Skip to Content
You are currently on the new version of our website. Access the old version .
NutrientsNutrients
  • Article
  • Open Access

24 May 2025

10 Pages

The Lack of a Glucose Peak During the Oral Glucose Tolerance Test in Pregnancy: What Does It Portend for Perinatal Outcomes?

,
,
,
,
and
1
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, San Paolo Hospital Medical School, ASST Santi Paolo e Carlo, Via A di Rudinì 8, 20142 Milan, Italy
2
Department of Health Sciences, University of Milan, 20124 Milan, Italy
3
Department of Biomedical Sciences for Health, University of Milan, 20124 Milan, Italy
4
Reproductive Endocrinology Unit, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 55 Fruit Street, Boston, MA 02115, USA
This article belongs to the Section Nutrition in Women

Abstract

Background: An univocal definition for a lack of glucose peak during the oral glucose tolerance test in pregnancy (flat curve) has never been agreed upon. Thus, the aim of this study was to provide a definition for the flat 75 g oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) and to assess its clinical significance. Methods: A retrospective cohort study, where 8.810 pregnant singleton women were evaluated at the time of a 75 g OGTT between 240 and 286 weeks for the universal screening of gestational diabetes (GDM). The 75 g OGTT was considered flat when the difference between peak and fasting glucose concentrations was ≤30 mg/dL. A total of 953 (10.8%) women were diagnosed as having GDM, while 7.857 (89.2%) had normal glucose tolerance (NGT); 2791 women with normal glucose tolerance (35.5%) had a FLAT curve and 5066 (64.5%) had a concentration difference > 30 mg/dL (NGT). In all groups, we evaluated maternal characteristics and perinatal outcome. Results: Women with a FLAT curve were younger, taller, thinner, and their pre-pregnancy body mass index was lower than the other groups (all p < 0.001). The rate of obesity was also lower (p < 0.01). The vaginal delivery rate was higher than in NGT (80.4% vs. 77.8%; p < 0.01) and women with GDM (73.0%; p < 0.001) and that of primary cesarean lower than in NGT (11.9% vs. 14.8%; p < 0.001) and women with GDM (18.2%; p < 0.001). Between women with a FLAT and NGT OGTT curve, there was no significant difference for birthweight < 10th percentile (6.9% vs. 6.2%; p = 0.2), though the proportion of birthweight > 90th was lower (8% vs. 10%; p < 0.01). Conclusions: A 75 g flat OGTT as defined does not represent an abnormal maternal phenotype nor portend an adverse perinatal outcome.

Article Metrics

Citations

Article Access Statistics

Multiple requests from the same IP address are counted as one view.