Next Article in Journal
Economic Costs of Sharing the Harvester in the Control of an Invasive Weed
Next Article in Special Issue
Low Cost, Multi-Pollutant Sensing System Using Raspberry Pi for Indoor Air Quality Monitoring
Previous Article in Journal
Statistical Approach for Assessing the Suitability of Substrates for a Biogas Plant
Previous Article in Special Issue
Evaluating the Adaptability of Reinforcement Learning Based HVAC Control for Residential Houses
Review

A Systematic Review of Air Quality Sensors, Guidelines, and Measurement Studies for Indoor Air Quality Management

UrbSys (Urban Building Energy, Sensing, Controls, Big Data Analysis, and Visualization) Laboratory, M.E. Rinker, Sr. School of Construction Management, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32603, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sustainability 2020, 12(21), 9045; https://doi.org/10.3390/su12219045
Received: 29 September 2020 / Revised: 27 October 2020 / Accepted: 27 October 2020 / Published: 30 October 2020
The existence of indoor air pollutants—such as ozone, carbon monoxide, carbon dioxide, sulfur dioxide, nitrogen dioxide, particulate matter, and total volatile organic compounds—is evidently a critical issue for human health. Over the past decade, various international agencies have continually refined and updated the quantitative air quality guidelines and standards in order to meet the requirements for indoor air quality management. This paper first provides a systematic review of the existing air quality guidelines and standards implemented by different agencies, which include the Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS); the World Health Organization (WHO); the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA); the American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists (ACGIH); the American Society of Heating, Refrigerating and Air-Conditioning Engineers (ASHRAE); the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH); and the California ambient air quality standards (CAAQS). It then adds to this by providing a state-of-art review of the existing low-cost air quality sensor (LCAQS) technologies, and analyzes the corresponding specifications, such as the typical detection range, measurement tolerance or repeatability, data resolution, response time, supply current, and market price. Finally, it briefly reviews a sequence (array) of field measurement studies, which focuses on the technical measurement characteristics and their data analysis approaches. View Full-Text
Keywords: indoor air quality; standards; guidelines; pollutants; sick building syndrome; low-cost sensor indoor air quality; standards; guidelines; pollutants; sick building syndrome; low-cost sensor
MDPI and ACS Style

Zhang, H.; Srinivasan, R. A Systematic Review of Air Quality Sensors, Guidelines, and Measurement Studies for Indoor Air Quality Management. Sustainability 2020, 12, 9045. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12219045

AMA Style

Zhang H, Srinivasan R. A Systematic Review of Air Quality Sensors, Guidelines, and Measurement Studies for Indoor Air Quality Management. Sustainability. 2020; 12(21):9045. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12219045

Chicago/Turabian Style

Zhang, He, and Ravi Srinivasan. 2020. "A Systematic Review of Air Quality Sensors, Guidelines, and Measurement Studies for Indoor Air Quality Management" Sustainability 12, no. 21: 9045. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12219045

Find Other Styles
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Back to TopTop