Next Article in Journal
Influence of Sustainability Practices and Green Image on the Re-Visit Intention of Small and Medium-Size Towns
Previous Article in Journal
Biomass Torrefaction as a Key Driver for the Sustainable Development and Decarbonization of Energy Production
Article

Framework for Life Cycle Sustainability Assessment of Additive Manufacturing

1
IDMEC, Instituto Superior Técnico, Universidade de Lisboa, 1049-001 Lisboa, Portugal
2
DINÂMIA’CET—IUL—Centre for Socioeconomic Change and Territorial Studies, 1649-026 Lisboa, Portugal
3
UNIDEMI, Department of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering, Faculty of Science and Technology (FCT), Universidade NOVA de Lisboa, 2829-516 Caparica, Portugal
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sustainability 2020, 12(3), 929; https://doi.org/10.3390/su12030929
Received: 9 December 2019 / Revised: 11 January 2020 / Accepted: 24 January 2020 / Published: 27 January 2020
Additive manufacturing (AM) is a group of technologies that create objects by adding material layer upon layer, in precise geometric shapes. They are amongst the most disruptive technologies nowadays, potentially changing value chains from the design process to the end-of-life, providing significant advantages over traditional manufacturing processes in terms of flexibility in design and production and waste minimization. Nevertheless, sustainability assessment should also be included in the research agenda as these technologies affect the People, the Planet and the Profit: the three-bottom line (3BL) assessment framework. Moreover, AM sustainability depends on each product and context that strengthens the need for its assessment through the 3BL framework. This paper explores the literature on AM sustainability, and the results are mapped in a framework aiming to support comprehensive assessments of the AM impacts in the 3BL dimensions by companies and researchers. To sustain the coherence of boundaries, three life cycle methods are proposed, each one for a specific dimension of the 3BL analysis, and two illustrative case studies are shown to exemplify the model. View Full-Text
Keywords: additive manufacturing; sustainability assessment; framework; social; environmental; economic additive manufacturing; sustainability assessment; framework; social; environmental; economic
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Ribeiro, I.; Matos, F.; Jacinto, C.; Salman, H.; Cardeal, G.; Carvalho, H.; Godina, R.; Peças, P. Framework for Life Cycle Sustainability Assessment of Additive Manufacturing. Sustainability 2020, 12, 929. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12030929

AMA Style

Ribeiro I, Matos F, Jacinto C, Salman H, Cardeal G, Carvalho H, Godina R, Peças P. Framework for Life Cycle Sustainability Assessment of Additive Manufacturing. Sustainability. 2020; 12(3):929. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12030929

Chicago/Turabian Style

Ribeiro, Inês, Florinda Matos, Celeste Jacinto, Hafiz Salman, Gonçalo Cardeal, Helena Carvalho, Radu Godina, and Paulo Peças. 2020. "Framework for Life Cycle Sustainability Assessment of Additive Manufacturing" Sustainability 12, no. 3: 929. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12030929

Find Other Styles
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Back to TopTop