Next Article in Journal
Health Behavior Change in Hearing Healthcare: A Discussion Paper
Previous Article in Journal
Characteristics of Multiple Sclerosis Patient Stance Control Disorders, Measured by Means of Posturography and Related to Brainstem Lesions
 
 
Audiology Research is published by MDPI from Volume 10 Issue 2 (2020). Previous articles were published by another publisher in Open Access under a CC-BY (or CC-BY-NC-ND) licence, and they are hosted by MDPI on mdpi.com as a courtesy and upon agreement with PAGEPress.
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Listening Levels of Teenage iPod Users: Does Measurement Approach Matter?

University of Alberta, Canada
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Audiol. Res. 2012, 2(1), e6; https://doi.org/10.4081/audiores.2012.e6
Submission received: 27 September 2011 / Revised: 10 January 2012 / Accepted: 20 January 2012 / Published: 30 January 2012

Abstract

The main objective of this study was to determine the influence of background noise levels and measurement approach on user-selected listening levels (USLLs) chosen by teenaged MP3 player users. It was hypothesized that the presence of background noise would (i) increase the USLL across all measurement approaches, (ii) result in no significant USLL differences between survey reports, objective lab measures or calibrated self-report field measures, and (iii) cause no interaction effect between level of background noise and measurement approach. There were two independent variables in this study: the level of background noise and measurement approach. The first independent variable, level of background noise, had two levels: quiet and transportation noise. The second independent variable, measurement approach, had three levels: survey, objective in-ear lab measurement and calibrated self-report field measurement. The dependent variable was ear canal A-weighted sound pressure level (dBA SPL). A 2 x 3 repeated-measures ANOVA was used to determine the significance of the main and interaction effects. USLLs increased in the presence of background noise, regardless of the measurement approach used. However, the listening levels estimated by the participants using the survey and self-report field measure were significantly lower than those recorded using in-ear laboratory measurements by 9.6 and 3.3 dBA respectively. In-ear laboratory measures yielded the highest listening levels. Higher listening levels were observed in the presence of background noise for all measurement approaches. It appears that subjects’ survey responses underestimate true listening levels in comparison to self-report calibrated field measures, and that both underestimate listening levels measured in the laboratory setting. More research in this area is warranted to determine whether measurement techniques can be refined and adjusted to accurately reflect real-world listening preferences.
Keywords: iPod listening levels; measurement approach; noise exposure; personal listening devices; teenagers iPod listening levels; measurement approach; noise exposure; personal listening devices; teenagers

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Haines, N.C.; Hodgetts, W.E.; Ostevik, A.V.; Rieger, J.M. Listening Levels of Teenage iPod Users: Does Measurement Approach Matter? Audiol. Res. 2012, 2, e6. https://doi.org/10.4081/audiores.2012.e6

AMA Style

Haines NC, Hodgetts WE, Ostevik AV, Rieger JM. Listening Levels of Teenage iPod Users: Does Measurement Approach Matter? Audiology Research. 2012; 2(1):e6. https://doi.org/10.4081/audiores.2012.e6

Chicago/Turabian Style

Haines, Nicole C., William E. Hodgetts, Amberley V. Ostevik, and Jana M. Rieger. 2012. "Listening Levels of Teenage iPod Users: Does Measurement Approach Matter?" Audiology Research 2, no. 1: e6. https://doi.org/10.4081/audiores.2012.e6

APA Style

Haines, N. C., Hodgetts, W. E., Ostevik, A. V., & Rieger, J. M. (2012). Listening Levels of Teenage iPod Users: Does Measurement Approach Matter? Audiology Research, 2(1), e6. https://doi.org/10.4081/audiores.2012.e6

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop