Next Article in Journal
Effects of Sodium Phosphate and Sodium Nitrite on the Pitting Corrosion Process of X70 Carbon Steel in Sodium Chloride Solution
Previous Article in Journal
Nanoparticles and Nanostructured Surface Fabrication for Innovative Cranial and Maxillofacial Surgery
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Correction

Correction: Xia, C.; et al. Unified Strength Model of Asphalt Mixture under Various Loading Modes. Materials 2019, 12, 889

1
National Engineering Laboratory of Highway Maintenance Technology, Changsha University of Science & Technology, Changsha 410004, China
2
Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Michigan Technological University, 1400 Townsend Drive, Houghton, MI 49931, USA
3
Guangxi Communications Design Group Co., Ltd., Nanning 530000, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Materials 2020, 13(23), 5393; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma13235393
Submission received: 16 November 2020 / Accepted: 25 November 2020 / Published: 27 November 2020

Change in Tables

The authors wish to make the following correction to this paper [1]. Due to mislabeling, replace:
Table 6. Indirect tensile strength test of asphalt mixture.
Table 6. Indirect tensile strength test of asphalt mixture.
NumberLoading Rate v (MPa/s)Section Area of Specimen A (mm2)Failure Loading F (kN)Strength
RD (MPa)
Average Value of Strength RD (MPa)Coefficient of Variation
1558.528.948 3.1113.2580.044
260.433.164 3.452
360.530.900 3.211
41060.134.997 3.6613.7040.022
558.935.778 3.819
659.134.142 3.632
72059.340.709 4.3164.410.041
859.640.299 4.251
958.843.611 4.663
103059.246.808 4.9714.8370.026
1159.744.307 4.666
1259.646.205 4.874
13405947.542 5.0665.1850.020
1459.850.621 5.322
1560.149.393 5.167
165059.753.129 5.5955.4870.037
1761.255.106 5.661
1859.649.343 5.205
196060.555.592 5.7775.6580.035
2061.456.810 5.817
2160.151.430 5.38
227061.757.814 5.8915.7840.029
2360.353.241 5.551
2460.857.154 5.91
with
Table 6. Indirect tensile strength test of asphalt mixture.
Table 6. Indirect tensile strength test of asphalt mixture.
NumberLoading Rate v (MPa/s)Height of Specimen h (mm)Failure Loading F (kN)Strength
RT (MPa)
Average Value of Strength RT (MPa)Coefficient of Variation
1558.528.948 3.1113.2580.044
260.433.164 3.452
360.530.900 3.211
41060.134.997 3.6613.7040.022
558.935.778 3.819
659.134.142 3.632
72059.340.709 4.3164.410.041
859.640.299 4.251
958.843.611 4.663
103059.246.808 4.9714.8370.026
1159.744.307 4.666
1259.646.205 4.874
13405947.542 5.0665.1850.020
1459.850.621 5.322
1560.149.393 5.167
165059.753.129 5.5955.4870.037
1761.255.106 5.661
1859.649.343 5.205
196060.555.592 5.7775.6580.035
2061.456.810 5.817
2160.151.430 5.38
227061.757.814 5.8915.7840.029
2360.353.241 5.551
2460.857.154 5.91
The authors wish to make the following correction to this paper [1]. Due to mislabeling, replace:
Table 7. Test results of unconfined compressive strength of asphalt mixture.
Table 7. Test results of unconfined compressive strength of asphalt mixture.
NumberLoading Rate v (MPa/s)Section Area of Specimen A (mm2)Failure Loading F (kN)Strength
RD (MPa)
Average Value of Strength RD (MPa)Coefficient of Variation
10.0234.862 34.862 4.4414.1340.057
232.169 32.169 4.098
330.325 30.325 3.863
40.0538.473 38.473 4.9015.0620.039
538.795 38.795 4.942
641.943 41.943 5.343
70.147.249 47.249 6.0195.9010.025
846.998 46.998 5.987
944.721 44.721 5.697
100.563.773 63.773 8.1248.4210.025
1166.851 66.851 8.516
1267.691 67.691 8.623
13178.429 78.429 9.9919.8160.013
1476.255 76.255 9.714
1576.483 76.483 9.743
16287.064 87.064 11.09111.4410.022
1790.636 90.636 11.546
1891.735 91.735 11.686
with
Table 7. Test results of unconfined compressive strength of asphalt mixture.
Table 7. Test results of unconfined compressive strength of asphalt mixture.
NumberLoading Rate v (MPa/s)Section Area of Specimen A (mm2)Failure Loading F (kN)Strength
RC (MPa)
Average Value of Strength RC (MPa)Coefficient of Variation
10.027850.03 34.862 4.4414.1340.057
27849.93 32.169 4.098
37850.12 30.325 3.863
40.057850.03 38.473 4.9015.0620.039
57850.06 38.795 4.942
67850.08 41.943 5.343
70.17849.98 47.249 6.0195.9010.025
87850.01 46.998 5.987
97849.92 44.721 5.697
100.57849.95 63.773 8.1248.4210.025
117850.05 66.851 8.516
127850.05 67.691 8.623
1317849.96 78.429 9.9919.8160.013
147850.01 76.255 9.714
157850.05 76.483 9.743
1627849.97 87.064 11.09111.4410.022
177849.99 90.636 11.546
187849.99 91.735 11.686
The authors would like to apologize for any inconvenience caused to the readers by these changes.

Reference

  1. Xia, C.; Lv, S.; You, L.; Chen, D.; Li, Y.; Zheng, J. Unified strength model of asphalt mixture under various loading modes. Materials 2019, 12, 889. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Xia, C.; Lv, S.; You, L.; Chen, D.; Li, Y.; Zheng, J. Correction: Xia, C.; et al. Unified Strength Model of Asphalt Mixture under Various Loading Modes. Materials 2019, 12, 889. Materials 2020, 13, 5393. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma13235393

AMA Style

Xia C, Lv S, You L, Chen D, Li Y, Zheng J. Correction: Xia, C.; et al. Unified Strength Model of Asphalt Mixture under Various Loading Modes. Materials 2019, 12, 889. Materials. 2020; 13(23):5393. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma13235393

Chicago/Turabian Style

Xia, Chengdong, Songtao Lv, Lingyun You, Dong Chen, Yipeng Li, and Jianlong Zheng. 2020. "Correction: Xia, C.; et al. Unified Strength Model of Asphalt Mixture under Various Loading Modes. Materials 2019, 12, 889" Materials 13, no. 23: 5393. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma13235393

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop