Next Article in Journal
Numerical Iterative Design and Analysis of Double Freeform Surface Telecentric F-Theta Lens
Next Article in Special Issue
Face the Challenge—Generalization of Presentation Attack Detection
Previous Article in Journal
A Review on the Application of Biosensors for Monitoring Emerging Contaminants in the Water Environment
Previous Article in Special Issue
Beyond Signatures: Leveraging Sensor Fusion for Contextual Handwriting Recognition
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Brain–Computer Interface for EEG-Based Authentication: Advancements and Practical Implications

1
Computer Science Department, College of Computer and Information Sciences, Imam Mohammad Ibn Saud Islamic University, Riyadh 11432, Saudi Arabia
2
Information Technology Department, College of Computer and Information Sciences, King Saud University, Riyadh 11543, Saudi Arabia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sensors 2025, 25(16), 4946; https://doi.org/10.3390/s25164946
Submission received: 10 June 2025 / Revised: 4 August 2025 / Accepted: 8 August 2025 / Published: 10 August 2025

Abstract

Authentication is a critical component of digital security, and traditional methods often encounter significant vulnerabilities and limitations. This study addresses the emerging field of EEG-based authentication systems, highlighting their theoretical advancements and practical applicability. We conducted a systematic review of the existing literature, followed by an experimental evaluation to assess the feasibility, limitations, and scalability of these systems in real-world scenarios. Data were collected from nine subjects using various approaches. Our results indicate that the CNN model achieved the highest accuracy of 99%, while Random Forest (RF) and Gradient Boosting (GB) classifiers also demonstrated strong performance with 94% and 93%, respectively. In contrast, classifiers such as Support Vector Machine (SVM) and K-Nearest Neighbors (KNN) displayed significantly lower effectiveness, underscoring their limitations in capturing the complexities of EEG data. The findings suggest that EEG-based authentication systems have significant potential to enhance security measures, offering a promising alternative to traditional methods and paving the way for more robust and user-friendly authentication solutions.
Keywords: electroencephalography (EEG); brain–computer interface (BCI); authentication; event-related potentials (ERP); convolutional neural networks (CNN) electroencephalography (EEG); brain–computer interface (BCI); authentication; event-related potentials (ERP); convolutional neural networks (CNN)

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Alahaideb, L.; Al-Nafjan, A.; Aljumah, H.; Aldayel, M. Brain–Computer Interface for EEG-Based Authentication: Advancements and Practical Implications. Sensors 2025, 25, 4946. https://doi.org/10.3390/s25164946

AMA Style

Alahaideb L, Al-Nafjan A, Aljumah H, Aldayel M. Brain–Computer Interface for EEG-Based Authentication: Advancements and Practical Implications. Sensors. 2025; 25(16):4946. https://doi.org/10.3390/s25164946

Chicago/Turabian Style

Alahaideb, Lamia, Abeer Al-Nafjan, Hessah Aljumah, and Mashael Aldayel. 2025. "Brain–Computer Interface for EEG-Based Authentication: Advancements and Practical Implications" Sensors 25, no. 16: 4946. https://doi.org/10.3390/s25164946

APA Style

Alahaideb, L., Al-Nafjan, A., Aljumah, H., & Aldayel, M. (2025). Brain–Computer Interface for EEG-Based Authentication: Advancements and Practical Implications. Sensors, 25(16), 4946. https://doi.org/10.3390/s25164946

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop