Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

Search Results (41)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = subperiosteal implants

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
12 pages, 866 KB  
Case Report
Full-Arch Rehabilitation of an Edentulous Mandible with a Subperiosteal Implant Following Oncologic Reconstruction: A Case Report
by Justine Sanslaville Andres, Pauline Dussueil, Nicolas Lamy, Ramzi Ouadah and Hervé Moizan
Prosthesis 2026, 8(5), 47; https://doi.org/10.3390/prosthesis8050047 (registering DOI) - 15 May 2026
Abstract
Background: Rehabilitation of edentulous mandibles in a post-oncologic setting remains a major clinical challenge. In such situations, placement of conventional endosseous implants may be compromised by severe bone deficiency, a history of peri-implant infection, and constraints related to reconstructive soft tissues. Customized [...] Read more.
Background: Rehabilitation of edentulous mandibles in a post-oncologic setting remains a major clinical challenge. In such situations, placement of conventional endosseous implants may be compromised by severe bone deficiency, a history of peri-implant infection, and constraints related to reconstructive soft tissues. Customized titanium subperiosteal implants, made possible by three-dimensional imaging, computer-aided design, and additive manufacturing, represent a potential alternative when conventional options are unfavorable. This case report describes a full-arch fixed rehabilitation of an edentulous mandible in a patient previously treated for squamous cell carcinoma of the floor of the mouth. Methods: A patient-specific titanium additively manufactured subperiosteal jaw implant (AMSJI) made of biocompatible titanium was designed using a digital planning workflow. Implant placement was performed in a single surgical session under general anesthesia, with fixation using osteosynthesis screws. A screw-retained full-arch provisional prosthesis was delivered intraoperatively, allowing immediate loading with adjustments aimed at avoiding compression of the healing soft tissues. Results: The patient achieved satisfactory functional and esthetic rehabilitation. Postoperative follow-up showed overall favorable mucosal tolerance; an early, limited peri-abutment mucosal dehiscence was observed and managed with suturing under local anesthesia, without compromising implant stability. Conclusions: This case highlights the clinical interest of patient-specific titanium subperiosteal implants as a fixed rehabilitation option in post-oncologic patients with major osseous and mucosal constraints and a history of reconstructive procedures. The combination of accurate digital planning and custom-made manufacturing may avoid the need for extensive bone grafting. However, these findings should be interpreted with caution due to the short-term follow-up and the inherent limitations of a single-case report, which limit the level of evidence and generalizability. Full article
11 pages, 569 KB  
Article
Quality of Life Following Dental Rehabilitation with Customized Subperiosteal Implants: A Pilot Cohort Study
by Evangelos Kostares, Michael Kostares, Georgia Kostare, Fani Pitsigavdaki, Ourania Schoinohoriti and Christos Perisanidis
Medicina 2026, 62(4), 777; https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina62040777 - 16 Apr 2026
Viewed by 349
Abstract
Background and Objectives: Severe alveolar atrophy may pose significant challenges for dental rehabilitation. Recent advances in digital planning and CAD/CAM technology have renewed the interest in patient-specific subperiosteal implants as a treatment option for anatomically challenging cases. This cohort study evaluated changes [...] Read more.
Background and Objectives: Severe alveolar atrophy may pose significant challenges for dental rehabilitation. Recent advances in digital planning and CAD/CAM technology have renewed the interest in patient-specific subperiosteal implants as a treatment option for anatomically challenging cases. This cohort study evaluated changes in oral health-related quality of life and patient satisfaction following rehabilitation with customized subperiosteal implants in severe alveolar atrophy. Materials and Methods: This cohort study included all consecutive adult patients with severe alveolar atrophy who underwent reconstruction with patient-specific subperiosteal implants at the Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery of “Evangelismos” General Hospital, Athens, Greece, in 2025. Oral health-related quality of life was assessed using the validated OHIP-14 questionnaire preoperatively and 12 months postoperatively. Patient satisfaction was evaluated using a numerical rating scale (NRS). Secondary outcomes included postoperative complications, implant exposure, implant stability, and need for reoperation. Comparisons between baseline and 12-month scores were performed using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test. Results: Nine patients who had completed 12-month follow-up were included. Five were male, and all implants were placed in the maxilla. Significant improvement was observed in oral health-related quality of life, with the median OHIP-14 total score decreasing from 41 preoperatively to 1 at the 12-month follow-up. Patient satisfaction also improved significantly, with the median NRS total score increasing from 17 to 58. Improvements were consistent across all OHIP-14 domains and all NRS items. No major complications were recorded. One patient developed early wound dehiscence, and one patient presented with implant exposure at the anterior palate. At the final follow-up twelve months postoperatively, all implants remained clinically and radiographically stable. Conclusions: These preliminary short-term findings suggest that customized subperiosteal implants may be a promising option for selected patients with severe alveolar atrophy in whom placement of conventional endosseous implants is not feasible; however, the results should be interpreted cautiously given the very small sample size and observational design. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

13 pages, 3809 KB  
Article
Novel Ti6Al4V Surface Treatment for Subperiosteal Dental Implants (Part II): Matrix Deposition and Osteogenic Markers
by Valentina Schiavoni, Lucia Memé, Giovanni Tossetta, Daniela Marzioni, Fabrizio Bambini, Andrea Frontini, Chiara Santoni, Paolo Moretti, Arianna Vignini, Roberto Campagna and Eleonora Salvolini
Materials 2026, 19(8), 1522; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma19081522 - 10 Apr 2026
Viewed by 436
Abstract
In a previous study, we demonstrated that a novel surface treatment applied to laser-melted Ti6Al4V substrates supports osteoblast-like cell adhesion, proliferation, and the activation of early osteogenic pathways. Building on these preliminary findings, the present work aimed to further investigate the ability of [...] Read more.
In a previous study, we demonstrated that a novel surface treatment applied to laser-melted Ti6Al4V substrates supports osteoblast-like cell adhesion, proliferation, and the activation of early osteogenic pathways. Building on these preliminary findings, the present work aimed to further investigate the ability of the same surface to promote extracellular matrix (ECM) deposition, organization, and osteogenic maturation, which are critical events for the establishment of a stable bone–implant interface in subperiosteal dental implants. Human osteoblast-like MG-63 cells were cultured on Ti6Al4V discs subjected to different surface treatments, including a proprietary surface modification (ATcs) specifically designed for subperiosteal applications. ECM formation and maturation were evaluated through scanning electron microscopy coupled with energy-dispersive spectroscopy, immunofluorescence, and semiquantitative analyses of osteogenic markers type I collagen (COL1A1), secreted protein acidic and rich in cysteine (SPARC), and dentin matrix protein 1 (DMP1) through Western blotting. The results showed that, while all tested surfaces supported cell adhesion, the ATcs surface promoted a distinct osteogenic profile characterized by enhanced DMP1 expression, organized collagen deposition, and the formation of calcium–phosphate–rich mineralized structures. Compared to surfaces that primarily stimulated cell proliferation or early matrix production, ATcs appeared to favour progression toward late-stage osteogenic maturation and matrix mineralization. Taken together, these findings extend our previous observations and indicate that this novel surface treatment not only supports osteoblast viability and early differentiation but also promotes extracellular matrix maturation, a key prerequisite for effective osseointegration. Although further in vivo studies are required, the present data provide additional biological rationale for the use of ATcs-treated Ti6Al4V surfaces in next-generation custom-made subperiosteal implant designs. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advanced Dental Materials: From Design to Application, Third Edition)
Show Figures

Figure 1

20 pages, 745 KB  
Systematic Review
Treatment of Severe Atrophy with Juxta-Osseous Implants: A Systematic Review and Case Report
by Alberto Gasbarri, Filippo Giovannetti, Giulia Caporro, Maurizio D’Amario, Renato Sperati, Ali Jahjah, Ettore Lupi and Mario Capogreco
Bioengineering 2026, 13(4), 386; https://doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering13040386 - 27 Mar 2026
Viewed by 614
Abstract
Background: Severe jaw atrophy limits traditional endosseous implantation, often necessitating complex regenerative procedures. Advances in digital planning and 3D printing have reintroduced custom-made subperiosteal (juxta-osseous) implants as a viable alternative. This study evaluates the clinical reliability and advantages of next-generation juxta-osseous implants. [...] Read more.
Background: Severe jaw atrophy limits traditional endosseous implantation, often necessitating complex regenerative procedures. Advances in digital planning and 3D printing have reintroduced custom-made subperiosteal (juxta-osseous) implants as a viable alternative. This study evaluates the clinical reliability and advantages of next-generation juxta-osseous implants. Materials and Methods: A systematic review was conducted in accordance with PRISMA guidelines across the PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science databases. The search focused on English-language studies reporting on custom-made titanium juxta-osseous implants in patients with severe maxillary or mandibular atrophy. Methodological quality was assessed using the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) Critical Appraisal Checklist. Additionally, a representative clinical case of a 60-year-old female treated via a fully digital workflow is presented to illustrate the protocol. Results: Twenty-six articles were included, accounting for 147 clinical cases. Most patients exhibited Cawood and Howell Class V–VI atrophy. All identified treatments utilized integrated digital workflows, including CBCT imaging, CAD/CAM design, and additive manufacturing (SLM/DMLS) of medical-grade titanium alloy. Reported success rates exceeded 90%, with high primary stability enabling immediate or early loading protocols and high patient satisfaction. Complications were primarily limited to manageable soft-tissue dehiscence. Conclusions: Modern juxta-osseous implants represent a promising, minimally invasive alternative to bone grafting for severe atrophy, enabling rapid functional restoration in the short-to-medium-term. However, because current evidence is limited to clinical studies, these findings should be interpreted with caution. Long-term prospective trials are essential to establish definitive clinical predictability and standardized protocols. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advanced Dental Materials for Restorative Dentistry)
Show Figures

Figure 1

16 pages, 2628 KB  
Article
Guided Alveolar Ridge Preservation (G-ARP) Using a Cortical Lamina: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial
by Giacomo Mainetti, Franco Bengazi, Tomaso Mainetti, Karol Alí Apaza Alccayhuaman, Andrea Grassi, Eddy Troya Borges and Daniele Botticelli
Dent. J. 2026, 14(4), 193; https://doi.org/10.3390/dj14040193 - 24 Mar 2026
Viewed by 373
Abstract
Background/Obectives: Alveolar bone resorption after tooth extraction compromises esthetics and implant placement. Conventional alveolar ridge preservation (ARP) relies on grafting. This randomized controlled study evaluated a graft-free, lamina-based approach aimed at preserving ridge morphology by protecting the buccal cortical plate. Methods: Forty alveoli [...] Read more.
Background/Obectives: Alveolar bone resorption after tooth extraction compromises esthetics and implant placement. Conventional alveolar ridge preservation (ARP) relies on grafting. This randomized controlled study evaluated a graft-free, lamina-based approach aimed at preserving ridge morphology by protecting the buccal cortical plate. Methods: Forty alveoli were randomly assigned to Guided Alveolar Ridge Preservation (G-ARP) with a subperiosteally positioned cortical lamina (test) or unassisted healing (control; CTRL). Cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) was performed before extraction and after five months. Vertical and horizontal dimensional changes were statistically compared. Results: Healing was uneventful. At five months, the G-ARP group showed a vertical gain of 0.5 mm and a horizontal reduction of 0.2 mm, whereas the CTRL group exhibited a vertical loss of 1.7 mm (p < 0.01) and a horizontal loss of 2.7 mm (p < 0.001). Effect sizes were large for vertical change and very large for horizontal change (Hedges’ g = 0.95 and 2.19, respectively). Regeneration occurred through native bone formation without grafts. Conclusions: Subperiosteal placement of a cortical lamina effectively preserved ridge dimensions after extraction. This graft-free approach may offer technical and biological advantages while supporting new bone regeneration. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Bone Augmentation in Dentistry)
Show Figures

Figure 1

16 pages, 6169 KB  
Article
Effect of Internal Structural Design on Stress Distribution in 3D-Printed Subperiosteal Implants Under Mechanical Loading
by Ádám Vörös, Balázs Lőrincz, János Kónya and Ibolya Zsoldos
Bioengineering 2026, 13(3), 368; https://doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering13030368 - 20 Mar 2026
Viewed by 653
Abstract
Custom-made subperiosteal implants are increasingly used in clinical cases where significant bone loss due to trauma or disease renders conventional endosseous implant placement unfeasible. This study investigated how different internal structural designs affect the deformation and stress distribution in mandibular subperiosteal implants under [...] Read more.
Custom-made subperiosteal implants are increasingly used in clinical cases where significant bone loss due to trauma or disease renders conventional endosseous implant placement unfeasible. This study investigated how different internal structural designs affect the deformation and stress distribution in mandibular subperiosteal implants under clinically relevant loading conditions. An idealized implant geometry was defined based on average human mandibular dimensions, and four configurations with identical outer shape and connection features were created, differing only in sidewall architecture (solid, top-relieved, top-relieved with lateral perforations, and top-relieved lattice framework). All specimens were manufactured by metal additive manufacturing and evaluated using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT). Mechanical testing was performed in two stages: (i) cyclic loading consisting of 500 bite cycles at an overall force of ~326–350 N and (ii) a single static high-load event of 2000 N, applied parallel to the fixation pin axes. CT datasets acquired before and after each stage were compared to detect permanent deformation. No measurable residual deformation was identified in any configuration; the only observed macroscopic change was an adhesive-bond limitation in one case, rather than structural yielding of the implant. Finite element analysis further supported these findings by identifying localized stress concentrations mainly at the implant–prosthetic interface and by revealing the load-transfer zones that govern the mechanical response. Overall, the results indicate that lightweight, perforated, and lattice-based internal designs can preserve global structural integrity across physiological and supra-physiological load ranges while enabling design optimization to improve stress distribution. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Applications of Biomaterials in Dental Medicine)
Show Figures

Figure 1

18 pages, 7447 KB  
Article
Digital Design of Juxta-Osseous Subperiosteal Implant Rehabilitation for Severe Maxillary Atrophy
by Agron Meto, Emanuele Morella, Algen Isufi and Aida Meto
Appl. Sci. 2026, 16(5), 2228; https://doi.org/10.3390/app16052228 - 26 Feb 2026
Viewed by 503
Abstract
Background: Rehabilitation of the severely atrophic maxilla remains a major challenge in implant dentistry, particularly when conventional endosseous implants and regenerative procedures are contraindicated due to extensive bone loss, sinus pathology, or patient-related factors. Advances in digital planning and additive manufacturing have enabled [...] Read more.
Background: Rehabilitation of the severely atrophic maxilla remains a major challenge in implant dentistry, particularly when conventional endosseous implants and regenerative procedures are contraindicated due to extensive bone loss, sinus pathology, or patient-related factors. Advances in digital planning and additive manufacturing have enabled the reintroduction of juxta-osseous subperiosteal implants as a graftless, patient-specific treatment option. This case report aimed to describe the complete digital workflow, surgical placement, and immediate prosthetic rehabilitation of a customized juxta-osseous subperiosteal implant in a patient with severe posterior maxillary atrophy and a history of failed sinus augmentation procedures. Case Presentation: A 75-year-old male patient presenting with left severe posterior maxillary atrophy and previous unsuccessful sinus lift surgeries was rehabilitated using a digitally designed, additively manufactured titanium subperiosteal implant. Cone-beam computed tomography–based planning and CAD–CAM technology were used to design a patient-specific framework, which was rigidly fixed to stable maxillofacial support and immediately loaded with a screw-retained provisional prosthesis. Results: Clinical and radiographic follow-up demonstrated stable implant fixation, soft tissue healing, absence of biological or mechanical complications, and satisfactory functional and aesthetic outcomes. The patient reported high levels of comfort and satisfaction throughout the treatment period. Conclusions: Digitally manufactured juxta-osseous subperiosteal implants may represent a predictable and minimally invasive graftless alternative for selected patients with severe maxillary atrophy, particularly when conventional implant placement or extensive bone augmentation is not feasible. Accurate digital planning, rigid fixation, and appropriate patient selection appear to be key factors for clinical success. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Applied Dentistry and Oral Sciences)
Show Figures

Figure 1

12 pages, 2299 KB  
Case Report
Horizontal Ridge Augmentation with Xenogeneic Bone, Hyaluronic Acid, and Dermal Matrix by Tunnel Technique: A Case Series
by Giuseppe D’Albis, Marta Forte, Lorenzo Marini, Kezia Rachellea Mustakim, Andrea Pilloni, Massimo Corsalini and Saverio Capodiferro
Dent. J. 2026, 14(1), 25; https://doi.org/10.3390/dj14010025 - 4 Jan 2026
Viewed by 664
Abstract
Background: Several minimally invasive techniques have been introduced to augment horizontal ridge volume for prosthetically driven implant placement, utilizing different biomaterials to enhance regenerative outcomes. This article presents two clinical cases illustrating a tunneling approach for horizontal alveolar ridge augmentation using a [...] Read more.
Background: Several minimally invasive techniques have been introduced to augment horizontal ridge volume for prosthetically driven implant placement, utilizing different biomaterials to enhance regenerative outcomes. This article presents two clinical cases illustrating a tunneling approach for horizontal alveolar ridge augmentation using a combination of xenogeneic bone graft, hyaluronic acid, and an acellular dermal matrix. Methods: A single vertical incision was made mesial to the bone defect and a dermal matrix was suitably shaped and positioned into the subperiosteal tunnel. Subsequently, the bone graft was inserted between the dermal matrix and the buccal bone plate. Primary wound closure was achieved. After six months, implants were placed. For each patient, an optical scan was performed at baseline (T0), at six months post-operative ridge augmentation surgery (T1) and at two months post-implant insertion (T2). A digital measurement of the horizontal ridge thickness was performed at each inserted implant site. Clinical parameters and patient postoperative morbidity were recorded. Results: The procedure was well tolerated by the patients. No postoperative clinical complications were observed. The mean tissue thickness achieved at T1 was recorded to be 13.3 mm. The same value was recorded at T2. Conclusions: This technique allowed the placement of prosthetically guided implants, with minimal morbidity and no observed complications. Further studies analyzing the histology of newly formed bone and performing three-dimensional radiological examinations to confirm the effectiveness of the surgical technique are warranted to validate these preliminary findings. Clinical Trial Number (NIH): NCT06424223 Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

2 pages, 131 KB  
Abstract
Revisiting Subperiosteal Implants: A Narrative Review of the Contemporary Literature
by Robert-Ramzi Azar, Edward-Ronald Azar, Andreea-Violeta Ardelean, Alexandra-Denisa Stoian, Georgiana Boici, Cosmin Sinescu and Meda-Lavinia Negruțiu
Proceedings 2025, 127(1), 29; https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings2025127029 - 20 Oct 2025
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 1187
Abstract
Subperiosteal implants, once a historical footnote in implant dentistry, are experiencing a revival in the digital era [...] Full article
16 pages, 2611 KB  
Article
Influence of Cyclic Loading on the Removal Torque of Unique Subperiosteal Implant Screws
by Ádám Vörös, Klaudia Kulcsár, Dávid Pammer and Ibolya Zsoldos
J. Funct. Biomater. 2025, 16(9), 306; https://doi.org/10.3390/jfb16090306 - 22 Aug 2025
Viewed by 1821
Abstract
During the investigation, the effect of screw tightening torque on the potential loosening of screws under load was examined in the case of custom-made subperiosteal implants. The study focused on the connection screws between the implant components, testing the commonly applied tightening torques [...] Read more.
During the investigation, the effect of screw tightening torque on the potential loosening of screws under load was examined in the case of custom-made subperiosteal implants. The study focused on the connection screws between the implant components, testing the commonly applied tightening torques of 15 Ncm and 30 Ncm. Mastication was simulated using a custom-designed, PLC-controlled testing device, which allowed for the reproduction of variable numbers, forces, and speeds of bite cycles. With this device, six different scenarios were tested, including 500, 2000, and 10,000 bite cycles, under both constant and variable bite forces. A caliper was used to record potential length changes of the screws, force sensors measured the bite forces, and calibrated torque screwdrivers were used to verify the loosening torques. Based on the analysis of the measured data, it was concluded that for the M1.8 screws tested, a tightening torque of 15 Ncm does not provide sufficient resistance against loosening, whereas 30 Ncm offers adequate stability. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Biomechanical Studies and Biomaterials in Dentistry)
Show Figures

Figure 1

19 pages, 3409 KB  
Review
Indications and Complications of Subperiosteal Implants: Literature Review and Case Series
by Gerardo Pellegrino, Maryia Karaban, Carlo Barausse, Amerigo Giudice, Alessandro Antonelli, Roberto Pistilli and Pietro Felice
Dent. J. 2025, 13(8), 337; https://doi.org/10.3390/dj13080337 - 23 Jul 2025
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 4657
Abstract
Background/Objectives: Severe jawbone atrophy, particularly in elderly or medically compromised patients, presents a significant challenge for conventional implant placement. In cases where bone augmentation is not feasible, alternative techniques—such as short, narrow, tilted, and zygomatic implants—may be indicated for the rehabilitation of the [...] Read more.
Background/Objectives: Severe jawbone atrophy, particularly in elderly or medically compromised patients, presents a significant challenge for conventional implant placement. In cases where bone augmentation is not feasible, alternative techniques—such as short, narrow, tilted, and zygomatic implants—may be indicated for the rehabilitation of the atrophic jaw. Subperiosteal implants have re-emerged as a further viable alternative, especially with recent advancements in digital planning and custom fabrication. This study aims to evaluate the clinical outcomes and complications associated with subperiosteal implants through a literature review and a supporting case series, and to propose clinical preliminary guidelines for their use. Methods: Fourteen studies—including case reports, case series, retrospective studies, and systematic reviews—were analyzed to assess the effectiveness and risk profile of subperiosteal implants. Additionally, we present a case series of nine patients with advanced vertical and horizontal alveolar bone atrophy treated using custom-made, digitally-designed subperiosteal implants. Surgical techniques, prosthetic workflows, and complications were recorded and assessed. Results: Subperiosteal implants were found to be particularly suitable for patients with narrow alveolar crests and severe atrophy where traditional implants are contraindicated. Literature and case series data indicated favorable outcomes, with early complications such as soft tissue inflammation and prosthetic misfit being manageable. A low complication rate was recorded in our series, with digital workflows contributing to improved implant fit and reduced technical errors. Conclusions: Subperiosteal implants could offer an effective solution for complex atrophic cases, provided that patient selection, surgical precision, and prosthetic design are meticulously managed. Based on our findings, clinical recommendations are proposed to guide their application in contemporary practice. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue New Perspectives in Periodontology and Implant Dentistry)
Show Figures

Figure 1

12 pages, 2233 KB  
Opinion
Prosthodontic Considerations for Customized Subperiosteal Implants: A Consensus Report
by Álvaro Tofé-Povedano, Javier Herce-López, Mariano del Canto-Pingarrón, Ramón Sieira-Gil, Carlos Rodado-Alonso, Pablo Garrido-Martínez, Jorge Reyes-Minguillán, Octavi Camps-Font, Alba Sánchez-Torres and Rui Figueiredo
Appl. Sci. 2025, 15(14), 7633; https://doi.org/10.3390/app15147633 - 8 Jul 2025
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 2018
Abstract
(1) Background: The present study was carried out to provide a state-of-the-art review of the prosthodontic factors related to customized subperiosteal implants (CSIs), and to offer clinical guidelines in this regard. (2) Methods: An expert consensus meeting was held in July 2024 in [...] Read more.
(1) Background: The present study was carried out to provide a state-of-the-art review of the prosthodontic factors related to customized subperiosteal implants (CSIs), and to offer clinical guidelines in this regard. (2) Methods: An expert consensus meeting was held in July 2024 in Santpedor (Manresa, Spain) to establish the most relevant clinical guidelines. (3) Results and (4) Conclusions: An interdisciplinary approach including surgeons, prosthodontists, bio-medical engineers and dental technicians, integrating both biological and mechanical considerations when designing CSI rehabilitations, is very important. While the reported survival rate of CSIs appears promising, their long-term performance beyond 5 years remains insufficiently documented. Thus, CSIs are a viable treatment option for patients with insufficient bone to place conventional implants, but there is a clear need to identify and analyze delayed-onset complications associated with these devices. The findings and their broader implications should be thoroughly examined, and potential future research directions should be highlighted. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Novel Technologies in Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery)
Show Figures

Figure 1

14 pages, 883 KB  
Systematic Review
Clinical Performance of Subperiosteal Implants in the Full-Arch Rehabilitation of Severely Resorbed Edentulous Jaws: A Systematic Review and Metanalysis
by Luis Sánchez-Labrador, Santiago Bazal-Bonelli, Fabián Pérez-González, Tomás Beca-Campoy, Carlos Manuel Cobo-Vázquez, Jorge Cortés-Bretón Brinkmann and José María Martínez-González
Dent. J. 2025, 13(6), 240; https://doi.org/10.3390/dj13060240 - 28 May 2025
Cited by 6 | Viewed by 3232
Abstract
Background/Objectives: Subperiosteal implants (SPIs) were first used in the 1940s, but due to their complications and the rise of dental implants, they were discontinued. Thanks to new technologies and new materials, nowadays they are being used again and studied as a treatment [...] Read more.
Background/Objectives: Subperiosteal implants (SPIs) were first used in the 1940s, but due to their complications and the rise of dental implants, they were discontinued. Thanks to new technologies and new materials, nowadays they are being used again and studied as a treatment for severe bone defects. This review analyzes the clinical results—survival rates and complications—of SPIs used to support full arch rehabilitations of severely resorbed maxillae and mandibles, comparing the outcomes resulting from implant placement conducted in one or two surgical interventions. Methods: An automated search was conducted in four databases (Medline/Pubmed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library), as well as a manual search for relevant clinical articles published before 28 February 2025. The review included human studies with at least four patients, in which SPIs were placed to restore full-arch edentulous maxillae and mandibles. Quality of evidence was evaluated using the Newcastle–Ottawa Quality Assessment Scale and the Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal tool. Results: A total of 14 studies met the inclusion criteria and were included for analysis, including 958 patients and 973 SPIs. The survival rate was 100% when one surgical intervention was performed and 85% when two interventions were performed after 4–38 months and 3–22 years follow-up, respectively. Conclusions: SPIs would appear to offer a good alternative for patients with severe bone atrophies, especially SPIs fabricated using digital techniques in a single step, presenting promising survival rates and a low complication rate, although more randomized clinical trials with long-term follow-up are needed. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue New Perspectives in Periodontology and Implant Dentistry)
Show Figures

