Next Article in Journal
Rethinking the Role of M&As in Promoting Sustainable Development: Empirical Evidence Regarding the Relation Between the Audit Opinion and the Sustainable Performance of the Romanian Target Companies
Next Article in Special Issue
Evaluation of Biological Reference Points for Conservation and Management of the Bigeye Thresher Shark, Alopias superciliosus, in the Northwest Pacific
Previous Article in Journal
The Impact of CEOs’ Transformational Leadership on Sustainable Organizational Innovation in SMEs: A Three-Wave Mediating Role of Organizational Learning and Psychological Empowerment
Previous Article in Special Issue
Sustainability of the Artisanal Fishery in Northern Chile: A Case Study of Caleta Pisagua
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Taboos/Norms and Modern Science, and Possible Integration for Sustainable Management of the Flyingfish Resource of Orchid Island, Taiwan

Graduate Institute of Marine Affairs, National Sun Yat-sen University, Kaohsiung 80424, Taiwan
Sustainability 2020, 12(20), 8621; https://doi.org/10.3390/su12208621
Submission received: 10 September 2020 / Revised: 7 October 2020 / Accepted: 16 October 2020 / Published: 18 October 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Sustainable Management of Marine Resources)

Abstract

Coastal management without scientific data or modern techniques has been implemented successfully by many coastal communities, and traditional ecological knowledge (TEK), which is regarded as a culturally framed belief system, has played an important role in the successful cases. TEK of flyingfish culture in the Orchid Island was proved to have a theoretical basis and advantages in managing the flyingfish resource. However, modernization, introduction of modern techniques (motorized boats), development of tourism, and numerous other factors have caused TEK to change or disappear, and integration of TEK with the modern science of environmental management may be a solution to sustain the marine resource. TEK constitutes numerous taboos and norms (T&N). This study, for the first time, itemized the T&N of the flyingfish culture by category, with plausible motives explained by the respondents through in-depth interviews of tribespeople in 2014 and 2015, and identified the T&N with ecological conservation implications. The study also implemented a sampling scheme to provide the first records of fishery composition, flyingfish catch amount (about 260,000–280,000 fish per year), and the catch rate for the island. Finally, this study discussed three interrelated approaches for sustainable management of the flyingfish resource, including integration of TEK with science-based monitoring, control and surveillance (MCS), and research.
Keywords: traditional ecological knowledge; indigenous & community conserved area; Orchid Island; Tao; flyingfish culture; taboos and norms; MCS traditional ecological knowledge; indigenous & community conserved area; Orchid Island; Tao; flyingfish culture; taboos and norms; MCS

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Chang, S.-K. Taboos/Norms and Modern Science, and Possible Integration for Sustainable Management of the Flyingfish Resource of Orchid Island, Taiwan. Sustainability 2020, 12, 8621. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12208621

AMA Style

Chang S-K. Taboos/Norms and Modern Science, and Possible Integration for Sustainable Management of the Flyingfish Resource of Orchid Island, Taiwan. Sustainability. 2020; 12(20):8621. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12208621

Chicago/Turabian Style

Chang, Shui-Kai. 2020. "Taboos/Norms and Modern Science, and Possible Integration for Sustainable Management of the Flyingfish Resource of Orchid Island, Taiwan" Sustainability 12, no. 20: 8621. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12208621

APA Style

Chang, S.-K. (2020). Taboos/Norms and Modern Science, and Possible Integration for Sustainable Management of the Flyingfish Resource of Orchid Island, Taiwan. Sustainability, 12(20), 8621. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12208621

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop