Next Article in Journal
Eastern Canadian Gastrointestinal Cancer Consensus Conference 2014
Previous Article in Journal
The Optimal Organization of Gynecologic Oncology Services: A Systematic Review
 
 
Current Oncology is published by MDPI from Volume 28 Issue 1 (2021). Previous articles were published by another publisher in Open Access under a CC-BY (or CC-BY-NC-ND) licence, and they are hosted by MDPI on mdpi.com as a courtesy and upon agreement with Multimed Inc..
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Guidelines

Fertility Preservation in Reproductive-Age Women Facing Gonadotoxic Treatments

1
Pacific Centre for Reproductive Medicine, Burnaby, BC, Canada
2
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Queen’s University, Kingston, ON, Canada
3
McGill University Health Centre, Reproductive Centre, and Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Curr. Oncol. 2015, 22(4), 294-304; https://doi.org/10.3747/co.22.2334
Submission received: 13 May 2015 / Revised: 11 June 2015 / Accepted: 11 July 2015 / Published: 1 August 2015

Abstract

Background: Advancements in the treatments for cancer and autoimmune and other hematologic conditions continue to improve survival and cure rates. Despite those changes, various gonadotoxic agents and other treatments can still compromise the future fertility of many women. Progress in medical and surgical reproductive technologies has helped to offset the reproductive consequences of the use of gonadotoxic therapies, and allows for future fertility and normal pregnancy. Methods: A review of the literature was performed to outline the pathophysiology of gonadotoxicity from various treatments. The success of fertility preservation, fertility sparing, and cryopreservation options are reviewed. Barriers and facilitators to referral and oncofertility treatment in Canada are also outlined. Results: According to the quality of the evidence, recommendations are made for fertility assessment, patient referral, cryopreservation, and other assisted reproductive technologies. Conclusions: To ensure ongoing fertility in women undergoing gonadotoxic treatments, assisted reproductive technologies can be combined with a multidisciplinary approach to patient assessment and referral.
Keywords: Oncofertility; fertility preservation; cryopreservation; gonadotoxicity; young adults; adolescents Oncofertility; fertility preservation; cryopreservation; gonadotoxicity; young adults; adolescents

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Roberts, J.; Ronn, R.; Tallon, N.; Holzer, H. Fertility Preservation in Reproductive-Age Women Facing Gonadotoxic Treatments. Curr. Oncol. 2015, 22, 294-304. https://doi.org/10.3747/co.22.2334

AMA Style

Roberts J, Ronn R, Tallon N, Holzer H. Fertility Preservation in Reproductive-Age Women Facing Gonadotoxic Treatments. Current Oncology. 2015; 22(4):294-304. https://doi.org/10.3747/co.22.2334

Chicago/Turabian Style

Roberts, J., R. Ronn, N. Tallon, and H. Holzer. 2015. "Fertility Preservation in Reproductive-Age Women Facing Gonadotoxic Treatments" Current Oncology 22, no. 4: 294-304. https://doi.org/10.3747/co.22.2334

APA Style

Roberts, J., Ronn, R., Tallon, N., & Holzer, H. (2015). Fertility Preservation in Reproductive-Age Women Facing Gonadotoxic Treatments. Current Oncology, 22(4), 294-304. https://doi.org/10.3747/co.22.2334

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop