virchows Arch. 2017, 471 (Suppl. S1), S1–S352. [Google Scholar]
  27. Jackson, C.R.; Minca, E.C.; Kapil, J.P.; Smith, S.C.; Billings, S.D. Superficial malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor with overlying intradermal melanocytic nevus mimicking spindle cell melanoma. J. Cutan. Pathol. 2016, 43, 1220–1225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Castriconi, M.; Antropoli, M.; Grillo, M.; Andreano, M.; Santoro, M.; Villamania, E. Unusual bleeding of a giant cell fibroblastoma: A soft tissue sarcoma of the skin mimicking metastatic melanoma. Ann. Ital. Chir. 2015, 86, S2239253X15023701. [Google Scholar]
  29. Sayah, M.; Hammer, S. Colonic Clear Cell Sarcoma Associated with Neurofibromatosis Type 2. Am. J. Clin. Pathol. 2015, 144 (Suppl. S2), A409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Liu, C.; Ren, Y.; Li, X.; Cao, Y.; Chen, Y.; Cui, X.; Li, L.; Li, F. Absence of 19 known hotspot oncogenic mutations in soft tissue clear cell sarcoma: Two cases report with review of the literature. Int. J. Clin. Exp. Pathol. 2014, 7, 5242–5249. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  31. Sidiropoulos, M.; Busam, K.; Guitart, J.; Laskin, W.B.; Wagner, A.M.; Gerami, P. Superficial paramucosal clear cell sarcoma of the soft parts resembling melanoma in a 13-year-old boy. J. Cutan. Pathol. 2013, 40, 265–268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Falconieri, G.; Bacchi, C.E.; Luzar, B. Cutaneous clear cell sarcoma: Report of three cases of a potentially underestimated mimicker of spindle cell melanoma. Am. J. Dermatopathol. 2012, 34, 619–625. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Rodriguez-Martin, M.; Saez-Rodriguez, M.; Esquivel, B.; Gonzalez, R.S.; Cabrera, A.N.; Herrera, A.M. Clear cell sarcoma: A case mimicking primary cutaneous malignant melanoma. Indian J. Dermatol. 2009, 54, 168–172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Tanas, M.R.; Rubin, B.P. Malignant neuroectodermal tumor with melanocytic and rhabdomyoblastic differentiation. Rare Tumors 2009, 1, e26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Brightman, L.A.; Demierre, M.-F.; Byers, H.R. Macrophage-rich epithelioid angiosarcoma mimicking malignant melanoma. J. Cutan. Pathol. 2006, 33, 38–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Matsuda, Y.; Saoo, K.; Hosokawa, K.; Yamakawa, K.; Yokohira, M.; Zeng, Y.; Takeuchi, H.; Iwai, J.; Shirai, T.; Obika, K.; et al. Epithelioid malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor. Report of a case with inflammatory infiltration. Pathol. Res. Pract. 2005, 201, 355–360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Demir, Y.; Tokyol, C. Superficial malignant schwannoma of the scalp. Dermatol. Surg. 2003, 29, 879–881. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  38. Bonetti, F.; Martignoni, G.; Colato, C.; Manfrin, E.; Gambacorta, M.; Faleri, M.; Bacchi, C.; Sin, V.-C.; Wong, N.-L.; Coady, M.; et al. Abdominopelvic sarcoma of perivascular epithelioid cells. Report of four cases in young women, one with tuberous sclerosis. Mod. Pathol. 2001, 14, 563–568. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  39. Ferreiro, J.A.; Nascimento, A.G. Hyaline-cell rich chondroid syringoma. A tumor mimicking malignancy. Am. J. Surg. Pathol. 1995, 19, 912–917. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Honma, K.; Watanabe, H.; Ohnishi, Y.; Tachikawa, S.; Tachikawa, K. Epithelioid malignant schwannoma. A case report. Acta Pathol. Jpn. 1989, 39, 195–202. [Google Scholar]
  41. Gould, E.; Albores-Saavedra, J.; Rothe, M.; Mnaymneh, W.; Menendez-Aponte, S. Malignant giant cell tumor of soft parts presenting as a skin tumor. Am. J. Dermatopathol. 1989, 11, 197–201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Flow chart of the selection process.
Figure 1. Flow chart of the selection process.
Cancers 15 03584 g001
Figure 2. Overview of main findings. CCS: clear cell sarcoma; MPNST: malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor; SPEC: sarcoma of perivascular epithelioid cells; STS: soft tissue sarcoma.
Figure 2. Overview of main findings. CCS: clear cell sarcoma; MPNST: malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor; SPEC: sarcoma of perivascular epithelioid cells; STS: soft tissue sarcoma.
Cancers 15 03584 g002
Table 1. Characteristics of included studies: patient characteristics and clinical presentation.
Table 1. Characteristics of included studies: patient characteristics and clinical presentation.
First AuthorYearType of StudyN ptsSexAge (Years)Initial Diagnosis Anatomical RegionSiteClinical PresentationIHC Positivity
Potter AJ [17]2022Case report1M30MelanomaLower limbsToeUlcerated, nodular cutaneous lesion on the distal third toe, which had been present for several yearsS100, HMB45, SOX10
Tahiri EL [18]2022Case report1M31MelanomaLower limbsHeelHeel mass noduleS100, HMB45, Melan A
Biglow LR [9]2021Case report1F47MelanomaUpper limbsFingerSubcutaneous nodule at the finger without any obvious nevus or skin color changesS100, SOX10, Vimentin, BCL2
Zhang X [19]2021Case report1M68MelanomaVisceralPleuraDyspnea and cough following a dental abscess that was treated with root canal procedure; imaging studies revealed a large right pleural effusion, raising the concern of an empyemaSOX10, S100, HMB45, Melan-A
Nawrocki S [20]2020Case report1M25MelanomaLower limbsLeft inguinal regionRaised blood blister that changed colorsS100, HMB45, Melan A
Obiorah IE [21]2019 Case series 2 F37MelanomaHead and neckLeft neckComplaint of left jaw pain and swellingHMB45, S100, CD31, CD34, CD68
M33MelanomaTrunkBackMid-back pain radiating to the flanks, as well as leg weakness and numbness, with gait abnormalitiesHMB45, S100, Vimentin
Donzel M [22]2019Case report1M27MelanomaHead and neckPalatePalatal ulcerations; ill-defined and erythematous, with a friable center, superficial erosions, and irregular, raised edgesHMB45, SOX10, Melan A
Obiorah IE [23]2018Case report1F43MelanomaHead and neckRight neckSmall nodule on the right side of her neckS100, HMB45, Vimentin
Curry JL [24]2018Case report1M68MelanomaUpper limbsLeft upper harmPrimary tumor not told; recurrence: new; slightly tender; 1.0 cm purpuric cutaneous nodule within the lymphatic drainage field of his previous primary melanoma of his left upper armCD11, CD43, CD68
Leon-Castillo A [25]2017Case report1M65MelanomaHead and neckOccipital scalpLarge multinodular, cutaneous occipital scalp lesion with erythematous backgroundCD31, ERG, D2-40, factor VIII–related antigen, Tyrosinase, HMB45, Melan A
Zivanovic M [26]2017Case report1M20MelanomaLower limbsFootN/AS100, Melan A, HMB45
Jackson CR [27]2016Case report1M56MelanomaTrunkChestFlesh-colored chest lesion for 7 yearsS100, SOX10, CD34
Castriconi M [28]2015Case report1M56MelanomaUpper limbsRight axillaGiant mass located on the right axillaN/A
Sayah M [29]2015Case report1F54Suspect of melanomaVisceralCecumSevere iron deficiency anemia and hematocheziaS100, Cytokeratins, HMB45
Liu C [30]2014 Case series 2M29Suspect of melanomaUpper limbsLeft thumbSolid gray–white tumorHMB45, Melan A, CD56, S100, Vimentin, NSE
M76Suspect of melanomaVisceralJejunumComplaining of bowel obstruction, macroscopic examination: tumor (2.5 cm × 2.2 cm × 1.5 cm) with a whitish–gray surfaceS100, Vimentin, NSE
Sidiropoulos M [31]2013Case report1M13Suspect of melanomaHead and neckLower lipSymptomatic papule on the lower lip that was suggestive of a mucoceleS100, CD99, sinaptofisina, HMB45, MiTF
Falconieri G [32]2012 Case series 3M12MelanomaLower limbsLeft footLesion in the dorsal aspect of footS100, Melan A
M60MelanomaLower limbsUpper thighSlowly growing pigmented nodular lesionS100
F29MelanomaLower limbsRight footLesion in the sole of the footS100, Melan A, HMB45
Rodríguez MM [33]2009Case report1M53MelanomaUpper limbsRight harmPainful erythematous, dome-shaped, nodular lesion 1.3 cm in diameter, firm to palpation and movable, with a serohemorrhagic crust on its surfaceS100, HMB45
Tanas MR [34]2009Case report1M67MelanomaTrunkAbdomenAbdominal massS100, HMB45, MiFT, Melan A
Zoufaly A [11]2007Case report1M69MelanomaN/AN/AN/AN/A
Brightman LA [35]2006Case report1M86MelanomaHead and neckScalpLarge irregular dark gray–blue plaque with an adjacent speckled tan noduleS100, CD31, CD34
Matsuda Y [36]2005Case report1M75Suspect of melanomaLower limbsLeft thighOval-shaped mass; elastic, soft, and adherent to the left thigh on palpationS-100, NSE, GFAP, MBP, Chromogranin A and synaptophysin
Demir Y [37]2003Case report1M80Suspect of melanomaHead and neckScalpPainless ulceration on his scalpS100
Bonetti F [38]2001Case series 4F28Suspect of melanomaVisceralIleumAbdominal painHMB45, MART 1
F19Suspect of melanomaGenitalUterusAbdominal painHMB45
F40Suspect of melanomaGenitalUterusSurgery because of uterine leiomyomas; during the operation, a 2.5 cm × 12 cm × 1.5 cm pelvic nodule was accidentally found and thought to represent endometriosisHMB45
F41Suspect of melanomaGenitalMyometriumPresumed fibroids in uterusHMB45, MART 1
Ferreiro JA [39]1995Case report1M75MelanomaHead and neckFaceNon-painful mass of the facekeratin, S100, Vimentin
Honma K [40]1989Case report1M65MelanomaUpper limbsLeft axillary fossaN/ALeu7, NSE
Gould E [41]1989Case report1M78MelanomaUpper limbsLeft armBlack nodule above the elbowa1 anti-chymotrypsin (AACT), a1 antitrypsin (AAC)
Table 2. Characteristics of included studies: second assessment and final diagnosis.
Table 2. Characteristics of included studies: second assessment and final diagnosis.
First AuthorYearWhy Second Assessment and/or Diagnostic Re-EvaluationEWSR1 TranslocationFinal Diagnosis
Potter AJ [17]2022Unresponsive to treatmentPositiveClear cell sarcoma
Tahiri EL [18]2022Unusual presentation PositiveClear cell sarcoma
Biglow LR [9]2021Unusual presentationNegativeMalignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor
Zhang X [19]2021Uncertain diagnosisPositiveClear cell sarcoma
Nawrocki S [20]2020Uncertain diagnosisPositiveClear cell sarcoma
Obiorah IE [21]2019Review after deathPositiveClear cell sarcoma
Uncertain diagnosisPositiveClear cell sarcoma
Donzel M [22]2019Uncertain diagnosisPositiveClear cell sarcoma
Obiorah IE [23]2018Uncertain diagnosisN/AClear cell sarcoma
Curry JL [24]2018Review after surgeryN/AMyeloid sarcoma
Leon-Castillo A [25]2017N/AN/ACutaneous angiosarcoma
Zivanovic M [26]2017N/APositiveClear cell sarcoma
Jackson CR [27]2016Expert opinionN/AMPNST—malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors
Castriconi M [28]2015N/AN/APleomorphic sarcoma
Sayah M [29]2015Unusual presentation PositiveClear cell sarcoma
Liu C [30]2014Unusual presentation PositiveClear cell sarcoma
Unusual presentation PositiveClear cell sarcoma
Sidiropoulos M [31]2012Research for EWSR1 translocationPositiveClear cell sarcoma
Falconieri G [32]2012Unusual presentation PositiveClear cell sarcoma
Unusual presentation PositiveClear cell sarcoma
Unusual presentation PositiveClear cell sarcoma
Rodríguez MM [33]2009Uncertain diagnosisPositiveClear cell sarcoma
Tanas MR [34]2009N/AN/AMalignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor
Zoufaly A [11]2007N/AN/AKaposi’s sarcoma
Brightman LA [35]2006Uncertain diagnosisN/ACutaneous epithelioid angiosarcoma
Matsuda Y [36]2005N/AN/AMalignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor
Demir Y [37]2003Expert opinionN/AMalignant schwannoma
Bonetti F [38]2001Unusual presentation N/ASarcoma of perivascular epithelioid cells
Unusual presentation N/ASarcoma of perivascular epithelioid cells
Unusual presentation N/ASarcoma of perivascular epithelioid cells
Unusual presentation N/ASarcoma of perivascular epithelioid cells
Ferreiro JA [39]1995N/AN/AChondroid syringoma
Honma K [40]1989N/AN/AEpithlioid malignant schwannoma
Gould E [41]1989N/AN/AMalignant giant cell tumor of soft tissue
Table 3. Summary of the quality assessment of the included studies.
Table 3. Summary of the quality assessment of the included studies.
First AuthorYearClear Criteria for InclusionValid Methods for the Identification of the Initial ConditionValid Methods For Identification of the Final ConditionIn a Case Series, Consecutive Inclusion of ParticipantsClear Reporting of DemographicsClear Reporting of Clinical InformationReporting of Time of Second AssessmentReporting of Reason for Second Assessment
Potter AJ [17]2022YesYesYesN/AYesYesNoYes
Tahiri EL [18]2022YesYesyesN/AYesYesNoYes
Biglow LR [9]2021YesYesUnclearN/AYesYesNoYes
Zhang X [19]2021YesYesYesN/AYesYesUnclearYes
Nawrocki S [20]2020YesYesYesN/AYesYesNoYes
Obiorah IE [21]2019YesYesYesYesYesYesYesYes
Donzel M [22]2019YesYesYesN/AYesYesNoYes
Obiorah IE [23]2018YesYesYesN/AYesYesNoYes
Curry JL [24]2018YesYesYesN/AYesYesNoYes
Leon-Castillo A [25]2017YesYesYesN/AYesYesNoNo
Zivanovic M [26]2017YesYesYesN/AYesNoNoNo
Jackson CR [27]2016YesYesUnclearN/AYesYesNoYes
Castriconi M [28]2015YesYesUnclearN/AYesYesNoNo
Sayah M [29]2015YesUnclearYesN/AYesYesNoYes
Liu C [30]2014YesUnclearYesYesYesYesNoYes
Sidiropoulos M [31]2012YesUnclearYesN/AYesYesNoYes
Falconieri G [32]2012YesYesYesYesYesYesNoYes
Rodríguez MM [33]2009YesUnclearYesN/AYesYesNoUnclear
Zoufaly A [11]2007YesYesNoN/AYesNoNoNo
Tanas MR [34]2009YesUnclearUnclearN/AYesYesNoNo
Brightman LA [35]2006YesYesYesN/AYesYesNoYes
Matsuda Y [36]2005YesUnclearUnclearN/AYesYesNoNo
Demir Y [37]2003YesUnclearYesN/AYesYesNoYes
Bonetti F [38]2001YesUnclearYesYesYesYesNoYes
Ferreiro JA [39]1995YesUnclearUnclearN/AYesYesNoNo
Honma K [40]1989YesUnclearUnclearN/AYesNoNoNo
Gould E [41]1989YesUnclearunclearN/AYesYesNoNo
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Cassalia, F.; Cavallin, F.; Danese, A.; Del Fiore, P.; Di Prata, C.; Rastrelli, M.; Belloni Fortina, A.; Mocellin, S. Soft Tissue Sarcoma Mimicking Melanoma: A Systematic Review. Cancers 2023, 15, 3584. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers15143584

AMA Style

Cassalia F, Cavallin F, Danese A, Del Fiore P, Di Prata C, Rastrelli M, Belloni Fortina A, Mocellin S. Soft Tissue Sarcoma Mimicking Melanoma: A Systematic Review. Cancers. 2023; 15(14):3584. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers15143584

Chicago/Turabian Style

Cassalia, Fortunato, Francesco Cavallin, Andrea Danese, Paolo Del Fiore, Claudia Di Prata, Marco Rastrelli, Anna Belloni Fortina, and Simone Mocellin. 2023. "Soft Tissue Sarcoma Mimicking Melanoma: A Systematic Review" Cancers 15, no. 14: 3584. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers15143584

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop