Next Article in Journal
Fertility Preservation in Reproductive-Age Women Facing Gonadotoxic Treatments
Previous Article in Journal
Nonsurgical Treatment of Recurrent Glioblastoma
 
 
Current Oncology is published by MDPI from Volume 28 Issue 1 (2021). Previous articles were published by another publisher in Open Access under a CC-BY (or CC-BY-NC-ND) licence, and they are hosted by MDPI on mdpi.com as a courtesy and upon agreement with Multimed Inc..
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

The Optimal Organization of Gynecologic Oncology Services: A Systematic Review

1
Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada
2
Program in Evidence-Based Care, Cancer Care Ontario, and Department of Oncology, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
3
Southeastern Ontario Health Sciences Centre, Palliative Care Medicine Program, Kingston, ON, Canada
4
Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada
5
London Regional Cancer Program, London, ON, Canada
6
Juravinski Cancer Centre and McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
7
Surgical Oncology Program, Cancer Care Ontario, Toronto, ON, Canada
8
Department of Gynecology-Oncology, Princess Margaret Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Curr. Oncol. 2015, 22(4), 282-293; https://doi.org/10.3747/co.22.2482
Submission received: 4 May 2015 / Revised: 8 June 2015 / Accepted: 9 July 2015 / Published: 1 August 2015

Abstract

Background: A system-level organizational guideline for gynecologic oncology was identified by a provincial cancer agency as a key priority based on input from stakeholders, data showing more limited availability of multidisciplinary or specialist care in lower-volume than in higher-volume hospitals in the relevant jurisdiction, and variable rates of staging for ovarian and endometrial cancer patients. Methods: A systematic review assessed the relationship of the organization of gynecologic oncology services with patient survival and surgical outcomes. The electronic databases medline and embase (ovid: 1996 through 9 January 2015) were searched using terms related to gynecologic malignancies combined with organization of services, patterns of care, and various facility and physician characteristics. Outcomes of interest included overall or disease-specific survival, short-term survival, adequate staging, and degree of cytoreduction or optimal cytoreduction (or both) for ovarian cancer patients by hospital or physician type, and rate of discrepancy in initial diagnoses and intraoperative consultation between non-specialist pathologists and gyne-oncology–specialist pathologists. Results: One systematic review and sixteen additional primary studies met the inclusion criteria. The evidence base as a whole was judged to be of lower quality; however, a trend toward improved outcomes with centralization of gynecologic oncology was found, particularly with respect to the gynecologic oncology care of patients with advanced-stage ovarian cancer. Conclusions: Improvements in outcomes with centralization of gynecologic oncology services can be attributed to a number of factors, including access to specialist care and multidisciplinary team management. Findings of this systematic review should be used with caution because of the limitations of the evidence base; however, an expert consensus process made it possible to create recommendations for implementation.
Keywords: organization; gynecologic oncology; systematic reviews organization; gynecologic oncology; systematic reviews

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Fung-Kee-Fung, M.; Kennedy, E.B.; Biagi, J.; Colgan, T.; D’Souza, D.; Elit, L.M.; Hunter, A.; Irish, J.; McLeod, R.; Rosen, B. The Optimal Organization of Gynecologic Oncology Services: A Systematic Review. Curr. Oncol. 2015, 22, 282-293. https://doi.org/10.3747/co.22.2482

AMA Style

Fung-Kee-Fung M, Kennedy EB, Biagi J, Colgan T, D’Souza D, Elit LM, Hunter A, Irish J, McLeod R, Rosen B. The Optimal Organization of Gynecologic Oncology Services: A Systematic Review. Current Oncology. 2015; 22(4):282-293. https://doi.org/10.3747/co.22.2482

Chicago/Turabian Style

Fung-Kee-Fung, M., E.B. Kennedy, J. Biagi, T. Colgan, D. D’Souza, L.M. Elit, A. Hunter, J. Irish, R. McLeod, and B. Rosen. 2015. "The Optimal Organization of Gynecologic Oncology Services: A Systematic Review" Current Oncology 22, no. 4: 282-293. https://doi.org/10.3747/co.22.2482

APA Style

Fung-Kee-Fung, M., Kennedy, E. B., Biagi, J., Colgan, T., D’Souza, D., Elit, L. M., Hunter, A., Irish, J., McLeod, R., & Rosen, B. (2015). The Optimal Organization of Gynecologic Oncology Services: A Systematic Review. Current Oncology, 22(4), 282-293. https://doi.org/10.3747/co.22.2482

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop