Review Reports
by
- Rui Chen 1,2,3,†,
- Ralf Toumi 3,† and
- Weimin Zhang 2,*
- et al.
Reviewer 1: Andrey Lavrinenko Reviewer 2: Chong Wang
Round 1
Reviewer 1 Report
Comments and Suggestions for AuthorsSee Attachment
Comments for author File: 
Comments.pdf
Author Response
Dear reviewer,
This letter clarifies the revised manuscript "An adaptive learning approach for tropical cyclone intensity correction", which requires major revisions for possible publication in Remote Sensing.
First of all, we would like to express our sincere gratitude to you for reviewing this manuscript and for the significant comments that have helped us to improve the quality of the paper. We have seriously considered all your comments and have made appropriate point-by-point changes. All the details are given below in this letter. The reviewer's comments are in black, and our responses are in red. The modifications included in this letter are highlighted in blue.
The revised manuscript has been extensively rewritten, and the language has been improved a lot to make it clearer. All the changes we have made are intended to improve the quality of the paper. The corresponding changes in the revised paper are also highlighted in blue. And the line number referred to in this letter only represents the line number in the revised manuscript. We also attach the revised version and the final version with the marks removed in this letter.
Best wishes,
Rui Chen, Ralf Toumi, Xinjie Shi, Xiang Wang, Yao Duan, Weimin Zhang
Author Response File: Author Response.pdf
Reviewer 2 Report
Comments and Suggestions for AuthorsPlease see the attachment.
Comments for author File: Comments.pdf
Please see the attachment.
Author Response
Dear reviewer,
This letter clarifies the revised manuscript "An adaptive learning approach for tropical cyclone intensity correction", which requires major revisions for possible publication in Remote Sensing.
First of all, we would like to express our sincere gratitude to you for reviewing this manuscript and for the significant comments that have helped us to improve the quality of the paper. We have seriously considered all your comments and have made appropriate point-by-point changes. All the details are given below in this letter. The reviewer's comments are in black, and our responses are in red. The modifications included in this letter are highlighted in blue.
The revised manuscript has been extensively rewritten, and the language has been improved a lot to make it clearer. All the changes we have made are intended to improve the quality of the paper. The corresponding changes in the revised paper are also highlighted in blue. And the line number referred to in this letter only represents the line number in the revised manuscript. We also attach the revised version and the final version with the marks removed in this letter.
Best wishes,
Rui Chen, Ralf Toumi, Xinjie Shi, Xiang Wang, Yao Duan, Weimin Zhang
Author Response File: Author Response.pdf
Round 2
Reviewer 1 Report
Comments and Suggestions for AuthorsSee attachment
Comments for author File: Comments.pdf