Figure 1

15 pages, 7308 KB  
Article
Novel Ti6Al4V Surface Treatment for Subperiosteal Dental Implants: Evaluation of Osteoblast-like Cell Proliferation and Osteogenic Response
by Roberto Campagna, Valentina Schiavoni, Loredana Rao, Fabrizio Bambini, Andrea Frontini, Francesco Sampalmieri, Eleonora Salvolini and Lucia Memé
Materials 2025, 18(6), 1234; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma18061234 - 11 Mar 2025
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 1362
Abstract
Nowadays, custom-made subperiosteal implants are emerging as a solution in all those cases where there is lack of healthy bone tissue to support endosseous implants. The development of innovative techniques has allowed the production of grids that precisely match the patient’s anatomy. Elucidating [...] Read more.
Nowadays, custom-made subperiosteal implants are emerging as a solution in all those cases where there is lack of healthy bone tissue to support endosseous implants. The development of innovative techniques has allowed the production of grids that precisely match the patient’s anatomy. Elucidating the impact of laser-melted Ti6Al4V grids on both hard and soft tissues with which they come into contact is, therefore, mandatory. In this study, we analyzed the effects of five different surface treatments on a human osteoblast-like cell line (MG-63). In particular, the cell proliferation and osteogenic response were evaluated. Taken together, our data demonstrate that in our in vitro setting, the new surface treatment developed by Al Ti color could enhance osteogenesis and improve the stabilization of the implant to the residual bone by stimulating the best osteogenic response in MG-63 cells. Although further studies are required to validate our data in an in vivo model, our results provide the basis for future advances in implantology for the long-term maintenance of osseointegration. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Biomaterials for Bone Tissue Engineering (Second Edition))
Show Figures

Figure 1

20 pages, 5200 KB  
Article
New Subperiosteal Dental Implant Design with Finite Element Analysis and Mechanical Validation: A Design Validation Study
by Vicente Vanaclocha, Carlos Atienza, Amparo Vanaclocha, Andrés Peñuelas, Juan Gómez-Herrero, Francisco Pérez-Carrió, José Antonio Diego-Leyda, Nieves Sáiz-Sapena and Leyre Vanaclocha
Materials 2025, 18(3), 622; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma18030622 - 29 Jan 2025
Cited by 3 | Viewed by 4755
Abstract
New subperiosteal dental implants were designed to offer new options to edentulous patients with severe bone resorption for whom endosseous dental implants are not advisable. In our study, we aimed to design and manufacture subperiosteal dental implants with a minimum volume to facilitate [...] Read more.
New subperiosteal dental implants were designed to offer new options to edentulous patients with severe bone resorption for whom endosseous dental implants are not advisable. In our study, we aimed to design and manufacture subperiosteal dental implants with a minimum volume to facilitate surgical maneuvers and metal coverage by mucosa while ensuring maximal long-term implant strength and functionality. With cone-beam CT-scan data obtained from an edentulous patient, a maxilla and mandible recreation were created, and subperiosteal implants were designed and analyzed with FEA (250 MPa infinite-life limit stress). We redesigned them until they stood the infinite-life limit loads mentioned above. Then, they were manufactured with Ti6Al4V alloy and laser-powder bed fusion technology. All implants withstood mechanical tests (450 N static and 150 N loads for five-million cycle 150 N fatigue tests) with no failures. The first design resulted in maxillary and mandibular implant failures. Through the redesign process, the implant volume was reduced, and the number and placement of bone fixation screws were optimized while maintaining resistance to chewing. Once manufactured, these new implants withstood the loads mentioned above without failure. Our subperiosteal dental implants are an option for edentulous patients with severe maxilla and mandibular bone resorption. Manufactured with Ti6Al4V alloy and laser-powder bed fusion technology, they withstood the above-mentioned mechanical tests without failure. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in Dental Implants and Prosthetics Materials)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop