Next Article in Journal
Reframing a Novel Decentralized Knowledge Management Concept as a Desirable Vision: As We May Realize the Memex
Previous Article in Journal
Evaluation of Low- and Intermediate-Temperature Performance of Bio Oil-Modified Asphalt Binders
Article

Household Farm Production Diversity and Micronutrient Intake: Where Are the Linkages? Panel Data Evidence from Uganda

1
International Institute of Tropical Agriculture (IITA), Kacyiru, KG 563 Street #3, Kigali P.O. Box 1269, Rwanda
2
Department of Agricultural Research, LADS Consult, Kampala P.O. Box 7106, Uganda
3
Department of Human Nutrition and Dietetics, University of Rwanda, Kigali P.O. Box 7279, Rwanda
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Academic Editor: Harpinder Sandhu
Sustainability 2021, 13(7), 4041; https://doi.org/10.3390/su13074041
Received: 3 March 2021 / Revised: 24 March 2021 / Accepted: 30 March 2021 / Published: 5 April 2021
Hunger and malnutrition are key global challenges whose understanding is instrumental to their elimination, thus realization of important sustainable development goals (SDGs). However, understanding linkages between farm production diversity (FPD) and household micronutrient intake is important in mapping micronutrient deficiencies and hidden hunger. Such understanding would inform appropriate interventions against malnutrition. Unfortunately, empirical literature is scarce to sufficiently inform such understanding. Using nationally representative panel survey data covering about 3300 households, we study linkages between FPD and nutrition, and associated impact pathways. We analyze data using panel regression models. Results show that at least half of sample was deficient in daily energy, iron, zinc, and vitamin A intake vis-à-vis FAO recommendations. Deficiencies were most severe (85%) with vitamin A. Positive and significant associations (about 1% for each added crop/livestock species) exist between FPD and daily household energy, iron, zinc, and vitamin A intake. FPD impacts energy and micronutrient intake via two main consumption pathways; markets (about 0.01% for each shilling), and own farm production (about 0.1% for each shilling). Therefore, own farm production yields better outcomes. Gender effects also exist. Male-headed households exhibited better nutrition outcomes (energy—11%, iron—8%, and zinc—12%) mostly via markets. Effects on Vitamin A were also positive although insignificant. View Full-Text
Keywords: farm production diversity; panel data; nutrition; energy; iron; zinc; vitamin A; Uganda farm production diversity; panel data; nutrition; energy; iron; zinc; vitamin A; Uganda
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Sekabira, H.; Nalunga, S.; Umwungerimwiza, Y.D.; Nazziwa, L.; Ddungu, S.P. Household Farm Production Diversity and Micronutrient Intake: Where Are the Linkages? Panel Data Evidence from Uganda. Sustainability 2021, 13, 4041. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13074041

AMA Style

Sekabira H, Nalunga S, Umwungerimwiza YD, Nazziwa L, Ddungu SP. Household Farm Production Diversity and Micronutrient Intake: Where Are the Linkages? Panel Data Evidence from Uganda. Sustainability. 2021; 13(7):4041. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13074041

Chicago/Turabian Style

Sekabira, Haruna, Shamim Nalunga, Yves D. Umwungerimwiza, Lydia Nazziwa, and Stanley P. Ddungu 2021. "Household Farm Production Diversity and Micronutrient Intake: Where Are the Linkages? Panel Data Evidence from Uganda" Sustainability 13, no. 7: 4041. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13074041

Find Other Styles
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Back to TopTop